Book Review

On A Wicked Dawn by Stephanie Laurens

C

Title: On A Wicked Dawn
Author: Stephanie Laurens
Publication Info: Avon 2002
ISBN: 0-06-000205-0
Genre: Historical: European

Ah, Stephanie Laurens and the Cynsters. Either you love the series or you could chuck it on the pile of books easily read, easily forgotten. I’m usually of the latter party, but with this novel, I find myself a bit stuck, but not because I’ve enjoyed it so much. Mostly because I’m so confused by it.

I suspect that authors who get themselves going on series end up with bloated family trees of various relatives having made successful love/lust matches and eventually, the author might run out of ideas of what to do with this lustful bunch. I also suspect that is exactly what has happened here.

On A Wicked Dawn, and by the way, the title has nothing to do with the plot, not that romance titles do, is the story of Amelia Cynster, one of a set of female twins who I first encountered when I read Devil and Honoria’s story, Devil’s Bride. Amelia and her sister Amanda were very young, about to make their debuts within a few years, and were more annoying than adorable if I recall. Now Amelia is left in London after her sister makes a lovely match with some lord of somethingorother, and she’s set her sights on Lucien Ashford, Viscount Calverton.

Lucien, quite the honorable gentleman, has spent many years within Amelia’s circle of acquaintance, and many more trying to dig his family out of a mountain of debt left by his wastrel of a father. Without telling anyone about his circumstances beyond his mother and their solicitor/banker/investement wizard, Lucien manages to invest and profit enough to bring his family from the deep scaret to the solid black – or in this case, the purple. Now that Lucien has the money, it is time for him to have the luuuuuv ™.

Amelia has figured out that he was in dire straits for years, and sneaks into his house at three in the morning, the night after he has imbibed his weight in liquor celebrating the windfall that put his family firmly on the side of fortune. She proposes marriage: we’d suit well, and you need my dowry.

Rather than correct her, he agrees. And then passes out.

Now pay attention, because that last part is important. See, in most romance novels, there is a hero, a heroine, some attraction, and some force or problem that must be overcome to reach their happily ever after. Both parties have to earn their happy ending. Sometimes that problem is internal (he stutters or has a predilection for sheep, she spends too much or has a weakness for rutabaga flambe, leading to bad breath and pimples) and sometimes it is external (cue evil villain and don’t forget to make him a gay abuser of animals, too) and sometimes it is not even a person. Sometimes it is cultural differences, class differences, or a big misunderstanding that keeps on going.

This book has two problems to overcome by the authors creation, though there are far more than two problems as far as I am concerned. First, Laurens creates this peculiar theme of control that is found in many of the Cynster novels. He who admits love first, loses control. The men fear losing control of their lives because of their growing emotions for the heroines. The heroines want control over their manly men. Lather, rinse, repeat.

The same is true of On A Wicked Dawn: Lucien fears losing control of his engagement and then his marriage by admitting he loves Amelia, and seeks to secure her declaration of love to assure him that he is not alone in the emotional experience. He also does not want to tell her of his duplicity, because he is afraid…of what exactly I am not sure. Of her being angry at him? It’s a peculiar plot device and not one I understand entirely.

As for Amelia, she’s loved Lucien for years and now that they are married, she sets off building the marriage of her dreams: a love match between two committed people. Where she got the template for that in the London society in which she moved I have no idea. But that’s what she wants. So she’s plotting and scheming to gain his love, while he does the same to gain hers.

And how do they go about securing this love? By exhausting themselves with sex. Seriously, if there was ever a book made for frequent and interminable masturbation or a surfeit of hormones, this is it. They are either kissing, going to second base, rounding third, or just humping like bunnies every fifth page. You’d think they’d have been caught in the act, but no, rooms down the hall from ball rooms, masquerades, garden parties, house parties: all fair game for some humpity hump. And after the marriage? There is still some humpin’ going on. It is non stop. And I have to wonder if the main reason Laurens wrote this book was to answer the question, “Can I write a romance novel that is, content-wise, 78% sex scenes?”

There is another force at work in the novel causing conflict, but it seems like such an afterthought that I still can’t figure out the point of it. Someone is stealing items of value from members of the ton, and various scenes indicate a lady, though one is never sure which lady it is. And the plot is so disconnected from the rest of the story it’s more of an annoyance than a source of intrigue.

