RITAandGHFinalistsAnnouncedatRWANational

by SB Sarah Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 04:37 AM

The list is up, for the RITA and Golden Heart. I’ll be honest, and I’m not sure if this is a reflection of me, of something else, or just the way it played out this year but I have not been near or even in the same room as some of the books nominated for a RITA. I’ve never heard of some of them.

But I am very pleased to see Elizabeth Hoyt, Anna Campbell (who is up against herself, heh heh, with the pair of her dueling against Julia Quinn) and Melissa Marr on the finalist slate. I’ve pasted the list below the fold.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
38 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories:

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of JessicaMcG JessicaMcG said on...
03.26.08 at 05:25 AM |

Ok, so I counted how many authors I was familiar with that are nominated and came up with 10. However, I haven’t read 95% of the book nominated.  I wonder what that means about the books I did read?

Picture of Lorelie Lorelie said on...
03.26.08 at 05:40 AM |

Yep, I haven’t read squat of these either. 

And I have no idea what the big deal is with Cherry Adair.  I read two of hers, about four years ago and the horrible-ness is still seared into my brain.

Picture of TrishJ said on...
03.26.08 at 06:00 AM |

Terri Garey’s book DEAD GIRLS ARE EASY is a fantastic read! There’s adventure, ghosts, voodoo and luurrve. If you want to get a taste of awesome RITA fun, give it a read.

Picture of Chicklet Chicklet said on...
03.26.08 at 06:03 AM |

The nominations are for books published in 2007, right? So I don’t need to be indignant that The Spymaster’s Lady isn’t listed?

As for the current crop, I’ve heard of three of these books: Sexiest Man Alive (which is on my TBR pile at home), High Noon, and the J.R. Ward one, which… I’ll not say anything about.

Picture of TrustMe_2_Forget said on...
03.26.08 at 06:05 AM |

there are alot of authors mentioned that I’ve never heard of, though I did read 4 of books listed(both of Anna Campbell’s) and have 6 more in my TBR pile...mostly from authors like Nora Roberts, JR Ward, Susan Anderson & Lisa Kleypas

Picture of GrowlyCub GrowlyCub said on...
03.26.08 at 06:09 AM |

I recognize 25 of the names and have read other books by 15 of them.  Of the nominees I’ve read 1 (Sara’s Son) and have another on my TBR (Kristin Hardy).

I cannot for the life of me understand why Sara’s Son is in Suspense.  I was told authors select the category and while I think Sara’s Son was excellent, the judges should not have selected it as correctly classified in Suspense.

Oh well.  I’m not sure if this slate means I’m out of touch or if RWA is.

Picture of Aubrey said on...
03.26.08 at 06:12 AM |

I didn’t think Tangled Up In You and Coming Undone (Gibson and Andersen, respectively) were *that* great--a three on a scale of one to five, maybe. I am glad to see Maggie Shayne and Melissa Marr nominated. Wicked Lovely was one of the best books I read last year, and I can’t wait til I have a chance to read Ink Exchange.

Picture of Libby said on...
03.26.08 at 06:27 AM |

I’m so excited to see Wicked Lovely up there! Best of luck to you, Melissa!

Untouched by Samantha Hunter is one of the best Blazes I’ve ever read--it’s got a fun superhero theme if you’re into that. I highly recommend it, her nomination is well-deserved.

I have Untouched by Anna Campbell on my TBR, but other than that, I haven’t read any of the rest of them.

Picture of Em said on...
03.26.08 at 06:31 AM |

I’m not sure if this slate means I’m out of touch or if RWA is.

Does it matter? Either way, I think the bigger point is that the Rita has very little influence on most people’s reading choices.

I mean, really, is anyone looking at that list and thinking, “OMG! Rita books! I must go buy these right this minute, before I miss out on the best books of the year!”

Puh-leeze.

Picture of Brianna said on...
03.26.08 at 06:31 AM |

So I don’t need to be indignant that The Spymaster’s Lady isn’t listed?

Chicklet - I totally agree with you here. I just finished reading this. Annique is the best written heroine I’ve ever read. I’m reccing this book to my friend who doesn’t read romance - I know she will love it.

I really only read Regency (and some other historical periods if the synopsis grabs me). I really hope that Julia Quinn wins - Secret Diaries is one of her best yet.

Picture of SB Sarah said on...
03.26.08 at 06:32 AM |

No need to be indignant - The Spymaster’s Lady was released in Jan 2008 and is not eligible for the 2007 RITA.

However, if it is NOT on the RITA finalists for 2008, I will definitely be setting something on fire.

Not my copy of the book, though.

Picture of Leslie Dicken Leslie Dicken said on...
03.26.08 at 06:48 AM |

Dead Girls Are Easy by Terri Garey
HarperCollins Publishers, Avon Books

Gotta root for my pal. I’ve known Terri for several years and she’s been overlooked each year in the GH.  Finally she’s getting the recognition she deserved with DGAE!  I couldn’t be happier for her. This book was so much fun!

As for the rest of the list, well, I tend to tire of seeing the same names year after year.  How many RITA finals does one crave? I dunno. Guess it’s just me. I had one GH final and I was happy. (Then again, maybe I’m just cheap! LOL!)

Picture of Cathy Cathy said on...
03.26.08 at 06:50 AM |

Hmm. I have Deanna Raybourn’s book on my TBR pile. I bought it thinking it was a historical mystery, and here it is nominated for two RITAs. I must get around to reading that one.

Picture of Nora Roberts said on...
03.26.08 at 06:53 AM |

~Puh-leeze.~

You may be right--you probably are. But the award means a great deal to the majority of RWA members. It’s not a reader-to-writer award, but a writer-to-writer award.

Picture of Chicklet Chicklet said on...
03.26.08 at 07:28 AM |

Just to clarify, my comment about being unfamiliar with the vast majority of nominees this year wasn’t meant to disparage the nominees, just myself. Because I thought I was relatively knowledgeable about the genre, and y’know, obviously I’m not. ;-)

Picture of --E --E said on...
03.26.08 at 07:44 AM |

I have not been near or even in the same room as some of the books nominated for a RITA. I’ve never heard of some of them.

-->I’ll go you one better. Some of these are from my employer, from the imprint that I work on, and I don’t recognize them.

(Okay, it’s not that bad. They went directly to my staff and didn’t have any problems, so I didn’t have to do anything with them. But oi, it’s a long way from my assistant days when I knew everything about every title, right down to memorizing the ISBNs.)

Picture of kpsr. said on...
03.26.08 at 07:45 AM |

wait, Hank Phillippi Ryan the reporter in boston writes romances?
who knew?
also, i’ve read 12 of the nominated books!  (not counting the double nominated one twice)
that’s a crazy number for me. and i have a few others waiting tbr. nice.
also also, huzzah for girl at sea! that book is so much fun. go maureen johnson!

Picture of Barb Ferrer Barb Ferrer said on...
03.26.08 at 08:04 AM |

Count me among the people who are stupid giddy for Terri Garey.  I’ve watched her work her ass off for years and I was thrilled when she got her deal.  That she’s a double finalist is just thrilling to me.  Probably not as much as for her *g* but I definitely know what she must be feeling.

Picture of Darlene Marshall Darlene Marshall said on...
03.26.08 at 08:10 AM |

Congratulations to all the nominees!

Picture of Kismet said on...
03.26.08 at 09:09 AM |

Think of it along the lines of the Oscar awards.....I’ve never seen most of those movies either, but they still mean a lot to the artists. :)

Yaaaaay, for Anna Campbell and Julia Quinn!!!! no Victoria Dahl?

Picture of Ciaralira Ciaralira said on...
03.26.08 at 10:09 AM |

I’ve only read 4 of the finalists, and haven’t heard of many of the others, but I’m excited to rush out and try them. I think I’ll start a romance book club where we read through the RITA winners every year - Yum!

