







by Candy • Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 02:59 PM
I’ve been completely self-absorbed lately. More than usual, I mean. We’re moving out in a few weeks, and I’ve been going into panic mode. And now, all of a sudden, I have decided I need to see if we can afford to buy a house.
In short: my insularity has shot up to sky-high levels. (Not to be confused with my insulin, though given how much weight I’ve put in the past few years, I probably need to worry about that, too. Crap.)
Anyway, I somehow missed the fact that a huge-ass hurricane called Katrina has wreaked holy hell along the southern coast of the US. And I found out today from Alison Kent’s blog that Larissa Ione is one of the many people who have been affected by this disaster. Please check Alison’s page for a list of ways you can help Larissa, and stay tuned for an upcoming auction on her behalf.
I’m a day late, but at least I’m not a dollar short.
Those of you who are interested in donating money for disaster relief, check out these usual suspects:
Red Cross
Mercy Corps
Catholic Charities
And don’t forget the companion animals! When disaster strikes, pets can be affected just as badly--if not worse, since most disaster shelters won’t take animals--as people. Some people who are helping out our furry/feathered/scaly/chitinous (hey, many people own arthropods as pets!) friends:
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
The Humane Society of the United States
American Humane Association
Noah’s Wish
And for any and all charity donations you might wish to make, check out how your prospective recipient disburses their revenue at Charity Navigator.


by Candy • Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 12:26 PM
So Sarah and I successfully broke our adserver, then successfully resurrected it. It’s working now. If not, we’re ready to kick, bludgeon and otherwise violently punish it until it behaves again.
We’ve also created a spiffy terms and conditions page. Just click on the Ads button up above. Or click on the button you see shilling our ad space off to the right. Or click on this link.
One more thing: Is the ad breaking anybody’s layout? Emma, are you still having issues with the sidebar appearing at the bottom? I’ve tested this on three different browsers (IE, Firefox and Netscape) running on Windows 2000, but more feedback would be good. Let us know of any problems in the comments.






by Candy • Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 12:13 PM
Our Grade:
Title: Lords of Rainbow
Author: Vera Nazarian
Publication Info: Betancourt & Company 2004, ISBN: 1930997884
Genre: Science Fiction/Fantasy

