








by SB Sarah • Monday, July 31, 2006 at 01:59 PM
Our Grade:
Title: Major Crush
Author: Jennifer Echols
Publication Info: Simon Pulse, Simon & Schuster 2006, ISBN: 1-4169-1830-2
Genre: Young Adult
As a teenager, I loved Sweet Valley High, but particularly the ones that dealt with romance. I almost passed out that one time Bruce Patman put his hand on Elizabeth Wakefield’s breast. It said “breast” in a SVH novel?! DUDE.
Little did I know then the education I’d get from real romance novels, and from YA romances that are actually high quality. Lucky me, as a Smart Bitch, I received an ARC of Jennifer Echols Major Crush. I’m so jealous of the YA readers now who have much better books to read. What was I thinking?
But enough about me.
Virginia Sauter is the newly-appointed drum major at her rural Alabama high school. She’s also a former beauty pageant queen who rebelled, cut her hair off, pierced her nose, quit the majorette squad and went band. WAY band. So far band that she was voted co-drum-major.
Unfortunately for Virginia, she shares drum major responsibilities with Drew Morrow, who held the position solo last year, and who has some degree of resentment about sharing the position with a girl this year. There’s never been a girl drum major, and to make matters worse, in their first performance, they suck.
Even worse: Virginia has had a crush on Drew for a long, long time, and he refuses to acknowledge that she exists - a decision that certainly contributes to their suckiness as drum majors.
Seems that drum majors, and I didn’t know this, keep the time and tempo of the band through their conducting. If the drum majors don’t work together, they sound like crap - or, as one character says, like a symphony warming up before a performance begins.
Fortunately for Virginia and the band, the new band director, Mr. Rush, intervenes, and lays down the law. They will work together or they’ll both lose their positions. And further, Mr. Rush has ideas about how they can work their differences to the band’s advantage in competition, beginning with a new, feminine drum major costume for Virginia, and a ballroom dance-style dip for both of them to begin their performance.
The challenge of working together forces Drew and Virginia to become friends, despite or perhaps because of the enormous attraction between both of them, and while there are complications - Drew has an evil girlfriend, and Virginia doesn’t feel sure enough of herself to make any move on Drew - the story gets it’s drama from so many clever, interesting characters and plot points that serve to set this book apart. From the guy who’s harbored a crush on Virginia since forever, to her African-American best friend and beauty queen who cannot wait to leave small town Alabama behind her, to her parents and their secret that Virginia’s keeping from everyone, there’s plenty of drama to keep the book moving.
One of Echol’s gifts in this novel is keeping the story very contemporary without making it seem like she’s name-dropping. Like the writers of a really good teen television drama, she’s able to portray a high school teenager’s thoughts (the book is told from Virginia’s perspective in first person) without sounding like she’s trying too hard. Authenticity of tone and setting come easily to this author.
The two best points of this book for me are Virginia herself, and her friendship with Drew. While it might be difficult for me, a 31-year-old schlubby lady living in Jersey to relate to a teenage beauty queen and drum major in rural Alabama, it is not hard for me to relate to someone feeling like they have been dropped into a situation that seems like too much, too fast, and too emotionally difficult. It’s a mark of brilliance on Echols’ part that the character who doesn’t fit in is a beauty queen who quits the pageant circuit to join the band. One doesn’t think beauty pageant contestants suffer often from feelings of awkwardness, low self-confidence, or alienation.
The other delicious part of this book is the dramatic sexual tension between Drew and Virginia. Forced to work together and talk to each other on long-ass bus rides all over the state, they form a friendship of sorts, and become each other’s confidantes, revealing the truth behind their public images. Virginia shares with Drew the secret she’s been hiding from everyone, and Drew tells Mr. Rush and Virginia why he’s gone from being a laid-back relaxed high schooler to a stressed-out responsibility-driven drum major obsessed about being perfect and getting the highest possible score on his SATs.
The one problem I had with the story was that the HEA didn’t seem 100% guaranteed, because one question -the financial security of Drew’s future - is left unanswered. There’s a throwaway comment by the band director that seems to indicate that everything will be fine, but I wasn’t sure at all by the end, and I wanted a complete happy ending for these awesome characters, because I was rooting for them the entire time.
I have a serious weakness for YA romances, from the 1-800-WhereRU stories to vintage SVH, and this one is a definite keeper. A full band salute to Jennifer Echols from this very giddy Smart Bitch.










by SB Sarah • Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 01:37 PM
Thanks to Robin and whomever posted and updated a page of the RITA finalists, we can announce the 2006 RITA Winners from last night’s gala. We hope it was much better than last year - someone give us an update how it went, please!
And in the meantime, WOO HOO and YAY and all sorts of obnoxious fist pumping and elegant grunting to the 2006 RITA winners.
Best First Book
Show Her the Money
by Stephanie Feagan
Best Contemporary Single Title
Lakeside Cottage
by Susan Wiggs
Best Inspirational Romance
Heavens to Betsy
by Beth Pattillo
Best Long Contemporary Romance
Worth Every Risk
by Dianna Love Snell
Best Long Historical Romance
The Devil to Pay
by Liz Carlyle
Best Novella
‘The Naked Truth About Guys’ in The Naked Truth
by Alesia Holliday
Best Paranormal Romance
Gabriel’s Ghost
by Linnea Sinclair
Best Regency Romance
A Reputable Rake
by Diana Gaston
Best Romantic Suspense
Survivor in Death
by J.D. Robb
Best Short Contemporary Romance
The Marriage Miracle
by Liz Fielding
Best Short Historical Romance
The Texan’s Reward
by Jodi Thomas
Novel with Strong Romantic Elements
Lady Luck’s Map of Vegas
by Barbara Samuel
Best Traditional Romance
Princess of Convenience
by Marion Lennox
12 comments •
Trackback •

Categories: News •
The Link-O-Lator
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.










