







by SB Sarah • Thursday, November 03, 2005 at 03:47 PM
Thanks to brilliant reader Michelle, I am now dumbfounded and curious about the marketing decisions of major romance brands.
Harlequin will be offering NASCAR themed and branded romances:
NASCAR™ claims 75 million fans and says 30 million of them are women.
“NASCAR™ has one of the largest and most loyal bases of female fans of any sport in the United States and we are delighted to publish novels that will appeal specifically to them,” Harlequin CEO Donna Hayes said.
Now, NASCAR™ in and of itself is fascinating. Born in the deep South (Darlington, SC, for example, hosted the first “superspeedway” before Daytona built their speedway, though the racing itself started in North Carolina way back in the 40’s) it is a mix of down-home activities like watching car racing and tailgating, only with seriously brilliant participants. The men and women of the pit crews? Multiple engineering degrees. You gotta have some seriously mathematical smarts to be a NASCAR™ crew member - and yet many of them are life-long racing fans from small rural areas who had big brains and a desire to get advanced engineering and science degrees. So the potential for some fascinating heroes is definitely there, along with the opportunity for writers to create protagonists that break some of the rural Southern stereotypes.
But as for the Harlequin connection, are female NASCAR™ fans really an untapped demographic of romance readers? Is this a savvy move on their part or is it destined to be a big boo-boo in the history of romance? And, most importantly, is there going to be a RITA category for Best NASCAR™ romance?
72 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings •
The Link-O-Lator
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.






by SB Sarah • Wednesday, November 02, 2005 at 06:03 AM
Some of our lovely readers have been kind enough to send us submissions for our cover snark, mostly with quiet pleas of anonymity so we don’t get anyone in trouble. Agreed! The delicate balance of bad cover and good sportsmanship and professional behavior is one we Smart Bitches to not want to monkey with!
To that end, we’d like to open our inboxes to your “Holy God Almighty I’ve Gone Blind” Bad Cover Submissions. Feel free to send us links, cover JPGs or GIFs, or just a title or author name, and we promise to dish out the snark without dishing on your identity.
So, let us have it. Seriously! I’m 2 days overdue! If anything will send me into labor, it’s bad romance covers! I’ve already tried everything else (except Castor oil because that is disGUSTing).
Edited to add: You can email or . No need to worry about leaving a comment if you don’t want to go public!




by SB Sarah • Tuesday, November 01, 2005 at 01:51 PM
So here’s a question that came up (ha!) while Candy and I were discussing Harlequins with boss/employee relationships. One of my guilty-pleasure stories is a Jude Deveraux wherein the CEO tricks a woman from the typing pool into spending the weekend with him at a friend’s Christmas wedding (why? Because she could tell him apart from his twin brother, duh!).
At one point, they have sex without protection, and she’s wigging out, while he’s totally calm about it. Turns out, of course, he’s never gone without a condom when gettin’ it on, which is a sign that she is The One. One ride on the bareback pony and you’re practically married? Oh. Come. On.
The whole “twin without a condom” true love scenario is just peculiar -almost as peculiar as that one Linda Howard where he rolled on the condom about an hour before they got it on, and just wore it under his pants. It wasn’t hot, it was creepy!
Condom-as-luuuurve-device? Ugh. It’s so not sexy. I mean, there’s no way to make a condom sexy! It’s an obligatory element but it’s not sexy or fun. I mean, it’s a rubber sheath that smacks you with reality. Putting it on with your teeth is interesting, and from what I’ve read there’s lots that can be done with it, some lube, and a hot washcloth, but still, condoms are not romantic.
Then I thought, “Hm! I should ask the Bitchery, for surely they know.” So I ask: can a condom in a sex scene be sexy? Can it be introduced in a manner that carries all the appropriate weight of its use, indicating that the characters aren’t complete idiots about STDs, but also not halt the hot n’heavy chemistry in its tracks? Got any examples of “Hot Hot Condom, Baby, Yeah?”
58 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.









by Candy • Monday, October 31, 2005 at 01:29 PM
Deep in the back file cabinet, in the recesses of the Harlequin office, there exists a file folder. It hides behind the “Confidential: Grave Location, Jimmy Hoffa” folder, and the sealed file marked “Truth about Turin, Shroud of.” It’s even nestled in the shadow of the “Dion, Celine: Home Planet Location” folder.
It’s the “Forbidden Titles” file. A list of titles so bad, even the folks down in the Harlequin Presents office aren’t allowed to look at them, for fear they wrest control of the empire away from the publishers and wreak havoc on our understanding of romance as we know it.
Your intrepid Smart Bitches, though, they know how to jimmy the lock on an old metal file cabinet, while holding cosmopolitans in one hand and a stack of Bombshells in the other. Behold: the titles you will never see in a Harlequin Presents novel.
The Painfully Shy Computer Geek’s Russian Bride
The Italian Tycoon’s Restraining Order
The Basement-Dwelling Mama’s Boy’s Virginity
The Stupid White Man’s Dark-skinned Secret Baby
The Heiress’ Purple Cheekbone Bruises
The Crack Whore’s Secret Babies, All Three of Them, Plus a Couple of Toddlers, Too (Hey Man, Who can Keep Track Of All Those Moving Things When You’re High?)
The Boardroom Mistress’s Sexual Harrassment Lawsuit
The Porn Star Thinks Positive
The Morbidly Obese Lady’s Secret Pregnancy
The Heir’s DID Mistress’s Other Personality’s Mail-Order Bride”
The Hungarian Tycoon’s Yugo
Love in the El Camino
The Billionaire’s Incontinent Wife
The Spaniard’s Mostly Virginal Bride, Because Anal Totally Doesn’t Count
The Greek’s Underage Cambodian Whore
A Scandalous Accounting Discrepancy
Pregnancy by Turkey Baster
The Billionaire’s Bulimic Supermodel Mistress
His Secret Weeping Sores
Bound by A Really Fat Dominatrix
The Disobedient Bottom
Herpes Infection of Revenge
Expecting the Playboy’s HIV Test To Come Back Negative
Fellating the Father of the Groom
The Secret of Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch
The Mediterranean Mogul’s Secret One-Testicled Lovechild
The Sheikh’s Obnoxious Halitosis
25 comments •
Categories: Fun And Games •
Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by Candy • Monday, October 31, 2005 at 11:12 AM
Via Sara Donati’s blog, I found this Slate article on Diana Gabaldon, the Outlander phenomenon and A Breath of Snow and Ashes.
Have I mentioned how very, very much I love being condescended to? Check out some of the steaming nuggets of wit and wisdom offered up in this article:
She has a point: There aren’t too many Harlequin titles that include winking references to the Scottish writer Tobias Smollett. Still, Gabaldon doesn’t skimp on the heaving bosoms and heavy breathing. How did she turn her odd mishmash of high culture and low into a No. 1 best seller?
Hey, asshole, there aren’t too many books written nowadays, highbrow or otherwise, that make winking references to eighteenth-century Scottish authors of picaresque novels.
And sex scenes immediately make a book part of low culture? Way to break Tom Wolfe’s heart, man.
Despite Gabaldon’s insistence that her books aren’t romances, her earliest readers were, in fact, bodice-ripper fans—or, at the very least, people who enjoy juicy descriptions of bedroom gymnastics.
Yes. Wading through hundreds upon hundreds of pages of story to get about 10 pages total of sexual description is VERY efficient for us sex fiends. Outlander: steamier than Backdoor Sluts Vol. 8!
Gabaldon’s books do include the elements required to appeal to this vast market. True, they’re brainier than anything featuring Fabio on the cover (...)
Ahhh, the stigma of Fabio. See what evil those covers hath wrought?
Also, note to Laura Kinsale: You apparently write brainless smut. Just thought you’d like to know.
Lovestruck fans can relish A Breath of Snow and Ashes’ steamy bedroom scenes, which are detailed in prose that borders on purple. How else to describe an erotic encounter that begins with the line, “I made love to him at first like a sneak thief, hasty strokes and tiny kisses, stealing scent and touch and warmth and salty taste”?
Aieeee, again with the obsession with the sex scene.
OK, let’s try an informal poll here: How many people read the thousands upon thousands of pages of Gabaldon’s deathless prose just so you can get to Jamie’s turgid swordplay?
To those of you who raised your hands: May I suggest erotica as a more fruitful avenue for your smutty pursuits?
Gabaldon’s books are in fact so assiduously researched that they’re sold at British souvenir shops as accurate depictions of 18th-century Highlander life.
Oh my God, where’s Maili? Her head will EXPLODE when she reads this.
The series contains big words aplenty, a Dickensian surfeit of characters, and scenes of chilling brutality; A Breath of Snow and Ashes features a post-mortem Caesarean section, for example, that is not for the faint of heart. Even the sexual horseplay has an intellectual bent: Leave it to Gabaldon, the onetime university professor with a Ph.D. in ecology, to describe a woman’s response to getting her ass squeezed as “dissentient.”
Ladies, I think we’ve been dissed. The smutty books! They have big words! Alert the presses!
It’s a wonder that bookstores didn’t sell out their entire stock of dictionaries the day A Breath of Snow and Ashes was released, as sex-starved porn hounds bodice-ripper fans everywhere got their sticky mitts on the book.
They’re also the folks who apparently don’t blanch at passages that refer to “the warm, musky weight” of a fiftysomething Scotsman’s testicles.
Really, what’s with this article’s obsession with sex? It sounds like the Mr. Koerner has read only the jiggly bits, because those are the only parts he’s bothered quoting. At the very least, he’s unhealthily focused on them. Most reviewers who read and enjoy romance don’t dwell on and on and ON about sex scenes in quite the way this guy seems to.
I wonder what would happen if he read an Emma Holly? Would his pants catch on fire, I wonder? A fire that can only be put out by the innocent yet wildly arousing touch of a lush-figured widow who’s secretly a virgin?
See, it’s not even that this guy took potshots at a genre I read that I take offence to. It’s that he took potshots that were lazy and just plain WRONG. It’s like making fun of Chinese accents by saying “pretty prease.” Look, if you want to engage in puerile stereotypes, at least get them RIGHT.





23 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Ranty McRant
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.