I want to send out a big CONGRATS to all the Seattle finalists:

Christina Dodd, Julia Quinn, Cherry Adair, Joleen Wieser, Jane Porter, and Janice Johnson

It must be something in the water…

Picture of MaryKate said on...
03.26.08 at 11:28 AM |

I’m very sorry to see neither Colleen Gleason nor CL Wilson listed.

That being said, I’ve read 14 of the books nominated, so I think that’s probably pretty good.

Congrats to all of the nominees. Is it like the Academy Awards where “It’s just an honor to be nominated?”

Picture of Victoria Dahl Victoria Dahl said on...
03.26.08 at 12:36 PM |

Big congrats, everybody!!!

And I’m so glad the YA category pulled through this year.

Picture of Lissanne said on...
03.26.08 at 01:23 PM |

I have to admit that I don’t recognise many of the nominees this year - looks like I’ll be expanding my to-read list even further.

I’m pleased to see favourites such as Julia Quinn and Lisa Kleypas nominated, but I am absolutely thrilled that Laura Lee Guhrke’s “And Then He Kissed Her” was nominated - it is one of my favourite historical romances. No, scratch that - it’s one of my favourite books, period.

Best of luck to all the nominees!

Picture of Cat Marsters Cat Marsters said on...
03.26.08 at 02:23 PM |

As for the rest of the list, well, I tend to tire of seeing the same names year after year.  How many RITA finals does one crave?

I know.  It could be any other year from the lists.  Is it still sparkly and exciting the tenth time around?  Do you still need to eat an entire Doctor Who Tardis cake if you miss out (erm, not that I did or anything).

Think of it along the lines of the Oscar awards.....I’ve never seen most of those movies either, but they still mean a lot to the artists.

But actually, I remember reading an article that compared Oscar-winning actors’ paychecks before and after their wins and nominations.  The leap was amazing, from six figures to eight in some cases.  The more wins, the higher the salaries.

Picture of Kate Kate said on...
03.26.08 at 03:57 PM |

I’ve only read one Rachel Gibson (It Must Be Love) and wasn’t partial to it, so stayed away. Did I just pick a dud? Are the better ones I should consider?

Excited to see Mine Till Midnight on there - less excited to see Sugar Daddy, which I didn’t like as much.

Picture of Rosemary Rosemary said on...
03.26.08 at 04:02 PM |

I’m delighted to see the YA category reappear, not least for the reason that there are some really superb books represented in that (and other) categories.  I went back and looked, at it had been 11 years since there had been sufficient qualifying entries for the YA category to make! 

As for the RITAs being out of touch with what readers actually read, someone up topic pointed out that this is an award for writers from writers.  It has nothing to do with sales, and probably not going to be an inducement for the average reader to buy a book.  (The same could probably be said for the Nebulas and the Edgars.)

But it’s really REALLY awesome to be recognized by your peers.

--Rosemary Clement-Moore (one of the authors you haven’t heard of. :-) )

Picture of Nora Roberts said on...
03.26.08 at 05:00 PM |

~Is it still sparkly and exciting the tenth time around?~

Speaking for myself, yes. Absolutely.

Picture of Janice Lynn Janice Lynn said on...
03.26.08 at 08:01 PM |

I’m another huge Terri Garey fan...uhm, maybe I should reword that huge. ;) I’m a fanatical Terri Garey fan and am so excited that she double finaled with Dead Girls Are Easy!  I love that book and Terri’s awesome writing voice. 

I was also disappointed not to see C.L. Wilson on the list for best first book and paranormal.  I can not imagine anyone not LOVING Lord of the Fading Lands.  Another surprise to me was that historical author Stacey Kayne’s Mustang Wild didn’t get a Rita nod.  Her fiesty heroines and yummy cowboy heroes are fabulous.  Of all the great books I read during 2007 (and there were bunches of great ones!), Terri, C.L., & Stacey definitely stood out.

I can only imagine the thrill of finaling in the Rita (maybe someday!), but as far as unpublished (and a few published) finals, my belly still does flip-flops each and every time I get that call or email and I walk on air for the rest of the day.  I truly hope that excitement never fades.

To all the finalists, congrats!!!

Picture of Lindsey Brookes Lindsey Brookes said on...
03.27.08 at 03:02 AM |

I agree that C.L. Wilson should have made the Rita nods with Lord of the Fading Lands.  That book pulls you right in and makes you want more from this author. 

Thrilled to see Terri Garey’s Dead Girls Are Easy make the Rita list.  Loved that book!

Congrats to all the 2008 GH /Rita finalists!  I’ll be adding more books to my TBR pile.

Picture of Cat Marsters Cat Marsters said on...
03.27.08 at 03:07 AM |

I’ll add to the 2008 Rita hopes for The Spymaster’s Lady.  I just finished it, and it was brilliant.  If it doesn’t at least final next year, someone wants shooting.

Picture of TrishJ said on...
03.27.08 at 05:33 AM |

La Nora, Congrats on your RITA nod!! I think it’s great you’re keeping America literate by giving the crowd more books they enjoy.

Some others mentioned CL Wilson--can’t imagine why she didnt’ make it. Such strong writings and a good SB grade deserves a final. Stacey Kayne and Tawny Weber were 2 others I expected to see. I love Stacey’s historicals and Tawny writes a hot Blaze!

Congrats to all of the finalists. I think everyone nominated deserved it--I just wish there was room for more of my favorites!

Picture of Chrissy Chrissy said on...
03.27.08 at 06:07 AM |

Me wonders where the bitches weigh in on the recent revelation that over a dozen books were disqualified because they were ebooks.

New wording, apparently, prohibits the submission of a bound/printed ebook.  There was a big threat at Romance Divas, anyway.

Everybody duck… there’s an RWA kerfluffle en route!

Picture of Chrissy Chrissy said on...
03.27.08 at 06:11 AM |

I love Hank PR but she writes books about a reporter… and…

well, the MaryJane Category Romance Award goes to…

Picture of sarah strohmeyer sarah strohmeyer said on...
03.27.08 at 07:26 AM |

Long time lurker, first time poster. Had to chime in and say that this will be my first RWA convention I’ll be going to. It took the nomination to push me over the edge...and risk my sister in law’s ire since she might be getting married (again) that weekend.

Here’s my ?. Do people really dress up? Like how much. Because, as someone who was too fat to go to be invited to her prom, I have never, ever, ever owned a long evening dress and this is my excuse. Which is the real reason I’m going since I have a fart-in-a-windstorm’s chance of winning.

So if anyone knows how dressy - could you tell me? I’d hate to, you know, overdue it.
Thanks - sorry for barging in.

Sarah (The Sleeping Beauty Proposal Sarah)

Picture of SB Sarah said on...
03.27.08 at 07:48 AM |

Hi Sleeping Beauty Sarah! I’d say, if there’s a chance you’ll be on stage accepting an award, and since you’re nominated, there is that chance, expect your fellow nominees to be dressed well. Black tie well, formal wedding well, but not business casual well. This is a dressy event. If the scale were “nice” “very Nice” “Very Nice” and “ultra formal,” the RITAs are between Very Nice and Formal, I think.

Last year I was wearing the one dress that fit me (I was 8 mos pregnant) but I saw ballgowns, formal gowns, cocktail dresses, really spiffy pants suits (Like tuxes only bad ass) and varying expressions of style that were all dressy and fab. I hope that helps you.

Picture of sarah strohmeyer sarah strohmeyer said on...
03.28.08 at 12:24 PM |

Thank you! Surely, I would have arrived dressed inappropriately. I can’t tell you how excited I am about this dressing up business. I’m 45 and feel 16.

Because at 17, of course, I learned the truth.

Picture of Christodoulos Christodoulos said on...
04.13.08 at 07:18 AM |

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: