I also remember reading these, not many, but they exist. I don’t remember any titles though.

Categories: Reviews by Author, T-Z • Reviews by Grade: D
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.
Better Days Ahead is a 1950’s saga of several families whose misfortune leads them to California. Their lives begin in disparate settings and by the end of the novel are entwined in multiple ways, struggling with racism, violence, class differences, and the loss of their collective innocence.
I found that throughout most of the book, the struggles overshadowed any moments of growth or contentedness for the characters, which made the novel increasingly difficult to read as it continued.
In the world of fanfic, this would be an example of bad hurt/comfort fic, “hurt/comfort” being a subgenre where one character goes through a painful experience (physical, mental, or emotional) and is comforted by another character. However, this novel, and quite a few pieces of fanfic, lean way, way too heavily on the “hurt” portion of the equation, leaving the reader to wonder not only how any character could make it through such a painful experience, but exactly what issues the author has that s/he tortures their characters so.
It’s oddly reassuring to know that badfic occurs in the professional realm, too. *g*
And my mother wonders why I read very little other than romances. Why would I subject myself to this when I can turn on the TV news (which I rarely do--the paper’s bad enough) and get the same, only live and in color. No thankyouverymuch.
This book ahas nothing but glowing reviews over at Amazon. I wonder what people are thinking sometimes.
Jeez, Sarah, why would you continue reading this, with all the good books on your TBR stack? It sounds to me like this reading experience offered all the joy and fulfillment of chewing tin foil.
I have to say though that I just finished reading a “painful” book, The Kite Runner. As much as I had problems with the protagonist at the beginning of the book and wanted to stop reading, the author was skilled in leading the reader to understand there was something more coming, something that would make it worth reading. And it was.
Sorry your reading experience didn’t offer the same satisfaction.
Yes, you suffered by reading this. But you made me giggle like mad with, “They’ve been saved, just like the claymation baby.” Claymation baby! Hoo ha! I thank you for your pain.
Wow. You are determined—I would have stopped at the abusive newborn scene. And the sex scene! I really don’t understand why some folks write non-erotic sex scenes. What’s the damned point of that? Does the author thinks it gives him street cred as a Serious Literary Figure if he acknowledges that some sex is crappy?
Only a D-, huh? That’s still passing.
Actually Doug, it isn’t, at least not at my college and a lot of the ones in the area. A D is basically just a curvier version of an F.
English Mill Press? What the hell is THAT?
Oops, I forgot a whole bunch of stuff.
“Thorn Drake”? Seriously? Yikes, I thought that was a Rebecca Brandewyne hero’s name. And some of that dialogue? And that storyline?
I love reading reviews like this. They have a way of making me feel so abundantly imaginative and literate.
(Come on, I know damned well plenty of you other bitches feel the same way!)
‘So, Dolores, what do you think of making love? I thought it was pretty good myself. Once I broke through that steel door of yours....’
That is the point at which I would have repeatedly flung the book into the wall before tossing it to the floor and jumping around on it and throwing it away. Just reading that line in your review made my vision go all hazy and red and made me all spluttery and stupid.
And jut from looking at the cover copy, and the basic gist of the story, its something I would have bought and read had I not seen this.
I just noticed “Romantic Times” gave this thing four stars and, although they didn’t exactly rave about it, certainly didn’t pan it, either (said nice things, actually). So, how reliable are their reviews--not to mention their reviewers’ tastes?
I’m in search of an excerpt.
That’s disgusting.
Thank you for saving me some pain. I would have been seriously pissed off if I’d bought that book.
Another potential author’s spot taken by shite.
And the worst part, for my money, is not even the heinous scenes, the stilted dialogue, the revolting subject matter - it’s that phrase “pancake flat” with regard to the baby’s head. What manner of shit-assed editor let such a cliche through? And people lambast romance and other genre fiction for being trite.
Lol, I’ve come across some books like this when I studied Scandinavian Languages and Culture. In Sweden, they get prizes. :roll:
Actually I think that this book is self-published. Here’s why --
The author page is at http://www.charlievalentinebooks.com
Her publisher page is at http://www.englishmillpress.com/
Note how both URLs direct you to the same website.
Angelle, you are correct, and why I didn’t think to look at both is beyond me. I just checked the WhoIs for englishmillpress.com - and the site is registered to the author. Same identical registration data is provided for the author’s URL as well. So you are right that this is self-published.
Which would explain the questions about editing.
Also, now that I look closed at the registrant data, geographically-speaking, the locations of the many-stars reviewers on Amz seem to be in a similar geographic location.
If you know what I’m sayin’.
funnniest fucking thing I’ve read all week. thanks, SB Sarah!
08.21.06 at 09:32 AM |