PartyCrashersbyStephanieBond

by SB Sarah Saturday, August 27, 2005 at 08:53 AM
Our Grade:
D+
Title: Party Crashers
Author: Stephanie Bond
Publication Info: Avon 2004, ISBN: 0060539844
Genre: Contemporary Romance


I really wanted to like this book – the premise is fabulous. Aspiring Realtor™ working in the Neiman’s shoe department hooks up with some women who crash parties just about every night, mixing and mingling with Atlanta society, eating their body weight in Beluga and scamming their way into and out of haute couture, which they purchase from Neiman’s and return the next day. But aspiring Realtor’s™ boyfriend had gone missing along with her car, and here’s this hunkhunka hot hot rich-love giving her the eye and recognizing her through her party-crashing disguises. Now she’s digging for clues to her boyfriend’s disappearance while fending off the amorous advances of hotty mc rich-hot.

The shoe department alone caught my attention, even though my feet, they are dedicated and faithful lesbians in that they will only wear comfortable shoes. But I work in Manhattan; I’ve seen some thousand-dollar shoes walk by. There is nothing like the allure of couture shoes for some women, and it’s a fascinating world, just from the ankles down. But alas, the shoes are not a character in this story.

This could have been a book about reinventing oneself, only to appreciate the way one was at the start of the story. This could have been a book about a girl who lives a very vanilla life and gets a glimpse of the wild side by crashing elite parties and starts to come out of her shell. It also could have been a mystery about a boyfriend who’s gone missing and possibly stolen the heroine’s car, leaving her to wonder about his true character, while a much more attractive candidate for her affections pledges selflessly and somewhat suspiciously to help her, even as the police start to target her as their prime suspect.

Party Crashers tried to be all of these things, but in the end, I found the heroine, Jolie, to be so almighty boring that I couldn’t root for her, or even discern any real transformation in her character.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
15 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of Kate R Kate R said on...
08.27.05 at 10:54 AM |

Hey--lookie there. You loved that other Bond book! How often does that happen to you, Sarah? Hitting such powerful and opposite responses to the same author’s work?

I rarely have such a completely turned-off reaction to a book by an author whose other work I’d loved. In fact the worst I can recall is ‘meh’ and that was early vs. later work. Wonder if that means I’m a fangirl? 

[off-topic but only slightly: So you bitches hated my failed bumperstickers, huh. Last time I avoid work by playing with new software for you. This week, anyway.]

Picture of SB Sarah SB Sarah said on...
08.27.05 at 11:20 AM |

Failed bumperstickers? Huh?

And yeah, it’s weird when one book is so enjoyable and the next one from the same author leaves me cold. But oh well. It happens.

Picture of fiveandfour fiveandfour said on...
08.27.05 at 11:37 AM |

Sarah, you said “the sex scene”, as in there was one and not several.  After reading the quote you posted from the book, I think something to be thankful for was that there was only one :).  The nicest thing I could think to describe that would be the word uninspiring.

Picture of Alyssa Alyssa said on...
08.27.05 at 11:50 AM |

after a few mental calculations regarding expansion, contraction, and overage, she straddled him in what proved to be a gradual yet successful maneuver.

Words fail me in describing this passage.

It may have been a “successful maneuver,” but if she had to spend that much time on “mental calculations,” she was doing something wrong.

Picture of Gabriele Gabriele said on...
08.27.05 at 11:59 AM |

after a few mental calculations regarding expansion, contraction, and overage, she straddled him in what proved to be a gradual yet successful maneuver.

Yikes, that sound like an Oswald Kolle explanation of the Kamasutra.

Oswald Kolle was the sex pope in Germany in the 70ies and his shows are hilarious nowadys.

Picture of AngieW AngieW said on...
08.27.05 at 01:10 PM |

I read this book a while back and you totally nailed it. Mostly, I remember wanting to throttle the heroine for a number of reasons, which you’ve listed, but also because I hate heroines who keep important information from the police for unclear reasons which usually means only because the author needs a way to keep the suspense/mystery plot moving forward. If the only way to do that is through the sheer stupidity of your heroine, it’s a good bet your heroine is going to be labeled TSTL.

Picture of SB Sarah SB Sarah said on...
08.27.05 at 02:01 PM |

fiveandfour: There was a one-line mention to later humpity hump-hump in the story, but that was the sole descriptive scene that went into some erotic detail. Or, drove six miles around the erotic detail and went for sex-as-merger instead.

AngieW: YES. Do not have the heroine withold information for no reason other than to further the plot. Jolie went back and forth in her estimation of the police, and the less she told them, the more they treated her as a suspect, which is how she was behaving. Gah.

Picture of Ellen Fisher Ellen Fisher said on...
08.27.05 at 03:47 PM |

I wish Avon would quit labeling Bond’s books “romance” on the spine.  They’re not really romance-- they revolve much more around women’s relationships among themselves than women’s relationships with men.

Picture of Amy E Amy E said on...
08.28.05 at 08:24 AM |

Damn, am I glad you put this review up now.  I was going to buy this book when I get paid on Tuesday, but now I’ll save that $$.  Muchos gracias.

And I had to reread that excerpt three times before I understood that it was a sex scene!  Yes, even with you pointing out that it *was* sex, I thought you had to be mistaken.  And I don’t even want to know about the hat reference.  Weird.

Picture of SB Sarah SB Sarah said on...
08.28.05 at 08:31 AM |

Seriously, the hat reference came out of nowhere. It wasn’t like there was some sort of hat theme. It just appeared in the scene. I agree - weird.

And Ellen: you are so right. This was not romance; it was more like suspense, only with a feeble romance and a feeble set of female relationships to match. If it had followed the formula, it could have been a Higgins Clark.

Picture of Robin Robin said on...
08.28.05 at 10:36 AM |

“Seriously, the hat reference came out of nowhere. It wasn’t like there was some sort of hat theme. It just appeared in the scene. I agree - weird.”

Although I haven’t read this book, I also had to spend a few moments puzzling over that hat reference.  The only thing I could come up with is (oy, it’s hard, that is difficult, to avoid punning here, isn’t it?) “receptacle for the little head,” but who knows if that’s anywhere near what she was thinking. 

I’m reading a book right now where the author seems to be writing with a thesaurus by her side.  While I appreciate the impulse to go beyond overused language, the artificiality of words that don’t quite fit can be really distracting.  Especially when she still keeps calling the heroine “small” and “little” like a “bird.” Am I the only one who HATES numerous references to a heroine as “small” or “tiny,” especially while the hero is mounting her?  Like she could snap at any moment from the force of his manly lovin’?  The hat’s not sounding so bad now, really.

Picture of Maili Maili said on...
08.28.05 at 11:23 AM |

” Am I the only one who HATES numerous references to a heroine as “small” or “tiny,” especially while the hero is mounting her?

Yes! It makes it so icky that I have to skim these scenes.  Unfortunately there is a huge number of romances [especially historical romances, for some reason] that feature that weird tendency.

Picture of Robin Robin said on...
08.28.05 at 11:52 AM |

“Unfortunately there is a huge number of romances [especially historical romances, for some reason] that feature that weird tendency.”

Ugh.  I’ve seen it before, but the book I’m reading now (a trad Regency) uses it everywhere!  It’s icky enough that the hero THINKS it all the time, but wow wee, how did the author continue to write it over and over and OVER again without all of its icky overtones clogging her throat like too much peanut butter?  It brings to mind so many bad references, from pedophilia to battery that it’s starting to overwhelm my whole reading experience.

And Maili, I read your old blog post on demonizing thin women, and that’s definitely NOT what I’m talking about here.  I agree with you, by the way.  Your post also made me think about how Romance uses the physical size of the heroine to express fragility or vulnerability or a lack thereof.  While it’s certainly not the demonization you refer to, it strikes me as equally problematic to solidify an already tragic tendency to associate slimness and smallness in women with weakness by making the connection so persistently and overtly in women’s fiction.

Picture of Gail D Gail D said on...
08.28.05 at 12:42 PM |

So was Jolie small too, ontop of her other annoyances?

Given the state of that “love” scene, I don’t think this is a book I want to get. But then, I haven’t liked many of Stephanie Bond’s books at all. I think there was one, maybe, back when she was writing more romantic stories quite a few years back, but the next one I read after that, I didn’t care for. So I haven’t read Bond in a long, long time.

Picture of celeste celeste said on...
08.28.05 at 05:22 PM |

Whenever an author seems to be focusing a lot on a size discrepancy between the hero and heroine, I start wondering what a child psychologist would make of sketches where the kid always draws the representation of herself as way smaller than everyone else.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: