YouareviewingentriesfromAugust2005

Katrina

by Candy Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 02:59 PM

I’ve been completely self-absorbed lately. More than usual, I mean. We’re moving out in a few weeks, and I’ve been going into panic mode. And now, all of a sudden, I have decided I need to see if we can afford to buy a house.

In short: my insularity has shot up to sky-high levels. (Not to be confused with my insulin, though given how much weight I’ve put in the past few years, I probably need to worry about that, too. Crap.)

Anyway, I somehow missed the fact that a huge-ass hurricane called Katrina has wreaked holy hell along the southern coast of the US. And I found out today from Alison Kent’s blog that Larissa Ione is one of the many people who have been affected by this disaster. Please check Alison’s page for a list of ways you can help Larissa, and stay tuned for an upcoming auction on her behalf.

I’m a day late, but at least I’m not a dollar short.

Those of you who are interested in donating money for disaster relief, check out these usual suspects:

Red Cross

Mercy Corps

Catholic Charities

And don’t forget the companion animals! When disaster strikes, pets can be affected just as badly--if not worse, since most disaster shelters won’t take animals--as people. Some people who are helping out our furry/feathered/scaly/chitinous (hey, many people own arthropods as pets!) friends:

American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The Humane Society of the United States

American Humane Association

Noah’s Wish

And for any and all charity donations you might wish to make, check out how your prospective recipient disburses their revenue at Charity Navigator.

Picture of {name}
15 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Ads,Redux

by Candy Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 12:26 PM

So Sarah and I successfully broke our adserver, then successfully resurrected it. It’s working now. If not, we’re ready to kick, bludgeon and otherwise violently punish it until it behaves again.

We’ve also created a spiffy terms and conditions page. Just click on the Ads button up above. Or click on the button you see shilling our ad space off to the right. Or click on this link.

One more thing: Is the ad breaking anybody’s layout? Emma, are you still having issues with the sidebar appearing at the bottom? I’ve tested this on three different browsers (IE, Firefox and Netscape) running on Windows 2000, but more feedback would be good. Let us know of any problems in the comments.

Picture of {name}
21 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

LordsofRainbowbyVeraNazarian

by Candy Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 12:13 PM
Our Grade:
D+
Title: Lords of Rainbow
Author: Vera Nazarian
Publication Info: Betancourt & Company 2004, ISBN: 1930997884
Genre: Science Fiction/Fantasy

I started reading this book in late May.

I finally finished it last Sunday morning while sitting in my optometrist’s waiting room.

I think that pretty much says volumes about this book, but oh, I have volumes more to say about it. Shit, the book never seemed to end, so I reckon I can give y’all a taste of my pain with this review.

(Side note: Yeah, I know, it didn’t appear in the sidebar for the longest time because I’m a lazy bitch who doesn’t update the “What I’m Reading” bit very often.)

(Side side note: Vera, in spite what this review may imply, I think you’re awesome. If this review pisses you off, feel free to a) say and think very unkind things about my appalling literary tastes, and b) make extensive use of Monica Jackson’s Author Calming Visualization Aid. I’d also be the first to admit I’m a nitpicky, bitter cow with a chunk of coal in my breast instead of a heart.)

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
11 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, L-PReviews by Grade: D

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BaldwithManTitty

by SB Sarah Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 06:12 AM

Here is a fine picture of Andre Agassi sporting some fine spandex-clad man-titty.

And he’s bald.

And, some would argue, hot.

Why don’t we get men like him on romance covers?

(Thanks for the link, Hubby)

Picture of {name}
27 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

UptheHersheyHighway

by Candy Monday, August 29, 2005 at 08:47 AM

Oh yes, the love is thunderous!

Candy: Well, yes, I hear that thunder of a certain sort is a consequence of hard, vigorous Muddy Love session. And judging from the pained look on the girl’s face, the sessions have been hard and vigorous indeed.

Dude also looks like he’s holding his breath. Tant pis, man. Tant pis.

Sarah: She looks miserable, like she knows she just had bean burritos with a side order of beans, and knows that now is not the time for the backdoor lovin’. Promise of Thunder indeed. She’s a-gonna toot like there’s no tootmorrow.

Muddy Love is Swamp Love!

Candy: Oooooh! In a swamp, no less! Lots of snakes in swamps. Lots. And snakes like dark, enclosed spaces, right? I can guess where one snake is hiding right fucking now.

I mean, c’mon, LOOK AT HER FACE!

Sarah: Seriously, no doubt about what’s going on here. And at least she doesn’t look mortified like the chick in Thunderous Passage above. But ew, in the swamp? There are many, many more favorable locations in which to sample his Swamp Thing.

The magic is in… his pants!

Candy: Hey, this is the book where the dude uses cream as lubricant for the heroine’s cunny, right? Gotta love a man who knows how to use milkfat in a variety of ways. I wonder what he used for The Other Place? The chick on this cover looks sort of resigned, not pained, so that’s a good thing, right? The dude, on the other hand, looks sort of clueless, like he’s still trying to maneuver his way. “Can you feel me now? Can you feel me now?”

Sarah: This is, indeed, the book where the hero has to use cream to ease his passage. Good thing he got in the habit, because there’s more of a need now than ever for lubrication. Candy’s right, though. She looks completely at ease while he looks like he’s trying to break through her balloon knot with a case of the Melty Man.

My name is Slut-Who-Takes-It-Up-The-Ass

Candy: Judging by the looks of things, this chick’s Indian Name is “Woman-Who-Braves-Muddy-Love-Without-Astroglide.”

Sarah: It ain’t no feather, I’ll tell you that much. And where is her other hand? Guiding him into the chocolate hole? If she’s directing traffic, her name might be “I’m-Still-a-Virgin-If-We-Do-It-This-Way.”

Picture of {name}
29 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Bitches,Maaaaan.Bitches!

by SB Sarah Sunday, August 28, 2005 at 06:19 PM

You might have noticed the ad over to the right - we’re now accepting advertisements on our site. We hereby promise, however, that our ads shall:

- not be fuuuugly
- not be obtrusive
- not be hazardous to epileptics
- fit in the right sidebar
- shall not be used to heartlessly shill for money, but to cover our server costs, prizes, and overhead

Any questions about our rates (A page with details shall be appearing tomorrow) or to ask for more info? Email us at ads@smartbitchestrashybooks.com.

Picture of {name}
13 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ThreeWishesbyAmeliaElias

by SB Sarah Sunday, August 28, 2005 at 12:32 PM
Our Grade:
B-
Title: Three Wishes
Author: Amelia Elias
Publication Info: Aphrodite Unlaced 2005, ISBN:
Genre: Paranormal

Three Wishes I do not mean to imply that in some manner I penalized this work based on it’s length, but woodamn do I wish it had been longer. It’s a concise capsule of erotic romance that goes from warm to hot and stays there, and it contains the spinal core of what makes a crafty erotic romance a charged and creative read.

Lucas Drake has a genie and two problems: one, he’s used up his three wishes, and two, he’s in Lurrrrrve™ with his coworker Allyson Vaughn, who is both the daughter of his former mentor and partner, and the smart, savvy, sexy woman he wished into his life (that would be wish #2). Unfortunately for Lucas, his other two wishes were used to confirm the increased and permanent success of his business enterprise, and ensure that nothing that belongs or is intended for him well never be taken from him unless he gives consent. That last wish was crafted with such attention to detail and legalese that you’d think Lucas would have remembered to wish for Allyson’s affections.

Ooops.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
20 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, D-G

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

PartyCrashersbyStephanieBond

by SB Sarah Saturday, August 27, 2005 at 08:53 AM
Our Grade:
D+
Title: Party Crashers
Author: Stephanie Bond
Publication Info: Avon 2004, ISBN: 0060539844
Genre: Contemporary Romance


I really wanted to like this book – the premise is fabulous. Aspiring Realtor™ working in the Neiman’s shoe department hooks up with some women who crash parties just about every night, mixing and mingling with Atlanta society, eating their body weight in Beluga and scamming their way into and out of haute couture, which they purchase from Neiman’s and return the next day. But aspiring Realtor’s™ boyfriend had gone missing along with her car, and here’s this hunkhunka hot hot rich-love giving her the eye and recognizing her through her party-crashing disguises. Now she’s digging for clues to her boyfriend’s disappearance while fending off the amorous advances of hotty mc rich-hot.

The shoe department alone caught my attention, even though my feet, they are dedicated and faithful lesbians in that they will only wear comfortable shoes. But I work in Manhattan; I’ve seen some thousand-dollar shoes walk by. There is nothing like the allure of couture shoes for some women, and it’s a fascinating world, just from the ankles down. But alas, the shoes are not a character in this story.

This could have been a book about reinventing oneself, only to appreciate the way one was at the start of the story. This could have been a book about a girl who lives a very vanilla life and gets a glimpse of the wild side by crashing elite parties and starts to come out of her shell. It also could have been a mystery about a boyfriend who’s gone missing and possibly stolen the heroine’s car, leaving her to wonder about his true character, while a much more attractive candidate for her affections pledges selflessly and somewhat suspiciously to help her, even as the police start to target her as their prime suspect.

Party Crashers tried to be all of these things, but in the end, I found the heroine, Jolie, to be so almighty boring that I couldn’t root for her, or even discern any real transformation in her character.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
15 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CoronationCeremonyforJenica

by SB Sarah Friday, August 26, 2005 at 10:42 AM

Congratulations, Jenica, for correctly guessing the answer to today’s Guess That Lonely Heart - Victoria from Catherine Coulter’s Moonspun Magic.

The Smart Bitches Hereby Dub Thee:

Countess Manne-Tithy

Mini Manne-Tithy!

Picture of {name}
5 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

NamethatHeroine

by SB Sarah Friday, August 26, 2005 at 10:05 AM

S/he who giveth the name of the heroine, the name of the author, and the name of the book in most haste shall find themselves in ownership of a Smarte Bitche Title.

Help me escape - and extinguish the light, please.

Recently blossomed, though scarred, young heiress seeks stunningly handsome captain to help me escape evil guardian who seeks to, well, deflower my bloom. Must be willing to see beneath the surface and past planted suspicions, as I will certainly have to see past your superficial resemblance to evil in order to trust you. Marrying me for honor’s sake is understandable, but you must ‘fess up to the Luuuuurve™ eventually or I and your stalk will certainly wilt.

Picture of {name}
13 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Aren’tYouEmbarrassed?

by SB Sarah Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 12:09 PM

I had dinner the other night with a friend of mine who, as we were all discussing books we’d read and liked, intoned in as snide a voice as possible, “Aren’t you embarrassed to admit you read romance novels?”

“Nope.”

And honestly, one of the reasons I am over my embarrassment, which I fully admit I did have for a long time, is due to this website. I have always known that romance novel readers were a savvy lot, and that having the ability to appreciate explorations of female sexuality, emotional health and recovery from trauma, feminist rhetoric in traditional fairy tales, and the difficulty in crafting fine writing based on an established formula is nothing to be ashamed about. Especially considering the glut of romance that pours out every month - finding a well-crafted novel is a hard thing to do sometimes.

And my other friend present at that conversation, herself not a reader of romance, said that it’s just like mystery as a genre - it’s so popular there’s a lot of dreck out there.

So of course the first person made a comment about “housewives from Omaha” being hard core into their romance, making it sound as if puffy-paint women in middle-US states were the only ones who read romance.

I decided it wasn’t worth my time trying to establish any argument about why she was wrong wrong wrong, because really, I know that being smart and liking romance are not mutually exclusive, and if she thinks my choice of reading isn’t savvy and intelligent, why do I care?

But I was bothered by her derision because I spend WAY too much time on this site where everyone has such erudite, clever discussions about romance and the process of writing and reading it, so I figure everyone on the earth can appreciate romance the way we do. So to hear that old prejudice rearing it’s head? Ugh.

Then, last night, I was on the subway with an absolute crowd of romance readers. Of course the rule on the subway is, “Thou shalt not talk to the strangers,” so I couldn’t say a word, but holy hell - one chick was reading Medeiros, two people were reading Linda Howard, a third was reading Meg Cabot/Jenny Carroll, and I totally think I saw someone reading a Gabaldon, which is a big shock because those things, they are heavy. It was hard as all get out not to break the silence of the subway car and ask them how they liked their book.

So I’m still not the only one - phew! - who reads romance in public without shame. I love it when the not-so-secret society of romance readers show themselves in public - especially in a town like New York City, which at all times tries desperately to live up to its own hype. It almost makes me want to start a photo-blog of hidden candids of people reading romance. But that is waaaay too stalkish for me.

Picture of {name}
37 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

WhyEvilReviewsAreSoMuchMoreFunThanNiceReviews

by Candy Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 11:28 AM

Edit: Assume, for this article, that I’m talking in particular about well-written, entertaining reviews by people with a better-than-tenuous grasp on English and logic, and not poorly-written hack reviews, either positive or negative.

Via Paperback Writer, Cynthia Harrison quotes author and literary critic James Atlas on why we love negative reviews.

“Why is a stern critical denunciation so invigorating? It appeals, I think, to the punitive, grudging, envious impulses we generally suppress in our daily social transactions, gives expression to hostile, aggressive instincts through a sanctioned mode of discourse.”

