Smart Bitches Trashy Books | All of the romance, none of the bullshit.

I must say that I really, truly hate the “strong, kick-ass woman beaten into submission by the power of luuuurve” story. You know the type, the heroine is a cop, military pro, warrior, strong ballsy business woman, etc. and because of the hero’s mighty whang, she suddenly must compromise her very being and submit to his author-i-tah. I. Hate. That.

I think that is why I really, really liked Ruth Wind’s new Bombshell, Countdown. The heroine is a kickass uber-spy who literally gets into bloody, knockdown-dragout fights with the bad guys, and though the hero sympathizes with her injuries, he never once (NOT ONCE!) suggests she stay home, leave the fightin’ to him, or rest her sweet head on his manly breast-a-sis. He is following her lead quite often, and I found it so very refreshing, that I am still amped about it several weeks later.

I hate it when the back cover makes it sound like the heroine is indeed a master at her task, especially if it’s cool like a wartime spy or a master of some craft or skill - but then the book itself has her pegged as some amateur who wishes she were a master, but of course she can’t be complete in her own right without the hero, so why should she be a master of anything? Her mastery is present only through and in him.

PAH.

Secret Babies?  Hate them.  And, really, really wants to know who reads them and begs for more?  Those books clearly have an audience.  Speak up ladies and explain yourselves.

Big Misunderstanding?  Grrr.  Please do not fill up 400 pages of heroes and heroines fighting over something that could be cleared up in a conversation.

Older Couples?  Don’t hate them as much as they just make me feel icky.  If there are any out there where the author doesn’t make a big deal about how “worn in” in the heroine is, I *might* be willing to try them.

Hey Sarah, what about back covers that detail action that takes place in the first five pages of the book, so that you’re left wondering: what about the next 245 pages of this book?

UGH I hate cover copy that details the first few pages. Or worse- the absolute WORST kind of cover copy: a letter from the hero to the reader.

EW.

Well, you don’t like older couples, I don’t like the older woman, much younger man plot device. It’s the whole Ashton Kutcher/Demi Moore thing and it’s sad because I don’t mind it in the reverse. Again, therapy might help me figure these issues out!

Another plot device that I always pass on is the significant other who dies and comes back as an angel to lead the other person to love. That’s kind of wierd for me. Who would want their dead spouse to act as their dating service and watch them get their groove on. Ew. Ew. Ew.

A cover blurb that’s a letter from the hero?  That’s a stupid of epic proportions.  Please tell me whatever publishing genuis did that has now been fired.  It’s possible that’s worse than secret babies.  Actually, no it isn’t. Nothing is worse than the secret baby everyone in town somehow knows about except the clueless father who lives on the other end of town and just never happens to see his ex-girlfriend until the kid is 3 and cute as a bunny.  Yuck....

I love that I am now a standard for hate.

LOVE. IT.

The letter from the hero - I’ve seen that on a couple of books. It’s insipid. I first saw it on the last of the Catherine Coulter historicals, before she switched to writing befuddling contemporaries with frustratingly inept heroines. I saw one recently on a paranormal with a shapeshifter, something about “I have a secret. I cannot let her find out what it is.”

Oh it is so freaking stupid. Someone took the idea of reader identification with the hero a liiiiittle too far.

Beth: you have upped the standards of funny vitriol to near-unreachable heights, standards previously held by Mrs. Giggles when she encountered yet another virgin heroine.

Oh, and that letter-to-the-reader cover blurb idea? I think there’s a very, very special circle in Hell for the person(s) who thought up of that, and I think part of it involves watching a crying Tammy Faye Bakker karaoke to Petunia Clark songs over and over and over again.

Currently wearing my dunce hat with pride, but would anyone like to edit secrete to secret for me?

Can you imagine my horror when I realized that the book I’d plotted and written two chapters of could be said to have BOTH a bad-boy-returned-to-small-town and a secret baby? And here was me thinking I was breaking new ground and being original.

Oh well, at least the ‘secret baby’ isn’t a cutesy kid, and it’s not the heroine’s, either, and the whole thing is a lot darker and more complex than the average bad-boy-secret-baby category romance. Maybe no-one will ever notice…

I absolutely hate weak heroines!  A lot of romance readers have been very vocal in their dislike of the wet blanket heroine, so I’m always flabbergasted when a writer, endeavours to make her heroine as stupid and weak as possible, what’s up with that?
I also hate romance couples who spend the majority of the book fighting and insulting one another, then somehow get caught up in their torrid feelings for one another, and then proceed to live happily ever after.  I wouldn’t treat a cockroach as bad as some of these couples treat each other. I just don’t buy it.

Bron, I can like secret babies.  I already posted about it here.  I don’t really want to overstate how much I like secret babies.  There have been a number of books that didn’t fly because the explanation for the secret was too weak or overwrought, but, still, I can have fun with them.  And I may write one some day.

I’m not worried, Bron. If your babies are secret, I’m sure the reasons won’t be:
pride
stupidity
fear of child being taken by father’s rich family.
feud with father.
avoidance of another nearly-finished book.

K, waiting.....

I don’t necessarily hate secret-baby plots.  I just think they’re worn out.  Plus, the plot device usually has a very weak setup, especially in a contemporary. 

One secret-baby book that I liked was by Katherine Sutcliffe.  My Only Love?  I think that was the title.  It had more of a realistic setup because it was a historical, and there was fallout for the heroine for having a child out of wedlock.

Now, I’ll have to disagree with you on the older couples or older woman/younger man.  I really like the idea of the latter.  I’m 37 and have become more enthusiastic about reading of an older heroine than one in her very early twenties.  An age thing, I suppose.

ACK! White Raven, you are forbidden from using the words “older heroine” in the same sentence with the age 37 ever again.  It’s not my blog but still, you’re killing me. I had just convinced myself turning 37 did not require me buying a wheelchair.  Now I’m sad again.

White Raven: just to clarify, I like older women/younger men romances; I wasn’t sure from the context of the message whether you liked or disliked the idea.

And I fully acknowledge that the case of the squicks I get when I read about people over 50 gettin’ it on is purely a personal thing, one that I’ll almost definitely outgrow, and is not at all the fault of the plot or the author using it.

So, Candy...does that throbbing heart count as an animated GIF?  You know, kind of like the Spider-Man one.  :wink:

“there’s a good explanation for why the mom had to keep the baby a secret from the dad”

Wait. There is a good explanation? *thinking* The dad is a mad killer? A fancy criminal? A pimpzilla? A necrophile?

Been arrested and sent to prison for the death of another girl, and they were only 18 and it was a stupid one night stand and her parents are really oppressive and make her adopt the baby out and she’s not the heroine, anyway???

Hope that works for you, Maili ;-)

Oh, and the ‘baby’ is now almost 17, and pregnant herself. It’s not really a scret baby plot in that the heroine is not involved with the ‘baby’ other than having befriended her recently. So maybe I’ll get away with it.

And yes, Kate, I’m FTDB. I’ve scarcely touched this one for months. I just think about it when I’m driving to and from work. But the other will be finished in a week or so. Really. Probably.

Candy:  Oh, there’s no need to clarify.  I probably just didn’t express myself adequately in that post.  Sorry about that.  :blank:

The older couple romance used to squick me as well.  It was only recently that I got over it by reading some beautifully written fiction by one author didn’t dwell on the age thing too much.  Because of that, I wasn’t always reminded that the protagonists were not too much younger than my own parents.  :)

The older woman/younger man scenario also has much more appeal for me these days.  I think there’s still a societal taboo about it so that gets my attention on its own. 

Helenkay:  LOL.  You’re right.  I’ve been dwelling too much lately on my continually increasing number of gray hairs and the fact that portions of my anatomy aren’t defying gravity the way they used to.  I really should push that wheelchair back in the closet where it belongs. :)

Speaking of older women/younger men, did you see that Colin Ferrell fulfilled old ladies’ fantasies everywhere by begging 70-yr-old Dame Eileen Atkins to sleep with him? (She refused. For some reason the 42 year difference bugged her)

Kate:  For real?  LOL.  I’d love to read about that. 

A friend of mine, who is a huge Keanu Reeves fan, sent a couple of us an article that talked about a budding relationship between him and Diane Keaton.  All I can say is “Go, Diane!”

Older couples don’t squick me out, if both parties are older. I haven’t read many May-December romances with the older heroine, but the older hero, that might give me the squidgies. But if both parties are getting it on and they are older, I don’t know that it bothers me that much.