by SB Sarah • Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 01:14 PM
Our Grade:
Title: Phyllida and the Brotherhood of Philander: A Bisexual Regency Romance
Author: Ann Herendeen
Publication Info: AuthorHouse 2005, ISBN: 1420869639
Genre: Regency
Ann Herendeen has written a very clever, highly articulate, historically sharp and delightfully entertaining romance, one that would make certain factions of the RWA tear their hair out in massive clumps. Forget one man and one woman. We have two men and one woman, a few men with other men, another man and a woman and a few other men, and a butler. If these folks ever got around to playing Twister, the video rights would sell for billions.
Phyllida begins with Andrew Carrington awaking in his home with “no memory of the previous night” and a young male prostitute named Kit in his bedchamber. He’s horrified that he’s once again gone so far down the path of debauchery that he’s blank on the last few hours and seems to have brought his evening’s entertainment into his own home, something he’d never do. Andrew is, however, cordial but guarded with Kit, and is very frank that he’s not a member of the peerage but is “a sodomite, just like you.”
The scene changes to Andrew in the back parlour of his club, the Brotherhood of Philander, where he announces that he’s decided to marry. The members of the Brotherhood are all sodomites, and the club was founded to give them a safe place to socialize and also...socialize. The brotherhood members are appalled at the idea that a dedicated gay man would risk alienating and lying to a woman for an entire marriage just to secure an heir. Andrew does have several points in his favor regarding his ideal marriage, however: he wants to be honest with his wife so he can live his preference without, as he put it, becoming a fugitive in his own country. More importantly, he stands to inherit an earldom upon the death of his uncle, which gives him a larger choice of women, since some families would tolerate just about anything so long as the title and accompanying wealth were guaranteed.
While some of the members of the Brotherhood think that the line might be drawn a few yards away from permitting a sodomite husband, Andrew is not concerned. He doesn’t want a peeress, or even an heiress. He wants an attractive, sophisticated virgin who was brought up to be a lady. His friend Verney has a suggestion: a young woman in the country, the eldest of three daughters of a woman of somewhat questionable reputation.
Phyllida is a wise young woman who immediately suspects the letter Verney sends her mother detailing Andrew’s offer of marriage: if it seems too good to be true, it is. But when she receives Andrew in person in her parlor, fully aware that he’s gay, she finds herself attracted to him anyway. And he is captivated by Phyllida, by her honesty and her bluntness.
The girl nodded. “I see,” she said, smiling as if she had heard good news. “And so you would rather purchase a wife with whom you can live honestly.”
Andrew raised an eyebrow. “This amuses you?”
“It is more of a relief,” she said. “I worried that if you were traveling so far out of your way to find a wife, there must be a sinister reason.”
“And the truth does not worry you?”
“No. I had rather have a marriage based on honesty.”
At first I was very surprised at Phyllida’s ability to accept Andrew’s open preference for men, something that to any other young gentrified lady would be news so shocking she’d pass out cold. I wasn’t sure why she was so open-minded, though perhaps it is attributable to the questionable reputation of her mother.
But Phyllida has some surprising secrets of her own: she’s a gothic novelist, writing under an assumed name. In fact, Phyllida is so proud and protective of her career that she almost refuses to marry Andrew and accept an astonishing windfall of marital wealth if he will not stipulate in the prenup that he will permit his wife to continue her secret career.
Phyllida and Andrew are married almost immediately, and author Herendeen is as brave as Phyllida: she goes right to the part that any reader would be curious about. How will Andrew fare in the bedroom? Will he be able to consummate his marriage with Phyllida with any degree of success, since he is already attracted to her?
I won’t spoil that which for this reader was some very clever writing. But I will say that the scene where Andrew seeks advice from his brother, who is equally a rake but after a different gender, had me practically in hysterics.
The conflict in the story doesn’t actually come directly from Andrew’s relationship with Phyllida; the intricacies of that relationship are only one of the forces acting against their happy ending. There’s also a much-talked-about bet placed at White’s against the success of their marriage, plus Andrew’s deep attraction to another man, the involvement of the Brotherhood in all of their lives, an individual who has intentions of blackmail, allegations of treason and spying, and of course the everyday danger of living in a society where any number of sexual sins are tolerated so long as those sins are heterosexual in nature. To live one’s life as an admitted sodomite, and to frequent clubs and brothels full of men, was to risk just about everything in terms of social status - hence the founding of the Brotherhood.
All these different problems required solutions, and by the end of the book I felt like there was one resolution after another, to the point where the story felt like a miniseries gone three episodes too long. Moreover, some of the resolutions were Big Misunderstandings, and some were very very clever, and the inconsistencies were glaring.
However, there was a great lot to like about this novel, beginning with the writing style. Herendeen has a writing voice that matches the tone and restraint of the Regency, and her descriptions and dialogue are fantastic. Furthermore, the plot was fast paced, but each character had a degree of depth such that no one character was wooden or stock.
Phyllida in particular was an interesting character. I alternated between liking her a lot and wanting to bash her over the head with a hardback for her stubbornness. As a writer who publishes in secret, she has a great deal of courage and belief in herself and in her talent, and thus she is very frank and honest - a perfect match for Andrew. While reading the book I noted in a margin, “Phyllida has balls in all senses except the one that would matter most to Andrew.”
And speaking of balls, there is a third almost-protagonist to this love story: Matthew Thornby. Matthew is the son of a rich merchant-made-baronet, and he and Andrew are immediately attracted to each other. While this is a bisexual Regency, and Andrew is as much a member of a couple with Phyllida as he is with Matthew, Matthew’s entrance into the story and role from then until the final chapter is almost secondary to the much more intricate and clever relationship Andrew shares with Phyllida. But as the title states, this is Phyllida’s story as much as it is Andrew’s.
My problems with the book came at the end, though a solution for how to view those issues came at the end, too. Herendeen has said she was writing a book she always wanted to read, and in the post script notes, “as a romance, it is also a form of fantasy fiction. However, since ‘Phyllida’ is set in a real place and time, certain elements of the story are necessarily based on fact” (529).
I usually skip the Author’s Note at the back of a novel, but I’m glad I read this one because it made a difference that the author acknowledged her own inclusion of fantasy. Against the backdrop of very real and very severe penalties for sodomy in Regency England, certain modern elements in the story were jarring, and could only be accommodated in my mind by this admission of fantasy. Andrew’s position on abortion, for example, and the final scene that creates a happy ending for Phyllida, Andrew, and Matthew were as off-putting to me as Phyllida’s initial comfort with the idea of marrying a sodomite.
However, due to the elegant writing, the otherwise detailed historical accuracy and the likeable Phyllida and Andrew, I enjoyed Phyllida and the Brotherhood of the Philander. There were several, “Oh, come ON, now” moments, but overall, I looked forward to reading more of this novel every time I pulled it out of my bag.





