Mo’updatesonRWAruckus,andalittlegameof“WhatIf?”

by Candy Saturday, June 11, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Update and Disclaimer: People seem to be reading wayyyy more into this than I meant for them to. I think a quick clarification of my stance is in order:

1. No, I’m not picking on Brenda because she’s Christian or an inspirational romance author. I’m picking on Brenda because of what she wrote on her blog.

2. Unlike some people out there, I honestly don’t believe that inspirational authors put any sort of pressure on the RWA board of directors to come up with the graphical and language standards. Last time I checked, prudishness, intolerance, a false sense of moral righteousness and general assheadedness are all human traits that are not even remotely close to being exclusive to Christians.

3. That what-if scenario I give below? It picks on inspirationals and Christians only because Brenda writes ‘em. If she’d written in another genre, my example would’ve used THAT. I say this quite explicitly below, but people seem to breeze by the statement and then attempt to make it a godless heathens vs. Christians kind of a thing. IT’S NOT. I’m just pointing out that because Brenda doesn’t have a stake in this, she has the luxury of being extremely removed from everything, hence the ability to finger-wag and tut-tut at all the outrage that has been expressed.

Keep these points in mind as you read the article below. And if you want to rant about the persecution of Christians in this society, by the way, here’s a hint: please don’t. Try living as a non-Muslim woman in, say, Afghanistan, or read about what happened to Kate Rothwell’s Muslim friends in Bosnia, then get back to me about what it means to be persecuted, mmmkay?


Brenda Coulter has the word: RWA has suspended the graphical standards, and are now convening a committee to study the issue.

Brenda also does some finger-wagging over the ranty, enraged bloggers who expressed so much outrage over the issue. My take on the big fuss? Good job, girls! I seriously doubt that action would’ve been taken so soon if people hadn’t lit a fire under the RWA’s asses about this.

And I can’t help but think that Brenda is able to take this extremely detached view on all the ranting because of who she is and what she writes. She has no stake in this (though to be fair she has expressed concern about the graphical standards and the way it was implemented without membership input). She finds erotic romances morally repugnant. Though she certainly has no beef with them being published or read (she’s straight but she ain’t narrow), she certainly has no vested interest in ensuring they’re well-represented in the market. I wonder how she’d feel if the following had happened:

Conditions in America are very different. Much of the population is agnostic, if not outright atheist. However, inspirational romances have hit the market and are really starting to take off--a whole bunch of Christian women are eating these up like candy and buying them by the bucketload. A bunch of inspy writers try to start an Inspirational Romances chapter, only to be met with barely-veiled disdain and bizarre obstacles. Some judges sometimes choose to not read these books because they think they are philosophically bankrupt (though they have no problems with inspys being printed or read). Then the RWA comes up with the following graphical standards for covers to avoid offending the non-Christian readers:

No depictions of churches, crosses, crucifixes or Jesus allowed. People on the covers are not allowed to seem as if they’re in a prayerful stance.

And the following words are not allowed on websites that they link to:

Jesus, God, Bible, any Bible verses, Christ, any references to Christianity as the one true religion or the Christian God as the one true God.

All in the name of not offending non-Christian readers, of course, or trying to unduly influence impressionable young people who haven’t decided which religion to believe in yet.

Now lest any of you think I’m a hater of religion or depictions of Christianity in my romances by coming up with this example, I’d like to note that I’m doing this solely because Brenda’s a writer of inspirationals, and I’m trying to come with an example that’ll hit home. If she was a chick lit writer, I would’ve use chick lit as an example, or romantic suspense, paranormal romance, or whatever other sub-sub-sub-sub genre she happened to be writing.

All right, Brenda! Have at it in the comments.

Picture of {name}
34 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

AboutCandy

by Candy Saturday, June 11, 2005 at 09:31 AM

WARNING: Entry is unusally long, extremely tiresome and contains gratuitous pictures of my cats and me making stupid faces. Read on at your own peril. Pictures updated on 6/19/2007.

AAAAGH!

BEHOLD! THE FACE OF EVIL! Mustache pre-scribbled on for your convenience.

Yay!

This is me after reading a good book.

Grrrr

This is me after having to look at Fabio covers for too long.

I’m now waiting for Monica to Photoshop my head onto various hideously obese women in retaliation for the C- I gave In My Dreams.

UPDATE! And Monica did it. Goddamn. I’m still laughing. I can’t stop. WHY OH WHY THE THUNDER THIGHS?

OK, so I’m totally shit at this biographical stuff, which is why I’m happy I have all these reader-submitted questions to answer.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
39 comments Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: About Us

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

BeaMember

by SB Sarah Friday, June 10, 2005 at 11:34 AM

After a commenting problem was solved by circumventing the security word/captcha via site membership, the idea smacked me: would other folks like to avoid the security lines and go straight to the VIP section of commenting?

Please note: we are virgins to the EE Membership world, so if we grab its man-sac too tightly and cause some malfunctions, we might have to cancel the membership privileges, but until then, let’s give it a stroke - ur, try.

If you’d like to register as a member of the Smart Bitch website, scroll down on the right until you see “Smart Bitchery Members” section and register. Once you’re logged in to the site, you can avoid the security measures for commenting and enjoy the knowlege that you are an official Member of the Smart Bitchery. Or, you could just be...a member. 

Picture of {name}
38 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

DestructionAngel’sCoronation

by SB Sarah Friday, June 10, 2005 at 11:11 AM

Congratulations to Destruction Angel, who despite not being able to comment due to some wacky EE problem, still managed to Guess that Lonely Heart correctly.

Henceforth you shall be known as

Nottingcreme

Picture of {name}
3 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

It’sYourFridayPersonalAd

by SB Sarah Friday, June 10, 2005 at 09:25 AM

You know the drill: guess the title, author, and heroine’s name, and win a spiffy, shiny Smart Bitch title, and the envy of SBTB readers the world over.

Military Maiden Seeks Hot-Water Man

Hot military maiden with penchant for magic wishes seeks equally hot ichthyoman for life-changing romance. Must be willing to follow me through multiple timezones, to help me thwart holy evil, and to find your way back to me whenever I spring forward.

Picture of {name}
23 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 479 of 526 pages « FirstP  <  477 478 479 480 481 >  Last »