YouareviewingentriesfromJuly2006

MajorCrush

by SB Sarah Monday, July 31, 2006 at 01:59 PM
Our Grade:
A-
Title: Major Crush
Author: Jennifer Echols
Publication Info: Simon Pulse, Simon & Schuster 2006, ISBN: 1-4169-1830-2
Genre: Young Adult

As a teenager, I loved Sweet Valley High, but particularly the ones that dealt with romance. I almost passed out that one time Bruce Patman put his hand on Elizabeth Wakefield’s breast. It said “breast” in a SVH novel?! DUDE.

Little did I know then the education I’d get from real romance novels, and from YA romances that are actually high quality. Lucky me, as a Smart Bitch, I received an ARC of Jennifer Echols Major Crush. I’m so jealous of the YA readers now who have much better books to read. What was I thinking?

But enough about me.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
29 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Non-Romance Reviews: Young AdultReviews by Author, D-GReviews by Grade: A

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

GottaGettaRITA-2006!

by SB Sarah Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 01:37 PM

Thanks to Robin and whomever posted and updated a page of the RITA finalists, we can announce the 2006 RITA Winners from last night’s gala. We hope it was much better than last year - someone give us an update how it went, please!

And in the meantime, WOO HOO and YAY and all sorts of obnoxious fist pumping and elegant grunting to the 2006 RITA winners.

Best First Book
Show Her the Money
by Stephanie Feagan

Best Contemporary Single Title
Lakeside Cottage
by Susan Wiggs

Best Inspirational Romance
Heavens to Betsy
by Beth Pattillo

Best Long Contemporary Romance
Worth Every Risk
by Dianna Love Snell

Best Long Historical Romance
The Devil to Pay
by Liz Carlyle

Best Novella
‘The Naked Truth About Guys’ in The Naked Truth
by Alesia Holliday

Best Paranormal Romance
Gabriel’s Ghost
by Linnea Sinclair

Best Regency Romance
A Reputable Rake
by Diana Gaston

Best Romantic Suspense
Survivor in Death
by J.D. Robb

Best Short Contemporary Romance
The Marriage Miracle
by Liz Fielding

Best Short Historical Romance
The Texan’s Reward
by Jodi Thomas

Novel with Strong Romantic Elements
Lady Luck’s Map of Vegas
by Barbara Samuel

Best Traditional Romance
Princess of Convenience
by Marion Lennox

Picture of {name}
12 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: NewsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

PhyllidaandtheBrotherhoodofPhilander:ABisexualRegencyRomance

by SB Sarah Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 01:14 PM
Our Grade:
C+
Title: Phyllida and the Brotherhood of Philander: A Bisexual Regency Romance
Author: Ann Herendeen
Publication Info: AuthorHouse 2005, ISBN: 1420869639
Genre: Regency

Ann Herendeen has written a very clever, highly articulate, historically sharp and delightfully entertaining romance, one that would make certain factions of the RWA tear their hair out in massive clumps. Forget one man and one woman. We have two men and one woman, a few men with other men, another man and a woman and a few other men, and a butler. If these folks ever got around to playing Twister, the video rights would sell for billions.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
5 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-KReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HelpaReaderOut

by SB Sarah Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 12:21 PM

We have a request to find a book - and there’s a lot of details so someone should remember this. UK readers, please let us know if you’ve heard of it.

I read the book in hardcover probably somewhere between 1994 and 1996.  As I borrowed the book from the library it may have been published around that time, or it may have been published much earlier.  The book cover was grey with either two masks on the front cover (one red and one black) or a red rose and a black mask.

It was a historical romance set in England during the time of the French Revolution and involved the heroine marrying a man that she barely knew and both the hero and heroine finding each other particularly dull.  Each, however, was a captain of their own ships and were sailing across the channel each week to help save prisoners in France.  Each was sailing under an alias.  The heroine’s alias was something to do with red, i.e. scarlet, rouge, etc, and the hero’s alias was something to do with black, i.e. noir, etc.  There was the usual conflict at sea between the two of them, which meant half way through the book they hated each other and by the end of the book they loved each other and then found out at the end, shock and horror, they were married to each other and never knew.

I am in the UK and I don’t know if it was only a UK publication or if it was published in the US as well.

Picture of {name}
15 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CoronationCeremonyforBooksellerChick

by SB Sarah Saturday, July 29, 2006 at 05:14 AM

Congratulations to Bookseller Chick, who correctly identified this week’s Guess That Lonely Heart - Tyler Stewart, from current RWA President Gayle Wilson’s The Bride’s Protector. Well done!

Kneel, Bookseller Chick, and arise with your new Smart Bitch Title. And as Duchess Cuntington, let me be the first to welcome you to the peerage.

Picture of {name}
3 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

GuessthatLonelyHeart

by SB Sarah Friday, July 28, 2006 at 03:52 PM

You know the drill - heroine’s name, title and author yields Smart Bitch Title.

Hide me, hide me!

Running-for-my-life bride seeks special-ops man to sweep me off my feet and into some kind of protective custody, preferably in his hotel room. My agent has stolen every penny I made, and my Croesus father-in-law-to-be has just been assassinated. I might be useful in clearing your name of the hit you had nothing to do with, if you can keep me safe from the nonstop assault of my fiance’s hitmen who want me dead at the altar.

