GuestBitchReview:DemonAngelbyMeljeanBrook

by Candy Monday, January 15, 2007 at 02:32 PM
Our Grade:
B+
Title: Demon Angel
Author: Meljean Brook
Publication Info: Berkley 2007, ISBN: 0425213471
Genre: Paranormal

Editor’s Note: Smart Bitch regular Robin won a copy of Meljean Brook’s Demon Angel on the condition that she review it by the 15th of January. However, Robin didn’t have a blog, and hosting it on Meljean’s site would’ve looked, well, iffy at best. This is where the Bitches come in. Robin’s a regular, Meljean’s a friend, and Lord knows we could use more reviews in this here joint anyway. Therefore: Robin’s review for your reading pleasure, right here on Les Salopes Intelligentes.


About a third of the way through Demon Angel an awareness settled over me of what – for me, at least—separates great paranormal fiction from anything less:  regardless of the otherworldly elements and characters, the focus of my favorite paranormal novels is ultimately on human emotions and dilemmas.  The paranormal, in other words, allows me to see the so-called normal in a different and hopefully new way.  That’s why I adore Charlaine Harris’s southern vampire series so much (although I know it’s not Romance per se); Sookie is the heart of each and every one of those books, struggling to come into her own as a woman and a strong, independent person in a world that holds numerous dangers, many of which are entirely mundane.  Such is the strength of Meljean Brook’s debut novel, too, as a story of two strong individuals who struggle with themselves, with each other, and with what it means to be human.

Given the central role of love in Romance, you’d think that Paranormal Romance would be a very dynamic subgenre—a passionate love match wrapped up with a story about what it means to be human and to be so powerfully connected to another, who is often truly “other.” What is more human than falling in love and struggling through the various issues and obstacles that threaten the couple’s forever love and happiness?  But surprisingly, at least to me, more than a few of the Paranormal Romances I’ve read fail to give me that double impact I so look forward to.  Whether it’s because the paranormal aspects of the book overshadow the emotional interaction of the lovers, or because they seem no more than a slightly exotic backdrop, I haven’t found as many great Paranormal Romances as I once expected to.  I want more Paranormal Romances that match the intensity and beauty of, say, Sharon Shinn’s Archangel or the quirky insights into human nature I get from the Sookie Stackhouse books.  I know that many readers absolutely adore J.R. Ward’s Black Dagger Brotherhood series, but even those books are often discussed as a “guilty pleasure,” especially for readers who wrestle with their feminist beliefs when (or usually after) reading the books.  Thus my expectations going into Demon Angel were pretty low, and my excitement after only 50 pages or so a welcome surprise.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
16 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of Nathalie Nathalie said on...
01.15.07 at 11:41 PM |

Les salopes intelligentes!!  You do my French heart proud!

Picture of PC Cast PC Cast said on...
01.16.07 at 08:28 AM |

Well done Robin!  An excellent review to add to the bitchery.  And you’ve just enticed me to buy this book.

Picture of Jane Jane said on...
01.16.07 at 08:35 AM |

What a wonderful review.  You really encapsulated what spoke to me in the book and that is

At one level, Demon Angel is the story of two characters who cannot escape their essential nature but are both mistaken in regard to who they think they are.  And through their relationship, not only do they truly discover each other, but they also play out the unsettled relationship between sacrifice and salvation, both human and immortal.

It was fascinating to read the multi layered nature of the book and have Lilith and Hugh represent two sides of an overlapping coin.  One trait of Hugh’s that is not often mentioned is his “ego” but also his selfishness. When he was no longer fulfilled in his role as guardian, he fell.

The full blooded characters make the romance so much more rich.

Picture of Metal Monkey Metal Monkey said on...
01.16.07 at 01:31 PM |

Wow - that was a really looooooooong review. But I read every single word. Yours is the first review that made me want to buy this book. Good job!

Picture of Robin Robin said on...
01.16.07 at 01:44 PM |

Wow - that was a really looooooooong review.

I know—and I worked on it for a couple of days, because there was SO MUCH I wanted to talk about, and because everything is interconnected, it’s like trying to work your way out of a spiral.  Thanks for reading it all, and I really hope you like the book!

One trait of Hugh’s that is not often mentioned is his “ego” but also his selfishness. When he was no longer fulfilled in his role as guardian, he fell.

The full blooded characters make the romance so much more rich.

Yeah, one of the greatest things about Hugh, IMO, was the fact that he DID have an ego.  When I think of the heroes I’ve loved who have also been “good,” they’ve also been complicated by an overdominance of something positive—like Ruck’s honor in For My Lady’s Heart or Christy’s sense of mission in To Love and To Cherish.  For all of these men, their goodness is unequivocal, but still they struggle under the weight of what they feel is the “right” thing.  It’s a fine line between a well-drawn angsty hero and a martyr, but I think Hugh stays enough on the angsty side to be really attractive but still compelling.  And when he becomes a martyr, he has Lilith there to snap him out of it (insert image of Cher slapping Nicholas Cage’s face in “Moonstruck").

Another thing I liked was the joke about “pity” Hugh and Lilith have in the second part of the book.  There was just so much to say about this book, and I know I went too long as it is, but there was just a lot to like in there, IMO.