5 comments •
Trackback •

Categories: Reviews by Author, H-K •
Reviews by Grade: C
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by SB Sarah • Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 12:21 PM
We have a request to find a book - and there’s a lot of details so someone should remember this. UK readers, please let us know if you’ve heard of it.
I read the book in hardcover probably somewhere between 1994 and 1996. As I borrowed the book from the library it may have been published around that time, or it may have been published much earlier. The book cover was grey with either two masks on the front cover (one red and one black) or a red rose and a black mask.
It was a historical romance set in England during the time of the French Revolution and involved the heroine marrying a man that she barely knew and both the hero and heroine finding each other particularly dull. Each, however, was a captain of their own ships and were sailing across the channel each week to help save prisoners in France. Each was sailing under an alias. The heroine’s alias was something to do with red, i.e. scarlet, rouge, etc, and the hero’s alias was something to do with black, i.e. noir, etc. There was the usual conflict at sea between the two of them, which meant half way through the book they hated each other and by the end of the book they loved each other and then found out at the end, shock and horror, they were married to each other and never knew.
I am in the UK and I don’t know if it was only a UK publication or if it was published in the US as well.





by SB Sarah • Saturday, July 29, 2006 at 05:14 AM
Congratulations to Bookseller Chick, who correctly identified this week’s Guess That Lonely Heart - Tyler Stewart, from current RWA President Gayle Wilson’s The Bride’s Protector. Well done!
Kneel, Bookseller Chick, and arise with your new Smart Bitch Title. And as Duchess Cuntington, let me be the first to welcome you to the peerage.




by SB Sarah • Friday, July 28, 2006 at 03:52 PM
You know the drill - heroine’s name, title and author yields Smart Bitch Title.
Hide me, hide me!
Running-for-my-life bride seeks special-ops man to sweep me off my feet and into some kind of protective custody, preferably in his hotel room. My agent has stolen every penny I made, and my Croesus father-in-law-to-be has just been assassinated. I might be useful in clearing your name of the hit you had nothing to do with, if you can keep me safe from the nonstop assault of my fiance’s hitmen who want me dead at the altar.

by SB Sarah • Friday, July 28, 2006 at 04:50 AM
Hey! All you Bitchery members down in Atlanta for RWA 2006 - if you have any field reports from the conference to end all conferences, let us know! We’d love to hear how it’s going.
And - Candy and I are already talking about Dallas in 2007. We might even submit a presentation proposal (this means you’ll have to Join the RWA, Candy! Come on, be cool like me!) and wow you with our ability make no sense whatsoever! Or cuss a lot, whichever comes first.
I wonder, if we were going to make a RWA presentation, what would we talk about? Smart Bitch Titles?





by Guest Bitch • Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 01:13 PM
Our Grade:
Title: Highland Fling
Author: Jennifer LaBrecque
Publication Info: Harlequin 2006, ISBN: 0373792662
Genre: Contemporary Romance

Rarely do I pay much attention to Romance novel titles; if not downright offensive, they’re often inane and rarely informative. Highland Fling, though, really is a perfect title for Jennifer LaBrecque’s new time-travel Blaze, for it not only cleverly invokes a Scottish dance, but it also describes two primary relationships: the one between the hero and the heroine and the one between this reader and the book itself. While not a substantial read, Highland Fling is a respectably breezy fantasy trip (and I’m not just talking about all that squirrelly whirly air that goes along with traveling through time).
Kate Wexford is “assistant head of ER” at a respected hospital, a woman who describes her work as a physician as “not just a job; it’s who I am.” She finds herself embarrassingly enraptured by a portrait of an 18th century Scottish Highland Clan leader, a man she fantasizes about as if he was real and who unexpectedly becomes real when Kate gets a helpful hand into the museum portrait and into the world of the 1744 Scottish Highlands and the bed of Darach MacTavish. Luckily for the two surprised leads, Darach’s close friend Hamish turns out to be a time traveler himself who lives simultaneously in Kate and Darach’s temporal planes and who informs Darach and Kate that they called out to each other through time (I didn’t even bother trying to parse through all the rules here, because it only got me frustrated when I tried it during The Time Traveler’s Wife). Their fates are entwined, Hamish informs them, connected through Darach’s impending death at the bloody Battle of Culloden (although the real battle took place in 1746, LaBrecque has it as 1745), which will also put an end to the MacTavish line. The romance and the story unfold from there, as Kate and Darach travel back to Kate’s home in 2006 Atlanta in pursuit of information and a strategy to alter Darach’s apparent fate.
What worked best for me in Highland Fling was the interaction between Kate and Darach. Both characters are ostensibly leaders, and Darach especially is portrayed with a nice balance of cocksure confidence and circumspect concern for the welfare of his Clan. For the most part I felt that Darach escaped the irritating quasi-alpha fate of having his protectiveness morph into patronizing domination. It was easy for me to see how his growing passion for Kate was intertwined with his sense of responsibility to his people and not an abandonment of something that supposedly defined him. Kate was a little more difficult for me, because for all her assertions that medicine is her life and her identity, she became quickly and wholly consumed by Darach’s plight and her growing feelings for him. Several critical decisions Kate made late in the book were particularly troublesome for me, because they seemed to undermine a key element of her character and were made with absolutely no articulated contemplation of their real implications and likely impact on her identity and fate. I love strong and independent women in Romance, but professionally passionate women aren’t necessarily personally wanting and emotionally deprived (it’s often quite the opposite, in fact, at least in real life), and I wish we could move away from this stereotype in contemporary Romance. While I think I understand what LaBrecque was trying to do with this “healer of men and their souls,” Kate felt relatively shallow to me. So while I understood how two people from very different temporal moments could find a deep recognition and understanding of each other, my experience of Kate and Darach’s relationship was not very emotionally intense for me. While I enjoyed their story, I didn’t find enough dimension in the protagonists to really bring their drama to life in my mind or heart.
The greatest pleasure of Highland Fling for me was the banter between Darach and Kate, as she teases him for his Highland bravado and he teases her for her liberated sass, generating relationship stereotypes and skewering them at the same time:
Darach: “I love you you daft, crazy, lusty wench.”
Kate: “I traveled over two-hundred years to find you. You’re everything I never wanted in a man – arrogant, bossy, too sexy for your own good, and gone in less than a week.”
There was a clever scene involving a condom that LaBrecque used to very good effect, an interesting and amusing common-sense solution to sexually involving two characters early without the promise of everlasting love, and while some of the pseudo-Scottish speak felt over the top and inauthentic (worst line in the book: “Ah, Katie-love, you have a bonnie set of tits”), it wasn’t so overdone as to be intrusively obnoxious. There were a few unbelievable moments, most of which related to the ease with which Darach adapted to 21st century life and technology, and frankly I felt that two people with Darach’s and Kate’s intelligence could have arrived much more quickly at the solution to Darach’s dilemma, but the writing and the relationship held a certain good-natured cheekiness that made my reading experience more pleasant than I expected based on the premise of the book. I haven’t read Outlander and have no idea how that would have influenced my response to this book, but even I recognized some significant superficial similarities that made me hope Highland Fling was written in homage and not duplication. All in all, I found Highland Fling amiable if not memorably substantial.
Before I wrote this review I visited Harlequin’s writing guidelines for Blaze and was struck by the following: “The series features sensuous, highly romantic, innovative stories that are sexy in premise and execution . . . and [w]riters can push the boundaries in terms of characterization, plot, and explicitness.” I thought a lot about those two concepts – innovation and boundary pushing – trying to decide whether I should measure them differently for series fiction than I would for single title books. Fair or not, I realized that my expectations for series fiction are somewhat different. For example, while I noted quite a few clichés in the writing of Highland Fling (i.e. he “kissed her with a need bordering on pain,” “the fire of want . . . licked at them with flames of desire”), I didn’t count them against the book so much, and while I found numerous copyediting errors (i.e. the confusion of lie/lay, borne/born, misplaced modifying clauses, misspellings, and subject-verb disagreements), I was annoyed but not fatally so. There were things that niggled at me, like the mistaken date of the central historical event in the story, which then made it difficult for me to settle into the historical aspect of the story. I found myself more actively questioning things along the way, like the image I had of Darach wearing only his great kilt with no long shirt or short coat, as well as some of the language choices (i.e. Darach’s liberal use of “bluidy”/bloody, which I thought was a pretty profane oath in the 18th century, especially to a Jacobite). None of these things ruined my enjoyment of the story, but they did get me thinking about how the finer details of craftsmanship play a part in distinguishing a merely pleasant book from a memorably compelling one. Highland Fling was a pleasant C+ read.





34 comments •
Trackback •

Categories: Reviews by Author, A-C •
Reviews by Grade: C
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.





by SB Sarah • Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 09:36 AM
I went back and took a few more images of the Barney’s Department Store window showcasing faceless plastic ladies in little black dresses being toppled by stacks of romance novels. Thought you might enjoy a close examination of what authors are being showcased on Madison Avenue. Pardon the iffy quality of the shots - it’s a camera phone on a sunny day.
Barney’s Mannequins read Harlequin! Who knew? Is that the key to being featureless and skinny?
Another classic Harlequin novel, and maybe that other faceless lady is discussing the academic elements of the plot. You think?
There were also vintage romances in the border of stacked books. Think that red gown is making her wild for love? Or is it her absurdedly bony shoulders?
Yet another Barney’s mannequin reading vintage serial romance. But she’s tossed a pile of books at her “feet” - check out the next image.
Look at all the books she rejected. She even tossed some man-titty to the floor! For shame.
Here’s a close up of the tall stack that’s front and center in the window. If you’re Susan Anderson, Jane Heller, the late Arnette Lamb, Kat Martin, or Maggie Shane, you’re getting some damn fine publicity.






by SB Sarah • Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 04:25 AM
Behold, the Professional Division entries for The Big Kahuna Contest! Click on the thumbnails for the full-sized versions of the covers. As with the Amateur Division entries, email your vote for the Amateur division to AND - by July 30, midnight PDT.
15 comments •
3 trackbacks •

Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit •
News
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.








by SB Sarah • Tuesday, July 25, 2006 at 04:30 AM
Were you hankering for some cover snark? How about the entries for our Cover Contest instead?
Below, a collection of The Big Kahuna Contest: Amateur Division entries - and a special addendum. In addition to our Amazon gift certificate prize, one of our Professional Division contestants, April Martinez, has offered to make the winning cover into a full flat with the spine and back. So not only will you be buying books to make your TBR topple over on to your head, but you’ll have a fine display piece of your cover art. Thanks, April!
So, without further ado, have a look at our Amateur Division covers. This ain’t Cook County, Illinois, so please, vote once, and as early or late as your please. Just email your vote for the Amateur division to Sarah AND Candy by July 29, midnight PDT. Click on the thumbnails for full-sized versions of the covers.
To refresh your memory, here is a reprint of our fine cover copy by which these covers were inspired.
A Desperate Secret...
Chase Thurston Spencer Hastings V is a mild-mannered stock broker by day, but at night, he desperately tries to lock himself in his apartment, even as he wakes up every morning with blood on his trousers, fur clutched between his hands, and no knowledge of his activities the night before.
A Covert Operative...
Vaniqa Lorcet Valtrex is a princess working undercover without the protection of her kingdom, seeking the truth about a mysterious family of murderers who appear, strike, and dissolve into mist. She’s chased the rumors of their existence to New York, where she thinks she’s found the heir to their powerful heritage--and incredibly hairy feet.
A Perfect Opportunity for Love...
From her perch in a penthouse across the street from his, Vaniqa spends her every moment watching the mysterious man, waiting for her chance to avenge her best friend’s sister’s boyfriend’s brother’s girlfriend.
Update:
Note: Professional Division will be up later today, so hold on to the edge of your seat or something. There’s more to come!













