UndeadAndUnwedbyMaryJaniceDavidson

by Candy Monday, March 21, 2005 at 07:37 PM
Our Grade:
B+
Title: Undead and Unwed
Author: MaryJanice Davidson
Publication Info: Berkley Sensation 2004, ISBN: 042519485X
Genre: Paranormal


I’ll readily admit that I live under some kind of rock. A rock liberally decorated with cat hair, bookshelves and Sealab 2021 DVDs, but a rock nonetheless. Why do I say this? Until less than a month ago, I had never heard of MaryJanice Davidson.

OK, picked yourself up from the floor yet?

See, I suffer from a mild case of kainolophobia when it comes to romance novels. Almost every hot new breakout author I’ve tried in recent years has, well, bombed for me. It got so that I just about winced every time I picked up something that had generated a lot of buzz. So I quit paying attention to buzz entirely for years and just worked steadily through my TBR stacks, pictured below.

Paperbacks galore! Hardcovers unite!

And as you can see, I still have miles to go before I sleep. The paperbacks are double-stacked so there are twice as many books as what are visible. I figured out that space-saving measure ALL BY MYSELF.

Then Sarah and I started this website. I started paying some attention to buzz again, and of course I encountered MaryJanice Davidson’s name almost right away. Then Sarah offered to mail me her copies of Undead and Unwed and Undead and Unemployed. How could I resist? (And of course, not resisting is exactly how my TBR stacks reached Death Star proportions.)

Anyway, with this author, my trepidation was unfounded. Y’all, Undead and Unwed is so much fun. It’s not really a romance novel despite being marketed as such, and it’s about as substantial as J-Lo’s love affairs, but it’s pretty damn hard to put down once you pick it up.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
11 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, D-GReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Comments

Picture of Meljean Meljean said on...
03.21.05 at 09:10 PM |

Can I just say, “Yep and Yep!”?

I read this when it came out from EC, and was thrilled when I’d heard it had been expanded for print release from Berkley, but aside from the introduction of Sinclair’s three honeys, not substantial seemed to be added (even though the word count doubled).

What I noticed more was what had been taken out: Betsy actually having sex with the cop in the beginning, kissing Tina, the more explicit scene with Sinclair and his ladies--it was all sex stuff, but it seemed to add a bit more to Betsy and her relationship with Sinclair. I realize they toned it down to make it more mainstream, and the addition of the (doomed) Sinclair-lady made Betsy a bit more sympathetic, but I still like that original version better--it felt the right size.

Picture of Nicole Nicole said on...
03.22.05 at 09:10 AM |

Oh yes.  I’m always amazed how MJD can write a character who is SO snarky, annoying and bitchy, yet I can’t stop reading.  I’ve heard that she is upping the sex in her future novels, though.  I still need to get her Secrets stuff.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
03.22.05 at 09:36 AM |

I had no idea that Undead and Unwed was reelased by EC before it was published by Berkley. And I’m disappointed that the scenes with Nick and Tina were excised, frankly. Gives me the impression she was trying to sanitize it for the masses. “Oh we CAN’T have Betsy kissing Tina! Then everyone will think she’s *gasp* A LESBIAN.”

Dangit. Is the original version still available? Because now I want to read it.

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
03.22.05 at 09:43 AM |

I disagree on two points: 1, I would have graded it higher because I love to go back and flip through to my favorite scenes (swimming pool - oh yeah!).

And 2, I think that part of Betsy’s antagonism with Sinclair comes from that overprotectiveness and “follow me, little clueless lady” attitude. While MJD doesn’t expressly say so in the book, when we meet Betsy, she’s got a job and an apartment - though she does get fired from said job - and she’s pretty independent. She doesn’t seem to have any major esteem issues and is good to her parents, has a good relationship with her mom, etc. She’s a happy, self sufficient autonomous woman.

So for her to be thrown into a situation where she’s both powerful in the literal sense and powerless in the knowledge sense-she’s the Queen but she doesn’t know the rules or particularly want all the responsibility - would be very disconcerting for her, even though she doesn’t master synaptic function to address these concepts specifically.

Then, to have a masterful, hot, and overbearing sexpot of a dude be all, “Get behind me little girl and shut up and listen to me” would just amplify feelings of inadequacy which she very likely isn’t used to having and most likely couldn’t identify.

Because, before and after death, she was young, thin, pretty, blonde, possibly also hot, clever, snippy, and wait, why do I like her again? Either way, Betsy isn’t going like like following behind anyone, much less someone she’s attracted to. So for her to be constantly antagonistic to the point of it becoming a habit makes sense.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
03.22.05 at 10:02 AM |

See, when you explain it, it makes a lot more sense. Unfortunately, Davidson didn’t nearly as good a job as you did, heh. And yes, Sinclair is definitely overbearing, but I didn’t really get so much of a “shut up and get behind me” kind of a vibe from him so much as a “Holy crap you’re a completely clueless new vampire who’s very probably our long-prophesied queen and you’re fucking some serious shit up so won’t you LISTEN once in a while so you don’t turn any more people into quivering husks of lust oh wait you’re really hot I’ll steal a kiss now thx” kind of a vibe.

And after seeing what she did to Nick and everything Tina and Sinclair had to do to fix it (especially Tina--aieeeee), I would’ve found it more convincing for Betsy to be a bit more… I dunno. Appreciative? More cognizant of how much she doesn’t know that Sinclair can show her? Plus he saves her ass--multiple times! And she reads his mind while in the pool and he does NOT sound like somebody with an ulterior motive. (I admit I swooned when he thought the bit about how she’s his queen and he’d die for her. Sigh.) He also offered to give up his harem, for her and only her. He’s giving up his major food and nookie source for her! I dunno, I find that pretty swoontastic too.

So I dunno. I can see where you’re coming from, but to me, her continued antagonism to Sinclair is still pretty unconvincing to me.

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
03.22.05 at 10:15 AM |

I can conceed the idea that she’s not properly grateful for the efforts to fix her mess - that grated on me too.

I also wonder if her previous autonomy also helps craft her inability to express gratitude (am I misremembering that she makes some sort of gesture/mention of thanks to Tina but not to Sinclair?). She doesn’t like having to rely on him or anyone and doesn’t like being directed, even when she is in a position of inferior knowledge.

Can you tell how much I like Betsy that I’m willing to forgive her a bit.

And MAJOR swoonage with those two Sinclair moments. My joints get all gooey just thinking about it. *sigh*

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
03.22.05 at 10:27 AM |

You know, that’s the thing: I don’t think Betsy is the one being the asshead, I feel that Davidson is forcing her to act this way to prolong the conflict for two or three or however many more books--if this makes any sense. My sense of what Betsy is and how she would act is clashing with the way Davidson is making her behave, you know what I mean? Which leads to my irritation. I really dig Betsy too.

Do I sound like one of those really, really creepy people who talk about fictional characters as if they’re real life people who have an independent existence outside of the books? I am, aren’t I?

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
03.22.05 at 10:38 AM |

Or one of those authors who swears her characters “tell” her what to do with them each day. I mean, I understand a personality so well developed it starts to write itself as the writer gets to know that person so intrinsically. But yeah, do you have little Betsys and little Sinclairs sitting on your shoulder saying,"No, I would SO not do that!” That could be creepy.

But I totally understand what you are saying about your impression of Betsy going against her actions. I do think she is contrary enough to get her back up at the idea of giving Sinclair an inch, but you do raise a good point about inconsistency.

Picture of Candy Candy said on...
03.22.05 at 10:48 AM |

Yeah, I agree that Betsy is the type who’d delight in flipping someone the bird and going her own way just to be ornery--I just wish Davidson had given her more convincing motivation to act that way.

I agree about the authors who talk about how their characters dictate how the book goes. The thing that drives me nuts is, 99% of these authors DON’T write character-driven books; a lot of times you can hear the plotting devices clonking and clanking and hissing away in the background, interrupting your reading experience with TSTL moments or conveniently villainous parents who start and then foster Big Misunderstandings, etc. I’m like, “If you talk the talk, then goddammit walk the walk, beeeyotch!”

Picture of Sarah Sarah said on...
03.22.05 at 11:03 AM |

Character-driven books with plotlines advanced by believable character actions are indeed oddly few and far between. However, one of the things I like about “Undead and Unwed” is that a few major things happen to Betsy, and then Betsy starts happening to those circumstances - know what I mean? She got bit and somehow she fulfills a prophecy, but she also doesn’t take all of it from a prone position. Unless said position is required for hot booty call. Which is good. Because dang that Sinclair is a hot one.

Motivation for Betsy is a difficult thing to pin down, too. I like my investigation into the origins of her personality based on existing context clues (context clues! I got way tired of them in 2nd grade but they are so useful!) but you are right that there are some holes to fill in.

Picture of cw cw said on...
03.22.05 at 10:24 PM |

I have the EC version of U&U (and the PB) but haven’t gotten around to reading the “lite” version in paperback. (And since that was the first ebook I ever bought, and there weren’t many reviews of it, that was a total leap of “F- it”!) From what I understood they excised some of the heat (and accompanying characterization) and doubled the wordcount without adding more..."meat". That sort of sucked out the fun for me, making it more comedic vampire chick lit than the comedic vampire romance I felt it was before. Which is okay, but I miss MJD’s kick-ass *romances* (as in her “Love’s Prisoner"). :D

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: