










by SB Sarah • Tuesday, February 07, 2006 at 05:06 AM
I was reading Derik’s Bane by MaryJanice Davidson on the bus this morning, and, despite not being caffeinated, my brain started a major rumination. One of the characters has the gift of premonition, and as an illustration of the range of that gift, MJD writes that she predicted a tax audit, and September 11th, 2001.
I imagine people have a range of feelings regarding locating contemporary storylines, be they fantasy or not, in the present-day reality using real news events to establish time and location. Personally, I find that there’s a certain limit to how much reality I’m able to swallow in my fiction, but where specifically that limit is, I have a hard time defining.
Not to pick on MJD, because many authors use current events to ground their fiction in contemporary reality, but here’s an example of reality I can deal with. A few pages prior to the 9/11 reference, another character was able to analyze where Bin Laden is/was, and contacted a werewolf cabinet member to go get his behind. Heh - funny. Werewolves can figure out where Bin Laden is, but the US government intelligence cannot, even after five years.
But the reference to how a character was able to warn the pack to “stay the hell out of New York on September 11, 2001?” That gave me chills and yanked me right out of the book. This is probably because I was on a bus heading into New York City at that moment, and because even after five years, 9/11 is not something I quite know how to deal with, in fiction or in reality.
But then, Nora Roberts wrote in Blue Dahlia that the heroine’s husband was killed in a plane crash in September of 2001. There were no specific references to 9/11, but later the reader learns it was a small plane crash, and not one of the jetliners that was hijacked. But yet I was somewhat perturbed that there was a plot detail SO CLOSE to 9/11 and yet no mention of the actual day, because surely any American who was reading the novel noticed the juxtaposition of “September” and “2001” and mentally filled in the “11.”
How close can you get to something so horrible and so real, and still retain the reader’s attention? Does anyone else have the problem of locating news events in contemporary fiction? Does it yank you out of the story?
I have to wonder if it’s references to domestic terrorism that affect me specifically because I was totally fascinated by Stephanie Feagan’s parallel Enron-esque company in her first Pink book, Show Her the Money. The company Pink blew the whistle on wasnt Enron, but it was close enough that you knew the circumstances were a fictionalization of the reality. But events like 9/11? There’s no fictionalizing that, really. I couldn’t even watch the promos for the recent movie “Flight 93” that retold what happened to the people on the plane that were able to call loved ones after it was hijacked but before it crashed. The promos made me nauseous.
To be honest, now that I think about it some more, this might be a quirk of Sarah, since I’m usually trying to ignore the threat of terrorism by reading romance on the subway. I’ve mentioned before my theory that romance fantasy and paranormals are popular right now because it’s soothing to be able to clearly identify the bad guy, because h/she has fangs or fur or a really big freaking gun. In the current reality, you don’t know if the bad guy is the dude with the backpack on the R train, or the lady with the big ass purse on the bus next to you.
So perhaps the mentions of 9/11 in fiction give me chills because I’m in and out of an inadequately-prepared terrorist target every workday, and thus it may be unfair of me to try to draw a line in the sand, so to speak, as to where references of reality cross the line into “too much reality.” However, I’m curious as to what the Bitchery has to say about this one. Am I being asshattedly sensitive or does anyone else feel that way at times as well?





41 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.









by SB Sarah • Tuesday, February 07, 2006 at 05:04 AM
Bitchery reader Anon asks, “Please don’t let the Good Shit section languish in obscurity! It’s been wonderfully helpful. Could I entreat the Bitchery to solicit Sage Advice on the subject of fantasy and sci-fi with interesting relationships between hero and heroine?
Here’s my shelf to get things started:
Lois McMaster Bujold, starting with Cordelia’s Honor and all the way
through the Miles Naismith series, also the Chalion series
Doris Egan, Ivory trilogy
R.A. MacAvoy, The Grey Horse and Book of the Kells
Sharon Miller and Steve Lee, Liaden books
Sharon Shinn, Archangel series
Megan Whalen Turner, Queen of Attolia
Caroline Stevermer, A College of Magics
Martha Wells, Wheel of the Infinite
The only problem with all of these books is that I’ve read them so very
many times, and I’d love new suggestions!”
So, you request, we respond! I’m going to open this up to SciFi & Fantasy romance - bring on your recommendations, and if that’s too broad a category, we can narrow it down when we post the final tally.
67 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Good Shit vs. Shit to Avoid
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by SB Sarah • Monday, February 06, 2006 at 06:10 AM
This week, we’re taking a look at some reader-submitted stepback covers. So nice when the cover is rather bland and then you open the flap and HOLY CANOLI are those REAL?!
Our first stepback: Patricia Pellicane’s Sweet Revenge
Sarah: “The sea is rising up behind me, and here, I have this dead girl with giant silicone boobies. Aren’t Coast-Guard-approved floatation devices made of silicone? I sure hope so!”
Also, can we talk about how disturbingly long her first two fingers are? What does she DO with those fingers?! Prostate exams… on giraffes?
Candy: “Non non non, ma cherie...You keep your knees bent, lift your breasts UP and suck that stomach IN. Like so, comprends?”
Or maybe he’s demonstrating the newest Aikido throw to the little chickadee?
Under the Wild Moon by Diana Carey
Sarah:”Darling, I don’t think it’s going to work between us. First, I have to go fight those monks over there. But more importantly, you have jaundice, you aren’t able to stand up, and one of your breasts appears to be coming out of your shoulder. And, now you’re melting into a puddle. Don’t you see? It’s not you. It’s me. I can’t handle your specialness.”
Candy: YAY medieval mullets! Very authentic.
Side note: All these bitches need to look into knee surgery or something. The premature kneecap failure rate among these models must be appalling.
The Dark Horseman Marianne Harvey
Sarah: You know the horse is thinking, “Ok, I’m about to go over the cliff because Lord Bozo doesn’t look where he’s going, AND I have to pull the weight of this doofy dead woman ol’ Bozo insists on dragging everywhere, even though she’s beyond rigor mortis and her dress is clearly from three seasons ago. And NOW there’s some big fire burning over there and what is he doing? He’s looking down her cleavage again. Maybe I can throw them both over the cliff.”
Candy: Riding a rearing stallion with a shirt mostly unbuttoned is eminently practical and a sign of excellent horsemanship. Also, allowing your stallion to rear so wildly about 2 millimeters away from the edge of a cliff. Between that and the chick with the mean crick in her neck, I say this tableau looks like a Darwin Award waiting to happen.



by SB Sarah • Friday, February 03, 2006 at 07:13 PM
Alert! It is the birthday of Smart Bitch Candy, Saturday, February 4!
So, let us rejoice, and compose our ardor in raunchy haiku, couplets, and iambic smartbitchometer in her honor!
Ready, set, go!
And have a happy birthday Candy!
(And thanks to MadLantern for the graphics!)
31 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: News
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.





by SB Sarah • Friday, February 03, 2006 at 06:15 PM
Congratulations to Sara K, who took all of 15 minutes to guess correctly that this week’s lonely heart was Emma Dunster, heroine of Julia Quinn’s Splendid.
Kneel Sara K, and receive your Smart Bitch Title!
Congratulations, Sara K!
2 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.