LordsofRainbowbyVeraNazarian

by Candy Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 12:13 PM
Our Grade:
D+
Title: Lords of Rainbow
Author: Vera Nazarian
Publication Info: Betancourt & Company 2004, ISBN: 1930997884
Genre: Science Fiction/Fantasy

I started reading this book in late May.

I finally finished it last Sunday morning while sitting in my optometrist’s waiting room.

I think that pretty much says volumes about this book, but oh, I have volumes more to say about it. Shit, the book never seemed to end, so I reckon I can give y’all a taste of my pain with this review.

(Side note: Yeah, I know, it didn’t appear in the sidebar for the longest time because I’m a lazy bitch who doesn’t update the “What I’m Reading” bit very often.)

(Side side note: Vera, in spite what this review may imply, I think you’re awesome. If this review pisses you off, feel free to a) say and think very unkind things about my appalling literary tastes, and b) make extensive use of Monica Jackson’s Author Calming Visualization Aid. I’d also be the first to admit I’m a nitpicky, bitter cow with a chunk of coal in my breast instead of a heart.)

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
11 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, L-PReviews by Grade: D

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of Sindell Sindell said on...
08.30.05 at 03:41 PM |

How can one hate Robert Altman? But I agree about the book. I read a few chapters and sold it on Ebay.

Picture of celeste celeste said on...
08.30.05 at 03:50 PM |

I agree with you about Tolkien. To me, his books read like non-fiction accounts of a fictional world. I don’t see them as true fiction at all.

Picture of Vera Nazarian Vera Nazarian said on...
08.30.05 at 09:38 PM |

Candy,

First of all, thanks very much for the review—hooray, at last! :-)

And now, believe it or not, I am actually cackling here.  If anyone can properly roast Lords of Rainbow, I’d rather have it be you, in your inimitable way. 

Okay, I can even see where you are coming from and how the reading can be sloooooow, sort of like watching the Mars rover stumbling over large rusty rocks… for hours.  But at the same time let’s keep in mind that as the Mars rover slogs along, the stuff it uncovers and transmits back to us on earth is sort of mindblowing, fucking neat....

So, in a number of ways it’s a difficult and immersive story, but the buildup is there, and I do think the impact at the end is felt that much more because of the gradual unrolling of the details.  Nope, no way is it a page-turner, I agree.  And the characters are not your typical romantic hero and heroine. But I do hope that despite all the annoyances, the theme and flavor will stay with you in a good way.

I also invite the rest of you smart bitches to check the book out.  Who knows, it might be more to your taste?

Again, thanks a million, Candy.  This is about the only time I laughed in a good way at a not-so-good review of my stuff. ;-)

Picture of Michelle K Michelle K said on...
08.31.05 at 03:51 AM |

All I have to say is that this:
Nary a noun goes unmodified. Adjectives are stacked wantonly atop one another, snuggling up against each other without so much as a comma to separate them
Made my day.

Picture of Kate R Kate R said on...
08.31.05 at 04:15 AM |

damn, you’re classy Vera. . . so which of Monica’s images did you use?

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
08.31.05 at 06:42 AM |

Vera: VERY glad you aren’t sharpening knives and using Google Maps to pinpoint my location in Portland. Anyway, yes, I liked the theme and setting quite a bit, and Ranheas is unusual in a really good way. I knew it wasn’t a romance novel, so disappointed expectations didn’t play a part in my grade or the Ebil Things I said.

And I’m with Kate: So which of Monica’s Visualization Aids did you end up using? Monica has given me the signal honor of creating TWO personalized ones for me (more than any reviewer I know of!), but the one that makes me laugh the hardest is this one here.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
08.31.05 at 06:58 AM |

Oops, forgot about this one: “How can one hate Robert Altman?”

Remember, I’m a nitpicky, bitter cow with a chunk of coal in my breast instead of a heart. I’m the only one among my friends who can’t stand Robert Altman movies. I’m not even sure I can pinpoint what exactly it is about his movies that drives me bonkers. Part of it’s the rather self-conscious nature of many of his films, I think. Another is the feeling that I’ve seen it all done before, only better.

Picture of Dee Dee said on...
08.31.05 at 08:27 AM |

Could it be that self-important tone of Altman’s movies that underlies the whole thing? ("This is brillliant because it’s Robert Altman’s") Of course, I’m the uneducated twat who thought “Close Encounters” was boring and had no payoff or answers, making the viewer wonder exactly why they spent all this time watching it, so you’ll need some salt with that.

Vera--Wow, it’s rare you get to see that kind of class. Bows deeply.

Candy--If my books ever sell and are worthy of getting a new one ripped into them, lol, at least I know I’ll laugh if you ever get to do it for me.

Smooches,
Dee

Picture of Raina_Dayz Raina_Dayz said on...
08.31.05 at 12:10 PM |

I also have a tough time getting through Tolkein, to me it’s simultaneously thrilling and boring beyond belief.  Robert Altman blech, he hasn’t done anything good since Popeye.  Oh wait, that is poop too. 

I have to say though, reading your review actually made me interested in reading the book, which is not my typical reaction to a negative review.  The premise is fascinating.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
08.31.05 at 01:58 PM |

“Could it be that self-important tone of Altman’s movies that underlies the whole thing?”

Yeah, that’s part of it, too. It doesn’t help that Robert Altman fans are pretty rabid, and look down their noses at people who don’t like the movies and claim that we’re too stupid to get them. Oh, I get them. They still inspire a sensation in me that’s akin to chewing on tinfoil.

“I have to say though, reading your review actually made me interested in reading the book, which is not my typical reaction to a negative review.”

Hehe, I’m glad! I like Vera, so go go go check out the book. The premise is definitely very interesting.

Picture of Vera Nazarian Vera Nazarian said on...
09.01.05 at 12:08 AM |

Kate R and Candy,

Nope, didn’t end up using any of Monica’s Visualization Aids (even though the one in the office is… well, amazing).  Just cringed for a moment and then started giggling. Lords of Narcolepsy, my ass. :-)

Really, it is no problem, and I appreciate all the attention for the book.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: