YouareviewingentriesfromBannedBookWeekReviews

DeeniebyJudyBlume

by SB Sarah Monday, October 01, 2007 at 06:00 AM
Our Grade:
B
Title: Deenie
Author: Judy Blume
Publication Info: Atheneum Books Jan 2003 (reissue), ISBN: 0689866100
Genre: Top 100 Banned Books

Submitted by Smart Bitch Sarah

I read every Judy Blume book, including the ones where the lead characters had problems that made no sense to me (Then Again Maybe I Won’t for example) or where I had outgrown the (Superfudge). Deenie was one I reread frequently.

The reason the book is so often challenged is due to the scenes in which Deenie talks about massaging a “special spot,” and when her life gets stressful, she ends up rubbing that spot every night so she can get to sleep. Add to that a scene with a gym teacher giving very straight facts about periods, jilling off, and other touchy stuff and you have a book that gets a lot of knickers in a twist. And it’s a shame because the realism and thoughtfulness of Deenie is a potentially comforting read for many young women.

Deenie is not just about masturbation and menstruation, however, and sadly that’s lost in the protests. Deenie, whose mother wants to engineer a modeling career for her whether she likes it or not, is diagnosed with scoliosis and has to wear a Milwaukee brace to treat her spine. Deenie’s mother also lays the pressure on Deenie’s sister Helen, who, while not as stunning and beautiful as Deenie, is wicked smart, and of course should be a doctor or a lawyer.

Deenie is not a story about stoking your own fires at an early age. It’s a story about a girl whose defining characteristic, her beauty and physical perfection, is compromised by scoliosis and by having to wear a back brace, and who therefore has to figure out who she is and who she wants to be.

The masturbation scenes are a fraction of the story, and serve a logical purpose: to develop Deenie’s growing awareness of her own body, both in a sexual sense and a medical sense. She’s not in control of how her spine grows, but she is in control of her own self-pleasure and satisfaction. The scenes aren’t gratuitous in the least, and if the reader didn’t really know what masturbation was in the first place, it wouldn’t necessarily be obvious from the descriptions, either. I know whereof I speak: I read this book at an age when masturbation was unknown to me and I had no idea what Deenie was doing with that washcloth. I thought it was some sort of back rub.

The idea that this book is challenged so frequently makes me profoundly sad, because I never thought of it as “the masturbation book.” I thought of it as “the scoliosis book,” and it was certainly the only one I read that dealt with the subject. Isolating a book from a readership of women who already feel isolated because of a scene that comprises a tiny, tiny part of the entire narrative strikes me as unbelievably short-sighted, because I’d bet every last dollar I can tuck in a stripper’s g-string that those who protest are regular wankers themselves. 

Picture of {name}
25 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: 2007 Banned Book Week Reviews

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

What’sHappeningtomyBody?BookforBoys:AGrowing-UpGuideforParents&SonsbyLyndaMadaras

by SB Sarah Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 03:00 AM
Our Grade:
A
Title: The "What's Happening to My Body" Book for Boys, Revised Third Edition
Author: Lynda and Area Madaras
Publication Info: Newmarket June 25, 2007, ISBN: 1557047650
Genre: Top 100 Banned Books

Submitted by Darlene Marshall

I bought this book from Planned Parenthood when my lads were small.  I still love it.  It speaks in plain language, uses a Q&A technique, and best of all from my POV, used schematic drawings of people to show what intercourse looked like. I liked that because I can remember feeling frustrated during sex-ed over the lack of real explanation--I knew the egg and the sperm got together, but I wasn’t sure how the man’s penis got inside the woman’s body.  Were they standing up?  Sitting on chairs?  Leaning against a wall?  Of course, now I know all of that’s possible (just read my books for details), but that’s the kind of, pardon the expression, hard-core information a pre-teen wants!  They also want to know if it’s normal to masturbate, to have wet dreams, to get erections at awkward times (like when you’re thinking about linoleum) and what the opposite sex looks like naked.

My sons are now 20 and 24, one’s gay, one’s straight, both are pretty normal members of society.  I would highly recommend this text for parents of sons, and I have no doubt the one for daughters is equally valuable.

Picture of {name}
17 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: 2007 Banned Book Week Reviews

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

NeedsomeMotivation?

by SB Sarah Saturday, September 29, 2007 at 05:48 PM

Behold: the prize for the best Banned Book Review for 2007: your choice of the children’s or adult’s Banned Book bracelet. You too can sport a miniature cover of To Kill a Mockingbird or Captain Underpants on your delicate wrist.

image

So far we have a very few entries (not including mine, which isn’t eligible) so if you’d like a shot, please send your review of one of the top 100 most challenged books from 1990-2000 to me asap.

Picture of {name}
13 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: 2007 Banned Book Week Reviews

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

GoAskAlicebyAnonymous

by SB Sarah Saturday, September 29, 2007 at 01:00 AM
Our Grade:
F
Title: Go Ask Alice
Author: Anonymous
Publication Info: Simon Pulse 1971, ISBN: 1416914633
Genre: Top 100 Banned Books

Submitted by Charlene

Go Ask Alice was published in 1971 as the true diary of Alice, an innocent young Christian girl who is slipped a dose of LSD in her soft drink while she is at a party and almost instantly turns into a promiscuous, drug-addicted runaway. She eventually reforms and returns home but after being rejected by her peers returns to the streets, dying of an overdose three weeks after the diary ends. In an act of selflessness, her parents arranged for publication of the diary in hopes of warning other youths about the perils of the counterculture.

The book was an immediate bestseller. Shocked parents, educators, and ministers bought the book, hoping that Alice’s lessons would persuade young people under their care not to succumb to temptation. Unfortunately for the adults involved, many young people had immediate strong doubts about Alice’s story. For instance, Alice’s explanation of how she became addicted to speed is literally impossible, and the counterculture lifestyle is portrayed as a nest of hippies, liberals, and people of colour (in other words, People Not Like Us) whose main point in life appears to be to defile helpless innocent white girls. The prose is beyond melodramatic (and beyond the capacities of most teenaged girls, for that matter) and Alice never misses the chance to moralize. All in all it appeared to many teens to be nothing but clunky, heavy-handed propaganda, and was often scorned and parodied.

The young weren’t the only ones with questions, though. Doubts surfaced very early among critics as to whether the book was a true transcript of Alice’s diary. For one thing, it doesn’t read like something written by a teenager. Alice barely mentions her friends or boys, instead devoting enormous amounts of space to long-winded, largely inaccurate descriptions of the effects of drugs that read as if they had been plucked from a church youth handbook. “Editor” Beatrice Sparks admitted in 1979 that the book was not a transcript of her patient’s diary but only based on it, but the release of numerous very similar (and equally factually suspicious) books by Sparks which also purported to be “true diaries” has increased the suspicion that Go Ask Alice is fully fictional. Later research by Mark Oppenheimer and others has supported the theory.

Go Ask Alice was removed from many libraries after conservative parents complained about the book’s graphic depictions of sex, drug use, and violence. Although it has never been banned for being a fraud, it has in recent years been moved - to the fiction section, where it belongs.

Picture of {name}
45 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: 2007 Banned Book Week Reviews

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BannedBookReviews

by SB Sarah Friday, September 28, 2007 at 12:00 PM

Please don’t forget to send in your Banned Book Review, wherein you review one of the top 100 most challend books from 1990-2000. We’ll vote on the best ones - so be creative - and I promise awesome asskicking prizes. Email your reviews to and asap!

Picture of {name}
2 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: 2007 Banned Book Week Reviews

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 7 of 7 pages « FirstP  <  5 6 7