Picture of {name}
7 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HotLanta!

by SB Sarah Friday, July 28, 2006 at 04:50 AM

Hey! All you Bitchery members down in Atlanta for RWA 2006 - if you have any field reports from the conference to end all conferences, let us know! We’d love to hear how it’s going.

And - Candy and I are already talking about Dallas in 2007. We might even submit a presentation proposal (this means you’ll have to Join the RWA, Candy! Come on, be cool like me!) and wow you with our ability make no sense whatsoever! Or cuss a lot, whichever comes first.

I wonder, if we were going to make a RWA presentation, what would we talk about? Smart Bitch Titles? 

Picture of {name}
22 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HighlandFlingbyJenniferLaBrecque

by Guest Bitch Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 01:13 PM
Our Grade:
C+
Title: Highland Fling
Author: Jennifer LaBrecque
Publication Info: Harlequin 2006, ISBN: 0373792662
Genre: Contemporary Romance

Rarely do I pay much attention to Romance novel titles; if not downright offensive, they’re often inane and rarely informative.  Highland Fling, though, really is a perfect title for Jennifer LaBrecque’s new time-travel Blaze, for it not only cleverly invokes a Scottish dance, but it also describes two primary relationships:  the one between the hero and the heroine and the one between this reader and the book itself.  While not a substantial read, Highland Fling is a respectably breezy fantasy trip (and I’m not just talking about all that squirrelly whirly air that goes along with traveling through time).

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
34 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

FunwithBarneysandHarlequin

by SB Sarah Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 09:36 AM

I went back and took a few more images of the Barney’s Department Store window showcasing faceless plastic ladies in little black dresses being toppled by stacks of romance novels. Thought you might enjoy a close examination of what authors are being showcased on Madison Avenue. Pardon the iffy quality of the shots - it’s a camera phone on a sunny day.

Barney’s Mannequins read Harlequin! Who knew? Is that the key to being featureless and skinny?

Another classic Harlequin novel, and maybe that other faceless lady is discussing the academic elements of the plot. You think?

There were also vintage romances in the border of stacked books. Think that red gown is making her wild for love? Or is it her absurdedly bony shoulders?

Yet another Barney’s mannequin reading vintage serial romance.  But she’s tossed a pile of books at her “feet” - check out the next image.

Look at all the books she rejected. She even tossed some man-titty to the floor! For shame.

Here’s a close up of the tall stack that’s front and center in the window. If you’re Susan Anderson, Jane Heller, the late Arnette Lamb, Kat Martin, or Maggie Shane, you’re getting some damn fine publicity.

Picture of {name}
9 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

TheBigKahunaContest:ProfessionalDivision

by SB Sarah Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 04:25 AM

Behold, the Professional Division entries for The Big Kahuna Contest! Click on the thumbnails for the full-sized versions of the covers. As with the Amateur Division entries, email your vote for the Amateur division to AND - by July 30, midnight PDT.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
15 comments3 trackbacks Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some ShitNews

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

TheBigKahunaCoverContestEntries:AmateurDivision

by SB Sarah Tuesday, July 25, 2006 at 04:30 AM

Were you hankering for some cover snark? How about the entries for our Cover Contest instead?

Below, a collection of The Big Kahuna Contest: Amateur Division entries - and a special addendum. In addition to our Amazon gift certificate prize, one of our Professional Division contestants, April Martinez, has offered to make the winning cover into a full flat with the spine and back. So not only will you be buying books to make your TBR topple over on to your head, but you’ll have a fine display piece of your cover art. Thanks, April!

So, without further ado, have a look at our Amateur Division covers. This ain’t Cook County, Illinois, so please, vote once, and as early or late as your please.  Just email your vote for the Amateur division to Sarah AND Candy by July 29, midnight PDT. Click on the thumbnails for full-sized versions of the covers.

To refresh your memory, here is a reprint of our fine cover copy by which these covers were inspired.

A Desperate Secret...

Chase Thurston Spencer Hastings V is a mild-mannered stock broker by day, but at night, he desperately tries to lock himself in his apartment, even as he wakes up every morning with blood on his trousers, fur clutched between his hands, and no knowledge of his activities the night before.

A Covert Operative...

Vaniqa Lorcet Valtrex is a princess working undercover without the protection of her kingdom, seeking the truth about a mysterious family of murderers who appear, strike, and dissolve into mist. She’s chased the rumors of their existence to New York, where she thinks she’s found the heir to their powerful heritage--and incredibly hairy feet.

A Perfect Opportunity for Love...

From her perch in a penthouse across the street from his, Vaniqa spends her every moment watching the mysterious man, waiting for her chance to avenge her best friend’s sister’s boyfriend’s brother’s girlfriend.

Update:

Note: Professional Division will be up later today, so hold on to the edge of your seat or something. There’s more to come!

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
45 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Amorningcupof“WHATTHEFUCK”togoalongwithyourcoffee

by Candy Monday, July 24, 2006 at 04:59 AM

Kate Rothwell recently posted a letter to the editor by one Jan R. Butler. It’s truly a masterpiece, invoking the usual homophobic canards. Despite knowing it’s the same old moronic bullshit parroted by bigots that basically boils down to “it’s wrong because it makes us really, really uncomfortable,” I still got good and pissed off reading it--because the logic so very specious, if nothing else.

For example:

(...) romance isn’t about just any “two people” celebrating “love in its many forms.” Organizations such as the Man-Boy Love Association would certainly refer to themselves as celebrating love “two people” (or more) finding love in one of its many forms” . . . while they actively promote pedophilia.

So, NAMBLA provides some sort of ringing and conclusive condemnation of all homogaiety, eh? If that’s true, then it has to apply to the flip side, too: all those pedophiles who identify as heterosexual (and the vast majority of kiddie-fuckers are straight) are a ringing condemnation of heterosexuality. Think about this, folks: next time you pick up a mainstream romance novel, have sex with your significant other or fall in love with somebody of the opposite sex who’s about your own age, you’re ALL condoning pedophilia. QED.

And, please, spare us the arguments about “censorship” and “inclusiveness.” Preference for “one man, one woman” stories represents what RWA has always claimed is romance’s target demographic: college-educated, married, middle-class, monogamous, and moral. . . .Only in recent years has a vocal (translate: shrill) minority tried to drive RWA’s focus off that path, under the guise of “broadening its horizons.” But refusing to define romance according to the parameters it has held for centuries doesn’t “broaden” anything . . . it only starts us down the aforementioned slope, and once we’re in that slide, heaven help us.

That bit about the demographic? Made me howl with laughter. HOWL. WITH. LAUGHTER. Since when was “moral” an explicit demographic for any American business other than the shills of fundamentalist money-making scams run by fucknuts like Jim Bakker, Pat Robertson and the crew at Focus on the Family? But more than that, I love how “moral” is suddenly tied in not only with marriage and monogamy, but college-educated and middle class. Brilliant!

Seriously, reading this shit just makes me want to make out with girls and donate more money to the ACLU and the Human Rights Campaign.

And as for the centuries-old standards of romance: Do tell, what are they? Butler seems to be an expert on so many things, no doubt supported by impeccable research and logic, I’m just agog to hear her opinions on this. Do let me know how the unwritten “no pre-marital sex” rule in romances has remained so steadfast for centuries.

What brought romance fiction to its present level of success is a collection of decades’ worth of one-man, one-woman relationships stories, in all their richness, variety, and power. RWA should be the first to endorse that, rather than attempting to placate fringe groups trying to impose their standards upon the rest of us. If anyone’s in danger of being “censored” here, it’s believers in “what comes naturally”: one-man, one-woman romance. We in RWA owe it to ourselves not to let that happen.

And here we see the magnificent set-up of a false dichotomy: romances featuring homosexuality, bisexuality and polyamory/group sex must somehow endanger the state of monogamous hetero romances. I’ve never understood how homosexuality in ANY way threatens or limits what a heterosexual person wants to do, by the way--and this applies for marriage, way of life and reading material. Don’t like gay marriage or gay sex? Then I highly, highly recommend that you not marry or fuck somebody your own gender. Don’t like gay romance? Don’t read ‘em.

The old “but we’re the ones being persecuted by being forced to accept this immorality!” argument also holds no water. By arguing that gay and/or polyamorous romances shouldn’t be published in the first place, a group of people are, in effect, being restricted, censored and disenfranchised. People who try argue otherwise are not only being stupid, but dishonest about their motives. Look, “because I think it’s gross” or “because my religion tells me it’s so” is not a good enough reason to impose your standards on everyone else. And I honestly don’t see how publishing gay/poly romance novels oppresses those who like only straight romances. I can assure you, gay and poly romances don’t somehow emit radioactive Immorality Waves in cartoony stink-lines and somehow corrupt all the surrounding books so that alla sudden, the cowboy is slipping his range-raised meat up the sheikh’s dark cavern instead of shagging the amnesiac virgin heiress.

Picture of {name}
109 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Ranty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

PersonalAdContest

by Candy Friday, July 21, 2006 at 04:40 PM

That’s right kittens: Better late than never! Here’s another chance for you to win one of our Totally Freaking Awesome aristocratic titles.

Author’s Name + Heroine’s Name + Title of Book = Smart Bitch Title

See? It’s practically scientific.


Louisville heiress to massive fortune seeks convenient husband to marry within two months (or the money will literally go to the doghouse) who will still love me for myself. High tolerance for ditziness and hijinx a plus. 

Picture of {name}
38 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Timber!

by SB Sarah Friday, July 21, 2006 at 10:27 AM

Barney’s Department Store in New York has apparently called on Candy to serve as their muse for their current window display. Usually they feature ambigulously gendered plastic people modeling billion dollar dresses in funky poses.

This week: the mannequins are being crushed by falling stacks of paperback romance novels.

I walked by and thought, “Hey! That’s my TBR pile! And look! There’s Candy’s!” Good to know the high-end department stores in Manhattan can relate to the Smart Bitches and their reading habits (though not our style of clothing).