I think the dude is reading just a bit too much into it. Oh, make no mistake, my sense of schadenfreude is very well-developed, as are my usual stand-bys, Bitchery, Hateration and pure, good-old fashioned Malice. But let’s face it, it’s not as if I suppress my punitive, grudging and otherwise eeeville impulses a whole lot. If I’m pissed at someone or think they’re a raging moron, they generally know, either because I tell them so, or I give them The Look--you know, the one that says “Wow, I didn’t know the extensive excision of so much matter from the prefrontal cortex would allow a person to walk and breathe as efficiently as you seem to.” (I think of The Look as self-defense, because before I developed it, someone would, without fail, come whining to me about the color printer being broken WITHOUT READING THE ERROR MESSAGE THAT’S DISPLAYED ON THE HUGE FUCKING LCD SCREEN. After the development of The Look, people actually come to me only when the printer is about to blow up, and not because friggin’ Tray One is out of paper.)

Ahem, where was I? So, I don’t love reading negative reviews because I can’t vent often enough. I love reading negative reviews because they’re usually funny as hell. There are few who can write a positive review and still keep it hilarious. One of them is Bam--just read her Linda Howard reviews. She almost (almost!) makes me want to pick up a Linda Howard, even the novels I’d read in the past that sent my blood pressure skyrocketing because I wanted to drown the hero and heroine in concentrated hydrochloric acid, but couldn’t, and instead I had to content myself with gnashing my teeth in the knowledge that an HEA awaited the protagonists instead of a slow and painful death. Mrs. Giggles does a pretty creditable job, too--of writing entertaining positive reviews, that is, not gnashing her teeth. I don’t know her well enough to judge her teeth-gnashing abilities.

Why are negative reviews so funny? Because comedy, my friends, is predicated on pain. Watching the crip-fight between Timmy and Jimmy on South Park is hysterically funny, even if it makes you feel dirty and wrong for laughing. Having Timmy and Jimmy set aside their differences and become friends? Not funny, even if it’s uplifting and positive and all that shit.

Think of all the jokes you know and love. The really, really good ones that make you howl with laughter. I guarantee you, almost all of them, from “Dopey fucked a penguin, Dopey fucked a penguin!” to “Did you really think I asked for a twelve-inch pianist?” are based on somebody’s pain, suffering and/or humiliation.

Even the fluffiest, most friendly and toothless Meg Ryan romantic comedies *crosses self for invoking the Name of Evil* base their humor on pain.

So in summary:

Pain = teh funney

Good things and fluffy kittens = adorable, sweet, uplifting, etc. but not really funny

And I have to admit, I like writing negative reviews better than I do positive reviews. The eeeville reviews are cathartic. The book has made me suffer through yea these many hours of horrendous prose. I can only dream of returning the favor. Positive reviews of books I really like are fun to write too; the snark is toned down considerably, but the excitement of “HolyshitthisbookisawesomeIneedtotellotherpeople NOWNOWNOW!” carries me through. The hardest reviews to write are usually the “meh” reviews--the B minuses, the Cs. Lukewarm feelings for lukewarm books tend to make for lukewarm prose.

So let’s hear it: do any of you love reading negative reviews as much as I do, even when it’s savaging a book you actually like? Why do you like it? Do you think my assertion that comedy = pain is full of shit? Have any evil, evil jokes to share? Have at it in the comments.

Edited to Add:

Here’s a perfect demonstration of what makes something funny:

This Craigslist rant? Not funny.

This reply? AWESOMELY FUNNY.

Picture of {name}
51 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ARomanceForTheAges

by Candy Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 05:33 PM

The Very Tall Husband made this banner a while back as a sig file for the Something Awful forums. Since we were talking so much about Thundercats earlier, I thought I’d share the love.

The gay inter-species love.

FEEL IT.

What's that in your pocket, Lion-O? Snarf snarf.

Picture of {name}
26 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Fromthe“WhatWereTheyThinking?”Department

by SB Sarah Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 01:10 PM

First, check out this fine piece of cover art for Rick Moody’s new book. It’s a popup, but go on, it’s worth it.

Would you look at that cover and think, ‘Oh! Yes! A satire on Hollywood’s independent film industry!”

Of course you would...not!

Noble and clever Ron Hogan forwarded us this article about how the cover is turning women off to the point where the publisher has redesigned it (warning: NY Times requires registration after the dateline of the article) to reflect more of the book’s content.

Oh, if only the same were true for most romance authors. Can you imagine - “No, you will NOT have big man-titty on my book cover!”

Picture of {name}
6 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Yourequest,wecomply

by SB Sarah Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 12:32 PM

Candy asked for dissent and commentary, and one of the requests, made by more than a few people, was for a link to comments that would display the newest comments first, as opposed to having to scrooooooll down to the bottom to see the most recent comments.

So, behold. You see below each entry a “comments” link, which displays oldest to newest as you scroll down, and a “new comments first” link, which displays new comments at the top of each window.

Enjoy! 

Picture of {name}
30 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »