YouareviewingentriesfromJune2007

NotQuiteaLadybyLorettaChase

by Candy Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 04:08 AM
Our Grade:
B-
Title: Not Quite a Lady
Author: Loretta Chase
Publication Info: Avon 2007, ISBN: 0061231231
Genre: Historical: European

Ingredients:

1 aristocratic female, used once and discarded
1 scientifically-minded, commitment-phobic male
1 heartless rake
1 doting stepmama
1 doting father, adorably clueless
1 daunting, autocratic father
1 rival for heroine’s affections in the form of a tall, dark and handsome colonel
1 secret baby
2 tablespoons matchmaking efforts
1-1/2 cups unlikely coincidence
1 large stick romantic tension
1 cup witty banter
3 gallons guilt and self-recrimination
2 cups unlikely ending
1 giant red bow, velvet or satin preferred

Instructions:

1. Pre-prep: Take aristocratic female and combine with heartless rake, then lightly kill rake. Incubate secret baby for nine months, then remove from female and (via doting stepmama) spirit away to the North for later use. Insert in baby’s place 3 gallons guilt and self-recrimination; occasionally add presence of doting father to bring guilt to a gentle simmer. Let heroine stew for several years.

2. Take autocratic hero’s father and combine with matchmaking efforts. Send hero to ramshackle estate.

3. Bring hero into heroine’s presence and agitate gently. Add witty banter as necessary.

4. Beat hero and heroine with romantic tension until well-muddled. Add a good dash of rival to speed up the process.

5. Combine hero and heroine in laundry room.

6. Throw in unlikely coincidence into the mix and stir at high speed. Unlikely coincidence will bring conflict to a brisk boil and make the reviewer go “Dammit, I HATE it when I’m right about these sorts of deathly predictable things.”

7. Remove cluelessness from father. Briefly increase guilt on heroine’s part, then drain away and replace with now no-longer-very-secret child. Unite hero, heroine and child.

8. Douse mixture liberally with unlikely ending; allow to soak for two minutes and pour into a bowl. Cover bowl and tie everything together neatly with giant red bow.


Loretta Chase once wrote in Lord of Scoundrels: “In my dictionary, romance is not maudlin, treacly sentiment. It is a curry, spiced with excitement and humor and a healthy dollop of cynicism.”

As far as definitions go for romance, that’s an excellent one, and I’d say Loretta Chase herself has been one of the best at writing novels that live up to that adage. In fact, there are only two books of hers that aren’t on my keeper shelf: the alternately brilliant and atrocious The Last Hellion (alas, the atrocious bits outweighed the brilliance), and Not Quite a Lady.

So, not that I want to get inappropriately personal or anything, but: Loretta. Dude. What happened?

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
23 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SavortheIrony.It’sDelicious.

by SB Sarah Monday, June 11, 2007 at 03:03 PM

Many, many people emailed me this story today, so many thanks go out for the opportunity to savor this delicious story: seems the guy who plays Adam in the Creation Museum’s multimedia exhibit has been showing off his serpent in other gardens, prompting museum folks to pull the video from their exhibit.

The actor, Eric Linden, owns a graphic Web site called Bedroom Acrobat, where he has been pictured, smiling alongside a drag queen, in a T-shirt brandishing the site’s sexually suggestive logo. The Web site, which has a network of members, allows users to post explicit stories and photos. He also sells clothing for SFX International, whose initials appear on clothing to spell “SEX” from afar. It promotes “free love,""pleasure" and “thrillz.”

Gotta love thrillz. Of course, Linden seems to have his head on straight - both of them:

“For the Creation Museum, I did what I did as an actor. It doesn’t necessarily mean I believe in evolution or a believe in creation,” Linden said. “I’m hired to get a point across. On the flip side, if I was hired to play a murderer, that doesn’t mean I’d go out and kill somebody. It’s make-believe.”

Yet the museum isn’t seeing it that way:

“We are currently investigating the veracity of these serious claims of his participation in projects that don’t align with the biblical standards and moral code upon which the ministry was founded,” Answers for Genesis spokesman Mark Looy said in a written statement.

Oh dear, oh dear. Only the purest of actors can participate, it seems. There are so many to choose from, too.

In keeping with the moral code and standards upon which this site was founded, I won’t name all the many, many generous and fabulously-dressed individuals who sent me this link for our collective enjoyment. So perhaps it was the person next to you, or the dude driving just a little too slow on the highway, or the checkout lady at Target. You just don’t know, so be grateful to everyone you meet, as they might be one of the folks who spread this little bit of joy today. 

Picture of {name}
17 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: NewsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Hasselhoffpoets/Manglescansionandeyeballs/Onlyonewillwin

by Candy Monday, June 11, 2007 at 06:32 AM

*drumroll*

HaikuKatie!

She beat Iffygenia and her marvelous “Modern Major-General” parody by an asshair--and really, “asshair” seems the most appropriate term for somebody narrowly winning a poetry contest about The Hoff.

Congratulations, HaikuKatie. A package of Hofftastic Awesomeness should be arriving at your doorstep soon.

Picture of {name}
12 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

AgnesandtheHitmanbyJenniferCrusieandBobMayer

by SB Sarah Monday, June 11, 2007 at 03:10 AM
Our Grade:
A-
Title: Agnes and the Hitman
Author: Jennifer Crusie and Bob Mayer
Publication Info: St. Martin's Press August 21, 2007, ISBN: 0312363044
Genre: Romantic Suspense

Agnes just bought her dream home from the mother of a friend of hers. She has a newspaper column as a food writer under the moniker “Cranky Agnes” and is a generous woman who wants a permanent family - which shouldn’t be a problem, since she loves feeding people, but somehow, it is.  Aside from a not-very-small anger problem that usually manifests itself with a frying pan and someone’s cranium (often a fiance or boyfriend caught cheating on her), Agnes is pretty awesome. In fact, now that I’m finished with the book, I’m going to miss her.

Shane, as the back cover says, “Just ‘Shane,’” is a hitman. His Uncle Joey asks him to come to the very very back of the backwater that is Keyes, South Carolina, to take care of a “little Agnes,” who seems to be under attack, as someone tries to steal her dog - though that someone ends up getting beat down with a frying pan for their trouble. Shane arrives, and indeed, people are entering the house attempting to shoot Agnes. Add to that a wedding to throw, a grandmother of the bride and former homeowner trying to sabotage the whole shebang so she can get her house back AND keep the downpayment, a somewhat secretive and very steel-Magnolia mother of the groom, a mother of the bride who is caught between wanting revenge on her mother for a world of hurts and wanting the best wedding for her daughter, and a bride and a groom caught between all these crazy ladies, and Agnes has her share of problems to work out in a few day’s time.

Unfortunately, the arrival of Shane brings with it additional problems which can be filed under the heading of “mob,” “elderly but not retired mob,” “other hitmen,” and “25-year-old scheme to recover $5 million dollars,” and since Shane and Agnes are drawn to each other in primitive and intimate ways, their problems create a very very soupy mess.

Yes, this is certainly a bunch of problems. In fact, I’d say it’s an anthology of problems, but if I did, someone might come after me with a frying pan. So we’ll pretend I didn’t say the “a” word.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
30 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Author, L-PReviews by Grade: A

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SavageMoonbyCassieEdwards

by SB Sarah Sunday, June 10, 2007 at 07:29 AM
Our Grade:
F
Title: Savage Moon
Author: Cassie Edwards
Publication Info: Dorchester 2002, ISBN: 0843949635
Genre: Historical: Other

Browser compatibility issues? GROWL!

Below is the text from the review of Cassie Edwards’ Savage Moon, with the comments in italics and not Javascript-enabled. So if you can’t read the entry with the Java comments, please enjoy below.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
18 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, D-GReviews by Grade: F

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SavageMoonbyCassieEdwards

by SB Sarah Saturday, June 09, 2007 at 07:00 PM
Our Grade:
F
Title: Savage Moon
Author: Cassie Edwards
Publication Info: Dorchester 2002, ISBN: 0843949635
Genre: Historical: Other

It’s awful. it’s just awful.

Does that sum it up enough? No? You want me to relive the story details for you, to put my brain through the egg beater one more time? I’m already mour stupidur for having read this stinker of a book. But fine.

About two or three weeks ago, anonymous packages started showing up on my porch every few days. Inside each one was a Cassie Edwards novel. Due to this absurdly generous person, I am now the proud owner of Savage Moon, Savage Hope and a few other savage titles that I’m not even going to get up out of this chair to go verify. There are five Savages currently living in my bookshelf. I have them isolated. No telling what contagion they might pass on to the other books.

I mentioned the arrival of these packages of poop in book form to Candy, who, if it were possible to do so over IM, snickered and professed innocence to any idea that Cassie Edwards might need to find a home on my poor bookshelf. Despite the fact that each book bears a sales tag from Powell’s, which last I checked was in OREGON, the same state as presently houses CANDY (and also LILITH so do not THINK you are off the hook, ma’am), I have no concrete proof as to who set me up the bomb.

Then Candy, evil wench that she is, publicly challenged me to a duel of sorts: read a horrid book, write a review. I, of course, was conveniently gifted with a shit buffet of Edwards oeuvre, so why shouldn’t I put myself through the agony of reading one of these savage monstrosities?

Trouble was, I had to pick one. So I picked Savage Moon since the title was funny enough that perhaps laughing at it could give me a small soothing balm of comfort while I poisoned my brain. Alas, the Moon did little to help me. Thus book sucked donkey balls. There isn’t an F low enough to throw at it. I might have to modify our grading schedule and give it a Z except that the poor letter Z did nothing to deserve being permanently stuck on a Cassie Edwards novel.

Let me give you a brief plot summary: Misshi Bradley, who is really named Mitzi but her older brother has a monster of a lisp and can’t say her name so Misshi she is, thereby damning me to think of Misha Baryshnikov, is on a wagon at age 10 heading west. Her parents are dead, her siblings are dead, and the only family member left is her older brother, Dale. As expected, their wagon train is attacked by a renegade band of Shoshone Indians, lead by Chief Bear, who grabs Misshi with her wild red hair, throws her over his saddle, and rides away. Dale manages to get off one shot, which lodges in Chief Bear’s head, completely scrambling his brains, though he does manage to hold onto a squirming 10 year old tossed across his saddle.

Misshi is brought to Chief Bear’s camp but makes her escape in the fuss the others make over Chief Bear’s incapacitated state. Moments before Chief Bear and his comatose self are brought into the camp, however, Chief Bear’s wife helps their only son, Soaring Hawk, escape to form a camp of his own, because he does not approve of his fathers renegade ways. Trust me, he doesn’t approve. He says it about six time in one page.

Ten years later, when Misshi is conveniently 18 years of age, the book reveals that she’s been miraculously adopted by a neighboring Shoshone tribe and made the adopted daughter of the chief. How this was accomplished, no one knows, least of all me because the book didn’t tell me, but Misshi is a happy, dimwitted dipshit of a heroine in the Edwards mold, and has dyed her hair black with some random but powerful weed so she can blend in better with the other Shoshone.

Her adopted father turns out to be something of a mentor to Soaring Hawk, who is now a chief in his own right, and his little band of not-so-renegade-but-yet-renegade dudes has grown and remained safe and happy in their secret location. Soaring Hawk meets Misshi, their respective nether parts burst in to flame, and the obstacles they have to overcome to find their happy ending revolve around the fact that she’s white with red hair. Misshi realizes her appearance as a Shoshone is only skin deep, and she must struggle to find emotional and cultural balance between her old life, her yearning to be reunited with her brother, and her new potential life as a chief’s white wife, even IF the other members of his group accept her.

HA! I’m kidding. Honest appraisal of cultural difference? You are barking up the wrong shit tree. Not here, my friend. The obstacles facing Misshi and Soarking Hawk’s happiness stem from her brother Dale’s having gone batshit crazy while serving in the military. Vowing revenge for the kidnapping of his sister, he dresses as an Indian and attacks Indian camps and wagon trains, scalping and killing everyone in site, and saving the scalps as tribute to his lost sister. As soon as he finds Chief Bear, whom he doesn’t know has had his chiefly brains turned into a cerebral scramble, he plans on quitting his life of bloody crime and going off to St. Louis to be an opera singer.

No really. I’m not making that up.

Since I had to go through the experience of not only reading this tripe but reading it PUBLIC where people on the bus could SEE that I was reading this tripe, I figured, what better way to share my journey through the Cassie circle of hell than to excerpt my very favorite parts of the book and footnote them with my reaction. Hold your mouse over the hypertext and a small window should appear. Let me know if it doesn’t work in your browser.

Journey with me now. But take some Pepto first.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
96 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, D-GReviews by Grade: F

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

InspirationalCoverArtContest:theEntries!

by SB Sarah Friday, June 08, 2007 at 09:10 AM

Behold! Inspired covers that derived inspiration from that most inspirational of museums. Send your votes for which one inspires you (to laugh, to cry, to lament the theocracy that undermines American democracy) to Sarah and Candy by June 12. One vote per person, please.

Note: because I am a doofus who forgot to state a size limit in the original contest announcement, I had to edit some of them to fit this here website.

Any questions, you know where to find us. In the garden of Eden, there, asking miss Eve what she’s using to get that shiny, shiny hair.

EDITED TO ADD: Please make sure to vote via email even if you leave a comment with your vote. Commented votes are unofficial, kind of like edit polls!


Entry #1

Entry #2

Entry #3

Entry #4

Entry #5

Entry #6

Entry #7

Entry #8

Entry #9

Entry #10

Entry #11

Entry #12

Picture of {name}
31 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BeholdthePowerofmyPowerpoint

by SB Sarah Friday, June 08, 2007 at 08:30 AM

I got this PowerPoint presentation in teh email today, and had to share. Because if it’s Friday, and it’s Smart Bitches, there must be kilts.

Kilt Power! (right click and download, Bitches!)

Enjoy!

EDITED TO ADD:

I OWE YOU ALL CHOCOLATE because I neglected to mention that this is OMG-SRSLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

No, really, NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

Geez. I feel like a tool. I’m sorry ya’ll! 

Picture of {name}
74 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: But...that's not really about romance novelsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CarpeHasselhoff!

by Candy Friday, June 08, 2007 at 08:18 AM

*cue horn-like synth riff*

Butchered poems together
Laughed till we fell ill
And maybe there’ll be more
We have time to kill
I guess there is no one to blame
We’re being clowns
Hoffpoetry’s driving us insane

It’s the final countdown...

That’s right, motherHoffers! You have until midnight tonight to submit your Hoffpoem, and most importantly, VOTE FOR YOUR FAVORITE. Right now, I’m counting only one vote. Get Hoff your ass, and do it like it’s 1989.

Edited to add: Voting more than once is totally okay by us. Vote early, vote often, and feel free to submit more poems. It’s still wide open, folks.

Picture of {name}
11 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Whatkindoffoodwouldaromanceauthorbe…

by Candy Thursday, June 07, 2007 at 03:23 AM

Sarah’s Gmail quote of the day was: “I am the literary equivalent of a Big Mac and fries.” - Stephen King.

That started us thinking: What does that say about romance authors? What’s their food item literary equivalent? Well, fear not, readers! Trust the Smart Bitches to come up with the perfect food counterpart for your favorite authors.

Nora Roberts: Ice-cream. You can always have ice-cream. Sometimes it’s a little bland or frosty, and sometimes it’s just what you needed when it’s hot as hell outside. Ice-cream is rarely, if ever, bad.

Cassie Edwards: Potted Meat Food product. It’s marketed as food, and it tries very, very hard to be food, but ultimately, it’s Food Product. Frighteningly ubiquitous, and therefore even more terrifying.

Laura Kinsale: Saffron. Rare and exclusive, but packs a huge wallop when used.

Laurell K. Hamilton: Cilantro. Some people LOVE her to the point of OMG obsession, and some people cannot stand her and think she tastes like soap.

Jennifer Crusie: Obvious choice: cherry pie.

Loretta Chase: Coconut milk. Looks like cow’s milk, but most decidedly is not cow’s milk, and adds incredible richness and flavor to any dish.

Julia Quinn: Trifle. Light, happy, not too maudlin, not too filling to be an after-dinner treat.

Catherine Coulter: Deep fried Twinkies. Once upon a time, it was a good junk food. Now? Not good at all, despite the potential.

Lisa Kleypas: A basic chocolate layer cake. Sometimes absolutely spectacular, sometimes pretty bland and chewy with frosting that’s too sweet, but dude, it’s still chocolate cake, so we’re having a piece.

Anne Stuart: Dark, dark chocolate with random habaneros hidden inside.

Sharon and Tom Curtis aka Laura London aka Robin James: An incredibly intricate, arcane cake that looks glazed and normal on the outside, then you cut a piece and holy crap there’s fondant and buttercream with fruit and about 18 layers of 1/2” thick rich cake in between, all sliced so thin it looked like someone used a razor.

Barbara Samuel: A really, really high-quality brownie. Deceptively simple ingredients, but incredibly dense and delicious.

Patricia Gaffney: A big bowl of hearty stew that’ll warm you to your toes and make you feel good. Unless it’s the older bodice ripper novels she wrote for Leisure, in which case, she’s cheese. Perhaps Swiss, for the plot holes. (We’re not necessarily knocking them, mind you. Candy owns almost all of them, and loves them all.)

Dara Joy: American Cheese. Cheesy, yet weirdly plastic, completely unearthly, not quite a food--yet a total guilty pleasure, should you choose to debase your palate so.

Connie Mason: Casu marzu. Cheese so bad, it can actually make you go BLIND.

Sharon Shinn: Sour cream blueberry muffins. People think she’s a quickbread, but really, they’re giant cupcakes without frosting that people justify to themselves as Not Cake because they eat them for breakfast and get them two tables over from the cupcakes. Some Bujold and Asaro novels qualify, too.

Judith McNaught: Grocery-store cupcakes. Sometimes, you just crave them, so you buy a box and eat, like, a dozen in a row. And you suddenly realize that you feel a bit boofy because they’re way too sweet and greasy, and not only that, they have the same basic taste, even though they claim to have different flavors and frostings. See also: Jude Deveraux and Johanna Lindsey.

Kathleen Woodiwiss: Chinese American food. Sometimes it hits the spot, but too often it panders to what people *think* Chinese food should be, so it’s way too salty, way too greasy, and WHY IN THE SHIT IS SOY SAUCE IN EVERYTHING? Just because it’s Chinese food doesn’t mean you slather soy sauce on all of it, you goddamn infidels.

Doughnut: JR Ward. Jhelli philled dhoughnutz, phull of ahngzt, pain and sadism--oops, sorry, zsadism, all skull-shaped with frosting fangs and tiny candy shitkicker boots, trying really hard to look hardcore and scary, but DUDE. It’s a DOUGHNUT. Sure, it’s tasty. It may be a Voodoo Doughtnut, even, and God knows Candy’s fond of those things--in fact, she loves them so much, she got married in the store. But c’mon. They’re DOUGHNUTS, PEOPLE. GET A GRIP.

Bertrice Small: Tex Mex. When done right, it can be yummy, but when mass-produced, contains way too much sour cream sauce and a lot of heat that’s weirdly flavorless.

Harlequin Presents: Cup O’ Noodles ramen. They’re highly standardized, they’re everywhere, they’re cheap, they aren’t especially filling, and nutritionally, they’re about the equivalent of a bag of rocks (actually, the bag of rocks might beat the ramen, because the dirt clinging to the rocks might provide a little B12), but they work if you need calories, and some of the variations can be pretty tasty.

Danielle Steel: Cheez doodles.

Susan Elizabeth Phillips:  Tortilla chips. Delicious and addictive, but: Blue corn? White? Yellow? Low salt? Tequila salt? Extra salt? Pretty much about the same.

Diana Palmer: Biscuits. Made by virgins. Who are mistaken for whores by hard-faced Texan cowboys with women issues the size of, uh, Texas.

Stephanie Laurens’ Cynster series: Pocky. There’s Men’s Pocky, Almond Pocky, Strawberry Pocky, Green Tea Pocky, Coconut Pocky, Milk Pocky, Honey Pocky, Grape Pocky--Pocky Pocky Pocky. All variations of “sweet crap coating a pretzel stick.” And really, if “sweet crap coating a pretzel stick” doesn’t accurately describe all the humpings-on in a Laurens novel, we don’t know what does.

Edited to add:

Oops! Forgot to include this author in the entry:

Linda Howard: Foot-long hot dog with bullet-flavored relish and a lot of mustard. Can’t quite wrap your lips around that monster? TRY HARDER. RELAX. You’ll love it even as it hurts you. Really.

Picture of {name}
115 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Author’sDilemma

by SB Sarah Wednesday, June 06, 2007 at 10:48 AM

In the romance world, there’s many an unspoken rule as pertains to authors and reviewers and whatall. Used to be you weren’t supposed to give incisive reviews of romance novels that said (*gasp*) critical or even mean things about a book.

Yeah, oops, we blew right by that rule, didn’t we?

Another unspoken rule: if thou art an author, thou shalt not speak unkindly to or about a review thou hast received.

So what happens when the reviewer, a reviewer in a Hugely Powerful Publication Of Much Circulation (HPPOMC), gives a review that is totally, completely, utterly, asshattedly wrong?

Note: Details obliquely masked for fun guess-who-ing.

A rather fruitful author has co-written a novel with a few other fruitful and popular authors. It’s not an anthology (a word that would strike fear in the hearts of those who order books, since anthologies do not sell well of late) or a series of interconnected novellas in one cover. It’s a novel with more than one protagonist pair.

Seems the HPPOMC reviewer labels it in the review as three novellas AND as a novel, then recommends the collaborating group write a novel next time.

“Huh?” says SB Sarah.

“Gross mislabeling and the kiss of death,” says the fruitful author. Said author questions with ire whether the HPPOMC reviewer read the book in the first place.

Now, we’ve talked about reviewers who give away the ending a la Harriet Klausner, and the negative backlash against those authors who snark back at reviews they don’t like. But what do you do when a reviewer in a Hugely Powerful Publication Of Much Circulation gets the type of book and details wrong, so wrong that you, the author, question whether the reviewer read it in the first place?

The authors are tempted to take pen to paper and dish out a helping of cannon fire at the HPPOMC, stating that the review as written makes it clear that the reviewer was phoning it in, never read the book, and needs a right smackdown. But of course, they don’t wish to look like whiny dweebs who grouse at the sign of a negative review, even though it’s not the negative review they’d be focusing on, but the part where the reviewer got it so wrong it’s questionable as to whether said reviewer ever cracked the spine.

What would you do?

Do you speak up? Do you write the publication and say, “WTFBBQ?” Do you let it be? Do you take to the internet? How far can an author push against the “Act like you don’t care and say nothing unkind about reviews” rule when that review gets the subgenre and format of the book itself oh, so very very wrong? 

Picture of {name}
45 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random MusingsRanty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HoffPoetry:AContest!OfMuchAwesomeness!

by SB Sarah Wednesday, June 06, 2007 at 06:00 AM

When I returned from my Hoffgazing, I emailed Candy, who said, among other things, “HOLY CRAP” and “How was it?”

Sarah: It was breathtaking. Seriously. And I’m SO PISSED that I grabbed the wrong camera cable because I cannot upload the picture of me & Hoffster until I find the right cable.

Candy: DUDE! You took a picture of yourself and The Hoff?

DUDE!

So how long was the line? And what’s he look like in person?

Sarah: Oh no, Hoff’s publicist’s assistant took a picture of ME, The HOFF, and my HOFF PLANE.

I think that plane might need to be a prize on SBTB for something.

The line was probably about 100 people, maybe, and he looks rather sculpted in person, in a scalpel sense, not a Bowflex sense.

Candy: The HOFF PLANE definitely needs to be some kind of SBTB prize, I think.

Maybe some sort of poetry competition? Compose an Ode to Hoff, and win the autographed Hoffplane?


And then… IT WAS ON.

More,more,more!>