However, I can’t grade this lower than a C because I did enjoy reading it. So long as no one read over my shoulder while the hero and heroine did it on a riverbank, in bed, on a desk, in a chair, on the floor, in a closet, in the garden, in a shed, on the grass, in the parlor, on the table, in the foyer….

Comments are Closed

  1. Beth says:

    I actually couldn’t get past page 15 of this book. I think it was page 15. All I remember of it was:

    1. her making the proposal of marriage (which annoyed the living hell outta me, that whole scene);

    2. how it turned into the All Nookie All The Time channel immediately after (which annoyed me even more);

    3. boggling at how poor the prose was (which is a major problem for me, and if I don’t like substandard prose, I should maybe stop reading in this genre); and

    4. calling up the friend who loaned it to me and telling her she could take it back tout de suite, and her response: “Oh please GOD don’t make me take it back I beg of you!”

  2. Sarah says:

    Wait, so do I get bonus points for actually slogging through the whole thing while riding the train this week?

    “All Nookie All The Time Channel.” Snort!

    I swear, I love Books(not)Free, but sometimes the media mail slowness kills me. I am still waiting for a shipment, and I am getting low on things to read! I’m having to deviate from romance.

  3. Gail says:

    Just because Stephanie’s prose isn’t up to your standards, don’t give up on all of them. There’s Judith Ivory and Julia Ross, and I loved the prose in a just-out book by brand new author Marjorie M. Liu, Tiger Eye.

    I have trouble reading Laurens books myself though, because most of them seem to be all nookie all the time. I have nothing against a hot love scene but there needs to be a reason for it, more than the hero and heroine need something to do for a spare half hour. Or whatever. And this particular Laurens book—hate to admit, I never picked it up. Just never grabbed me… The ones I’ve picked up, I have finished—though I have skipped great big hunks of the middle…

  4. Jeanette says:

    What I like most about the SL books are the stepbacks. The inside? If you read a few you read them all.
    But the stepbacks are great !

  5. Candy says:

    Heee! Haven’t read the book, don’t plan to unless the urge strikes me to frequently and interminably masturbate, but based on your review, it reminds me of that Chris Rock bit from Never Scared in which he quotes a Lil Jon rap song: “To the window, to the wall, till the sweat drips from my balls… Skeet skeet.”

  6. Beth says:

    Sarah – you do indeed get way extra bonus points for reading it all. Amazing to me, that you lasted that long. Why, you have as much stamina as the heroine!

    (Um. I meant that as a compliment, but somehow it took a turn toward the grotesque.)

    Gail – I’ve by and large given up on the genre, even though I agree that Judith Ivory writes wonderful lovely prose (and imo Laura Kinsale saves the whole thing from the fire). But I’ll look for the other two you mention, thanks! I’m always looking for prose (in any genre) that doesn’t hurt my eyes. 🙂

  7. Jonquil says:

    “Can I write a romance novel that is, content-wise, 78% sex scenes?”

    Laurell K. Hamilton sneers over her shoulder, points to a Meredith Gentry novel, and says “98%!  Beat THAT, bitch!”

  8. Sarah says:

    Oh yes! The “Fucking Fairies” series! (As opposed to the Carpathians, which are the “Fucking Vampires,” and Anita Blake, which is “That Ho-Bag Vampire Hunter.”) I am such a sucker for the Hamilton books I am embarrassed to say so.

    I really got into the first two Merry Gentrys, but the development of the plot is so slow – because, you are right Jonquil, those things are 98% booty call.

  9. NancyJ says:

    I could not finish this book! I tried valiantly to get my $7.00 worth, but I failed.  I am so relieved there are others who felt the same way about this book.  I thought I might be turning into a prude who didn’t like sex scenes.

  10. Eva says:

    I thought I was a big fan of Stephanie Laurens’ Cynsters series. The first few were great and then the latter in the series just lost their plot – the tension’s gone, the prose just got…plain boring. Sometimes I force myself to finish the hardcover books by skim-reading right to the end. I think this book was one of them. Thank god for having a well-stocked local library!

Comments are closed.

↑ Back to Top