GeekHeroes

by Candy Monday, April 11, 2005 at 12:35 PM

I finished Emma Holly’s Strange Attractions over the weekend, and woo boy, what a fun book. Holly writes some friggin’ HOT man on man action, y’all. A few things bothered me about it, though, most of which I’ll cover in tiresome detail (as usual) in my review. But one thing jumped out at me as being especially irksome, and it’s a problem I’ve observed in many other romance novels, so I think it deserves its own not-so-little rant. I’m talking about geek heroes.

I’m a geek connoisseur. I’m a minor-league geek, almost all the boys I’ve dated have been geeks, I married a geek (a boy so geeky that I had the privilege of de-flowering him when we first started dating four years ago), and many, many of my friends are geeks--two of my best friends have PhDs, one in chemistry and the other in physics, and I have more than my fair share of friends who have Master’s degrees in engineering. OK, I only have two friends with advanced engineering degrees--but trust me, two definitely qualifies as “more than my fair share.” I have a bona fide statistician as a friend--a statistician who enjoys bird-watching and science fiction. My friends, it does not get much geekier than that.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
23 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Ranty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of cw cw said on...
04.11.05 at 01:50 PM |

Ohmigod this is hilarious. And so true.

>>partially-resorpted fetal twin dangling from their forehead<<

Now this I’ve yet to come across. IRL *or* in my reading, although that would be an interesting conversation piece in a romance.

Picture of Meljean Meljean said on...
04.11.05 at 02:17 PM |

Yes, yes and yes!

I love geek heroes--one of my favorite moments in a book was MaryJanice Davidson’s UNDER COVER. In the third novella, the geek hero comes in to the office for the first time while playing the Superman theme song. It’s hilarious, but I swear I know a bunch of people just like that (uh, but without the tons of cash).

Ditto on the conversation—tangents are everywhere, and often very funny.

I think a lot of people mix up “very smart” and “geeky”—I can see the smart in some heroes/heroines, but not often the geek. And, when the geek does come out, they are immediately cured through sexual healing—they take off their thick glasses and become sex gods. Whuh? Sure, there’s probably a lot of porn watching going on (Mulder, heh) but that doesn’t exactly portray a healthy sexual relationship for them to learn from.

Picture of Candy said on...
04.11.05 at 02:21 PM |

Glad you found it amusing. But on re-reading it: GOOD FUCKING GOD I need to proof-read that shit better before mashing that “Sumit Entry” button. Off I go to correct stupid typos....

Picture of Candy said on...
04.11.05 at 02:51 PM |

Yes, Meljean, you’re right: Smarter than average doesn’t always = geek. I see geeks as outsiders, and there are many classic hobbies/preoccupations (anime, Monty Python, The Simpsons, comics, video games, computer games, RPGs, SF/F) that are usually indicative of geekery as well. Geeks who are shy or reserved around strangers are very believable, but MAN, the way some of the romance novel geek heroes talk even after they get to know the heroine is so excruciating, it could make Baby Jesus cry.

Picture of sybil sybil said on...
04.11.05 at 03:27 PM |

I have nothing to add here but wwwhhhheeeeeeee a mulder and baby jesus crying reference in one thread.

excuse me while I sqeeee

ok move along now

Picture of white raven said on...
04.11.05 at 03:47 PM |

I love the geek hero.  It’s mental masturbation.  I once fell in total lust with a long-time ren-faire junkie like me.  He could quote nearly every line in any Monty Python creation, but what seduced me was when he recited dialogue from The 13th Warrior.  I was a goner.  ;-P

And speaking of Iron Chef, I watch the America series.  I want Masaharu Morimoto as my personal sex slave.  He can toss my pillows and/or my salad any day.

Picture of Jorie Jorie said on...
04.11.05 at 04:09 PM |

Did you read and like Nerd in Shining Armor by Vicki Lewis Thompson?  That is the only effective geek hero I’ve seen in romanceland.  He didn’t speak like Spock.  He didn’t care much about his clothes, but since I don’t care much about clothes, I didn’t care.  He was funny.  He managed to fly a plane in an emergency because one of his hobbies was doing those flight simluator games or whatever they are.  Anyway, I’d be curious to hear your take on him.  (The book isn’t perfect but I found it quite funny and very readable.)

Picture of Nicole Nicole said on...
04.11.05 at 04:20 PM |

Ah...you guys are my heroes.  I love geeks.  I’m married to a geek (Masters Electrical Engineering) and my friends are geeks (though mostly engineer geeks, I mean, one built a large Tesla coil by himself just for kicks, and a sawmill to build the coil).  And Monty Python...my husband once re-enacted the mattress/paperbag sketch in bed.  And I loved it.  And the little things that crop up into conversation, like clock edges.  And the hobbies…

And they’re FUNNY.  And rather hot.  And funny.  At least the ones I know are funny.

Picture of Emily Emily said on...
04.11.05 at 05:12 PM |

I’m married to a physicist and about 90% of the people we hang out with are astro-physicsts (seriously).  I, too, know geeks!

That said, I don’t think I’ve ever read a really great geek hero.  I’ll have to pick up the books you mentioned.

Picture of Trout said on...
04.11.05 at 06:42 PM |

Wheeeeee!  I stay very, very far away from geek hero romances PRECISELY because of these reasons! I married a self-made geek myself, and sometimes his geekery goes way over my head, but damn is his brain sexy! I enjoy talking to geeks so much more than non-geeks - the mental twists they make, the plays on words, are so much more interesting and funny.

Picture of Yummy said on...
04.12.05 at 05:45 AM |

Wassup with the “man on man” sex scenes.  Am I on the wrong site?

Picture of Candy said on...
04.12.05 at 06:23 AM |

Yummy: Emma Holly writes “erotic romances.” This means different things for different people, but in Holly’s case, it means she explores a lot a sexual matter that’s been strictly taboo in traditional romances. Hence, man-on-man sex, man-on-man-on-woman sex, sex with an assortment of toys (used on both men and women), etc. I love it, but I imagine it might offend some sensibilities. I’ll have the review up some time late today or early tomorrow if you’re interested in finding out about the book in more detail.

Picture of sybil said on...
04.12.05 at 06:27 AM |

come now yummy, I am sure that is very romantic to some

and as far as erotica goes many many women love to read m/m

too each their own and all that

Picture of Yummy Yummy said on...
04.12.05 at 06:42 AM |

Oh, I’m not the prudish, but I was just curious.  I’m more of the one mand one woman kinda gal, but hey, to each his own.  And I’m not saying it wouldn’t be a fun read.  :D

Picture of Monica Monica said on...
04.12.05 at 07:59 AM |

Great post!

I adore geeks, they’ve always been my fav.  And you’re right, now I think about it, I’ve never read about a real geek. . . and you’re right about them being more fascinating (and sexy) than the average bear.  Geeks come in ALL flavors.  My geeklove has been mostly fixated on black (including foreign) geeks (they are out there) and okay, maybe a Chinese guy (lots of those out there) back when.

Yayyyy, Geeks!

Picture of Candy said on...
04.12.05 at 08:38 AM |

Jorie: I haven’t read Nerd in Shining Armor. I’ve read and enjoyed Vicki Lewis Thompson in the past, but she can be really uneven in terms of quality. Mostly it’s her corniness that gets to me, plus how her characters fervently think about creating babies every time they get it on. Wanting children is all well and good, but to me, pregnancy ain’t sexy, and childbirth sure as hell ain’t sexy, and having that intrude in the nookie time turns me off. I’ve read some reviews and they seem to indicate that this book is pretty high in the cornball factor. If I see it in the bookstore, it’ll get the 15-page test, and thanks for the heads up.

How ‘bout a bunch of us geek lovers start up some kind of consultancy? “Geeks R Us” or something.

Picture of Beverly Beverly said on...
04.12.05 at 10:09 AM |

The line that got me ROTFL so bad I almost fell out of my chair, literally, was:

“they’re genuinely uncomfortable people to be around--but are we really trying to portray these kinds of geeks as the geek hero? I mean, WHY?”

Oh, so true, so true. I think that is the biggest contradiction out there in romances when authors do get the “geek” very wrong. Not mildly wrong, mind you, but irritatingly wrong. Why would anyone want someone that maladjusted as a hero/heroine anymore than they’d want a true alpha jerk as one?

Personally, I’ve always thought Jayne Ann Krentz does geek well without overplaying them. Her heroes AND heroines are usually fairly smart but with truly quirky individual personalitities that give each of them their own unique “geekiness”. Somewhat stereotypical but never enough to get in the way of the story she’s trying to tell.

Picture of Sarah said on...
04.12.05 at 04:57 PM |

I have been trying to figure out how to respond to this thread because, oddly enough because Candy and I don’t ever agree on stuff, I LOVE GEEK HEROES. I love nerdy heroes. And I LOVE when they are

One of my favorite nerdy heroes is Yank from SEP’s Hot Shot. The best thing about Yank is that he’s so into his own head, yet he does see what’s going on. And when the heroine treats him shallowly, as if he’s not a real person with emotions, he totally calls her on it. The best part, he has the most amazingly hot affair at the end of the story. And he’s completely emotionally and physically engaged with her - it just took a long long time for him, and the other characters, to get to his emotional core.

I think that’s the best way to see a well-written geek hero. A core of real and somewhat untapped emotions layered under a mountain of knowledge that protects the geek from having to engage those emotions unless the person he’s choosing to involve himself with has passed through and matched each of those layers of intelligence.

Picture of Alyssa Alyssa said on...
04.12.05 at 05:18 PM |

Erin McCarthy’s “Fuzzy Logic” in the Bad Boys Over Easy anthology has a geek hero. It’s a good story, and I love Lucas, the hero, though I tend to like McCarthy’s work. Not sure if you’d like the story, but it might be worth a look.

Alyssa

Picture of L.N. Hammer L.N. Hammer said on...
04.13.05 at 11:39 AM |

The sad thing is, SF does only a little better at geek heroes than Romance.  Though #3 is rarely an issue in those book.

---L.

Picture of Candy said on...
04.13.05 at 12:03 PM |

I thought Hiro in Snow Crash was a pretty sexy computer geek hero. OK, he was pretty studly in general what with his katana and all, but y’know. The geeks in Cryptonomicon also resembled real-life geeks I know pretty closely. Both these books are by Neal Stephenson, which probably says “I’m a bitch for Neal!” more than anything else.

Picture of L.N. Hammer L.N. Hammer said on...
04.13.05 at 01:57 PM |

I’ve been a bitch for Stephenson since reading his first novel, The Big U, as a sophomore.  Who was a gamer, and hung out in the physics labs.

Yeah, he does good geek.  It could be argued that most of what he’s written is an attempt to seriously get Geek.  He’s something of an exception.

---L.

Picture of Candy said on...
04.13.05 at 02:14 PM |

Y’know, I’m so much luckier and pickier in my SF reading than I am in my romance reading. I don’t think I’ve met an SF novel I haven’t liked yet, but then I’ve been reading mostly Big Names like Dan Simmons, William Gibson, Neal Stephenson, Kim Stanley Robinson, Vernor Vinge, Philip K. Dick. The possible exception would be Isaac Asimov, but I don’t dislike his books, I just find his writing style kind of meh.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: