RevengeGiftsbyCindyCruciger

by SB Sarah Wednesday, August 03, 2005 at 09:48 AM
Our Grade:
C+
Title: Revenge Gifts
Author: Cindy Cruciger
Publication Info: Tor Romance 2005, ISBN: 0-765-35225-7
Genre: Paranormal

Editor’s Note: We found out there was at least one factual error in this review. The offending sentence has been removed; the other alleged error is somewhat debatable (because Candy’s a contentious bitch) and stands for now. She’s going to hash it out in the comments. If you want to read more details on the errors, check out Cindy Cruciger’s livejournal.

Revenge Gifts centers around Tara Cole (note slight humor of name if you say it fast: terrible) who runs a web site for, you guessed it, revenge gifts. From pillows stuffed with cat hair to a year’s supply of candy for the weight conscious person you love to hate, her site allows people to mail-order their revenge and never worry about being found out. Tara runs the site out of her bungalow in Islamorada in the Florida Keys, where she lives rent-free in exchange for managing the owner’s bar.

Tara’s partner in romance is Howard Payne (again, check the name. If Tara marries him she’ll be “terrible pain"), who arrived in the Keys tracking Tara down for a business proposal. He wants to create a burial-at-sea business using Tara’s urns, and once he meets Tara, he wants to bury something else with her, too.

Most of the action in the book takes place either at Tara’s bungalow or at the bar, aptly named “Crusty’s,” where someone has been trying to set a curse upon her by leaving gris-gris bags, a black cat, a black rooster, a goat, and a black dog. Tara herself is a relatively flexible, laid back person - as if you can be uptight on the Keys - who has a few close friends, and spends most of her time running her business, tending bar, and trying to placate the myriad ghosts that inhabit her home. There’s the poltergeist who throws food at night, leaving Tara no choice but to keep next to no food items in her fridge, and heaven help her if there’s eggs in the house. There’s also her Great Uncle Les, whose cremated remains she keeps in holiday urns to spite him, as he hated the holidays. Les is prone to turning all the lights on at 4am.

The story is part romance, and part pilot issue of a longer series, so there are short term questions that are answered, and longer term questions that aren’t. I didn’t know it was a series until the author mentioned it in an email after I’d finished reading, and that took a load off my mind because I had a lot of unanswered questions at the end - and that, I suppose, is how a good series is made.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
15 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of FerfeLaBat FerfeLaBat said on...
08.03.05 at 10:02 AM |

The copy editor and I had issues with tense that I hope got fixed in the final print version.  I’m resubmitting this assignment for a grade adjustment when the final copy comes out.

The Javascript was spliced from a working program but edits garbled it.  Your concept of the code as it should be is correct.  Maybe I should put a download on my website? Would anyone WANT a quote generator from Revenge-gifts.com?

Thanks for the review!  Whew!  I can sleep now.

Picture of FerfeLaBat FerfeLaBat said on...
08.03.05 at 10:34 AM |

Wait.  Is a C+ good enough to qualify for a Smart Bitch title?

Picture of Nicole Nicole said on...
08.03.05 at 10:47 AM |

Sounds vewwy vewwy interesting.  In a good way.  I’ll have to check it out when it comes out.  Bah, that was a bad sentence.  Er..I’ll try to buy it when it comes out.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
08.03.05 at 10:59 AM |

“Is a C+ good enough to qualify for a Smart Bitch title?”

No grade is high enough to qualify for a Smart Bitch title.

Only by proving your mettle in one of our stupendously difficult and internationally-recognized (snerk) contests can one win a Smart Bitch title.

Unless you’re one of the founding members, in which case Sarah = Duchess of Cuntington, and I’m Comtesse de Gant D’Amour.

Nicole, I have a feeling you’ll really, really like Revenge Gifts. In some ways, it’s like really, really evil chick lit.

Picture of Nicole Nicole said on...
08.03.05 at 11:05 AM |

“really, really evil chick lit” Yup, sounds right up my alley.  Now to get my hands on a copy and blog about it.  It comes out when?

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
08.03.05 at 11:12 AM |

Candy, that is the perfect description - “really, really evil chick lit.” In a lip-smacking, hands-rubbing-together, manaical-laughter kind of way!

Picture of Jules Jules said on...
08.03.05 at 11:46 AM |

It comes out next month. I posted the booksamillion link for anyone interested.

I kind of think of Cindy as the Tom Robbins of romance. Don’t get me wrong. She’s different in that she’s snarky, but she uses the language in a colorful way that is reminiscent of Robbins.

The genre has been needing a shot in the arm. This book is it. And knowing that I wasn’t reading the final product, I didn’t get too caught up in the typos, etc. In all honesty, I know nothing of Javascript.

