IntheGardenwithParnormalNora

by SB Sarah Wednesday, May 18, 2005 at 06:30 AM

I got an email from Amazon letting me know that, as “someone who purchased a similar book in the past,” I might be interested in Black Rose, book two of the In the Garden trilogy by Nora Roberts.

There are a lot of mixed feelings about Nora. Some people hate her, some are completely indifferent, and some people really love her. I used to love everything she wrote, and relied on her for unequivocably entertaining reading. If there is a new Nora Roberts within a few months of a time when I know I’ll have a lot of reading time (car trip, plane trip, vacation), I buy it, hoarde it, and read it start to finish.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
22 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Ranty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

DuchessinLove

by Candy Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 02:27 PM
Our Grade:
C+
Title: Duchess in Love
Author: Eloisa James
Publication Info: Avon 2002, ISBN: 0060508108
Genre: Historical: European

All right, finished my first Eloisa James novel, and… well, it wasn’t painful. It was, in fact, mostly pleasant. Overall, though, I think the book was pretty damn lukewarm because--ah, hell, Sarah said it best when we were discussing it last week: “Early parts of the book were fab. And then it felt like the author had a big, “Uh, what do I do now?” moment and ended up driving the story while she applied mascara with one hand, drank coffee with the other, and changed the radio station with her right big toe.”

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
17 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-KReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HietheetoRomancingtheBlog

by Candy Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 06:14 AM

My RTB column is up today, my pretties. I called it “I’ve been told you’ve been bold with Harry, Mark and John.” Check it out NOW. So goeth the bitchly decree.

Picture of {name}
7 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

FortheloveofPetes!

by Candy Monday, May 16, 2005 at 09:36 PM

This has nothing to do with romance novels. Repeat, this has nothing to do with romance novels.

BUT OH FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST THEY’RE FINALLY RELEASING THE ADVENTURES OF PETE AND PETE ON DVD SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

In case you are uninitiated in the wonder that is Pete and Pete, this is how very fucking cool they are: one of the episodes has Iggy Pop in a cameo playing a mild-mannered suburban dad.

THAT is how very fucking cool Pete and Pete is.

Now all they need to do is release Rocko’s Modern Life on DVD. Do you hear me, Powers That Be at the Great Orange Splat?

Picture of {name}
4 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Mykingdomforadecentcopyeditor!

by Candy Monday, May 16, 2005 at 10:31 AM

Romance novels suffer from the worst, most sloppy (possibly non-existent) copy editing I’ve ever encountered. This was rammed home during the weekend when I was reading White Tigress by Jade Lee. The hero’s father’s name is Sheng Fu, yet it switches back and forth between Sheng Fu and Cheng Fu with dizzying frequency in the middle of the book. The family name also briefly changes from Cheng to Chang. And in one spot, something which clearly took place during the night time is referred to as having happened during the day in the next chapter.

This isn’t the only romance novel with this sort of problem. I bitched long and hard about the huge honkin’ continuity mistake in Sally MacKenzie’s The Naked Duke. The villain’s eye color switches from tawny to blue in Loretta Chase’s Mr. Impossible. In Taboo by Kathleen Lawless, the hero and heroine allegedly spend a week together but the book clearly covers only four days, with no “And then three days went by in delirious humpalicious bliss” to account for the disparity. And I’ve seen the words “feisty” and “chaise longue” mis-spelled more often than I can count.

These problems aren’t entirely the fault of the author. I can dig that proof-reading tens of thousands of words isn’t the easiest thing in the world to do, especially when you don’t have the requisite distance from the work to look at it with fresh eyes and you have to make extensive edits that require shifting the timeline around. Hell, I have trouble proofreading these 500-1500 word articles I bang out; I catch typos from old entries all the time. But that’s why authors have editors, no? Editors--copy editors, in particular--are supposed to catch problems like these. If a casual reader like me notices these issues, why the fuck aren’t the people who are actually being paid to pay attention to nitty-gritty details?

Sloppy editing only feeds the accusations that romance novels are sub-standard, and really, when routine words are mangled, character attributes change magically from page to page and the timing for events doesn’t obey time’s arrow, it’s hard to argue that romance novels are just as good and just as professionally-written as other varities of genre fiction. The publishers need to make the horror stop. Can’t these publishing houses afford to hire a team of decent copy editors? Leisure and Zebra seem to be the worst culprits when it comes to mind-boggling sloppiness in editing, but other companies certainly aren’t exempt.

There. My first blog entry after my mini-vacation, and it’s all pissy. Did y’all miss me?

Picture of {name}
33 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Ranty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 460 of 497 pages « FirstP  <  458 459 460 461 462 >  Last »