And you’ve just enticed me to buy this book.

I don’t think you’ll be disappointed—it’s much, much stronger than “Falling for Anthony,” and for a first book, pretty accomplished, IMO.

Picture of kardis kardis said on...
01.16.07 at 03:48 PM |

That was a great review, Robin. I just finished one on my blog the other day and I found it extremely difficult to put what I loved about it into words. Very good job!

Picture of Kristie(J) Kristie(J) said on...
01.16.07 at 05:15 PM |

A very good review!!!  And even though as Metal Monkey says it’s long, I too read every word.  One of the few times I’ve really been as caught up in a review as I have in the book itself.  Kudos!!

Picture of Katie Ann Katie Ann said on...
01.17.07 at 12:45 AM |

Long but engaging review.  :) Wonderful job.  “Demon Angel” is next on my shopping list!

Picture of LFL LFL said on...
01.17.07 at 09:10 AM |

Very well-written review, Robin.

Picture of Jaci Burton Jaci Burton said on...
01.18.07 at 10:38 AM |

What a wonderfully written, insightful review. I’ve already bought Demon Angel and it’s waiting for me to finish my deadlines so I can tear into it. I can’t wait!

Picture of shaunee shaunee said on...
01.18.07 at 10:45 AM |

Robin,

Picked up Demon Angel based on PC Cast’s review of your review and I couldn’t agree more with your review.  You absolutely nailed it!

Based on Brook’s writing style, I’m definitely looking forward to the sequel.  My suspicion is that it will be a bit more seamless now that the rules of her world are set in stone, so to speak.

Sometimes knowing the world you’re building and actually writing it are two very different things.  What to include, what to hold back and how to express it all (cryptically or showing all your cards) while trying to convey the complexities of a burgeoning relationship can be a major trial.  Furthermore, characters tend to take on a life of their own in a work in progress and before you know it, your very carefully planned world has to be modified.

Anyway, great review and great book!

Picture of EvilAuntiePeril EvilAuntiePeril said on...
01.18.07 at 11:05 AM |

Noooo! Aaaarrgghh! Amazon have delayed delivery of my copy while they order more of them from the publisher.

If it hasn’t arrived by the next time I visit the people generously acting as my poste restante, I think my head might explode. I haven’t looked forward to reading a new book so much in a very long time.

Picture of Robin Robin said on...
01.18.07 at 12:52 PM |

Hopefully those who don’t want to slog through my review will take all the raves about Brook’s book here in the comments and get Demon Angel.

Sometimes knowing the world you’re building and actually writing it are two very different things.  What to include, what to hold back and how to express it all (cryptically or showing all your cards) while trying to convey the complexities of a burgeoning relationship can be a major trial.

There had been so much written about DA before I got to it, I thought I’d have nothing to say myself—surprise!. I think I had the same problem reviewing the book that Meljean did writing it, which is why I wasn’t so quick to hold against the book some of the more convoluted moments.  I think she did a great job given the incredible level of detail she used in the book (and I get the sense that she has TONS more that she didn’t even include).  Just the difficulties in figuring out how to review the book made me more sympathetic to the discipline Brook had to practice to balance the characterizations, relationship building, and worldbuilding aspects of the book.  I also understand why some authors choose a more superficial approach to worldbuilding (like Emma Holly in The Demon’s Daughter), especially given the deadlines we hear about so often and the breakneck pace so many authors are writing under.  I hope the response that Meljean’s books is getting will encourage more editors to cultivate complex novels that—while perhaps requiring longer writing time—will satisfy readers who hunger for meatier reads.

Picture of Shaunee Shaunee said on...
01.18.07 at 03:45 PM |

Robin,

From your lips…

And while I’m ridiculously grateful for the meatiness with which you ascribe Brook’s work, I still have great affection for more fluffy efforts.  I think, for me at least, the commonality between the two lies in committed writing that has the author’s respect because it has very obviously been well researched and thoroughly loved well past adolescence into adulthood or some semblance thereof.

Loretta Chase is perfectly a-historical, if I’m allowed to make up a word.  Her heroines are not typical and her details are only sometimes slightly accurately.  Yet her work is thoroughly satisfying

Brook’s and Chase have at least that in common.

Picture of Robin Robin said on...
01.18.07 at 06:40 PM |

Loretta Chase is perfectly a-historical, if I’m allowed to make up a word.  Her heroines are not typical and her details are only sometimes slightly accurately.  Yet her work is thoroughly satisfying

I’m not sure I think of Chase’s books as “fluffy,” but I agree totally with your general point that it’s the diversity of voices—both dark and light—in the genre that’s so critical.  I haven’t spent a great deal of time figuring out what’s accurate or not in Chase’s books, but I so very much appreciate that they don’t talk like 21st century adolescent girls that she could probably do a lot of historical wrong without my noticing.  I’m nervous about her return to Avon, but still look forward to her new book.  I guess for me it’s a difference between “light” Romance and “lite” Romance—I can definitely appreciate light, but I’ve been less entranced with lite.

Picture of Ziggy Ziggy said on...
01.20.07 at 06:25 PM |

Great review! I really want to read this book now!

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: