AUsefulReview

by Candy Monday, June 20, 2005 at 04:07 PM

Christina Dodd wrote a review about a debut novel by Elizabeth Vaughan, Warprize. It praises the book to the skies and provides a pretty bitchin’ plot summary, but to me, here’s the most useful part:

I’ve been trying to compare WARPRIZE to other books I’ve liked, trying to figure out why it struck such chords with me, and I have to say the story is very much a sheik fantasy with a heroine who could have been written by Julie Garwood.

Man, I’m so not going to read this book. It’s not the sheikh fantasy bit--it’s the Julie Garwood bit. Not a fan, never have been, never will be. I think her heroines are uniformly annoying, and her writing style pedestrian.

No, don’t try to tell me that other books I’ve liked like, ohhh, Judith McNaught novels suffer from the same problems. I know this. But something about Garwood sends me to sleep. Either that, or I itch to re-write her sentences while I’m reading her books. Seriously.

I know. What romance reader doesn’t enjoy Julie Garwood? (Answer: the same reader who doesn’t particularly enjoy Nora Roberts or Jude Deveraux. Haaaaa!)

But ye legions of Garwood fans, rejoice! There seems to be a new author on the block who’s totally fabu and her new book features a Garwood-esque heroine. Go check it out and let us know what you think. Do you agree with Dodd’s assessment? Disagree?

(See how I very cleverly push the burden of reviewing a hot new book onto my readership? Again: Haaaaa!)

Picture of {name}
28 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Drive-ByEntryaboutSexandSafeSex

by Candy Monday, June 20, 2005 at 12:09 PM

Angie, Wendy and Karen post about condom usage in romance novels.

One of the primary concerns seems to be birth control. And yeah, condoms are pretty effective (but not as effective as you think--they’re only a few percentage points more effective than coitus interruptus). My big question is, if birth control is such a big deal, why aren’t more romance novel heroines on the Pill?

I mean, even when I wasn’t dating (I made a conscious decision a few years back to not date or have sex for a whole year) I still took my pill religiously. Why aren’t romance novel heroines? It’s a hell of a lot more effective than condoms, not as intrusive as IUDs, and doesn’t require surgery.

I would never rely on condoms as a sole means of birth control, given its relatively high failure rate, and I wouldn’t expect my fiction to reflect that either.

Yes, there are side-effects to the pill. Some of them aren’t pleasant. Some of them are so severe that some women can never go on them Pill. I have a friend like that. She just becomes a puke factory, no matter what brand and dosage level she tried. But the birth control pill is a non-entity in romance novels. It’s not even mentioned.

Condoms are much more useful for disease prevention, though it does shit-all for herpes and human papillomavirus, the virus that causes genital warts. For that reason alone, I like it better when the hero/heroine in a contemporary use a jimmy hat, especially if the two of them end up joggling their nasties within days of meeting each other (*koff*Linda Howard*koffkoff*). However, I’m especially irritated if the hero forgets to use a condom and the heroine decides that barebacking is a sign of TRUE LURVE™ (*koff*Dream Man*koffkoff*) instead of a sign that they should both get tested ASAP.

I do wish that contemporaries featured heroines who used BC methods other than rubbers, though. Or would that make ‘em too slutty?

Anyway, in a sort-of related note, I picked up Hot Spot by Susan Johnson from the library on Friday, and returned it on Sunday, largely unread. I’ve read a few of her historicals and didn’t particularly care for them, but I had hopes for Hot Spot because:

1. The heroine owns a comic book store.

2. I always thought Johnson’s short, choppy sentences and modern voice would be much more suited for a contemporary.

I was browsing through it casually while eating dinner, and I found annoyance number 1 very early on: Johnson uses the word “cuz” instead of “because” fairly frequently--not within dialogue, mind you, but within the narration. Now, I have no problems with a character using the word “cuz” as a contraction. When the narrator does, though, it’s irritating as hell and makes the book sound like it was written by a 15-year-old girl.

Annoyance number 2: Found a sex scene fairly soon (oh, c’mon, what do you THINK I was browsing for?). And seriously? Two paragraphs, if that, from the time the hero inserts his Magical Wonderflesh and the heroine coming so hard she screams the house down.

And every sex scene is that way. He inserts, he pumps, she comes, she screams. All in one paragraph or two. Her hair trigger is envious, but also exhausting to read about. There may be some bantering and/or foreplay, but these remained pretty minimal as well. At any rate, the sex scenes were so short (albeit plentiful), I wondered why Johnson included them at all. Quality, not quantity, people! Unless you’re Emma Holly, in which case the two go hand in hand.

And then there was annoyance number 3: The short, choppy sentences. Very distracting to read. They’re the same length, too. Also, they’re usually punctuated similarly. Makes for monotonous reading. Kind of like this paragraph.

So all three annoyances put together meant I didn’t even bother with Hot Spot, despite the interesting premise and heroine. I’m so glad I checked it out from the library.

Picture of {name}
40 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CategoricallyHorrific

by Candy Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 01:19 PM

Never too young to molest!

Candy: Dad: Naw, Bobby. That ain’t no way to touch your baby sister. C’mere, lemme show ya some REAL fun tricks. And remember, be gentle ‘cause you don’t leave any marks.

Oh yeah. Don’t tell Mom.

Sarah: This cover is just… ugh. And the series, “Three Cowboys and a Baby?” I bet you any amount of money, one of those babies is a secret baby.

Blech!

Candy: Hot damn. The only thing I want forgotten is the sheer mess that’s this cover. What in the fuck kind of effect were they trying to achieve? A combination of Monet on crack and an episode of Days of Our Lives--also on crack? Throw in a horror movie for good measure, because that woman doesn’t have any pupils. Note to cover artists: Regan from The Exorcist should not be your inspiration for romance novel cover art. And near as I can tell the dude doesn’t have any eyes, period, but he has this odd smirk on his face, almost as if he’s happy about it. He probably gave Satan his eyeballs in exchange for the ability to leer menacingly over poorly-painted landscapes.

Sarah: When paintball meets romance, the results are messy, explosive, and gross, and let’s not forget ugly. I think Candy’s on to something, because the cinematographer for Days clearly brought the fuzzy lens and the backlight over for this cover. Makes me wonder if I forgot to put my glasses on this morning.

I know we argue here that romance is often so well written it is akin to an art form, but that is NOT what we mean.

Candy: Alternate title: “When Zombies Want To Fuck.” If there are cover models more bloodless or lifeless in Romancelandia, I have yet to see them. And that’s including all the vampire romance covers I’ve seen.

Sarah: The episode of ‘Highlander’ that was never aired. Christopher Lambert plays Connor McLeod, a man with a horrible secret. He lusts, he pines, he cannot resist… women who have the flu.

Candy: Ummmm, I guess the “expecting” in the title of this book refers to the woman’s pregnancy (of which I can see very little sign), but really, that concerned look on their faces just makes ‘em look kind of constipated. They’re expecting an imminent bowel movement because they haven’t had one in three weeks. Or maybe they’re expecting that shipment of Metamucil to arrive any day now.

Also: if you’re in danger, RUN LIKE HELL YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS. Don’t stop in the middle of the street and pose all pretty with a faintly pained look on your faces. Frankly, the biggest danger you’re in is being mowed over by a car.

Sarah: That chick is expecting to have her midwife scream at her that she’s not gaining appropriately. Expecting means bigger boobs and a much rounder belly than that. She looks positively… normal. And if she’s that early in her pregnancy that she hasn’t begun to “show” yet, well, listen to Candy and get the hell out of the street. Don’t stand there in the breeze and pose like goofballs.

Picture of {name}
23 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Covers Gone Wild! (Non-Snoop Dogg Edition)

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ManTittyContest/Voteforyourfavoritehaiku/oh,literatetit!

by SB Sarah Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 09:38 AM

We are so blessed in the abundance of man-titty, and of man-titty haiku!

Here’s the voting rules: email or your vote by Tuesday, June 21.

When you vote, tell us the name of the haiku author, plus the number of the haiku you are voting for. Many authors submitted multiple haikus so we want to make sure which literary man-titty poem you are voting for.

And without futher ado, or without any ado at all, behold: Man Titty Haiku

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
Commenting is disabled, kids. Trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Go Ahead, Win Some Shit

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

SuddenlyYou,byLisaKleypas

by SB Sarah Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 06:46 AM
Our Grade:
C-
Title: Suddenly You
Author: Lisa Kleypas
Publication Info: Avon 2001, ISBN: 0-380-80232-5
Genre: Historical: European

I swear I’ve read Suddenly You before. I even think it was on my BnF queue and I had it in the house. I remember seeing the cover on my foyer table, in the old house. But did I remember the plot? Not at all. Which is odd; usually I can remember a Kleypas plot. She’s one of my solid-B writers, an author whose books are usually replete with good dialogue and interesting plots or curious arrangements of characters (especially as pertains to social (in)equality).

Suddenly You is the story of spinster writer Amanda Briars, who hires a man-ho for her 30th birthday so as to divest herself of that annoying virginity of hers. She visits a local madam, who arranges the man-ho, and promises to have him on her doorstep at the appropriate hour.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
20 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-KReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 476 of 528 pages « FirstP  <  474 475 476 477 478 >  Last »