





by Candy • Thursday, February 16, 2006 at 05:16 PM
I’ve been neglecting my blog rounds something shocking, lately, so I didn’t get to read this most excellent week-old Romancing the Blog entry about character identification and HEA requirements by Rosario until last night.
Like Rosario, I keep a certain distance from the characters I read about, although most of the time, I can dentify with certain aspects of their personalities or the struggles they go through, especially if they’re portrayed sympathetically. However, my enjoyment of a book isn’t predicated on sympathetic characters, because I’ve read and enjoyed books that immersed me in the points of view of characters who were quite repulsive, such as Marabou Stork Nightmares and Perfume.
And, again like Rosario, I can certainly accept certain elements of a Happily-Ever-After in a fictional world even if they’d be anathema to me in a real-life situation. I mean, if nothing else, romance novel heroines tend to be ridiculously fecund (and happy to be so), even though personally, the thought of having children makes me want to clutch protectively at my ovaries--or at least, the part of my abdomen underneath which my ovaries presumably lie.
In short, I want whatever makes the characters happy to be in the HEA. If having kids is important to the character, then by all means they should be surrounded by boatloads. To Love a Dark Lord by Anne Stuart features a rather over-the-top romance novel epilogue that depicts of My Greatest Nightmare Ever: the hero and heroine living on a farm, surrounded by constant chaos and a swarm of children. Far from making me retch, however, I went “Awwww, the two of them seem so happy!” and sighed happily.
There are instances in which I just can’t buy into the HEA for a particular novel, but it’s usually because the author hasn’t done a good job of portraying the love relationship. Most books with characters who fight and spar constantly only to be struck with the Sudden Realization of Luuuuurve, for example, fall into this category. However, this is different and distinct from specific elements that are HEA dealbreakers, which transcend the author’s ability to make me root for the HEA, so to speak.
These dealbreakers exist, but they’d have to be pretty over-the-top. If, for example, there existed some romance novel out there in which white supremacist protagonists happily spewed racist epithets together in their HEA, I’m pretty sure I’d be deeply, deeply uncomfortable. And by “deeply uncomfortable,” I mean “wishing a stampeding herd of buffalo would crush these assclowns already.”
And that’s an important difference, perhaps: I could perhaps BELIEVE that people who are completely offensive to my sensibilities (e.g. racists, homophobes, Ann Coulter) could live happily-ever-after, but the question is, would I want them to?
So, what do you others think? How closely do you need to identify with your characters to enjoy your fiction? What are some of your HEA dealbreakers?





28 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.







by SB Sarah • Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 11:17 AM
Sometimes during lunch, I google “romance” or “romantic” in Google:News and see what comes up. Today, the day after Valentine’s Day, I figured I’d find a few articles from the news feeds about proposals, gettin’ some on Valentine’s Day, or what the card stores do with all the leftover heart-shaped boxes of candy.
But no: it’s a cornucopia of the romantic efforts of the vaguely creepy.
First, we have a story about a new website that enables you to track down and flirt online with hot people in neighboring cars when you’re stuck in traffic. Because picking your nose isn’t enough of an activity, Ben Phillips has decided the new and best way to hook up with hot people is to… mark your car with a decal so other people can look you up online. Imagine the poetry that can come of this:
“Your headlights are perfect
and your bumper is, too.
I’ve got your decal number
so how ‘bout a screw?”
Then there’s high school junior Paul Kim, who spent his hard-earned money delivering roses to every female student in his graduating class. Nice gesture, but he underestimated by 100 students. I hope the boy gets at least a date out of it, though.
And finally, which is a more romantic film? Titanic or Brokeback Mountain? And while I’m asking the internet doofy questions, ¿Quién ES más macho, Fernando Lamas, o Ricardo Montalban?
Updated to add:
41 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings •
The Link-O-Lator
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.



by Candy • Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 06:59 AM
Wild nights! Wild nights!
Were I with thee,
Wild nights should be
Our luxury!
Futile the winds
To a heart in port,—
Done with the compass,
Done with the chart.
Rowing in Eden!
Ah! the sea!
Might I but moor
To-night in thee!
- Emily Dickinson
Let’s all be shameless saps today. What’s your favorite love poem? Post it in the comments.
44 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: News
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.






by SB Sarah • Monday, February 13, 2006 at 03:57 PM
Smart Bitch Publishing is now opening its doors - ha, just kidding. Or are we? We forget!
SBP is currently seeking query letters for our new imprint: Why Heroines with Amnesia (WHA?)! We’re hoping you can provide us with an outstanding amnesia storyline, replete with things we can’t quite remember clearly. We’re giving you a wide playgound for creativity, because there were rules but since we hit our heads on Fabio’s man-titty, we haven’t been able to recall what they were. Or what our names are, but we can still remember the basics of potty training. And bitching. We’re good at that, too.
Anyway!
WORD LIMIT: 450 words
FORMAT: Give us the proposed title and length
And then, the summary of your amnesia story! We want to know your characters, their conflict, your theme - and the only requirement is that the heroine (or the hero) MUST suffer from amnesia!
Forget the last part of the standard query about your publishing experience and the part where you kiss up. We know we’re awesome, and we know you are, too.
DUE DATE: Send your entries to both Sarah and Candy by Friday, February 17, 2006.
We want your query synopsis, before we forget why we asked. Entries will be posted for Bitchery voting, and winner will receive a gift certificate for Amazon.com, and a fine piece of literature, only I can’t remember which one.
Pesky amnesia.
8 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Fun And Games •
Go Ahead, Win Some Shit
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.






by SB Sarah • Monday, February 13, 2006 at 01:47 PM
Ah, it’s like fish in a barrel: the Native American romance novel cover. The fringe! The headbands! The majestic beadwork. The big bulge in the front of the buckskin trousers!
But what about the poor horsies, forced against their will to participate in this tawdry drivel?
Sarah: The magic in question is how the shirtless comanche is holding onto the stupid woman while she grabs his knee. Poor horse is going to fall the hell over with all that side weight, because the poor thing already has to lug those man titties around on his back.
Candy: Wow, this looks like a figure skating routine, only with a horse. Strapping ice skates onto a horse: talk about cruel and unusual.
Not that it’s any crueller or more unusual than having to bear these two preening asshats on its back.
And is this just a problem with my monitor, but does the man have no discernible nipples?
Sarah: “Stupid woman,” thought Has-Big-Mullet-But-No-Shirt. “Not only is she running around in her nightgown during a brushfire, but she doesn’t realize that horse is going to stomp her head like a melon. Oh well. Maybe me and my man-titties will fit in her shirt.”
Candy: Does it seem to you that BOTH of them are gazing at the horse with unbecoming longing? The girl seems to be gazing wistfully at the horse’s hocks, while the dude seems to be ignoring the girl’s fairly impressive rack in favor of her equine companion. The secret of the book is out: Wind is the name of the horse, and the book is centered around the unholy love triangle between the blonde chippy, an Apache stallion and the horse they both love just a leeeeetle too much for anyone’s comfort.
Sarah: I bet it burns, honey, that “midnight fire.” No one told these two about the romance taboo about buttsecks on horseback.
Candy: That is the BEST expression on her face. Anticipatory, yet blank. Kind of like cousin Bleh in Drawn Together. She knows that he’s promised to remember the KY next time, but she also knows he’ll keep “forgetting.” I mean, c’mon, look at the smug expression on his face. You just KNOW he’s the kind of asshole who’ll slip it up the backdoor and claim it was an “accident.”
The weird disembodied hand clutching at her boob also threw me off for a bit until I realized it was supposed to be hers.
Sarah: And when there’s no horse? Because he done ran off in fear of further trick riding injuries from dangling women off his bridle? Your handsome Apache can yank your arms off and ride you like a stick horse across the prairie.
Candy: All RIGHT! Talk about backdoor love on the range! (Where the deer and the antelope play...proctologist.)
Looking at the supremely awkward angle of her legs, I’m not sure HOW she’s staying upright. Unless she’s being propped up by SOMETHING.
I think there’s definitely a stick horse here, Sarah. Only it’s not the one you think. I think the stick horse is already being ridden, cunningly hidden ‘twixt the folds of the skirt.