by SB Sarah • Friday, February 09, 2007 at 10:01 AM
The Bitchery is ever an altruistic lot. Bitchery reader Marta Acosta sent me an email saying:
I buy lots of books, too many to keep or even give to my friends. I tend to donate them to the Goodwill because I figure someone will be happy to get a fairly new book at a good price. But I’d like to donate them (and my ARCs and regular copies of my books) to good organizations, like soldiers, military hospitals, women’s shelters, etc.
Perhaps you could do a call out to people asking if they have any suggestions and contact information about people collecting for these causes.
This is a good idea - thanks!
So: a general request -
Do you like to donate books? What’s your favorite place to donate? With the innate cheapness that is the USPS media mail shipping costs, we can pretty much send our books anywhere in the US for not a hurtful amount of money. So - please, give us the details: your library? Charity of choice? Home for the elderly? Book drive for soldiers serving overseas? Feel free to comment or email us offline if you rather, and we’ll post your suggestion for you.
And please, if you put your home address and tell us you want books? I shall smack you around with a 501(c)3 certificate.
by SB Sarah • Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 05:49 AM
We’ve talked about ARCs for sale on eBay, and the proper things to do with an ARC- used book store donation, charity donation, elderly home donation. Now I have a question, and I’m honestly asking. I’m not trying to be a smart ass. So feel free to tell me, “Oh you are so so misguided, you Smart Bitch, you.”
I have a good number of ARCs ranging in publishing date from December 2006 through April 2007, and while I am reading them and making notes for review, I can’t possibly keep them all. I’d need to build an addition on the house. For the record, books sent to me by an author specifically are not part of what I’m proposing.
My synagogue hosts an annual charity auction of donated goods to raise money for synagogue activities. The charity auction is hosted online (not at eBay but at a similar site that hosts nothing but charity auctions) and is available through April, with a big event on May 5 where the goods from the online auction are delivered, and there’s also a live auction and party to celebrate that oh-so-Jewish holiday, Cinco de Mayo. As a Spanish-speaking Jew, I’m all about this party.
My question is as follows: is it inappropriate for me to take the ARCs of books that, by the time of the auction, will already have been published, put them in a basket with a beach towel, some sunscreen, and a water bottle, and auction it off as a “Summer Beach Reading Basket?” Or would that be too close to “selling the ARC,” despite the proceeds going to a 501(c)3 not-for-profit?
I’m curious what you think - and what other altruistic ways we could redirect ARC copies for maximum benefit.
Yup. That’s right: More In Death covers. Because they’re just too good for us not to.
Sarah: Attn. Mr. Art Person: The sword as phallic symbol should probably directed toward her love grotto, not cutting her off at the femur. Might nick an artery.
Candy: Really, she doesn’t need the sword to take off those cheap thigh-highs. Those Renn Fayre types can be so melodramatic sometimes. Tsk.
Conspiracy in Death
Sarah: Really, I know that some doctors have a God complex, but are a snake-halo, rays of light, AND a crown of thorns really necessary?
Candy: If God is a surgeon, how much does it cost to take out malpractice insurance? Because when you think about it, the number of people killed by an act of God is truly mind-boggling. In fact, here’s a new twist on an old conundrum: Can God create a malpractice insurance premium so large, not even He can afford it?
Sarah: Eve! Consuming raw heart is NOT a cold remedy substitute for the diluted heart & liver of the Barnaby duck. For that matter, it does not help with baldness, either.
Candy: Wow. Eve is suddenly black and possessed of a horribly misshapen bald head. Did the doctor yank her out with a pair of forceps? Or did she undergo radical plastic surgery because she took the term “heart-shaped face” wayyyy too much to heart after reading one too many romance novels?
by SB Sarah • Monday, February 05, 2007 at 07:09 AM
Bitchery reader meardaba sent us the following link, stating “a friend of mine told me about this TV show called Wetten, Dass… (I Bet You That...) where contestants bet the show that they can do something ridiculous under certain criteria. She told me about this one contestant who bet that he could figure out the title of a song just by watching two men twitch their pectoral muscles to music.
by SB Sarah • Sunday, February 04, 2007 at 12:00 AM
It’s nearly midnight here on the East Coast of Smart Bitch Land - so I get to be the first, after Lord Mantitte, to wish Candy a happy, happy birthday!
And let us verily say in haiku style the wonderousness that is SB Candy:
Smart Bitch Candy Day?
Hark! A ManTitte Salute!
She’s Made of Awesome.
Luscious pectorals,
Undone shirts tucked in wide belts?
Behold the power.
by SB Sarah • Saturday, February 03, 2007 at 07:42 PM
I asked the DVR to record Angel’s Fall because I was so curious how Nora Roberts’ books would transform to movies. Considering that one of the strengths I enjoy in her books is the development of a character, flaws and all, over 300+ pages, I was very curious as to whether the characters would be as faceted in 120 minutes or less.
The short answer: of course not. But, that answer is entirely dependent on the actor. Heather Locklear does a marvelous job. Her costar didn’t come close to her abilities, and as a result the part that disappointed me the most was the romance - the mystery was interesting, but, like the imbalance in costar ability, the romance wasn’t nearly as compelling as the whodunit.
Below are my thoughts as I typed them out during the film. It’s not as coherent as if I’d written the whole thing in retrospect, but it’s after 10pm and I have the cough from hell and want my bed.
1. Heather Locklear has roots, and she STILL looks good. It’s not fair. It’s horribly not fair. She’s one of those women who can put her hair into what would look like the rattiest ponytail ever on me, and yet it’s elegant and perfect. Yeah, yeah, I know. Stylists on set. Still. Not fair.
She does a marvelous job with the visible insecurities, the manic and the passive terror. I haven’t read this book, either, so I’m going to have to go solely on the movie. (I’m asking the DVR to record the other movies, which are based on books I’ve read.)
2. The creative team behind the film made several clever decisions to show the lapse of time. It wasn’t just clouds flying across the sky at high speed, though there was some of that. There was also a time lapse shot of the menu changing to reflect her influence in the town restaurant, and some dramatic footage of seasonal changes as well. The cinematography was gorgeous. The location and the wide shots of the scenery made me wish I had Lifetime in high-def.
Moreover, the filming and cinematography were clever in that varying levels of overexposure were used to illustrate moments of Reese’s insecurity, such as when she suspects everyone is staring at her. The use of color and absence of color were used to fill in what can’t be shown in a book, and in this case, added depth to the film.
3. In the beginning, Reese’s flashbacks are revealing and tragic, and used to illustrate the storms going on in her mind. But at the end the overwhelming use of flashbacks was annoying and dragging instead of revealing or cause for sympathy.
4. The major flaw I noticed was the choppy and one-sided dialogue between the hero and the heroine. I thought Heather Locklear was marvelous, but I didn’t think there was enough buildup of sexual tension between her and the hero, played by Johnathon Schaech. She was often luminous in the role (again, I know, stylist on set), and easily communicated her frustration and her self-doubt. He was more often wooden, and somewhat bullying in his tone. Lines that were meant to be cajoling or inviting confidence - “Talk to me, Reese. Come on. You need someone to talk to.” - sounded pushy and demanding coming from him. Moreover, actions that he takes, such as searching for her on the internet, that could have been played as curiosity, or an empathetic need to understand her better, come across as somewhat creepy, even though he’s not really being developed as a suspect in the mystery.
I’ll admit, I never watched Dynasty or Melrose Place but knowing of the soapy nookie type shows that those were, I didn’t have high expectations of Locklear. Dallas, a soapy drama that I did watch, was many things, but a harbor of good acting was not one of them. Locklear was the person I had the most doubts about as an actor in the movie, and she beat everyone else with a stick in terms of ability.
Then there was the love scene, which had about eighteen thousand candles in it. I know that there’s a Nora cameo in each movie, and I was hoping it would be the love scene, where she walks in and says, “THIS IS NOT HOW I WROTE THIS SCENE! GET UP YOU SHAAAMELESS HUSSY.”
5. The other flaw: the music. It was heavy-handed on the creepy parts, but truthfully, and this is unfair, I don’t expect much from Lifetime movies. I understand the quality has improved recently, but I’m used to seeing some serious film drivel on Lifetime, particularly during the day, like “My Mother’s Sister’s Tumor: The Gangrielle Lobotoree Story.” There’s a certain amount of pathos - and by “certain amount” I mean about six tons too much - in Lifetime productions, so when compared to some of the other monstrosities I’ve seen on that channel, this was not too heavy on the bongos-of-danger, the strings-of-romance, and the tuba-of-drama.
This film does a good bit to work against my Lifetime prejudice, in fact. It was more creative in the filming than I’ve seen on that channel.
I’m not in the habit of rating movies here, but my grade on this one is a C+. The visuals would have brought it higher, as would have Locklear’s effort - I’m serious, she was pretty darn good - but the wooden hero and the overuse of flashbacks as a way to sustain tension drove it down.
Just when you thought we’d forgotten that we have a semi-regular contest on Fridays, here comes another one! ‘Cause we like to keep you on your toes. And also, Candy has a mind like a steel sieve and completely forgot it was her turn last week to come with one. Ha. Anyway, the usual rules apply:
First person to correctly guess Heroine’s Name + Title of Book + Author will be the recipient of a Smart Bitch Title, Guaranteed Made of 100% Awesome. And unlike all the other pansy-ass title-makers out there, we ensure ours are made from 100% Child Sweatshop Labor. Because hey, 6-year-olds need to work, too, and who are we to deny the forces of the free market?
This one’s an easy one, too.
Divorced white female, going through a bit of a mid-life crisis, seeks perky dog and nothing else. I’m certainly not looking for a dog that’s about as perky as the Hindenburg after it crashed. And I’m definitely, definitely not looking for a romantic entanglement with an ER doctor living on the floor below me. You know--the really, really hot one. The one who loves old movies and Mystery Science Theater 3000. The one who’s 10 years younger than me. Yeah, that one. I really don’t need to be involved with him. Not even remotely.
by Candy • Thursday, February 01, 2007 at 08:51 PM
One of the funniest, smartest bitches around died yesterday of breast cancer. Farewell, Molly. You’ll be missed.
In memoriam, I leave all of you here with her hilarious take on Texas dildo laws. I hope I don’t need to warn you that this video clip is not even remotely work-safe, but just in case, here it is: This video clip is not even remotely work-safe.
I tried very hard to get through this book, but when I reached page 100 and still wanted to throttle the heroine, her mother, her roommates, and everyone else, I had to put it down. Between the frustrating and unreliable heroine and the wooden ancillary characters, I’d had enough.
The heroine, Monette Victor, has just been released from prison after new evidence of bribery and extortion in her prosecution revealed that she had been framed for the murder for which she was convicted. She’d maintained all along that she was innocent and set up, but because of her less-than-stellar lifestyle as a mistress and wayward parent, she was convicted with little effort, particularly after the district attorney pressured other witnesses to falsely implicate her. She wrote a book in jail and became famous because she spilled all the dirt on the district attorney who framed her, because by that time, he was the state Attorney General. The resulting scandal caused him to resign - and Monette to go free.
It was relatively easy to find all the backstory details that set up the present novel, because they’re all on page 6 in a big fat info dump. How convenient.
In a nutshell: here’s the pattern of the heroine’s thought process.
Jail and my life experiences have taught me to be strong! And clever! And made me a whole new person!
But I’m a bad person who doesn’t deserve all the things that have happened to me. I’ve made some bad choices.
But my release from prison gives me a chance to build myself into a new confident woman!
But I’m not confident; I’ve caused a lot of harm and my children hate me. I’ve made some bad choices.
But everyone in this halfway house should go to college! We all have potential! I’m great! You’re great! We’re all great!
I’m not. I’ve made some bad choices.
I’m great!
I’m not. I’ve made some bad choices.
Seriously, if you scanned this book and did a CTRL-F for “bad choices,” I’m betting you’d find at least four uses of the pair in each chapter. The reader does see some of Monette’s bad choices, or hear about them as she tells someone else at length what they were, but the reader also sees that some of those bad choices result from not ridding herself of a slew of negative influences, even as she counsels others to do the same. Just saying she’s made bad choices doesn’t give me any sympathy for her when she continues to follow the same path.
There’s no initial explanation of what happened in jail to give her this insight into her own flaws, or what happened to put her at war with her own confidence, so all I had in the hundred or so pages was an annoying character who didn’t seem real or consistent. Add to that a love interest who is stuck in some wooden and terribly trite dialogue exchanges, and some cliche jealous women who embrace stereotypes with loving precision, and I had to put the book down.
The dialogue between characters, particularly the protagonists, was equally frustrating. Sometimes it was cardboard platitudes, sometimes it was phrases that wouldn’t roll naturally out of anyone’s mouth, and sometimes it was info-dumping. I couldn’t believe any of the characters because the dialogue wasn’t moving the story forward so much as filling in the past, or circling in the present.
Furthermore, the events in the heroine’s life were improbable as well. She walks out of jail, checks into the halfway house, appears on the morning news, then lands a job hosting her own mid-day talk show on a talk radio station. Because people who write books automatically do well on the radio?
What disappointed me most was that cover to plot summary, this book could have been great. The cover is exceptionally sexy - a woman’s legs walking up stairs in gold d’Orsay heels? Wow. And the plot summary holds an incredible amount of potential. An innocent woman who hadn’t lead a most honorable life sent to jail for years for a crime she didn’t commit (though she was guilty of a slew of much lesser crimes) is released because of her own bravery in telling the truth of her own story, even the unflattering part, and thus has a chance to rebuild her life? And to do so she has to balance her sense of innocence and her sense of guilt while ridding herself of people who only want her money or fame but give her nothing in return? Could be amazing. But it wasn’t. It was trite, stereotypical, wooden, boring, irritating and disappointing.
by Candy • Thursday, February 01, 2007 at 04:32 AM
In my old review for Response, I mentioned that retrograde amnesia plots are the tertiary syphilis of romance novels, and I realized that this comparison was more apt than I thought. Retrograde amnesia plots, especially those involving trauma so severe that the heroine can’t remember anything previous to the accident, including her own name, are painful, undignified, a signal that there’s little that can be done to make the book better (though occasionally drastic measures can save it from painful, miserable death), and it can drive readers crazy. Then I started thinking, well, hell, a lot of the plot lines and genre conventions of romance novels can be similarly compared to STDs.
So, without further ado, we proudly present to you: If Romance Novel Conventions Were Veneral Diseases. How many STDs does YOUR book feature?
Secret babies: Secondary syphilis. It’s terribly unsexy, difficult to recover from, and common sense and a little bit of prevention could’ve headed it off at the pass.
Virgin widows and horny, take-charge women in contemporaries who are still virgins: Herpes Type 2 (HSV-2). One of the most common STDs in Romancelandia. Not curable, but not usually fatal; mostly, it’s unsightly and annoying. Despite its prevalence, is still avoidable if one takes basic precautions.
Feisty heroines who set your teeth on edge and the asshole heroes who (allegedly) lurrrrve them: Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Again, one of the most common STDs in Romancelandia. They can be easily overlooked--that is, until they make the plot break out all over with warts. Can sometimes be cancerous to the whole book if it is infected with a particularly malevolent strain of hero and/or heroine.
Heroes with massive Mommy issues: Gonorrhea. Like gonorrhea, this plot device is eminently treatable, and many, many romance authors, flush with the giddiness of writing their first books, contract this plot device in a bout of frenzied, wanton writing. Can cause quite a bit of discomfort, but that’s youthful indiscretion for you. However, if left unchecked and in combination with other unsound hero behaviors (for example, being a complete cockhead to the heroine for no apparent reason other than the fact that she has ovaries and so did mommy dearest), it can make it easier to contract more fatal diseases, like the Big Misunderstanding.
Flavors of the Month (e.g., sheikhs in the 80s, Navy SEALs in the late 90s and early 00s, brooding vampires and werewolves now): Chlamydia. Like chlamydia, it’s the silent epidemic. You go for months, sometimes years, happily reading these books, feeling nary a twinge. Then suddenly, you look up at your bookshelf, and you realize you haven’t read a book in months that wasn’t part of some plaguey Regency Brotherhood with homoerotic overtones, or you couldn’t remember the last time you cracked open a romance novel in which both protagonists were a) fully alive, and b) fully human. AND IT BURRRRRRNS, OH IT BURRRRRRNS. Worst of all, you were unknowingly infecting your friends with it, too. “Hey, check out this awesome series involving werewolf brothers” you told them, innocently handing off some paperback DOOM. You could weep at your carelessness, but what’s done is done. All you can do is move on, warier and grateful that it didn’t get so bad that you contracted the equivalent of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: the dreaded Fangirlitis.
A website that reviews romance novels from a couple of smart bitches who will always give it to you straight. No bullshit. No gushing--unless the author really deserves it. To find out more, read all about us or check out our minty-fresh and funkadelic FAQ section.
Sadly, many of the anthologies with 3-5 authors create short stories or novellas with existing characters. I don’t know how interesting, or how enjoyable they’ll be as stand alones without the requisite background information. I rarely read any novella in…
That’s fantastic! I was just thinking about how influential your site is to readers like myself. I have picked up several authors and bought their books, when I would have never thought about them before based on your…
I really think that the cover for The Civilisation Game could be adapted for use for the next Anita blake novel—scantily clad woman with handgun dominates weird beast-man crouching subserviently at her feet. And you know what they say about…
Green Porno is very disturbing. I think what was freaky is she plays all the male insect parts. Or maybe because she is deadly serious… Very very strange