I was relieved to discover that Revenge Gifts is book one in a series. The characters and Tara’s love life with Howard is just beginning in Revenge Gifts. The book made a lot more sense when I found that out.

Picture of Jules Jules said on...
08.03.05 at 11:49 AM |

Sorry.

Click on Jules to link to BAMM.

Picture of Kel Kel said on...
08.03.05 at 12:07 PM |

I love me some Cruciger-style writing.  I can’t wait to visit the Revenge Gifts gang again!  Yes I know her, so I’m a biased source but I’m serious, you have to at least try it...*sing-song voice* “It’ll make you feel good.”

Her voice is unique to say the least.

Btw, In her “real” job Cindy writes java.  Editors suck sometimes.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
08.03.05 at 12:43 PM |

And knowing that I wasn’t reading the final product, I didn’t get too caught up in the typos, etc.

I tried, too. I didn’t make a peep in the review about the legions of typos I found in the book--at least three per page on the average, ranging from apostrophe abuse to misspellings. I’ve read ARCs before, so I’m not expecting perfection by any means, but this ARC broke all records. Whoever copy-edited or transcribed this ARC needs to be hung by the thumbs.

I felt like I had to address the tense changes, though, because while dropping/adding/transposing characters and punctuation can be attributed to sloppy copyediting or transcription, switching tenses for whole paragraphs seems like more of a conscious effort. I’m glad to hear that this issue was caught, because God knows it wasn’t in Palahniuk’s Haunted. I’ve just noticed that in general, it’s very hard to sustain the present tense in fictional narrative.

Btw, In her “real” job Cindy writes java.

Just a note: Java is not Javascript. Two different languages altogether. Java is a hell of a lot harder to work with (and a lot more powerful) than Javascript.

I do know Cindy works with all sortsa computer software and programming languages--definitely more than me, since I can barely hack my way through Javascript as it is (and Javascript is hardly the most difficult or rigorous of languages). However, the errors were so neat and consistent, especially the switching of the comment tags, that I wasn’t sure they could entirely be attributed to poor editing, but it sounds like that was the major culprit.

Picture of Briana Briana said on...
08.03.05 at 02:31 PM |

Whoever copy-edited or transcribed this ARC needs to be hung by the thumbs.

Bwwaahaaaaaa..... (Manaical laugh insertion.) Ain’t that the truth.

Picture of gena showalter gena showalter said on...
08.03.05 at 04:27 PM |

Oh, I love the thought of evil chick lit.  This is a book I’ll have to read!

Picture of Alyssa Alyssa said on...
08.03.05 at 07:32 PM |

I’m stuck on this:

From pillows stuffed with cat hair

As someone who is allergic to cats, I can say with complete honesty that this would be a nasty form of revenge, indeed.

Picture of Kel Kel said on...
08.04.05 at 04:07 AM |

I meant to say She writes javascript in her day job. My bad.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
08.12.05 at 07:05 AM |

According to Cindy Cruciger, I called it totally wrong when I thought one of her characters, Sam, was gay. There were at least two references in the book that made me think so, here are the two I dug out:

On page 24 of the ARC:

I gave him [Sam] my best smile as I slid his chardonnay and creme de cassis onto the coaster in front of him. (...) The smile is a wasted effort on him. His eyes were fixated on the mirror behind him. He is watching the guys walking in from the street entrance. A string of Harley Davidson cycles are now parked in view of the bar’s front window. Men are so fickle. But, interesting. I wonder if it’s the bikes or the bikers that grab his interest. I’m guessing both.

On page 61 of the ARC, right after Sam kicks out a pain-in-the-ass character:

“Thanks, Sam.” God, I wish he were straight.

There may have been more, but seriously, don’t take my word for it because it’s been a little while since I’ve read it, and these were two that stuck out in my mind.

But Cruciger claims that Sam is bisexual, sexually omnivorous. On the very bottom of page 63 and going into page 64 of the ARC:

And that is why Sam would make a bad boyfriend. If vacations were a guy, Sam would be the number one destination spot. He’d be a Club Med. Gay, straight, bisexual...if it’s fun, he’s up for it, as long as it ends in under two weeks.

My question is: Why in the hell would Tara pine for his straightness when he bangs women? She shows no squeamishness about bisexuality in the book at all (and lots of people, gay and straight, are really squeamish about bisexuals--I’ve talked to some gay friends about this, and they seem to view bis as “cheaters").

And if her squeamishness stems from him being a bad boyfriend, as the quoted passage suggests, then why didn’t she think “God, I wish he were straight and not such a whore”?

Just tryin’ to tell you why I thought what I did. I may have jumped to conclusions, but I think given the information I did, I made a somewhat valid (if controversial) interpretation. Other interpretations are valid, of course.

For this reason, I’m going to just mark the para in the review as “controversial” and leave it up to readers to decide.

Feel free to weigh in.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: