YouareviewingentriesfromMusings

HypotheticalResponsesFromMyFamilyonRomance

by Candy Friday, May 27, 2005 at 06:14 AM

Jennifer Jackson’s blog entry on Romancing The Blog today covers various opinions from her family members on romance novels. Which has inspired me to cover my family’s (hypothetical) responses.

Mom: I CAN’T READ. That’s right, you kids nowadays have it good, we actually sent you to school and paid for everything including college. And what do I get? Phone calls that are usually late because you forget about the time difference. CALL MORE OFTEN. And when are you coming home for a visit?

Dad: If it’s not in The Star or The New Straits Times, it’s not worth reading.

Brother No. 1: Romance novels? What do you think I am, some kind of fag?!?

Brother No. 2: Romance novels? What do you think I am, some kind of fag?!?

Brother No. 3: Romance novels? What do you think I am, some kind of fag?!?

Brother No. 4: Romance novels? I’m a fag, and I refuse to read them. Oh, wait, I did use to sneak them into my bedroom when I was a teenager, especially some of the spicier Penny Jordan titles. Anyway, they’re trashy. Nowadays I confine myself to fine literature with titles like Fag Hag and Bitch Goddess.

Sister: You don’t like Linda Howard? What’s wrong with you?

p.s. Didn’t cover my sisters-in-law’s responses because I don’t know their reading habits all too well, though I know SIL Numero Dos reads almost exclusively romances, mostly category titles.

Picture of {name}
6 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SmartBitchPimpin’

by SB Sarah Wednesday, May 25, 2005 at 07:13 AM

Candy gave me the nudge to self-pimp: my Romancing the Blog post is up. How to break up with books, when one is moving. *sigh* My shelves are SO bare. 

Picture of {name}
7 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

RomancegetsOrganicProps

by SB Sarah Saturday, May 21, 2005 at 10:44 AM

In the June 2005 issue of Organic Style there’s an article urging women to take more moments of pleasure for themselves (no, not that kind of pleasure. Put that erotica novel down!).

#13: Read a Romance Novel: See what all the fuss is about - all the eye-rolling disapproval and the secret enjoyment experienced by millions of women. Savor [every] delicious minute!

How excellent! Of course, we here at SBTB are not at all secret about our enjoyment, though we do plenty of eye-rolling at the bad ones and the dreadful beefcake clinch covers. But to be told to use romance novels as an indulgence for women akin to going on a picnic (#12), playing outside (#7), or going for an aimless walk (#1) - probably not a bad thing. Romance novels are certainly an indulgence for me a good part of the time.

Wish the writer has been able to keep the “eye-rolling” to a minimum though. 

Picture of {name}
3 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Tag-weareSOit!

by SB Sarah Friday, May 20, 2005 at 01:23 PM

We got tagged by Lynn to answer a meme. About books. And our personal opinions.

Gosh this is going to be SO hard. Candy? Me? Talk about books we like?

*sigh* We suppose we could do it. 

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
41 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Auto-Buy

by SB Sarah Monday, May 16, 2005 at 05:40 AM

Candy insisted I read Mr. Impossible by Loretta Chase, and was even kind enough to mail it to me - and remind me that I’d forgotten about it in my desk drawer (bad, Sarah. Bad). Chase, and Gaffney, are among Candy’s faves, and I’ve never read either until her hyperventilating intervention (Seriously, I could hear her screeching from the west coast when I emailed her that I’d not read either author).

And whaddya know, she was totally right. Gaffney’s To Love and To Cherish was really good - so good I still can’t figure out how to delineate what I liked about it. It was so different from any other romance I’d read - a beta hero! Who was hot! And cerebral! Considering I go for smarts over looks every time, yet never encounter a smart but average looking hero in a romance novel (romances are as much fantasy as Dove is moisturizing cream), this made me a happy camper.

And Mr. Impossible - y’all. I am not into historicals that go outside of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. I’m a solid “meh” on plots that take place in France, since it’s hard to suspend reality when reading about French royalty since I know what happened to a good many of them. But outside of that? Not my #1 choice when reading back cover copy and checking out the plotline. Mr. Impossible takes place in Egypt- I was prepared to not find it fascinating.

Holy crap on a crap-filled cracker, was I wrong. Again. Chase is gooood. So good I am totally into the idea of Egypt as a plot locale, and I am digging the book, even from page 30.

So now I have to add Chase and Gaffney to my auto-buy list, the list of authors whom I automatically buy on the basis that I know without a doubt that my $10 will be well spent and the book will be solidly excellent. Usually I don’t make that judgment based on one book, but having Candy’s recommendation backing it up makes it easier to modify the sacred auto-buy.

And when I realized the auto-buy list was going to endure some changes, it made me think more about my auto-buys of the past.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
24 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 72 of 83 pages « FirstP  <  70 71 72 73 74 >  Last »