by Candy • Monday, July 24, 2006 at 04:59 AM
Kate Rothwell recently posted a letter to the editor by one Jan R. Butler. It’s truly a masterpiece, invoking the usual homophobic canards. Despite knowing it’s the same old moronic bullshit parroted by bigots that basically boils down to “it’s wrong because it makes us really, really uncomfortable,” I still got good and pissed off reading it--because the logic so very specious, if nothing else.
For example:
(...) romance isn’t about just any “two people” celebrating “love in its many forms.” Organizations such as the Man-Boy Love Association would certainly refer to themselves as celebrating love “two people” (or more) finding love in one of its many forms” . . . while they actively promote pedophilia.
So, NAMBLA provides some sort of ringing and conclusive condemnation of all homogaiety, eh? If that’s true, then it has to apply to the flip side, too: all those pedophiles who identify as heterosexual (and the vast majority of kiddie-fuckers are straight) are a ringing condemnation of heterosexuality. Think about this, folks: next time you pick up a mainstream romance novel, have sex with your significant other or fall in love with somebody of the opposite sex who’s about your own age, you’re ALL condoning pedophilia. QED.
And, please, spare us the arguments about “censorship” and “inclusiveness.” Preference for “one man, one woman” stories represents what RWA has always claimed is romance’s target demographic: college-educated, married, middle-class, monogamous, and moral. . . .Only in recent years has a vocal (translate: shrill) minority tried to drive RWA’s focus off that path, under the guise of “broadening its horizons.” But refusing to define romance according to the parameters it has held for centuries doesn’t “broaden” anything . . . it only starts us down the aforementioned slope, and once we’re in that slide, heaven help us.
That bit about the demographic? Made me howl with laughter. HOWL. WITH. LAUGHTER. Since when was “moral” an explicit demographic for any American business other than the shills of fundamentalist money-making scams run by fucknuts like Jim Bakker, Pat Robertson and the crew at Focus on the Family? But more than that, I love how “moral” is suddenly tied in not only with marriage and monogamy, but college-educated and middle class. Brilliant!
Seriously, reading this shit just makes me want to make out with girls and donate more money to the ACLU and the Human Rights Campaign.
And as for the centuries-old standards of romance: Do tell, what are they? Butler seems to be an expert on so many things, no doubt supported by impeccable research and logic, I’m just agog to hear her opinions on this. Do let me know how the unwritten “no pre-marital sex” rule in romances has remained so steadfast for centuries.
What brought romance fiction to its present level of success is a collection of decades’ worth of one-man, one-woman relationships stories, in all their richness, variety, and power. RWA should be the first to endorse that, rather than attempting to placate fringe groups trying to impose their standards upon the rest of us. If anyone’s in danger of being “censored” here, it’s believers in “what comes naturally”: one-man, one-woman romance. We in RWA owe it to ourselves not to let that happen.
And here we see the magnificent set-up of a false dichotomy: romances featuring homosexuality, bisexuality and polyamory/group sex must somehow endanger the state of monogamous hetero romances. I’ve never understood how homosexuality in ANY way threatens or limits what a heterosexual person wants to do, by the way--and this applies for marriage, way of life and reading material. Don’t like gay marriage or gay sex? Then I highly, highly recommend that you not marry or fuck somebody your own gender. Don’t like gay romance? Don’t read ‘em.
The old “but we’re the ones being persecuted by being forced to accept this immorality!” argument also holds no water. By arguing that gay and/or polyamorous romances shouldn’t be published in the first place, a group of people are, in effect, being restricted, censored and disenfranchised. People who try argue otherwise are not only being stupid, but dishonest about their motives. Look, “because I think it’s gross” or “because my religion tells me it’s so” is not a good enough reason to impose your standards on everyone else. And I honestly don’t see how publishing gay/poly romance novels oppresses those who like only straight romances. I can assure you, gay and poly romances don’t somehow emit radioactive Immorality Waves in cartoony stink-lines and somehow corrupt all the surrounding books so that alla sudden, the cowboy is slipping his range-raised meat up the sheikh’s dark cavern instead of shagging the amnesiac virgin heiress.



by Candy • Friday, July 21, 2006 at 04:40 PM
That’s right kittens: Better late than never! Here’s another chance for you to win one of our Totally Freaking Awesome aristocratic titles.
Author’s Name + Heroine’s Name + Title of Book = Smart Bitch Title
See? It’s practically scientific.
Louisville heiress to massive fortune seeks convenient husband to marry within two months (or the money will literally go to the doghouse) who will still love me for myself. High tolerance for ditziness and hijinx a plus.

by SB Sarah • Friday, July 21, 2006 at 10:27 AM
Barney’s Department Store in New York has apparently called on Candy to serve as their muse for their current window display. Usually they feature ambigulously gendered plastic people modeling billion dollar dresses in funky poses.
This week: the mannequins are being crushed by falling stacks of paperback romance novels.
I walked by and thought, “Hey! That’s my TBR pile! And look! There’s Candy’s!” Good to know the high-end department stores in Manhattan can relate to the Smart Bitches and their reading habits (though not our style of clothing).