InMyDreamsbyMonicaJackson

by Candy Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 04:40 PM
Our Grade:
C-
Title: In My Dreams
Author: Monica Jackson
Publication Info: Dafina Books 2004, ISBN: 0758208685
Genre: Paranormal

Monica has warned me that she has her author calming visualization aid at the ready should I decide to rip In My Dreams to pieces. Well, I’m only to going to partially shred it in this review, because although it didn’t really engage me on a lot of levels, it really wasn’t all that bad. So what happens then? Does the author visualization aid change for the reviewer too? Do I get downsized to, say, Kirstie Alley instead of Gilbert Grape’s mama?

image vs. image

Though now that I think about it, I’m not sure which is crueller—Chartreuse satin, or 600 lbs. of backfat?

Anyway, on with the review. Bless has always been the “homely and weird” one of the three Sanderson girls. She sees auras, spirits and demons, she has precognitive dreams and she can perform minor healing acts. It’s a family trait; her aunt Praise has supernatural abilities too. All three sisters are radically different. Bless has the Gift, Maris is autistic, and Ginger is the beautiful one, the restless one, the one who ran for the bright lights of Atlanta as soon as she could.

One recurring dream in particular fills Bless with almost unbearable longing; in it, a handsome dark stranger seduces and loves her. She knows the man is real and that she’ll meet him one day, because she always meets the people she dreams about. She’s just not sure when.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
13 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-KReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of Nicole Nicole said on...
05.11.05 at 05:18 PM |

Hmm...sounds very, very interesting.  I like more details in my books too.  I hate when things like major fights get glossed over.  It’s like the author didn’t want to bother going in-depth with it, and just decided not to bother.  Maybe that goes along with the whole absence of grit that RTB post talked about today.  Do romance authors not want to get their hands dirty? That also reminds me why I hated what SK did with Zarek.  I thought she took the easy way out and didn’t want to deal with readers upset that he was so bad.  *sigh* That will always bug me.  I was so mad when I read that book, even though I liked it. 

Okay, I think I got slightly off-topic here.  Oops.  Good review though.

Picture of AngieW AngieW said on...
05.11.05 at 05:23 PM |

Thanks for the review! I’m glad to see it.

I have to say, I respect the fact that although you know Monica is a frequent visitor to this blog, you didn’t give it a glowing review. And that’s why people love the Smart Bitches!

Picture of Candy said on...
05.11.05 at 05:34 PM |

I’ll admit I’m kind of sweating bullets to see what Monica’s going to say about the review, hee.

“Maybe that goes along with the whole absence of grit that RTB post talked about today.  Do romance authors not want to get their hands dirty?”

See, that’s not the case with this book at all. Monica isn’t afraid to get graphic and down-and-dirty, she just doesn’t do it nearly often enough, and she starts doing it too late in the book. Mostly, though, it’s the lack of sensory perception that bothered me. I could see everything all right, I just couldn’t FEEL it.

Picture of Nicole Nicole said on...
05.11.05 at 05:44 PM |

Oh, that part was me getting off-topic.  Sorry if that didn’t come through.  It’s been annoying me all day and I just coulnd’t bring myself to let it out until now, I guess.

I do think I might look for this one someday.  It sounds interesting.  I like when authors do things out of the ordinary.  It’s always fun to see how it’s executed.

Picture of Monica Monica said on...
05.11.05 at 05:49 PM |

Thanks for the read, dearie.  The review is aw’raht. 

I left all the good paranormal/fantasy stuff out 1) because it was supposed to be a romance for a mass market romance line.  If I wrote the book in my head with all those details you mention, you know it would most definitely NOT have been romancey enough.  Would have been better tho’, I do admit.  Need new genre.
2) I didn’t want to upset the sistas even MORE with detailed demon/God/angel/reincarnation backstory than I already wrote.  Apparently, my efforts were in vein because plenty sistas were pissed off anyway.  (Black women tend to be conservative).
3) and probably the most telling--I didn’t have long enough to write the bitch.

Aw well, at least it ain’t boring.  I hate boring books. 

So now, who do I get to visualize you squishing?

Picture of Candy said on...
05.11.05 at 09:14 PM |

“If I wrote the book in my head with all those details you mention, you know it would most definitely NOT have been romancey enough.”

I know what you’re saying. But should you get a contract with a line that handles erotic paranormals and you end up writing a big, juicy, detailed paranormal, I’d totally pick it up. And risk the author visualization aid all over again.

“So now, who do I get to visualize you squishing?”

Oooh, so hard to choose. These right now are my top 3 choices:

1. Johnny Depp

2. Luke Wilson

3. Beck

Picture of Candy said on...
05.11.05 at 09:15 PM |

Heh, just realized these are all real skinny boys too--just like in your author visualization aid!

Picture of Wendy Wendy said on...
05.12.05 at 07:19 AM |

Well look at this:  open and honest dialog in the romance community and no one melted like the Wicked Witch of the West.  Props to Monica and Candy.

Picture of Jennifer Jennifer said on...
05.12.05 at 08:05 AM |

Um, I still want to read it anyway :)

Picture of Candy said on...
05.12.05 at 08:49 AM |

“Um, I still want to read it anyway :)”

As you definitely should. I have no doubt lots of people will like it better than I did; Holly Lisle, for one, loved this book.

Picture of Beverly Danae Beverly Danae said on...
05.12.05 at 09:46 PM |

I am a little over halfway through In My Dreams right now and am enjoying it.  It is too short, and I know what you mean about some things being glossed over.  However, it is a very interesting and inventive story and the book doesn’t shy away from being gritty and from being down-to-earth about it’s characters.

Picture of Cece Cece said on...
05.13.05 at 06:25 AM |

Trying to sell gritty and down to earth is tough =\

Picture of Kate R Kate R said on...
05.13.05 at 08:12 AM |

“Props”, Wendy? You sure you want these women to have props? isn’t the tragic demise of poor Mr. Depp enough?

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: