YouareviewingentriesfromDecember2005

GeraniumPrizeBastionforSheri

by SB Sarah Friday, December 30, 2005 at 06:23 AM

Ooops! Forgot Sheri’s Fabulous Prize - le Smart Bitche Title™!

Congratulations to Sheri and her fine werecod!

Picture of {name}
3 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SpamandCoverCopy-theWinner!

by SB Sarah Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 08:19 PM

All right, I’m a day late and definitely short (although I think I may be taller than Candy) but I do have teh winnehr of our Spam and Cover Copy contest - we had a great number of votes so my thanks to everyone who escaped the quiet days of work or the frenzy of a houseful of guests to read our entries.

And the winner of the Spam and Cover Copy contest is: Shari, for Entry #7, aka “the Werecod” entry. Y’all can’t resist the fishy desire of werecod Luuuuuuurve™. As one of our voters said, “All I have to do is picture the word “werecod” and I’m giggling like an idiot.” Indeed - I read that one aloud to Hubby and he almost broke something laughing.

Our runners up, because it is always nice to know what your responsibilities may be if the werecod cannot complete its term for whatever reasons, were Entry #13, for crank calls about Brad Pitt’s wienie in the form of a cover copy letter from the heroine, Entry #12’s Sofia and the Marquis de Sade time traveling to hedonism, and Entry #3 with tranny demon luuuuurve™.

So congrats to Shari, and see you in 2006 with more Smart Bitch Contests!

Picture of {name}
4 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesGo Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

OnthefifthnightofHanukkah,orthefourthdayofChristmas,theinternetgavetome…

by SB Sarah Thursday, December 29, 2005 at 07:01 PM

Here at Smart Bitch headquarters, we are and have been thrilled and bemused by the success of this here website. We love doing this site as much as we like reading romance and discovering new authors, and we luuuuurve™ the Bitchery community of smart people who read and comment on our site.

So, we’ve made two donations in honor of our readership as our gift to you this holiday season. Whichever holiday you celebrate, or even if you don’t celebrate at all, we are most grateful for you and to you for making this site a success.

Reading is Fundamental focuses on children’s literacy in the US, through several programs including its flagship initiative, the National Book Program. This program fosters literacy and interest in reading through motivational activities, family involvement, and book ownership for children. And as we all know, book ownership is among life’s greatest joys.

The second organization that received a donation in honor of our readership is the National Braille Press, a not-for-profit braille printer and publisher that focuses on life skills education for blind individuals, and in producing braille texts for children and adults, so that the blind can experience the joy of reading as well.

And also, braille is like a page printed with hundreds of thousands of tiny man-titties.

Happy holidays everyone, and from the heart of our bottoms, thank you very much for making Smart Bitches, Trashy Books what it is today. 

Picture of {name}
6 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BitcherySurvey

by SB Sarah Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 07:44 PM

Happy holidays and happy almost-new-year, folks! Candy and I are going to be away at separate times so you’ll get our answers at different times, but I’m looking for your replies to our year-end survey. I don’t care who had the most brutal celebrity break-up or who was best or worst dressed.

2005 will certainly be remembered for a variety of reasons, not the least of which as the year of the birth of this here web site, and the year in which my awareness of good romance authors expanded to include some great writers, both current and backlist.

But what are your memorable books and reads of the year? Let’s hear it:

Best author you discovered this year (Ok, you can name up to 3)

Best new book you read this year (again, top 3)

Book you wish you’d skipped over and spent that $9 on a pair of Payless shoes instead.

Book off your keeper shelf most likely to be read in 2006

What book coming out in 2006 are you most looking forward to? (Feel free to -gasp!- pimp your own, but please don’t link as the HTML often wonks the comments)

Best cover?

Worst Cover?

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
28 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

MerryCoverSnark,fromtheSmartBitches

by SB Sarah Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 08:53 AM

Sarah:Isn’t she a little, um, small? For his Night Stalker? Unless she uses those little arms to pull out his most recent kidney stone. Merry Christmas! It’s a calcification in your urethra!

Candy: What the fuck, people? Look, if the sexes had been reversed, that pixie thing would’ve made a barely satisfactory dildo. How in the hell is the nookifying supposed to work in this case? He diddles her with a lubricated Q-tip? She swims up his ass and tickles his prostate? Inquiring minds want to know.

Wait, scratch that, they DON’T.

Sarah:Ah, yet another reason to be glad I converted to Judaism six years ago. I don’t ever have to worry that one day, I’ll wake up, and Thor the Vacant-Eyed Cookie Thief will be lounging in his altogether under my tree.

I don’t think Thor needs a cookie that big, either.

Candy: Man, if I found that under my Christmas tree, I’d run for a shotgun. Not that I own a shotgun, but the thought of something like that lurking in my house is making me itch to buy one.

Sarah:Merry Christmas! There’s a teeny little dead guy perched by his man titties, dangling in your sock.

Candy: Nothing says “CHRISTMAS SPIRIT” like miniature corpses and midget necrophilia.

Picture of {name}
11 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HaveaBitchin’HolidaySeason!

by Candy Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 01:34 PM

Oh yes, you heard me--HAPPY HOLIDAYS, and a very happy New Year. I say that not because I’m PC (in case there was EVER any confusion that I do or don’t do things because of political correctness *snort*), but because I’m fuckin’ lazy. The other option was Kwanmasolstikah. I’m a godless heathen, but I really enjoy this season because any holiday that provides excuses for me to buy presents for my loved ones, receive gifts in return and eat myself into a stupor gets a thumbs-up from me.

This year, I’ll be spending the holidays in St. Croix with my bestest friend, Jen, who lives there on an organic farm. The plane leaves at 11:50 tonight, and I’m still not packed, yeee-haw. I like to live on the edge. I have a few things set to post while I’m away, but I won’t be able to respond to e-mail or comments for the next little while--they don’t have cellphone reception at the part of the island where I’m going to be, much less the Internets. 10 days without Interwebbing. Egad, I may very well collapse in a shivering pile of withdrawal. But know that I love all of you--yes, in dirty and unspeakable ways, even--and that I’ll miss this crazy site and obsessively checking for new comments.

See you next year!

Picture of {name}
9 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ALittleBehind

by Candy Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 02:34 PM

I’m in a playful mood today, and I realize that one of the few topics we haven’t covered exhaustively yet is anal sex. I mean, we’ve already gone on and on about pornographic spam haiku, chick lit vs. romance, rape in romance and monogamy vs. polyamory, and God knows we love our buttpirate jokes, but we’ve never actually covered the topic in and of itself.

I think the first anal sex scene I read in a romance was in something by Robin Schone. Was it The Lady’s Tutor or something else? Anyway, anal sex is currently in the realm of what I think of as “vanilla kink.” It’s not exactly standard sexual practice in Romancelandia yet, so there’s definitely a sort of charge to including it in a mainstream novel, like you’re breaching a taboo--something that’s definitely not present in, say, oral sex scenes in romances. On the other hand, it’s not too terribly exotic, like, say, furry fetishes or whatever.

In erotic romances--the relatively few I’ve read, anyway--anal sex seems to be de rigueur, and I’m wondering how long before it’s going to leak into most, if nor all mainstream romances. Anal sex: it’s the new oral!

I know that for many people, anal sex is definitely the line at which a lot of Squick Barriers are drawn. Personally, The only person who’s written anal sex scenes I can stomach is Emma Holly. I also readily admit to being more inclined to find guy on guy buttsecks sexy than guy on girl. It’s the prostate thing.

My view of anal sex scenes has also changed quite a bit over the years. My original take on it: GROSS. Now, however, I’ve discovered that as with anything else, the skill of the author makes or breaks it.

What do you guys think? Anal sex, yea or nay--and why?

Picture of {name}
32 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SpamandCoverCopy:ASmartBitchcontest-TheEntries

by SB Sarah Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 09:59 AM

Avast aardvark receiver photograph!

The entries for the Spam and Cover Copy Contest are ready for your voting. Please email your vote to both and by Wednesday, December 28 - we assume that you will be busy celebrating all the holidays at once, so we’ll give you extra time to read and giggle.

To refresh your memory: entries are to either include or be clearly inspired by one of the Spam Subject Lines in our list. The list is:

Smell some telepathic pouch
go buy charter worker
be talk of shining daemon
bi murphy crucifixion
Brad Pitt always had one
dewdrop on nanette breed
sofia in hedonism
get laid tonight mountaineer
Glen Mcintyre pilate
Get Slotoole on skulk
in fall hes codling
morgue oubilette
look rich pancake
thinking is sewage
savage be abstinent on damnation

And now… on to the entries!

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
Commenting is disabled, kids. Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesGo Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Snipsnip!

by Candy Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 09:32 AM

Susan Gable broke this story on Booksquare yesterday: Harlequin is trimming down the word counts for the longer series romance lines by about 10,000 words. For example, SuperRomances used to run about 80,000-85,000 words, but now they’re looking for books that contain about 70,000-75,000.

Their explanation? The fonts and margins are too small, which makes the books too hard to read. So OF COURSE the story has to be trimmed down! Forget increasing the number of pages by utilizing a comfortable font size and adequate margins while maintaining the same word count.

Obviously, the consumer’s needs were priority number 1 here. Because shorter stories for an already notoriously short format is the way to go.

But, as always, I welcome any and all scuttlebutt on this issue, especially if I’m mis-reading things or have mis-represented the case. Anyone got anything? Bang away in the comments.

Picture of {name}
35 comments3 trackbacks Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: NewsRanty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CoverSnark:CelebrityHurt-A-Thon

by SB Sarah Monday, December 19, 2005 at 08:17 AM

It’s probably a good idea to drop these “below the fold” so to speak, as some of them are, well, no, they’re all pretty damn egregious, just in different ways.

This week: another set of cover art figures that kinda resemble celebrities.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
20 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Don’tForgetSwamiCardinalHouseplant!

by SB Sarah Monday, December 19, 2005 at 08:06 AM

You have until Wednesday to enter our latest Smart Bitch Contest: Spam and Cover Copy! We haven’t had a ton of entries so if you’ve got a feeling of creativity, enter and reward frankie night synthesizer!

Seriously - send your entries to and . Remember - you don’t have to include ALL the spam subject lines, in case that wasn’t clear. Get funky creative but don’t be overwhelmed. 

Picture of {name}
1 commentTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesGo Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CoronationCeremonyforFranziska

by Candy Friday, December 16, 2005 at 09:28 PM

Franziska rules. Well, all our readers rule--in fact, if I may say so, our readers are teh awesome. But Franziska is a special flavor of ruling-ness today because she correctly guessed the answer for today’s personal ad contest.

So please bend over kneel, Franziska, and receive your title, for thou art now styled:

Picture of {name}
4 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ThisWeek’sPersonalAdContest:SerialKillers=HOTTTTTTTTT

by Candy Friday, December 16, 2005 at 02:13 PM

You should know by now. And if you don’t, you’ll figure out it out fast enough:

Title of book + Author + Hero’s Name (no hero’s name, no prize) = A prize consisting of a title of much awesomeness and dubious taste from us Smarty Bitchypoos.

Ready? Here it comes:

Widowed white male, accused serial murderer (how do you think I became a widower, eh?), looking for shy, neurotic daughter of a dead true crime fiction author to seducerate. C’mon, baby--the sex is always better when you do it with someone who may or may not have slaughtered his pregnant wife and kids.

Picture of {name}
10 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SpamandCoverCopy: ASmartBitchcontest!

by SB Sarah Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 11:37 AM

If you’re like me, you’ve noticed a huge surge in the amount of nonsense subject line spam appearing in your inbox. Here at the Smart Bitch Headquarters, I started getting some slighty risque subject lines, such as “smell some telepathic pouch” and “buy go charter worker.” After I picked myself up off the floor laughing at the idea of telepathic pouch, I realized, what a gold mine it was for any burgeoning writers in the Bitchery - specifically, those lusty souls who write back cover copy!

We all know the back cover copy - you skim it quickly because you know the writer of the book itself had nothing to do with it, and you hope to glean at least a clue as to what the actual book is about, knowing that the back cover copy and the content could in fact be less related than Candy and I.

And much like we have learned not to judge a book by its cover, which I call the Danelle Harmon Rule, we have learned not to judge a book by its cover copy either.

So we hereby challenge our erudite and creative Bitchery to craft us some back cover copy, using the random and odd spam subject lines that have appeared in my inbox in the last few weeks as inspiration. We give you the phrase, you come up with a florid, cover-copy-esque synopsis of what the book is about. Feel free to end with a rhetorical question as so many Zebras are wont to do (e.g. Will his hanging erudition come between them, or will love conquer all?)

The Rules

1. You must craft a back cover copy of no more than 250 words that includes the specific words of or is clearly inspired by one of the Spam Subject Lines in the list.

2. You may title your mythical book whatever you please, but you must make sure to tell us which Spam Subject Line inspired your creativity.

3. Please, respect the word limit. 250 words.

4. You must email your entry to Sarah and Candy by Wednesday, December 21. Bitchery Voting will take place for one week, and winners shall be announced the following week.

The Prize!

The writer whose entry receives the most votes will win
- a Smart Bitche Title!
- a snazzy Amazon gift certificate, for purchasing your own books, complete with inane cover copy
- a choice of CHEAPE VIA-GRA or CI_AL_IS. Just kidding!

And without further ado, here is the list of Spam Subject Lines!

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
1 commentTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesGo Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ClittyClittyBangBang

by Candy Wednesday, December 14, 2005 at 02:49 PM

During the discussion on our Lexicon of Eeeeeeevil, some of our readers pointed out quite rightly that outlawing all of the suggested words from sex scenes would create some problems, namely: what kind of language and what words do you use when you’re writing a historical romance, and the scene is from the perspective of a charming naif who is so protected, so innocent, so pure, that she barely even knows she has legs, much less the existence of the heavenly portal nestled between said legs like a shy, furry woodland creature--one of the cute ones without claws or antlers, please. Also, no fleas or intestinal parasites, because damn, talk about a mood-killer.

Ooops, sorry, this is supposed to provide an instructional guide on how to do things right, instead of poking merciless fun at the way things can go horribly awry.

So first things first: For sex scene guidance in general, I can’t recommend Sara Donati’s series of posts on the subject highly enough.

But we’re talking about a more specific problem, to wit: how to refer to assorted twiddly bits without resorting to oft-ridiculed words like “nubbin” (rhymes with rubbin’!) and “pleasure center” when the heroine has never been taught the proper lexicon?

I have some thoughts on this. OF COURSE I do. But keep in mind I’m no kind of professional writer, just a reader and a hack who occasionally writes some fiction for fun and who really, really, really, really, really, really, really enjoys thinking about sex in her free time. Which means my opinion is definitive and 100% correct, and anyone who disagrees is immediately a LOSAR--but then y’all knew that already, right?

My take on it, is to use describe what the heroine discovers and feels in plain language. It might help to think back to the days when you yourself Discovered New Terrain (though I realize some of us do it at a much younger age than others) but didn’t know any of the terminology.

For example, when I first found it, I thought of my clitoris as a very odd bump. Almost like a beesting, but not painful to the touch. Later, when I read formal descriptions in textbooks that described it as a pea-sized bit of flesh, a lightbulb went off it in my head.

Bumps and beestings aren’t particularly sexy, but they’re honest reactions, and c’mon, y’all are professional writers; I’m sure you can cobble up something even bet