WeRomanceReadershaveGoodSexLives

by SB Sarah Monday, February 13, 2006 at 11:23 AM

An anonymous Bitchery reader was kind enough to send me this splash of a PR release: Romance Novels: Are They the Antidote to a Dreary Sex Life? It’s a promotional piece for a specific book, “Midwinter Turns to Spring,” but it cites two journals as evidence that romance readers know how to get it on:

Women who read romance novels make love with their partners 74% more often than women who don’t, according to Psychology Today. Furthermore, when women fantasize frequently (as they do when they read romance novels), they have sex more often, have more fun in bed, and engage in a wider variety of erotic activities, according to a report in Psychological Bulletin.

Now, I’m having a spot of trouble finding the study in question. I’ve found a previously-linked study about male body issues and the whole size-matters question, and I’ve found articles about using your love story to find your perfect mate. There’s even discussion on the healthful results of sexual fantasy. I’m down with that, but where’s the stuff about how if we read them trashy books wit’ the man-titties, we’re all fired up in the sack?

Hmm. I smell dubious PR.

But being of a mildly scientific bent (read: not scientific at ALL) I queried all of my husbands as to whether my love of romance novels has improved our sex life. He said: “I don’t know.  I’ve never been married to someone who doesn’t read romance novels.  But I’ll go with true.”

I can see how it might be true, certainly. To quote Candy, “Bitch. Please.” One good sex scene and many a reader is all, “Yo! Hubby! BOOTY CALL!”

And it’s not just the external mental stimulation that can make one go off and seek some happy action. Reading romance reminds me of the value of my own romance, and certainly makes me more attentive to the health of my marriage. Erotica & romantica were probably one of the best discoveries I made last year, if you queried the husbands living in my house.

I’m sure that the idea that romance novels are good for the gettin’ it on is sound - but I’m not sure that the referenced studies exist. You can read about what men and women consider romantic but I haven’t found any references to romanve novels on the Psychology Today website. Perhaps a Bitchery reader will have better skills and luck in the search than I have.

But dubious PR or not - what do you think? True? False? Or are you too busy “reading” right now to type?

Picture of {name}
11 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random MusingsThe Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Meme-ingTenFamousPeopleI’dShag

by Candy Saturday, February 11, 2006 at 08:53 AM

Warning: nothing to do with romance novels, but I was bored and felt like hunting down pictures of pretty people.

So anyway, a little while ago, I found a meme that told you to list ten famous people you’d shag, but now I forget WHERE I saw it. Regardless, here’s my top ten list. Alex Kapranos and Jared Padalecki didn’t quite make it; James Mercer and Johnny Depp bumped ‘em off. The eye candy factor in this particular list may or may not suit you, since I generally like ‘em small, skinny and goofy, but if you think Spike Jonze is infinitely bone-able, you’ll probably dig this.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
84 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

CoronationceremonyforMandyRoth!

by Candy Friday, February 10, 2006 at 07:48 PM

Mandy Roth is the romance novel maven who successfully guessed the correct answer to today’s personal ad contest, and for that, she shall be soundly rewarded with one of our Smart Bitch titles! Kneel and prepare to be tapped with a sword. (No, not THAT kind of sword. OK, maybe on alternate Wednesdays, it’s that kind of sword.)

Rise, Mandy, for we dub thee:

Baroness Cocque-Slappe

Baroness Cocque-Slappe

Picture of {name}
2 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

YetanotherFridayPersonalAdChallenge!

by Candy Friday, February 10, 2006 at 12:04 PM

Hang on to your panties, because it’s Friday, which means ANOTHER personal ad challenge.

Author + Title + Heroine’s name = AWESOME SMART BITCH TITLE GOODNESS


Faux Ho Seeks Groping, Manhandling

Quiet teacher with felonious OMGHOT showgirl twin seeks big, burly law-enforcment type to manhandle and grope her. Long roadtrips a plus; long roadtrips with bitter arguments, big secrets, big misunderstandings and even bigger cocks a bonus.

Picture of {name}
8 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

GettingRidofBradley,byJenniferCrusie

by SB Sarah Friday, February 10, 2006 at 11:50 AM
Our Grade:
B
Title: Getting Rid of Bradley
Author: Jennifer Crusie
Publication Info: Mira 2001, ISBN: 1551668653
Genre: Contemporary Romance

I read Getting Rid of Bradley upon the recommendation of the Bitchery, who said I should dive in immediately after reading Who’s the Daddy. Indeed, like a fine sorbet, it did cleanse the palette.

The early works of Crusie are fun to read because you see her starting out with some sizeable writing muscles, and you know already that she eventually turns into something of a powerhouse. Not that I’m sucking up or anything. Really. Swear.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
6 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Grade: B

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 410 of 527 pages « FirstP  <  408 409 410 411 412 >  Last »