I started reading this book in late May.
I finally finished it last Sunday morning while sitting in my optometrist’s waiting room.
I think that pretty much says volumes about this book, but oh, I have volumes more to say about it. Shit, the book never seemed to end, so I reckon I can give y’all a taste of my pain with this review.
(Side note: Yeah, I know, it didn’t appear in the sidebar for the longest time because I’m a lazy bitch who doesn’t update the “What I’m Reading” bit very often.)
(Side side note: Vera, in spite what this review may imply, I think you’re awesome. If this review pisses you off, feel free to a) say and think very unkind things about my appalling literary tastes, and b) make extensive use of Monica Jackson’s Author Calming Visualization Aid. I’d also be the first to admit I’m a nitpicky, bitter cow with a chunk of coal in my breast instead of a heart.)
The setting and concept are pretty cool, and not something I’ve encountered in literature before. The story takes place in an alternate reality which lacks all color. That’s right: it’s all shades of grey in this here joint. It wasn’t always like this; apparently all the color deities, the Tilirr, fled the world and took all color with them when the last king, Alliran Monteyn, was placed into Snow White-style stasis. At least, I think this was when the world lost its color—the book is long, y’all, and I fell asleep many, many, many times while reading it.
What’s interesting is that while reading the book, I kept assigning color values to the landscape and the characters without any prompting; it wasn’t until I was well into the book that I started viewing the scenes in black and white on any consistent basis. I really liked this aspect the book, mostly because I like books that mess with my head and make me re-think perceptions and expectations.
The story opens when Our Intrepid Heroine, Ranheas Ylir, stumbles upon an what seems to be an assassination attempt on some aristocrats travelling in a coach. Since she’s a mercenary who holds dual PhDs in Asskickology and Bad-Ass Mofonics, she wades into the fray and saves some nobleman (and noblewomen) ass.
The nobleman is Lord Elasand Vaeste, whose wig in the realm of bigwigs is very large indeed. Well, OK, he doesn’t wear a wig, he just has long black hair with a totally gay-ass white streak running through it, which just makes me think of bad anime hair, which then makes me think of bad anime eyes, so I ended up picturing Elasand as a character from cheesy-ass yaoi art.
Ahem. Back to the story. Anyway, there’s intrigue afoot and he’s off for some Hush-Hush Bigwig Meetings with the Regent, but since he’s all tricksy and shit, he’s using his cousin’s upcoming wedding as an excuse to go to the capital city and visit the Court. He tries to hire Ranheas because even though he’s tricksy, he’s also a dumbass and set off on the journey with no guards, just a driver whom the assassins turned into hamburger right away. Ranheas, however, blows him off. Why? ‘Cause she’s a free spirit, man. *beatnik snaps*
But their paths cross again at an inn down the road. And of course Ranheas finally signs on to be his bodyguard. And for no discernible reason at all, falls in love with Elasand.
At this point I’m smacking my head against the book, because I hatesssss it when a character falls in love for no discernible reason. I mean, literally, at this point, the chick has spoken, like, ten sentences to the guy. There are a couple of stories that manage pull off this sort of Instant Lurve without making me want to hit all the characters involved with a dead fish, but they are few and far between indeed. Most of the time, I don’t buy this sort of scenario.
When they arrive at the capital city, there’s more skullduggery ahoy, including another foiled assassination attempt and the presence of strange emissaries from Qurthe, a heretofore unknown country far to the south. The soldiers seem able to kill without touching anyone, and the leader of the emissaries, Lord Araht Vorn, is particularly menacing. Dude is Big, Bad and Black, mang. The pussy-ass Regent is in a panic, and there’s some ill-defined but vaguely ominous fuckery going on with the various Guilds in the city which is sending the His Wimpy Uselessness into a tailspin, too.
In the meanwhile, interspersed with the actual story are an excruciatingly detailed description of the city’s layout and a painful, Robert Altman-esque (I HATE ROBERT ALTMAN RAR) slice-of-life montage, as we are introduced to a dizzying array of characters who populate the city. The action isn’t slowed down so much as crunched thoroughly into a pulp and left for dead on the side of the highway. I persevered through all this deluge of words, hoping and hoping for a payoff and… nothing. Most of the characters introduced in this section of the book? You’ll get maybe a couple paragraphs about them later on. It all basically reads like a massive infodump, and I am not a big fan of infodumping unless it’s geeky science shit. Neal Stephenson gets a pass, but not many other authors do.
So yeah, the Court has been overrun with freaky-ass people who claim to be emissaries to the Lord of the Dark and the City of Twilight, invasion seems imminent, the Regent is useless, Ranheas meets the head of the Assassins’ Guild, Elassir, under intimate and embarrassing circumstances, Elasand figures out that they need to seek help from the Tilirr, Elassir, Elasand and Ranheas set off on a mini-quest, and Shit Finally Happens. Slowly, because it takes Ranheas almost a friggin’ page to move two steps since the narration is weighed down with so much descriptive prose and internal musing, but it happens. The ending, when it finally, finally arrives, is predictable—c’mon, there’s a handsome young king in stasis, and his death was associated with the loss of color in the world, so just take a guess as to what happens by the end of the book.
OK, bagging so much on the plot is kind of unfair. I’ve read and loved books in which not much at all happens, but the beauty of the prose carries it through. The Riders by Tim Winton, for example, is a quintessential example of this sort of book.
This book’s prose drove me apemonkey bonkers.
First of all, I have never seen such rampant italic abuse in a book. Every color noun is italicized, including the word “color.” This is a problem when color words are used with distressing frequency. The various noble houses have colors associated with them, for example, and the Light Guild is able to re-create monochrome colored lights. The names of the Tilirr (of which there are six, one for each color of the rainbow) are all italicized, too, as are the pronouns associated with them. The Tilirr make many, many appearances in the book, and every time they do, a regular orgy of italicized words ensues as every friggin’ variation and shade of color associated with the Tilirr shows up and jiggles its ass on the page. (No, not literally—I might’ve been able to work through this book faster if there had been more ass jigginess, but alas, that was not meant to be.)
Throw in the occasional italics used for emphasis, and I ended up reading this book with some really fucked-up diction. I elect William Shatner as the narrator for the audio book, because that’s who I heard in my head every time those damn italics showed up.
For what it’s worth, I get why the colors are italicized. I get the point, and I noticed when the italics were no longer being used. I just don’t think it was a particularly useful point to make, and its awkwardness far outweighed anything else.
And the dialogue… Egad, the dialogue. Let me give you an example of how people talk in this book:
“I feel sorry for it, Ma!” the little girl said suddenly. “Neither man nor woman—no matter how beautiful, I wouldn’t wanna be like tha’! And I’m scared, Ma! I’m scared of it!”
So that’s an example of what the unwashed masses sound like. Here’s the nobility, showing us how quick on their feet they are in a crisis:
“Master Marihke!” he spoke in a stumbling manner. “And the rest of you! Pardon me, but you must go look outside.”
“What is it?” responded Marihke.
But Ukrt’s eyes were terrified. “Look outside, Masters!” he was saying. “Come now, quickly, look outside at the sky!”
“Indeed!” said Elasand, coming out of his distracted state. “This is the reason I’ve come here in the first place. There is something unusual happening outside! Come, all of you!”
If it had been me, I would’ve trampled over Elasand and gone outside already, because woo damn, when there’s an emergency, I’m going to get my ass moving pronto instead of waiting for some aristo with bad anime hair to tell me to get my ass moving.
But then, I’m the same heathen who thinks J.R.R. Tolkien needed lessons in dialogue writing too, so take this peeve with a grain of salt.
By far the most distracting aspect of the prose was the rampant adjectivitis. I’d be the first to admit that I, too, suffer from adjectivitis, which is a subset of a larger syndrome known as Modifierosis Nervosa. But this book… Oof. Nary a noun goes unmodified. Adjectives are stacked wantonly atop one another, snuggling up against each other without so much as a comma to separate them. Check these two examples out:
In the center, a little toward the back wall, stood a raised stone altar, in the form a large simply hewn crude stone with a somewhat concave surface, round like a very shallow wide bowl.
(…) Ranhe, following him as asked, saw tears glistening in his pale lapis ancient young eyes.
These are the memorably bad ones, but I’m not kidding when I say that almost all the nouns in this book are modified, often with two or more adjectives. Really, Rebecca Brandewyne should get ahold of this book post-haste.
The book is also littered with verbal tics. The one that bugged me the most was the way so many sentences started with “For.” The “for” was largely unnecessary, and their proliferation became especially bad towards the end of the book, as if it was spawning season for them.
But I will say this much about the book: the heroine is very unusual. For one, she’s a vegetarian. Not something I’ve seen much in fiction, unless they’re bad hippie-dipshit caricatures. And for another thing, she’s allowed to be unattractive in a really unusual way. Minor spoiler: She has hair! Like, all over! Including her face! Dude, this chick needs to shave daily. Oh, and her feet stink. It takes courage and skill to create a heroine like Ranheas, and she really stood out.
Unfortunately, I found all the other characters kind of annoying or completely undeveloped. Elasand? I wanted to smack him. Elassir, the head of the Assassins’ Guild? Not quite as annoying, but I still wanted to smack him. And don’t even get me started on the other characters, like the Regent and this poet laureate who’s a minor character but who really got on my tits every time he appeared. It’s not a good sign when I end up rooting for the bad guy and fervently hoping everyone perishes in a big, bloody battle, then feel peevish when not as many of the so-called good guys died as I had hoped.
So, in summary: cool concept, and I really liked Ranheas’ asskickiness (well, aside from her inexplicable love for Elasand). The rest of the book? GAH.





11 comments •
Trackback •

Categories: Reviews by Author, L-P •
Reviews by Grade: D
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by SB Sarah • Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 06:12 AM
Here is a fine picture of Andre Agassi sporting some fine spandex-clad man-titty.
And he’s bald.
And, some would argue, hot.
Why don’t we get men like him on romance covers?
(Thanks for the link, Hubby)




by Candy • Monday, August 29, 2005 at 08:47 AM
Candy: Well, yes, I hear that thunder of a certain sort is a consequence of hard, vigorous Muddy Love session. And judging from the pained look on the girl’s face, the sessions have been hard and vigorous indeed.
Dude also looks like he’s holding his breath. Tant pis, man. Tant pis.
Sarah: She looks miserable, like she knows she just had bean burritos with a side order of beans, and knows that now is not the time for the backdoor lovin’. Promise of Thunder indeed. She’s a-gonna toot like there’s no tootmorrow.
Candy: Oooooh! In a swamp, no less! Lots of snakes in swamps. Lots. And snakes like dark, enclosed spaces, right? I can guess where one snake is hiding right fucking now.
I mean, c’mon, LOOK AT HER FACE!
Sarah: Seriously, no doubt about what’s going on here. And at least she doesn’t look mortified like the chick in Thunderous Passage above. But ew, in the swamp? There are many, many more favorable locations in which to sample his Swamp Thing.
Candy: Hey, this is the book where the dude uses cream as lubricant for the heroine’s cunny, right? Gotta love a man who knows how to use milkfat in a variety of ways. I wonder what he used for The Other Place? The chick on this cover looks sort of resigned, not pained, so that’s a good thing, right? The dude, on the other hand, looks sort of clueless, like he’s still trying to maneuver his way. “Can you feel me now? Can you feel me now?”
Sarah: This is, indeed, the book where the hero has to use cream to ease his passage. Good thing he got in the habit, because there’s more of a need now than ever for lubrication. Candy’s right, though. She looks completely at ease while he looks like he’s trying to break through her balloon knot with a case of the Melty Man.
Candy: Judging by the looks of things, this chick’s Indian Name is “Woman-Who-Braves-Muddy-Love-Without-Astroglide.”
Sarah: It ain’t no feather, I’ll tell you that much. And where is her other hand? Guiding him into the chocolate hole? If she’s directing traffic, her name might be “I’m-Still-a-Virgin-If-We-Do-It-This-Way.”



