DuchessinLove

by Candy Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 02:27 PM
Our Grade:
C+
Title: Duchess in Love
Author: Eloisa James
Publication Info: Avon 2002, ISBN: 0060508108
Genre: Historical: European

All right, finished my first Eloisa James novel, and… well, it wasn’t painful. It was, in fact, mostly pleasant. Overall, though, I think the book was pretty damn lukewarm because--ah, hell, Sarah said it best when we were discussing it last week: “Early parts of the book were fab. And then it felt like the author had a big, “Uh, what do I do now?” moment and ended up driving the story while she applied mascara with one hand, drank coffee with the other, and changed the radio station with her right big toe.”

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
17 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-KReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of cw cw said on...
05.17.05 at 05:22 PM |

Heh. I felt the same way, and it was my first and last EJ. Just...eh. I have her MUCH ADO ABOUT YOU from the library, so I might give that a try.

Did you know the genre tag on the review says SFF? I don’t know if that was on purpose or not, just asking. :D

Picture of HelenKay HelenKay said on...
05.17.05 at 05:27 PM |

Sounds like the perfect excuse to stick with contemporaries.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
05.17.05 at 06:02 PM |

Whoops! Thanks for catching that, cw. I’ll correct it post-haste.

And HelenKay, this book isn’t necessarily representative of the best of the sub-genre. I mean, many people think it is, but I think it’s so-so. And you know how my taste is all impeccable and shit.

Picture of D. Angel D. Angel said on...
05.18.05 at 01:44 AM |

Duchess In Love is the only EJ I’ve read. That I can remember anyway.

It’s fun on the first read and annoying from the second on.

I believe Ms James is a Literature professor. She might very well have a list of every plot contrivance known to man on her desk.

Picture of Amy E Amy E said on...
05.18.05 at 04:19 AM |

I need that list!  I’m sure tossing in a couple random conflicts would greatly improve my own writing.  “Yes, Lord du Cocque, I know we’re a) in love b) already married c) meant to be, and d) alone on a deserted island, but I cannot be with you.  You see, when I was small, my daddy left, so I cannot trust men… despite the thousand miles of frigid, shark-infested waters that surround our little luurve-nest, I’m sure you’ll find a way to leave me.  So no nookie for you.”

Oh, yeah.  Compelling stuff!

Picture of HelenKay HelenKay said on...
05.18.05 at 05:24 AM |

I’m with Amy. If there’s a list somewhere EJ needs to cough it up.  If there are easy shortcuts out there this woman needs to share.  Sure, all of our books will sound the same but who cares.

Picture of Alison s Alison s said on...
05.18.05 at 07:51 AM |

I’m sorry, I know I’m petty, but I can’t get past those names. Camden? What Duke in his right mind would call his heir after a London suburb (village, presumably, at the time)? Duke of Girton? Girton was a teeny tiny village in the middle of nowhere until the late nineteenth century, when a women’s Cambridge college was built there. Very small-scale dukedom. Tuppy? Does this lady know what tupping a ewe is, in British rural vocabulary? Maybe she does. Sorry, this is just the sort of thing that makes me find it hard to read American-written historical novels, too many times. I bet Maili agrees.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
05.18.05 at 08:07 AM |

Actually, I was snickering every time I read “Tuppy” as well because I know “tup” is old-fashioned slang for the rumpy pumpy.

As for Camden--I thought it sounded somewhat odd and a bit modern but really, if I took offence to the odd names bestowed upon romance novel heroes and heroines by their creators, I wouldn’t have any umbrage left for the bad covers.

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
05.18.05 at 08:14 AM |

I did have to stop and think, ‘Camden?’ when I read DiL. It would be like encountering a Duchess named Jaden or a Viscount named...Jaden in an historical.

*green horned monster enters*

And Candy - speaking of the exceptionally erudite children, James is a Oxford-trained PhD in Shakespeare. I’m sure her children and anyone near her is as developed in the lexicon as she.

Picture of Maili Maili said on...
05.18.05 at 08:38 AM |

Heheheh. You’re right, Alison - I agree. Heck, half of my blog is about dodgy names in historical romances. I do wonder how will you react if you read an English-setting historical romance that has a hero named Devon.

Picture of anu439 anu439 said on...
05.18.05 at 09:12 AM |

I hope you review, Your Wicked Ways, the third in the series, about Helene. Goddamn I hate that book. I can’t say anything more beyond that or my head will explode.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
05.18.05 at 10:15 AM |

“I hope you review, Your Wicked Ways, the third in the series, about Helene.”

Uhhh. No. GOD no.

1. Book features adultery. I hatesss reading about adultery, preciousss.

2. I’m half-assedly reading Fool For Love, and while it starts out charmingly enough, I’m already starting to get mildly irritated with it. If Fool For Love doesn’t get better than a C, I’m aborting my Eloisa James experiment.

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
05.18.05 at 04:04 PM |

Fool for Love didn’t even merit finishing, I think. I hate it when the heroine gets ruined. One of my pet peeves.

As for Your Wicked Ways, I can give it a quick review:

Formerly ballsy heroine with depths of musical talent gets screwed over by immature wastrel of a husband. He begs for her to return as she is the only one in the marriage with any talent, and he needs to siphon some off of her for his current creative effort. Instead of being ballsy, as in previous novels, heroine becomes complete doormat, allows a hero so far gone down the road of unfaithfulness he’s completely unredeemable to treat her like trash, and then ends up “falling” for him. Sarah throws book across room in fit of fury, and laments loss of formerly fabulous heroine, who should have had a much better love story for herself.

In short, it sucked.

Picture of DPL DPL said on...
05.10.07 at 08:06 PM |

I actually really liked this one just because it was so SIMPLE. Nothing huge in the way of plot (e.g. kidnapping, war, murderous rampages that the hero and heroine must somehow avoid) but just some excellent, funny characters who seemed like nice kids who wanted to fall in love.  A very pleasant read.

Picture of Lori Lori said on...
10.14.07 at 02:54 PM |

I like Eloisa James because her characters always make me laugh.  In YOUR WICKED WAYS, I found myself have in love with Camden’s mistress because her sly wit was hilarious.

Picture of Jen Jen said on...
09.05.08 at 09:37 PM |

I’v always liked EJ!  Haven’t read this one yet, but if its the first of her books you’ve read I would recommend trying another.  Especially her Essex Sisters series.  One of the things I love about her writing is her humor.  Jen :)

Picture of Jan P Jan P said on...
10.02.08 at 01:53 AM |

Don’t laugh too much at this gal.  We’d like her growing up, living all over the world, top notch schools and now a lit professor who’s Italian count husband helps a lot with kids and house so she can write.  Plus she’s tall, cute and thin..errr.

Heard her give a talk at a romance writers conference.  She has an real Italian count as a hubbie, he also happens to be a professor.  She gets to split her time between the US and Italy. El’s father is also a prof.. (plus a very well known published poet tho I don’t know who), she’s lived all over the world (from dad’s book advances) as a child and the funniest thing she said at her talk was that her professorial family reacted like she is the black sheep of the family..."a “romance” writer?  I found this book hard to start but found her life more interesting..

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: