SeeingMeNakedbyLizaPalmer

by SB Sarah Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 05:14 AM
Our Grade:
C-
Title: Seeing Me Naked
Author: Liza Palmer
Publication Info: The 5-Spot 2008, ISBN: 0446698377
Genre: Chick Lit

So much of the trade-sized books marketed towards us women deal with fellow women doing what I call “playing the FU Card.” Playing the FU card describes the moment when a woman seizes her own life with 9 fingers, lifting that all important middle finger on her dominant hand to whatever, or whomever, has been telling her she ought to do otherwise than embrace her own (dare I say it) potential. Commence sucking of marrow, and possibly other items depending on the book, and living of life. 

Seeing Me Naked is about playing the FU Card. Elisabeth Page is the daughter of a famous 60’s rebel novelist. Her mother is an effortlessly graceful WASPy hostess with kindness and best intentions everywhere, particularly when smoothing over the massive divots left by her husband in the pristine lawn of her life. Elisabeth’s brother has just published his own novel, and is trying to move out from under the shadow of his father’s success to establish his own. Elisabeth herself has chosen something far, far from writing as her own career: she’s a pastry chef. She’s landed a job at a marvelous restaurant in LA, working under a typically outlandish and demanding crazy ass of a head chef, and her world is a cycle of hot coffee, her Blackberry, cooking, dealing with her quietly dedicated assistant Samuel, and her noxiously malignant backstabbing assistant Julie. In between the daily cycles of her life, every now and again she has to make an appearance at home, which is, of course, ripe with high peaks of drama.

More,more,more!>

Comments

Picture of fiveandfour fiveandfour said on...
04.30.08 at 07:58 AM |

I read this book about a week ago.  I couldn’t figure out if I didn’t love it because I had finished Names My Sisters Call Me just before reading Naked or if it was something in the book itself that held me at a distance from Elisabeth.  To explain a little further, with Names I saw some strong (and unexpected) parallels between the three sisters and my sisters and me.  Because reading Names was at times like seeing characters do things that I could easily see happening for real in my life, it gave me a lot of food for thought and had me looking at my sisters in a new way.  When I moved on to Naked, I found I have pretty much nothing in common with Elisabeth and it made me wonder if I need to be able to identify with a character in some way to really get into their journey.

On the one hand, I don’t think I need that identification.  I mean, I’ve never been through anything remotely resembling what Rachel goes through in Rachel’s Holiday, yet I think of it as one of the finest - if not *the* finest - book I’ve read in the “chicklit” genre (though Anybody Out There? provides excellent competition for that crown).  On the other hand, seeing something of an experience I’ve lived through, or an experience someone I know has lived through, seems to move books upwards in my esteem without me even realizing it.

Having said all that, I can’t argue against anything you said, Sarah.  Though I wasn’t quite as put off by Elisabeth as you were, I can see how she could get on one’s nerves.  I don’t think of that as necessarily a bad thing, but it does make it harder to think glowy thoughts about a book when the character that’s taking you through the story bugs the crap out of you. 

And to close out my monster comment, I know this will sound like damning with false praise which is not how I intend this to sound, but I think a positive thing about this book and your review in regards to how “chicklit” is perceived - even with your C- grade - is the fact that this “conversation” is proof positive that the genre has moved on from where a lot of people think the genre lives:  in the world of ‘girl moves to the big city, loses a little weight, buys some fabulous shoes and suddenly finds life is wonderful’.

Picture of SB Sarah said on...
04.30.08 at 08:51 AM |

I think a positive thing about this book and your review in regards to how “chicklit” is perceived - even with your C- grade - is the fact that this “conversation” is proof positive that the genre has moved on from where a lot of people think the genre lives:  in the world of ‘girl moves to the big city, loses a little weight, buys some fabulous shoes and suddenly finds life is wonderful’.

I think you are absolutely positively rock-my-socks right about that. Chick Lit isn’t just shoes and weight loss any more than romance is about adverbs and rape. I think (sweeping generalizations ahoy!) that chicklit represents the fact that women “come of age” later in life, if “come of age” means assuming personal autonomy and self-actualization, and that in current society that status comes from a mix of factors, including employment, identification of goals, personal relationships, family relationships, and adult establishment of each. While some of that is so often symbolized by shoes and weight loss, they’re actually pretty hefty topics for contemporary women (no pun intended), and of course are summarily derided and dismissed as merely cosmetic.

Picture of orangehands said on...
04.30.08 at 02:52 PM |

playing the FU card

*snort* genius. and probably my favorite form of chicklit.

actually, not quite sure if i’ve ever read another form of chicklit, now that i’m thinking about it.  of course, i haven’t read much chicklit period.

Picture of Elizabeth Elizabeth said on...
05.01.08 at 02:03 AM |

Okay, so I haven’t yet read anything by Liza Palmer, but I have to say that her titles rock.

Picture of Mike Paahana said on...
05.01.08 at 08:27 PM |

i hang out naked in front of young girls an theyy act like they shame see my dick but all reely like see an touch it

Picture of Laptoper Laptoper said on...
05.01.08 at 10:33 PM |

It worth of looking :)

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: