YouareviewingentriesfromMarch2008

HotSheet!

by SB Sarah Thursday, March 06, 2008 at 01:01 PM

Two items of note from the RWA Hot Sheet, which is an accounting of board meetings.

Item 1: “The Board renamed the RWA Lifetime Achievement Award the RWA Nora Roberts Lifetime Achievement Award.”

Word. Up. (When you hear the call? You got to get it underway!) (Good luck getting that out of your head.)

And: “The Board clarified that the RWA Honor Roll shall consist of current RWA members.  (Members who pass away will remain on the list with an asterisk beside their names.)”

What does that mean?

It means Cassie Edwards, who is not a current member, will no longer be on the Honor Roll. She’s off by technicality, in my opinion, but this, I imagine, was an issue because of the plagiarism accusations.

As you were.

ETA: I neglected to point out one other important part of the Hot Sheet (am I the only one who imagines Cheech Marin saying that? Yeah? Ok):

4. The Board formed a Task Force to study and make recommendations about the section of the Policy and Procedures Manual that deals with the Code of Ethics, especially the language regarding plagiarism and copyright infringement.

Picture of {name}
22 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

UltimateHero:UltimateMonologue:TheEntries

by SB Sarah Thursday, March 06, 2008 at 09:21 AM

Ready for some fine heroic Gary Farber? Passionate Gary Farber? Action superhero Gary Farber? Heroically heroic Gary Farber? We’ve got entries. Cast your vote in the comments. Comments close in 24 hours. Ready, Set, Go! 

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
Commenting is disabled, kids. Read the existing comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Ill&SillyDispatchesfromtheWTFDepartment

by SB Sarah Thursday, March 06, 2008 at 08:41 AM

Thanks to an anonymous tipster, we have a title that literally makes me ill to my stomach:

Innocent Wife, Baby Of Shame

Seriously. The title makes me ashamed and nauseated.

And on the flip side, from the same tipster:

The Sheikh’s Chosen Queen

Teddy Pig, what’s your comment on that one? 

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
61 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

LibelTourism:NotAvailablefromYourNewYorkTravelAgent

by SB Sarah Thursday, March 06, 2008 at 06:13 AM

It’s not really about romance but it’s fascinating nonetheless from a legal and a literary perspective: the New York Senate passed unanimously (take a look at that sequence of words for a minute. Holy smoke!) a new bill that will ”protect the state’s writers and publishers from so-called libel tourism.”

Given the almost hyperbolic title of The Libel Terrorism Protection Act, the law was “introduced after the New York Court of Appeals ruled in December that the state’s laws did not protect Rachel Ehrenfeld, an American author, from a possible bid by a Saudi Arabian businessman to enforce a summary judgment issued by the High Court in London.”

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
15 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: But...that's not really about romance novelsRandom Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Prof.SarahFrantzAwardedRWAResearchGrant

by SB Sarah Wednesday, March 05, 2008 at 12:00 PM

Fayetteville State University has announced that Dr. Sarah S. G. Frantz, Assistant Professor of English and Doctor of Awesome, has been awarded the 2007-2008 Academic Research Grant from the Romance Writers of America.

The $5000 grant provides funding for the academic study of mass market popular romance fiction.

Frantz teaches eighteenth-century and Romantic-era British literature at FSU, as well as popular literature and culture. She has published articles on Jane Austen and popular romance fiction and is currently editing two academic anthologies, one of which examines popular romance fiction from new theoretical perspectives. Frantz also blogs about popular romance fiction at Romancing the Blog and Teach Me Tonight. The research grant will provide summer funding for Frantz to write three academic articles on popular romance fiction.

WORD. UP. Congratulations to Dr. Frantz and mad props to the RWA for recognizing her scholarly research in popular romance fiction.

Picture of {name}
23 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

UltimateHero,UltimateMonologue

by SB Sarah Wednesday, March 05, 2008 at 09:48 AM

It’s scrumptious hero time. We’ve been slogging through negativity, underhandedness, blatant dishonesty, and unpleasant portrayals of minorities - and that’s just the presidential primary. So let’s get all mary sunshine on our own asses (ow) and have some fun.

Smart Bitch Contest Time!

Your task, should you choose to accept it, is to create a scrumptious hero. His name? Gary Farber. And really, is there a better name for a hero? Nope, probably not. The real Gary Farber has graciously allowed us use of his most excellent name for our contest, so thanks, sir!

Mr. Farber is the hero of your romance novel. Your next task, once you’ve pondered the limitless WIN that is Mr. Farber, is to compose a monologue for your hero. Keeping with the creative freedom that is inherent in the constraints structure of the romance genre, you can make this monologue part of any scene of your choice. Beating the bad guy? Love scene? Professing his undying devotion to the heroine? Demonstrating incredible prowess in logical and eloquent argument? Chatting over coffee? Your call. Just keep it less than 200 words, please.

Email your entry to with the subject line “Farber Hero Contest” by 10 pm Eastern time today and I’ll post them for voting tomorrow. Yeah, yeah I know. Time constraints. Really, they’re the only ones you have to battle within the romance genre, so kwitcherbitchin’.

Winner as voted by you will receive a $25 gift certificate to Amazon.com, a Smart Bitch title™, and a selection from the Smart Bitch Prize Closet of Awesome Romance.

Get writin’!

Picture of {name}
8 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Love,Truth,andConsequences:TheSagaContinues

by SB Sarah Wednesday, March 05, 2008 at 08:41 AM

From GalleyCat:

...another reader, taking note of Seltzer’s false claims to Native American heritage, spotted what could have been another red flag in Love and Consequences: Sherman Alexie’s Reservation Blues, which Seltzer is sure to have read while pursuing that ethnic studies degree she never quite picked up from the University of Oregon, also features a wise maternal character named “Big Mom.”

Ron is now seeking anyone who can compare the two works to see if the “similarities run deeper.”

Picture of {name}
12 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories:

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

TheFalloutContinues

by SB Sarah Wednesday, March 05, 2008 at 07:01 AM

First, big ups to Caitlyn Hunter for her blog post that contained the following bit of important wisdom:

I don’t know who to be more pissed with on this one; the authors for trying to dupe their readers or the editors/publishers for being blinded by all those dollar signs flashing in front of their eyes.

That one’s a toss-up, but the thing that really ticks me off is the thought of all those struggling writers out there–myself included–who would do just about anything to make it as an author

...except lie, cheat and steal. 

Word.

Edited to add: Barb Ferrer sent me a link to the Eugene, OR, Register-Guard, the home paper of Margaret Seltzer, which has an article today with some very telling information:

When questioned by The Register-Guard last week about calling the book a memoir despite the acknowledged changes in facts, Seltzer said publishers “didn’t want to buy it as fiction.”

And finally, Sandra D sent me a reprint of an article from Slate from 2006 that was reprinted today which asks, “Why are book editors so bad at spotting fake memoirs?”

Many editors think it’s not economically feasible to fact-check every book; intellectually, it may not be feasible either, given the degree of expertise brought to certain subjects. The publishers’ predicament is a real one....

Elisabeth Sifton, senior vice president at Farrar, Straus and Giroux, said, “There aren’t official procedures, but the supposition is that editors need to be smart and well-trained enough to spot this stuff....”

About issuing disclaimers in cases like these, Sifton said, “It’s purposeless, except to save face.”

As the trifecta of “oh shit” continues to unfold in the publishing world, some things become have become more clear as to the ways and means of books: if you make up some fiction, co-opt the painful history of a minority as your own, and call it the truth, that’s a problem.

If you co-opt the truth in other people’s writing, as well as the painful history of a minority as your own, and put it in your fiction without attribution, that’s ok. In fact, it’s on sale now.

Picture of {name}
10 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

GotanHour?

by SB Sarah Wednesday, March 05, 2008 at 12:30 AM

Ok, if you have that hour, go get another one. Got two? Ok, good.

Go check out this mammoth thread wherein a discussion about Allen’s WaPo article becomes a huge, erudite, and point-by-point discussion in defense of and about romance novels. Originally, the author of the post, hilzoy, made what many considered an unfair and ill-advised comment as to the value of romance novels, dismissing them as the equivalent to sudoku or porn. Porn, yeah, but sudoku? That’s a new one.

But wait, it gets awesome. The defense of romance in the hugely long comment thread is a big wow.

No, really. Erudite and entertaining. And it’s HUGE. I’m not even done reading it yet. Have a look.

EDITED TO ADD: My bad! I forgot - graceful curtsy to Cyranetta for the link!

Picture of {name}
32 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories:

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Seriously,WereTheyNotListening?

by SB Sarah Tuesday, March 04, 2008 at 06:45 AM

One more time, for the fun of it: NEW RULE. Don’t Write Fiction and Call It A Memoir. Corollary: fear the internet. If you’re writing about gang warfare or surviving the Holocaust, if it ain’t true, then it is fiction.

Seriously, what the crap is going on here?

EDITED TO ADD: Thanks to Anonym2857 for the link: New Rule #2: If your science is not tight, you have even more reason to fear the internet.

...[E]ssentially identical research published by different sets of authors — potential plagiarism — represented about 0.04 percent of MEDLINE’s database (roughly 6,700 cases in all).

Highly similar studies re-published by the same authors represented another 1.3 percent of the database’s documents.

Now the DejaVu database has been created to find “extremely similar Medline citations” and allow the scientific community collaborative access to figure out what’s padding and what’s plagiarism. The DejaVu project is funded by the Hudson Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

Now, where in tarnation is the Romance novel research granting organization to underwrite all the fact checking that went into our point-by-point examination of Edwards’ novels?

Picture of {name}
45 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

MostEroticWriters-Thenvs.Now

by SB Sarah Tuesday, March 04, 2008 at 06:05 AM

Marta Acosta forwarded me an interesting link: seems TimeOut London has just published their list of London’s 30 most erotic writers. Among them: Shakespeare, Chaucer, Freud, Boswell*, and Lady Caroline Lamb. Acosta noted in her email to me: only three women?!

So here’s my question - not to ask Who Are The Most Erotic Writers In All History Forever And Ever, I’m more after a different query. What writers blow your skirt up, literally? Who are the most erotic writers in your library?

*speaking of erotica: Every time I see Boswell’s name, I recall some reference to him that read, “like Boswell to his Johnson.” Once I learned that Boswell was Johnson’s biographer, and not pointedly attracted to his own personal johnson, that quote made a LOT more sense. 

Picture of {name}
58 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random MusingsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

UpWithYourBloodPressure!

by SB Sarah Monday, March 03, 2008 at 11:55 AM

The minute I started reading Charlotte Allens’ screed against women, the first thought bubbled up from the glaze of “Is this a joke?” was: “When is she going to mention romance novels?”

Ah! There it is. No virulent diatribe against the relative silliness of women would be complete without railing against those of us who betray the power of our brain cells by reading “those books,” i.e. romance. I have to admit, I am so spoiled by the time I spend at this site and others about romance that I forget at times how much romance novels are sneered at and slapped down, often by other women. And it is far more often women who give me shit about my reading material than men. 

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
83 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

InkExchangebyMelissaMarr

by SB Sarah Monday, March 03, 2008 at 06:27 AM
Our Grade:
B
Title: Ink Exchange
Author: Melissa Marr
Publication Info: HarperTeen April 2008, ISBN: 9780061214684
Genre: Science Fiction/Fantasy

Melissa Marr’s publicist at HarperCollins, also named Melissa, has been gifted with a heaping spoonful of Wisdom Pixie Dust, because after I wrote about the absurdity that was Jane Henderson’s review at the St. Louis Post Dispatch stating that Marr’s novel was a “knock off” of Laurell K. Hamilton, she sent me an ARC of Ink Exchange.

How could I resist the opportunity to find out if indeed Marr’s novel about teens mixed up with faeries outside Pittsburgh does indeed feature over-sexualization of teen girls that may lead to teen pregnancy, or the profound oversexxoring that would lead to a valid comparison of Hamilton’s Merry Gentry series? I couldn’t.

Now that I’ve read the book, I have to say, this book isn’t a knock off of anything I’ve read, unless there’s a giant designer purse made up of meaningful, emotionally wrenching YA storytelling from which this book snatched a tassel. There is no question in my mind that Jane Henderson’s opinion is so wrong, it’s not even in the same county as right.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
8 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Non-Romance Reviews: Young AdultReviews by Author, L-PReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

VirginityandVirginification

by SB Sarah Sunday, March 02, 2008 at 12:53 PM

I’m still trying to wrap my brain around all the thoughts that this article from MSNBC shook loose regarding women who undergo surgery to reattach their hymens so that they can be virgins again. Jane sent me the link and her reaction mirrored mine: EAAAAAUUUGH!

Since then my brain has been gnawing on the issue, and forcing me to examine my own horror. Why am I so squicked? And under what circumstances would someone want to surgically reattach their hymen? I can understand wanting to reclaim one’s own virginity if it was forcibly taken away by rape or assault, and I see the necessity when women are subject to honor killings should they dare have sex outside of sanctioned wedlock. But investing external value into the presence of a hymen such that one might pay a surgeon a good amount of money to reattach it for the pleasure of someone else… I don’t get it.

I also thought about and went back to re-read Candy’s and my discussion about virginity in the romance novel and how it’s a powerful and sacred construct affecting both heroes and heroines. But would a romance heroine be believable if she had her hymen reattached?

The surgery itself raises a lot of questions that I’m still puzzling over, not the least of which is how important virginity is in and outside of our culture. Outside of RomanceLandia, is losing your virginity important, and would you want it back? Me? No, thanks.

The balm to my what-the-fuck so far has been this interview series with the creator of The Virgin Project, a comic book that details individual’s experiences losing their virginity. Pages from The Virgin Project are making their public debut at the Seattle Erotic Art Festival Gala. Man, do I ever want to go to Seattle. If any of you ladies see the exhibit, please do let me know what you think!

Picture of {name}
104 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random MusingsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BitchesinSadieMagazine

by SB Sarah Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 08:07 AM

Vadis Turner 2008Remember Sassy magazine? I do. I subscribed. I had no idea how revolutionary it was until it was no longer around and I missed it. It was the first and only magazine in my teen experience that wasn’t about iridescent taffeta prom dresses with three-foot ruffles, celebrity crushes, and interminable ad spreads featuring porny Lolitas shilling for “Love’s Baby Soft.” After reading an issue I felt unquestionable smarter, even if I didn’t quite get the fascination with Evan Dando and the Lemonheads.

Sassy bit the big one when it was absorbed into Teen magazine, which, really, is like the Death Star aborbing the entire rebellion fleet and belching into space afterward. Back issues are still on eBay, some at exceptional markup.

More,more,more!>