AnotherChancetoEducateCandy!

by Candy Monday, August 15, 2005 at 08:34 AM

Update! Sylvia Day posts Debra Dixon’s rebuttal, and based on other evidence, concludes that Medallion dropped the ball. The comments have some interesting reading material, too. Found the link on Alison’s blog.

A couple of days ago, Kate Rothwell posted a letter from the CEO/Editor-in-Chief of Medallion Press about how their status as RWA-approved publisher has been yanked.

OK, I can see the value of vetting a publisher and giving it an organization’s Stamp of Approval so that aspiring authors who sell to small presses can be assured that they’re legit operations, not scam jobs.

But this part of the letter struck me as very, very strange:

Several months prior to Book Expo America 2005, we received a call from your [the RWA] office alerting us to the fact that you would be sending out a letter asking us to re-qualify for RWA approval. We were also told at that time that we had done nothing to warrant the re-qualification, but that your organization was having trouble with a particular publisher and chose not to single them out.

How weird does THAT sound? One iffy publisher was under investigation, but all the other small presses had to go through the re-qualifying process so that the iffy publisher’s feelings weren’t hurt?

Weird, weird, weird. I don’t get it. Can someone enlighten me on why this would be necessary?

Also, how often in the past has the RWA cleaned house for its list of approved small presses? Or is this the first time it has made presses that previously qualified go through the qualification process AGAIN with no evidence of malfeasance (e.g. opening up a vanity press division)?

I’m genuinely curious. Anyone care to educate me?

Please?

Picture of {name}
19 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SundayWorshipAtTheTempleofMan-Titty!GAYMan-Titty!

by Candy Sunday, August 14, 2005 at 05:32 PM

His wick. It is indeed gay.

Sarah: Dear God. It’s like a checklist: open shirt? Check! Tucked into pants? Check! Ruffle? CHECK!

But what’s up with Ichabod Crane’s low-hanging saggy scrotum, there? I mean, is shirt-dude kneeling out of pity? The man is half-dead, and the half that’s dead is down his pants.

Candy: The dude on the left looks really, really bored. “Oh boy. Another blowjob from a blond twink with nipples harder than sapphires. Just another day at Gaywyck.”

Biggest. Camelnose. EVER.

Sarah: MY EYES! MY EYES! Jesus in a sidecar, what is this? Romance for the elephantitis-loves-mullet set? Wouldn’t you seek help if your nads swelled up to the size of cantaloupes?

I can’t even see the rest of the cover. All I see is “giant nutsack!”

Candy: Mr. Testicular Elephantitis bears a somewhat strong resemblance to a friend of mine. His FACE, people, I mean his FACE. So there’s a whole new level of “EEEGAAAH!” going on over here when I look at this cover.

And in addition to elephantitis, Aspen… I mean cover dude totally looks as if he has scoliosis as well. I mean, is it possible to curve your spine THAT MUCH and still remain upright? I (and other adherents to the laws of gravity) would love to know.

And yeah, what’s up with the mullet, man? I guess I should be grateful it’s not Jheri-curled into the bargain.

What, she's not sticking around to watch them get it on?

Sarah: Published in smaller markets as “Fag-Hag’s Lament,” this cover features Lila Fowler from Sweet Valley High, dressed in her Civil-War best, running towards the cliffs of despair as she realizes that Bruce Patman loves himself, and only himself, and since he’s been conveniently cloned, so much the better for both of them.

Candy: And I thought Boondock Saints fanfic was the only place where twincest runs rampant.

That there’s an actual term for this fetish makes me even sadder and scareder.

My question is: Why is the silly girl walking away? If it were me and I’d just been utterly shunned that way, I totally would’ve whipped out my camera (or my sketchbook, to be historically accurate) and had a good time watching the two boys getting it on while recording it for posterity.

Not to mention the excellent blackmail material this kind of thing would’ve afforded....

Buh. No words for this.

Sarah: “Gee, Chet, thanks to some poorly-developed computer graphics, your leg appears to be going directly through my ass.”

“Golly, Lesley, you’re right. And so nice of you to compare my leg to my… other leg! Seems the soccer field is the only thing that’s empty.”

Candy: Wow. Another mullet. Twincest, elephantitis and mullets.

*starts weeping*

What’s weird (besides the mind-bogglingly awful artwork in general) about this cover is, everything on these two figures is hugely overdeveloped… exept for one key area.

OH COME ON. I can’t be the only person who automatically looks THERE on these covers. And it just doesn’t seem as if there’s anything THERE for the dark-haired dude.

Picture of {name}
31 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

HotSaucebyScottPomfret&ScottWhittier

by SB Sarah Sunday, August 14, 2005 at 05:21 PM
Our Grade:
B+
Title: Hot Sauce
Author: S. Pomfret & S. Whittier
Publication Info: Warner Books 2005, ISBN: 0446694312
Genre: Contemporary Romance

Hot Sauce, baby, yeah! I have been mentally pacing, imagining my reviewer self walking back and forth across the space of my brain, trying to figure out how to approach this review.

Short answer: did I like the book? Heck yeah.

But how do I review it? Do I focus on its importance as a gay romance in a heavily-heterosexual genre, or do I approach it as a romance akin to every other romance I’ve read?  As the RWA attempts to define what is romance, and what gendered pairs can and cannot participate in a romance novel, it is certainly important to acknowledge how important a gay romance novel is at the present moment. But at the same time, I should hold it to the same standards of any other romance novel, though that does mean that I might have to reveal some of my own preconceptions about romance, and how I ended up discarding a few thoughts of “If this were a heterosexual romance, who would fit the male role” and “… who would fit the female role” because to attempt to pigeonhole gay or lesbian couples into heterosexist stereotypes is wrong wrong wrong. And I know it - but that doesn’t mean I’m always immune from doing so, unfortunately. However, once I got into the story, it was just that: kickass storytelling, and the attempts to involve any heterosexism on my part fell away.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
27 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, L-PReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Candy’sList

by SB Sarah Sunday, August 14, 2005 at 03:13 PM

Did you know Candy has an Amazon list?

Romances That Aren’t Total Crap!

Lemme guess: Kinsale, Gaffney, and that Putney with Adrian, Uncommon Vows

Ooh ooh, what do I win? It has to be Candy; no one else would say “for the love of God and tacos,” and also, “Dude.”

Picture of {name}
9 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CommentFuckiness

by Candy Friday, August 12, 2005 at 01:14 PM

OK, Sarah and I are trying to figure out how to fucking close the comments in EE without making all the comments disappear.

And it’s motherfucking HARDER THAN IT NEEDS TO BE.

For the next few hours, things may be a bit wacky with the comments. Right now, you’ll notice there are two comment links for most of our entries. One of them has the entry box, the other one doesn’t.

So if weird things are happening, be patient, and just refresh the page. I’m trying out different solutions at a really quick rate, so the comment thing is going to change from moment to moment.

If you have long comments to leave, I recommend you type ‘em out in Notepad or something first because the way things are going now, you might lose ‘em.

Edited to add: FUCK YEAH we just figured it out! WHO’S YOUR DADDY? UNH UNH UNH OH YEAH WE RULE. *happydance*

Picture of {name}
17 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 429 of 499 pages « FirstP  <  427 428 429 430 431 >  Last »