YouareviewingentriesfromDecember2006

PeculiarAristocraticTitles

by Candy Thursday, December 21, 2006 at 12:41 PM

When Sarah and I first started this site, we decided on Smart Bitch Aristocratic Titles for ourselves. She was Duchess of Cuntington, and I was Baroness Gant D’Amour. Now, after unravelling the explosive mystery of my secret paternity, which may or may not involve the King of Sardinia, the mysterious disappearance of a gallon of lube and several cans of shaving cream, a villainous group of crocodile smugglers, an international ring of jewel thieves composed of vegan Maenads, and a burly footman named Morris, I found out I was heir to another title:

My Peculiar Aristocratic Title is:
Milady the Most Honourable Candy the Extemporaneous of Deep Throcking
Get your Peculiar Aristocratic Title

What’s your title?

Picture of {name}
40 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Yo.Time.We’reOverHere.

by SB Sarah Thursday, December 21, 2006 at 11:13 AM

Jess pointed out in the comments to our entry regarding Amazon reviews for sale that Harriett Klausner has been named one of Time Magazine’s influential persons of the year. While I do like the focus of the profile of Ms. Klausner that discusses the power of online reviewers, I’m not sure I love that the spokesperson for the revolution in online reviewing wouldn’t know plot accuracy if it hit her in the deus ex machina.

Seems the Time Person of the Year is You. Or me. Or both of us. Or all of us who use the internet and make our tastes and preferences known. We who control the information age by participating in the global discussion of romance novels, celebrity gossip, technology, and how cute our cats are when they sleep, we are the People of the Year:

The influence of newspaper and magazine critics is on the wane. People don’t care to be lectured by professionals on what they should read or listen to or see. They’re increasingly likely to pay attention to amateur online reviewers, bloggers and Amazon critics like Klausner. Online critics have a kind of just-plain-folks authenticity that the professionals just can’t match. They’re not fancy. They don’t have an agenda. They just read for fun, the way you do.

Candy and I, we are certainly amateur online reviewers, and we’re definitely bloggers. We don’t write on Amazon (which begs the question: what if Klausner got paid $5 a review? Ka CHING!) but we do write online in multiple locations. Now I wonder how the line between amateur online blog reviewer and professional reviewer will be defined, and how much credibility rests on amateur status versus quality of review. 

Picture of {name}
14 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: NewsRandom Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BigMissDuncan

by SB Sarah Wednesday, December 20, 2006 at 12:40 PM

Poor Duncan Larksthrush. He tries to tend his grapes, harvest his wheat, and roam in maudlin fashion about the moors of his Scottish castle, and yet he is still plagued by cover artists hiding in the bushes, and big misunderstandings with his women. Poor, poor Duncan.

But lucky, lucky us. Behold, the entries for the Smart Bitch Big Misunderstanding Contest. Please email your vote to Sarah AND Candy by midnight, Monday, December 25.

Let us make it a Merry Christmas for poor, poor Duncan.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
Commenting is disabled, kids. Trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ReviewsForSale

by SB Sarah Wednesday, December 20, 2006 at 06:39 AM

Bitchery reader June forwarded me this email, a message to which I can only say, “Holy Shit.”

A friend of hers subscribes to a job offer listserv, and the following message came on by:

Write Online Book Reviews

We need 5 reviewers for 3 of our newly released titles. We ask that you write a 1-3 Paragraph review with a 5 star rating (5 being best) of each of the 3 books. We will then ask that you forward the reviews over to us so that we can look over them before you post them on Amazon.com and Barns and Noble.com.

Most of our reviewers are paid from $5- to $10 per review or $15.00 to $30.00 per 3 review book set. Unfortunately, Amazon has recently instituted a new procedure whereby you can only review books if you have an account that you have used to purchase books / products from them before, so in order to bid you must have an account with Amazon that you have used to purchased books with them from before. You are bidding on writing 5 reviews and posting them to Amazon.com, BarnesandNoble.com and lulu.com

Apply for this job here:

Write Reviews for Company Books

Now, we’ve had the discussion before that Amz. reviews at this point can and must be taken with a grain of large and salty suspicion, but jeez. $5 to $10 a review?! I have to wonder where the money is coming from for the reviewing, and how they choose the books what get the good reviews. 

Picture of {name}
29 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: NewsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SmartBitchesEndoftheYearSale!

by SB Sarah Tuesday, December 19, 2006 at 06:30 AM

We Smart Bitches, in order to preserve a more perfect mantitty, do hereby offer for sale at 2006 rates advertisement space on our site for 2007. Come January 1, our ad rates will go up by $5.00 US, so act now and reserve a space for yourself on the 2007 SBTB advertising calendar!

Just email Sarah or Candy with the month(s) you’d like to reserve, and either pay the balance of your advertising term up front, or put down a $20 deposit, and we’ll hold the space for you at our 2006 rates. Design is always an option and we can get to work on your ad now or later, depending on whether you’ve got art that we can play with.

Currently our advertisements are $35 for a single month, or $25 per month if you purchase more than one month at a time. Design is $25 per advertisement.

As of Jan. 1 2007, our 2006 rates will expire, and our new rates will be $40 for one month, and $30 per month if you buy more than one month at a time. Design will be $30 as well, with the same Bitch style, and the same Bitch service.

Any questions? Email the bitches!

Picture of {name}
Leave a commentTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ScansfromtheSBSarah

by SB Sarah Monday, December 18, 2006 at 07:06 PM

I finally figured out how to use my scanner without having to scan the image six or seven times and wondering where it went between the scanner and my laptop, and I tackled this project tonight because YALL have GOT to SEE the cover for Lucien’s Fall. SRSLY.

image

Sarah: What is UP with the gender switcharoo here? He’s got babysoft bronze skin, a rounded jawline, and a ponytail that I’m openly jealous of, with the thick waves and whatall.

But take a look at Madeline, there. Specifically, her neck, her hand, and her hairy, fuzzy knee. She’s a HE. Even Hubby looked at the cover and said, “Dude. She’s got man hands.” She’s a MAN, baby. No wonder he heard music when he looked at her: “It’s Raining Men” was clearly on the playlist.

Candy: Between the man-hands and the slouch, Lucien is sighing from agony, not pleasure.

Also, what’s with the cheap bronzer both of them are using? Lucien, in particular, resembles a rather leathery squash. Pumpkins are for making into pies, not fucking.

image

Sarah: Just when I think my list of “Cover Poses that Fall Way Short of Sexy” is complete, along comes another to make the top 10. I call this one, “Dr. Mantitte: Obstetrician in Training.”

Candy: This has pretty much all the earmarks of an awful romance novel cover:

1. Mullet? Check

2. Pastels that are so bland, they’re offensive? Check. *hwarf*

3. Girl in bizarre submissive pose? Check.

4. Veins the size of firehoses on the man? Check.

And you’re right, Sarah--dude looks like he’s checking the progress of her pregnancy. “Congratulations, Mrs. Wilkins! Feels like a pair of wonderful twins--and your foetus feels perfectly healthy, too!”

image

Sarah: This is the back cover of Stephanie Laurens’ Devil’s Bride, which features a heroine named Honoria. Judging by this picture, Honoria has a hellaperm and breath so bad it blows Devil’s 70’s mullet into wild 80’s wings.

Candy: Sarah, Sarah, look! A Jersey perm in Regency England! Whodathunk Aquanet had been invented already?

Picture of {name}
14 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CommentsFixed

by SB Sarah Monday, December 18, 2006 at 12:00 PM

Seems there was an error with the commenting feature; I believe it’s been fixed.

But if you’re not able to comment, please email me at . Thanks!

Picture of {name}
3 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Lucien’sFallbyBarbaraSamuel

by SB Sarah Monday, December 18, 2006 at 11:39 AM
Our Grade:
B+
Title: Lucien's Fall
Author: Barbara Samuel
Publication Info: HarperCollins 1995, ISBN: 0061083623
Genre: Historical: European

When I first wrote down my notes to review this book, I had downgraded it to a C- and mentally subtitled it, “A Review that Will Make Candy Stomp Her Foot at Me.” But since it was a Candy-recommended read, and because I know she enjoys a book that she can ruminate over for a good while, I figured I should let the plot simmer in the back of my mind for awhile and come back to it.

Sometimes, this is called “procrastination,” which is coincidentally my worst habit. Sometimes, it’s called “Sarah gets a lesson in reevaluating books” because after a week of thinking on it and writing down all the things that frustrated me, I realized that what bugged me was precisely what made the book good. And not “good” in the sense of, “Oh, it wasn’t so bad in comparison to some things I’ve read.” It was good in the sense that the author took risks and made real characters so that instead of villains that were cardboard and easily dismissed, I had secondary characters, fully-developed foils for the protagonists, and actions that were disruptive to the progress towards a happy ending, but that were driven by understandable motivation, not simple evil.  It was so good, in fact, that the grade was elevated after rumination to a B+. 

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
13 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, Q-SReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Don’tForget-DuncanNeedsYou!

by SB Sarah Monday, December 18, 2006 at 05:26 AM

“But… Duncan,” she wept tearfully. “I do not understand. My brother’s best friend’s dog walker’s cousin knows this girl who says this guy saw you pass out at 31 Flavors last night!”

“Alas, my fair Tittynia,” Duncan whispered huskily. “Twas not me. I was home. Alone. Missing your titian hair and your Rubenesque calves.”

“Oh, Duncan, shelter me under the comfort of your man-titty for all time!” She closed her eyes, relief washing over her in a wet wave of tears. It had all been a big miscommunication, just like the time she thought she saw him dressed as a woman, but he said it was really his mother’s ghost shopping at Neiman’s, or that other time she saw him at the Asse Castle Gay Bar but it turned out to be his secret twin brother. Just a silly misunderstanding, she thought, blissfully.

The End.

Don’t forget to save Duncan’s fate - enter the SB Big Mis writing contest. Deadline is tomorrow at midnight, PST.

Picture of {name}
2 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesGo Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

TheOnlyThingMissingisFabio

by SB Sarah Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 05:55 AM

Fabio is busy convincing me to try I Can’t Believe it’s Not Butter in his tiger-pelt strewn living room, so I’m guessing he can’t also be playing on the Make Your Own Romance Cover page, too. Does this stop me from uploading images and having a good old wasting-of-time? Heck, no!

Miri was kind enough to forward me the think. Now I have to get my fine romance cover printed out so I can put it all over the house. Check me out. I’m savagely awesome, I think.

image

Picture of {name}
6 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

RomanceNovelsforScienceGeeks?

by Candy Friday, December 15, 2006 at 08:19 AM

Anyone else in the audience a big fan of Pharyngula? I am, but then, PZ Myers is an irreverent atheist with a serious cephalopod fetish who hates creationism and Intelligent Design even more than I do, so my fangirl love is probably no surprise.

Anyway, there was a recent discussion regarding the presumptive fugliness of female SF readers on assorted Scienceblogs (kerfuffle started on Gene Expression with this observation), which I’ve been following with interest--I am, after all, a female SF reader who, while not exactly the last of the red-hot mamas, isn’t a hideous hosebeast either. And then somebody asked a question about male romance novel readers: why isn’t there a cultural assumption about their appearance? And in the course of discussing this, Myers asks:

There is an interesting idea there about the genre ghetto. I’ve read a few [romance novels], years ago, and didn’t care for them much…and now I judge the whole genre by a fuzzy memory of a non-representative sample. Are there great authors I’m missing because I can’t get past the pink covers with bare-chested men on them?

I’m running late for work, or I’d give him a long list of recommendations. I figure the Bitchery might have some ideas.

Also, thoughts on fugly SF female readers and what it says about the culture?  I have some musings about that, too, but have I mentioned I’m late for work? I’m hella late for work. Fuck.

Picture of {name}
30 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CoverSnark,Internacionale?Oui!Oui!

by SB Sarah Thursday, December 14, 2006 at 12:42 PM

image

Sarah: Poor Emma Holly. The minute her heroes and heroines move to Europe, they start living in fetid, purple waters, rising out of the drink to maul passersby with their Swamp Thing.

I know erotica authors frequently write about people being wet, but I don’t think this is what they meant.

Candy: Parasite fetishes are a rare but increasingly popular movement. Look at how ecstatic they are to be bumping uglies in all that standing water. He’s all, “My leetle one, you are so deeleeeeecious. You smell just like ze giardia.” And she’s all “Oh, darling, I find your candirú irresistible. TAKE ME LIKE AN ANIMAL.”

image

Sarah: The Phaaaaaaaaantom of the giant wings, the dessicated face, and the pregnant heroine with the itchy nightgown is heeeeeeeeeeere!

Candy: Well, finally, an undead hero with an authentically rotting face.

image

Sarah: Her: “My mouth is up here.”

Him: “I’m not trying to kiss you. I’m trying to keep my hair dry under your giant hat. Alfonse just finished styling my mullet.”

Candu: You know, I’ve heard of fiendish plots perpetrated by blancmange-shaped aliens in an effort to win Wimbledon. But this is the first time I’ve seen a brain parasite disguised as a strawberry blancmange take over a human. Look at the way it’s extending a sly pseudopod towards the man. It’s sniffing for the presence of brains--a quest doomed for failure, I’m afraid.

Picture of {name}
21 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Duncan’sSadMan-TittiesNeedYou

by SB Sarah Wednesday, December 13, 2006 at 12:40 PM

I bet you all have your curiosity about Candy and me. Perhaps we spend our days reading romances, eating bonbons and snarking away at the man titty in our festively pink office that matches our festively pink website. Perhaps...or perhaps not.

Either way, to announce our final Smart Bitch Writing Contest of the year, I’ll give you a glimpse into how Candy and I come up with pretty much most of our content.

Sarah: Duncan Larksthrush needs a heroine, and a plot.

Candy: He needs a more manly name than Larksthrush, though. Rockthrust would be better. And one more thing: That parody was near-perfect except for the mention of Harlequin/Silhouette at the end. I wish people didn’t automatically assume all romances are Harlequins. Leisure, Zebra, Avon and Berkley would’ve been a much more accurate. God, I’m a nitpicky bitch.

Sarah: Maybe he’s Duncan Larksthrush, Duke of Rockthrush. Anyway, how can we best ask the Bitchery to help Duncan out?

Candy: How about a Big Misunderstanding scene? Like the big reveal. Person to come up with the most contrived, convoluted Big Mis wins.

Sarah: OH YES OH YES OH YES, she cried.

And thus a Smart Bitch Contest is born.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
4 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Fun And GamesGo Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ThePlightoftheRomanceCoverMan

by SB Sarah Wednesday, December 13, 2006 at 05:48 AM

Darlene was kind enough to forward a link to The Onion’s hi-larious man-titty lament, as she called it.

My favorite part? “Can’t a brawny, brooding man ride his stallion slowly through the fresh-smelling air of a misty forest at dawn and think ruefully back to his tender childhood that seems to him now to exist in another world entirely—without having to constantly look over his perfectly sculpted shoulders?”

Perhaps we Smart Bitches are too harsh on the manful cover models. Poor, poor man-titty.

Picture of {name}
22 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

AcrossthePond

by SB Sarah Monday, December 11, 2006 at 06:20 AM

Michelle Styles was kind enough to forward me a link to the continuing saga of the McEwan/Andrews literary scandal in the form of another article from the woman who broke the story to begin with. Julia Langdon takes note of the stable of writers with fine reputations who spring to the defense of McEwan, and points out that she herself never accused him of plagiarizing Andrews’ work.

She accused him of a lack of courtesy in acknowledging her work in the first place as an influence and (ahem) source of his own. Now she’s being blasted for having said anything with the kind of zeal that can come only from literary types and those who love to smack down the snitch.

I have to wonder, though, if her citations of Google searches for his acknowledgment to Andrews’ work are correct, all of which seem to arrive after he was called on the lack thereof, why didn’t he own up to his use of her work as a source? And why the words and the fury directed at Ms. Langdon?

Picture of {name}
9 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: NewsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 2 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3 >