by SB Sarah • Sunday, August 28, 2005 at 06:19 PM
You might have noticed the ad over to the right - we’re now accepting advertisements on our site. We hereby promise, however, that our ads shall:
- not be fuuuugly
- not be obtrusive
- not be hazardous to epileptics
- fit in the right sidebar
- shall not be used to heartlessly shill for money, but to cover our server costs, prizes, and overhead
Any questions about our rates (A page with details shall be appearing tomorrow) or to ask for more info? Email us at ads@smartbitchestrashybooks.com.





by SB Sarah • Sunday, August 28, 2005 at 12:32 PM
Our Grade:
Title: Three Wishes
Author: Amelia Elias
Publication Info: Aphrodite Unlaced 2005, ISBN:
Genre: Paranormal
I do not mean to imply that in some manner I penalized this work based on it’s length, but woodamn do I wish it had been longer. It’s a concise capsule of erotic romance that goes from warm to hot and stays there, and it contains the spinal core of what makes a crafty erotic romance a charged and creative read.
Lucas Drake has a genie and two problems: one, he’s used up his three wishes, and two, he’s in Lurrrrrve™ with his coworker Allyson Vaughn, who is both the daughter of his former mentor and partner, and the smart, savvy, sexy woman he wished into his life (that would be wish #2). Unfortunately for Lucas, his other two wishes were used to confirm the increased and permanent success of his business enterprise, and ensure that nothing that belongs or is intended for him well never be taken from him unless he gives consent. That last wish was crafted with such attention to detail and legalese that you’d think Lucas would have remembered to wish for Allyson’s affections.
Ooops.
Allyson has decided to leave the business headquarters to direct one of their subsidiaries in Seattle, and Lucas has to figure out how to confess his feelings without losing all sense of pride, since he has no idea how Allyson feels about him.
Meanwhile, Allyson is having a hard time keeping her eyes off Lucas, and is half pushing herself out to Seattle to get away from him, and away from her feelings for him.
This short story starts out with one of my favorite romantic situations: he’s hot for her but thinks she’s not interested, and she’s hot for him but won’t risk the humiliation if he doesn’t return her interest. Moreover, they work together, so they’re around each other in daily doses, but aside from the professional interaction, neither has any clue if they’re the only one with the irmy squirmy crotches where the other is concerned.
Because the story is a quick read, I’ll only give the setup of the plot, because to go any farther would give away too much. However, I did like it, and it went way too quick for my tastes; as I mentioned, I don’t penalize the author for that, though I wish that I’d had more time to get to know the characters, find out how Lucas came into possession of that there genie, and who the other owners are who financed the purchase of its lamp. I’d also like to spend a little more time inside Allyson’s head, because most of the story is from Lucas’ perspective, as he’s the one what has the genie, the magic snake in his trousers, and those three wishes.
When Lucas and Allyson do hook up - of course they do, it’s a romance! - woo damn. But there was only one issue I had there: both of them went from possibly-unreciprocated attraction to hot n’ heavy boardroom boinking with a lot of verbal confidence. I would expect more hesitation between them for their first (very hot!) love scene, but they jumped right into the dirty talk that I would have thought would require more trust between them to allow. With an unknown person it would seem unlikely that they’d use such terms, without first establishing trust in one another. Otherwise it doesn’t sound like an emotional entanglement; it sounds and reads more like hot carnal satisfaction with no background - although it does plenty to make it clear how fiery the attraction is between them.
One word about erotic romance and terminology: do pussies have to weep? Allyson’s wept twice in twenty pages and really, I wanted to get the poor woman a Stayfree. It’s a damn shame that there are so many ways to describe an erection, but so few to describe female arousal, especially in the tropical and emotional sense.
Elias does an admirable job of setting up a story wherein the hero was smart enough to wish for his dream woman, but not smart enough to ask for her guaranteed affections. It’s obviously better that he forgot, since any possible feelings on her part are due to her own attraction, not due to magical influence. The only magic at work around her was his third wish, which would not let her leave him unless he let her go.
Clearly she is meant for him, but aside from the choices of her own behavior, she’s not getting out of his sphere until he lets her go. So not only does Lucas have to own up to his own mistakes in his wishes, but he has to put on his big-boy pants (or, put them back on after tossing them on the floor) and earn his happy ending. And Lucas does so in an admirable, original way that allows Elias to guarantee for the reader that Lucas and Allyson’s HEA is due to their own decisions, and not to external influence, which in turn creates an emotionally and sexually satisfying romance in a convenient snack-sized portion.










by SB Sarah • Saturday, August 27, 2005 at 08:53 AM
Our Grade:
Title: Party Crashers
Author: Stephanie Bond
Publication Info: Avon 2004, ISBN: 0060539844
Genre: Contemporary Romance

I really wanted to like this book – the premise is fabulous. Aspiring Realtor™ working in the Neiman’s shoe department hooks up with some women who crash parties just about every night, mixing and mingling with Atlanta society, eating their body weight in Beluga and scamming their way into and out of haute couture, which they purchase from Neiman’s and return the next day. But aspiring Realtor’s™ boyfriend had gone missing along with her car, and here’s this hunkhunka hot hot rich-love giving her the eye and recognizing her through her party-crashing disguises. Now she’s digging for clues to her boyfriend’s disappearance while fending off the amorous advances of hotty mc rich-hot.
The shoe department alone caught my attention, even though my feet, they are dedicated and faithful lesbians in that they will only wear comfortable shoes. But I work in Manhattan; I’ve seen some thousand-dollar shoes walk by. There is nothing like the allure of couture shoes for some women, and it’s a fascinating world, just from the ankles down. But alas, the shoes are not a character in this story.
This could have been a book about reinventing oneself, only to appreciate the way one was at the start of the story. This could have been a book about a girl who lives a very vanilla life and gets a glimpse of the wild side by crashing elite parties and starts to come out of her shell. It also could have been a mystery about a boyfriend who’s gone missing and possibly stolen the heroine’s car, leaving her to wonder about his true character, while a much more attractive candidate for her affections pledges selflessly and somewhat suspiciously to help her, even as the police start to target her as their prime suspect.
Party Crashers tried to be all of these things, but in the end, I found the heroine, Jolie, to be so almighty boring that I couldn’t root for her, or even discern any real transformation in her character.
Jolie starts out a poor mouse of a woman: she just got fired from her job at a real estate agency and is working the holiday season at Neiman Marcus’ shoe department as she tries to set up her own brokerage. Her boyfriend had disappeared, as has her car – a coincidence that the police put together and presented as a possible theft on the part of said runaway boyfriend – and she’s a brittle, unhappy mess at the start of her story. She ends up spending the first day of her new job waiting on her superficial and possibly dishonest old boss, and running into a multibillionaire with a stack of shoeboxes as she heads for the storeroom. The old boss is predictably horrid, but the multibillionaire is struck by Jolie’s… well, I’m not sure what strikes him about Jolie in the first place. Maybe one of those Manolo’s was a really heavy mofo and smacked him into an altered reality.
Because Jolie, she is alternately insipid, clueless, willfull and then terrified, and utterly, utterly gullible. It’s hard to identify with or cheer for a character who decides to find out what happened to dear old boyfriend but then scares the crap out of herself at every turn, yet does little to figure out how to protect herself better.
So much happens to this woman, and she reacts with such terror much of the time that you wonder why she doesn’t crumple up in the middle of the action. I was so fascinated by the setting and the premise that I kept waiting for Jolie to come busting out of that plain-Jane shell and start kicking ass, but no. She remains as she is described on page 18:
[The mall was] a far cry from her own sheltered upbringing. She had been an only child, a change-of-life baby, and her frugal parents had harbored rather old-fashioned notions of child-rearing. But even if she hadn’t worn the most fashionable clothes or obtained her driver’s license until she was 18, she could thank her parents for loving her and for giving her a good value system. (Bond 18)
What…? Huh? Oh, sorry. I fell asleep transcribing the wonder that is Jolie. Bond hammers the point home with multiple references to the mess Jolie is in and how little she fits in that mess, such as: “How had she, a normal, hardworking good girl become enmeshed in a murder investigation?” (Bond 82) She’s a walking virtue, this Jolie.
Then comes her introduction to Carlotta, a sales woman in Neiman’s couture section. Carlotta is a full-time employee who has cultivated the attitude to keep the customers with intentions to buy involved in securing her attention, while scaring away the ones who are just browsing well out of their price range. Bond goes out of her way to make Jolie unassuming, quiet, and pure-heartedly friendly; why would someone as sophisticated as Carlotta be her friend? Carlotta is savvy, outgoing, clever, a seasoned makeup and wig artist, and she has perfected the art of party crashing. From printing up duplicate tickets to exclusive events to making sure she carries store-bought drink tickets to events that would otherwise require her to purchase them, Carlotta makes her way through Atlanta’s nightlife putting on a show, and hobnobbing with the rich and elite just for fun.
What’s odd about Carlotta is that she’s actually one of them – she’s from old money, though the reason for her pulling the wool over the eyes of people within her social stratus is beyond me, and beyond Jolie. It’s never really addressed, except in Jolie’s expansive ruminations.
My first thought upon reading Carlotta’s introduction into the story was that she was the villain, because I could think of no reason why someone as stylish and cultured as she would befriend someone like Jolie so instantly. But Carlotta does, and brings Jolie along under vague pretenses to a party at the High Museum, and gate crashes her way in with Jolie standing open-mouthed beside her. Eventually Jolie relaxes and has fun, but afterward she’s not really able to talk about the experience to her friend Leann because “[s]he didn’t want to admit she’d been bamboozled into being bad.” (Bond 86)
The party crashing becomes the crux of Jolie’s moral dilemma, and she spends more time agonizing over that than she does over her decisions whether to tell the police about her suspicions regarding the missing boyfriend. Carlotta purchases couture formal wear and shoes for them from their respective departments, and teaches Jolie secrets as to how to return it all in pristine condition so they get a full refund. How Neiman’s doesn’t catch on to he high number of employee purchases and returns on their accounts is beyond me. Jolie has a horrible time managing her guilt over the swindling of this multibillion dollar department store, and makes occasional comments about how their behavior isn’t “right.” This bugged the ever living shit out of me because there were so many larger issues at hand, from missing, possibly dead boyfriend, to his car being fished out of the river with a dead chick in it, to finding herself in potential danger from either the boyfriend or someone else, and she’s fixated on whether her moral values can handle Carlotta’s purchase of some Manolo’s for the Museum party when she has every intention of returning them. It’s like watching a church burning down and wondering if using the holy water to put out some of the blaze would be a mortal or a venal sin.
Meanwhile, all the party crashing has brought Jolie into contact with some very interesting people, beginning with Carlotta, and expanding to include former business associates of her missing boyfriend, and the very eligible bachelor, Beck, who not only remembers her from being pummeled with a cascade of shoeboxes at Neiman’s while shopping with his sister, but recognizes her through a variety of disguises. Beck starts attending a lot of social events to catch sight of Jolie, though his fascination with her is really never adequately explained, even by Beck himself. He makes several attempts to do so, and each one comes out false and wooden, as if he’s saying the right words at the right moment so Jolie (or I, the reader) will believe his truehearted intentions.
For a romance, which I don’t know that this book really was, there was a complete lack of character development for the hero. Beck was as one-dimensional as many of the supporting characters. He was rich, his father owned a media empire, he was protective of his sister and he called in favors to keep Jolie’s increasing scandal out of the media as much as possible. Ok, great traits, but what about Jolie? He repeatedly tried to help her when she looked alarmed and close to tears about something, and he recognized her when even people who knew her well, such as her former boss, were fooled. When things got particularly hairy, he bailed her out by calling in more favors. He was a regular white knight in beat-up flipflops, with an altruistic heart and a bank account to make one swoon.
He’s hot. He’s rich. He’s disillusioned with the pretense of wealth. He thinks it’s hilarious that she crashes parties he’d rather not have to go to. He’s hot – and rich, did I mention? And he has about three or four modes, like those faces you can hang on your cubicle wall to tell the office, which is made up of people who don’t give a crap anyway, how you are feeling today. Beck is compassionate and concerned. Beck is horny. Beck is using his influence to help you. Beck is ardent.
The man had the emotional depth of an eggshell. He certainly didn’t make me swoon. I was curious how he had that effect on Jolie, because I found his instant concern for her, and the extremes that he went to protect her immediately after meeting her, a little conspicuous. He did take any emotional risks to be with her, and didn’t change or grow, except he bought more shoes as an excuse to see her again. But he wasn’t a hero equal to the heroine; he was a convenient hero. He was hot, he was rich, he was charming, and he was there.
However, I don’t envy Bond the task she set up for herself in this book. It’s not easy to write about a heroine who needs to be involved enough with the missing boyfriend to care about where he is, and yet have enough reservations about that relationship that she won’t beat herself with the Prada shoes when she realizes she has the hots for the new man in her life. She has to care enough to keep looking, but not care so much that she turns down Mr. Hotty McMeanttoBe.
It was almost at times as if she was searching for her brother, only with a lot less personal angst. Just as I never understood what was so interesting about Beck, I never understood what she saw in Gary, the missing dude. It had to be hard to balance Jolie’s affection for and desire to find out what happened to her boyfriend, while at the same time introducing a more appropriate love interest in her life. Gary was a big part of the mystery. Was he bad? Was he not so bad but mixed up with bad people? How did he end up with these people in the first place? And did he care about Jolie or was he using her? Was he kidnapped by aliens? Did he run off in a pair of high-heeled Via Spigas and wear his feet down to stubby ankle bones with the pain of it? How do women walk in those shoes, anyway?
There are a lot of dropped storylines, or false leads that didn’t add to the plot so much as confuse me as to why they were never developed. For example, Carlotta’s brother is mentioned at least a dozen times as the source of her party-crashing equipment, but the reader never meets him. Carlotta also has some problems of her own that are neatly tied up at the end, without ever showing any true angst on Carlotta’s part to indicate how severe or how superficial these problems were.
But by far the one part of this book that made me drop a whole letter grade was the sex scene. This was the most antiseptic sex scene ever. It was almost as if Beck turned to her with a gleam in his eye and a woody in his pants and said, “Female, do you wish to have sex relations?”
This was the essence of life: a magnificent man, and hormones run amok…. Determined to be more participatory than a hat, Jolie returned the favor with equal consideration, then after a few mental calculations regarding expansion, contraction, and overage, she straddled him in what proved to be a gradual yet successful maneuver.
I’m not sure what the goal was here, perhaps an allusion to her real estate career, but this was the height of the many, many times in the last 100 pages I asked, silently, “Are you kidding me?” Overage? It’s humpity humpy hump, not calculus.
By the time I finished reading this book – and it was a fast-paced read that took me about 2 days to and from NYC – I had folded the corner of so many pages of questionable plot twists, bizarre character development, and kooky dialogue that the book looked like it had shark teeth when I fanned it open.
I really wanted to like this book, because the idea of crashing elite parties and mixing with the guests just for the hell of it seemed so outlandish and fun – and the possibilities for romantic suspense in a setup where the main character is dressing up in couture shoes and fashions to sneak into these events are just endless. But a boring heroine, a facetless hero, and a few too many dropped storylines with herrings that weren’t so much red as they were grey, made the resolution to that adventurous start conclude in a bland and tasteless fashion.









by SB Sarah • Friday, August 26, 2005 at 10:42 AM
Congratulations, Jenica, for correctly guessing the answer to today’s Guess That Lonely Heart - Victoria from Catherine Coulter’s Moonspun Magic.
The Smart Bitches Hereby Dub Thee:



by SB Sarah • Friday, August 26, 2005 at 10:05 AM
S/he who giveth the name of the heroine, the name of the author, and the name of the book in most haste shall find themselves in ownership of a Smarte Bitche Title.
Help me escape - and extinguish the light, please.
Recently blossomed, though scarred, young heiress seeks stunningly handsome captain to help me escape evil guardian who seeks to, well, deflower my bloom. Must be willing to see beneath the surface and past planted suspicions, as I will certainly have to see past your superficial resemblance to evil in order to trust you. Marrying me for honor’s sake is understandable, but you must ‘fess up to the Luuuuurve™ eventually or I and your stalk will certainly wilt.



by SB Sarah • Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 12:09 PM
I had dinner the other night with a friend of mine who, as we were all discussing books we’d read and liked, intoned in as snide a voice as possible, “Aren’t you embarrassed to admit you read romance novels?”
“Nope.”
And honestly, one of the reasons I am over my embarrassment, which I fully admit I did have for a long time, is due to this website. I have always known that romance novel readers were a savvy lot, and that having the ability to appreciate explorations of female sexuality, emotional health and recovery from trauma, feminist rhetoric in traditional fairy tales, and the difficulty in crafting fine writing based on an established formula is nothing to be ashamed about. Especially considering the glut of romance that pours out every month - finding a well-crafted novel is a hard thing to do sometimes.
And my other friend present at that conversation, herself not a reader of romance, said that it’s just like mystery as a genre - it’s so popular there’s a lot of dreck out there.
So of course the first person made a comment about “housewives from Omaha” being hard core into their romance, making it sound as if puffy-paint women in middle-US states were the only ones who read romance.
I decided it wasn’t worth my time trying to establish any argument about why she was wrong wrong wrong, because really, I know that being smart and liking romance are not mutually exclusive, and if she thinks my choice of reading isn’t savvy and intelligent, why do I care?
But I was bothered by her derision because I spend WAY too much time on this site where everyone has such erudite, clever discussions about romance and the process of writing and reading it, so I figure everyone on the earth can appreciate romance the way we do. So to hear that old prejudice rearing it’s head? Ugh.
Then, last night, I was on the subway with an absolute crowd of romance readers. Of course the rule on the subway is, “Thou shalt not talk to the strangers,” so I couldn’t say a word, but holy hell - one chick was reading Medeiros, two people were reading Linda Howard, a third was reading Meg Cabot/Jenny Carroll, and I totally think I saw someone reading a Gabaldon, which is a big shock because those things, they are heavy. It was hard as all get out not to break the silence of the subway car and ask them how they liked their book.
So I’m still not the only one - phew! - who reads romance in public without shame. I love it when the not-so-secret society of romance readers show themselves in public - especially in a town like New York City, which at all times tries desperately to live up to its own hype. It almost makes me want to start a photo-blog of hidden candids of people reading romance. But that is waaaay too stalkish for me.











by Candy • Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 11:28 AM
Edit: Assume, for this article, that I’m talking in particular about well-written, entertaining reviews by people with a better-than-tenuous grasp on English and logic, and not poorly-written hack reviews, either positive or negative.
Via Paperback Writer, Cynthia Harrison quotes author and literary critic James Atlas on why we love negative reviews.
“Why is a stern critical denunciation so invigorating? It appeals, I think, to the punitive, grudging, envious impulses we generally suppress in our daily social transactions, gives expression to hostile, aggressive instincts through a sanctioned mode of discourse.”
I think the dude is reading just a bit too much into it. Oh, make no mistake, my sense of schadenfreude is very well-developed, as are my usual stand-bys, Bitchery, Hateration and pure, good-old fashioned Malice. But let’s face it, it’s not as if I suppress my punitive, grudging and otherwise eeeville impulses a whole lot. If I’m pissed at someone or think they’re a raging moron, they generally know, either because I tell them so, or I give them The Look--you know, the one that says “Wow, I didn’t know the extensive excision of so much matter from the prefrontal cortex would allow a person to walk and breathe as efficiently as you seem to.” (I think of The Look as self-defense, because before I developed it, someone would, without fail, come whining to me about the color printer being broken WITHOUT READING THE ERROR MESSAGE THAT’S DISPLAYED ON THE HUGE FUCKING LCD SCREEN. After the development of The Look, people actually come to me only when the printer is about to blow up, and not because friggin’ Tray One is out of paper.)
Ahem, where was I? So, I don’t love reading negative reviews because I can’t vent often enough. I love reading negative reviews because they’re usually funny as hell. There are few who can write a positive review and still keep it hilarious. One of them is Bam--just read her Linda Howard reviews. She almost (almost!) makes me want to pick up a Linda Howard, even the novels I’d read in the past that sent my blood pressure skyrocketing because I wanted to drown the hero and heroine in concentrated hydrochloric acid, but couldn’t, and instead I had to content myself with gnashing my teeth in the knowledge that an HEA awaited the protagonists instead of a slow and painful death. Mrs. Giggles does a pretty creditable job, too--of writing entertaining positive reviews, that is, not gnashing her teeth. I don’t know her well enough to judge her teeth-gnashing abilities.
Why are negative reviews so funny? Because comedy, my friends, is predicated on pain. Watching the crip-fight between Timmy and Jimmy on South Park is hysterically funny, even if it makes you feel dirty and wrong for laughing. Having Timmy and Jimmy set aside their differences and become friends? Not funny, even if it’s uplifting and positive and all that shit.
Think of all the jokes you know and love. The really, really good ones that make you howl with laughter. I guarantee you, almost all of them, from “Dopey fucked a penguin, Dopey fucked a penguin!” to “Did you really think I asked for a twelve-inch pianist?” are based on somebody’s pain, suffering and/or humiliation.
Even the fluffiest, most friendly and toothless Meg Ryan romantic comedies *crosses self for invoking the Name of Evil* base their humor on pain.
So in summary:
Pain = teh funney
Good things and fluffy kittens = adorable, sweet, uplifting, etc. but not really funny
And I have to admit, I like writing negative reviews better than I do positive reviews. The eeeville reviews are cathartic. The book has made me suffer through yea these many hours of horrendous prose. I can only dream of returning the favor. Positive reviews of books I really like are fun to write too; the snark is toned down considerably, but the excitement of “HolyshitthisbookisawesomeIneedtotellotherpeople NOWNOWNOW!” carries me through. The hardest reviews to write are usually the “meh” reviews--the B minuses, the Cs. Lukewarm feelings for lukewarm books tend to make for lukewarm prose.
So let’s hear it: do any of you love reading negative reviews as much as I do, even when it’s savaging a book you actually like? Why do you like it? Do you think my assertion that comedy = pain is full of shit? Have any evil, evil jokes to share? Have at it in the comments.
Edited to Add:
Here’s a perfect demonstration of what makes something funny:
This Craigslist rant? Not funny.
This reply? AWESOMELY FUNNY.





by Candy • Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 05:33 PM
The Very Tall Husband made this banner a while back as a sig file for the Something Awful forums. Since we were talking so much about Thundercats earlier, I thought I’d share the love.
The gay inter-species love.
FEEL IT.







by SB Sarah • Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 01:10 PM
First, check out this fine piece of cover art for Rick Moody’s new book. It’s a popup, but go on, it’s worth it.
Would you look at that cover and think, ‘Oh! Yes! A satire on Hollywood’s independent film industry!”
Of course you would...not!
Noble and clever Ron Hogan forwarded us this article about how the cover is turning women off to the point where the publisher has redesigned it (warning: NY Times requires registration after the dateline of the article) to reflect more of the book’s content.
Oh, if only the same were true for most romance authors. Can you imagine - “No, you will NOT have big man-titty on my book cover!”




by SB Sarah • Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 12:32 PM
Candy asked for dissent and commentary, and one of the requests, made by more than a few people, was for a link to comments that would display the newest comments first, as opposed to having to scrooooooll down to the bottom to see the most recent comments.
So, behold. You see below each entry a “comments” link, which displays oldest to newest as you scroll down, and a “new comments first” link, which displays new comments at the top of each window.
Enjoy!