






by SB Sarah • Monday, February 13, 2006 at 11:23 AM
An anonymous Bitchery reader was kind enough to send me this splash of a PR release: Romance Novels: Are They the Antidote to a Dreary Sex Life? It’s a promotional piece for a specific book, “Midwinter Turns to Spring,” but it cites two journals as evidence that romance readers know how to get it on:
Women who read romance novels make love with their partners 74% more often than women who don’t, according to Psychology Today. Furthermore, when women fantasize frequently (as they do when they read romance novels), they have sex more often, have more fun in bed, and engage in a wider variety of erotic activities, according to a report in Psychological Bulletin.
Now, I’m having a spot of trouble finding the study in question. I’ve found a previously-linked study about male body issues and the whole size-matters question, and I’ve found articles about using your love story to find your perfect mate. There’s even discussion on the healthful results of sexual fantasy. I’m down with that, but where’s the stuff about how if we read them trashy books wit’ the man-titties, we’re all fired up in the sack?
Hmm. I smell dubious PR.
But being of a mildly scientific bent (read: not scientific at ALL) I queried all of my husbands as to whether my love of romance novels has improved our sex life. He said: “I don’t know. I’ve never been married to someone who doesn’t read romance novels. But I’ll go with true.”
I can see how it might be true, certainly. To quote Candy, “Bitch. Please.” One good sex scene and many a reader is all, “Yo! Hubby! BOOTY CALL!”
And it’s not just the external mental stimulation that can make one go off and seek some happy action. Reading romance reminds me of the value of my own romance, and certainly makes me more attentive to the health of my marriage. Erotica & romantica were probably one of the best discoveries I made last year, if you queried the husbands living in my house.
I’m sure that the idea that romance novels are good for the gettin’ it on is sound - but I’m not sure that the referenced studies exist. You can read about what men and women consider romantic but I haven’t found any references to romanve novels on the Psychology Today website. Perhaps a Bitchery reader will have better skills and luck in the search than I have.
But dubious PR or not - what do you think? True? False? Or are you too busy “reading” right now to type?
11 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings •
The Link-O-Lator
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.






by Candy • Saturday, February 11, 2006 at 08:53 AM
Warning: nothing to do with romance novels, but I was bored and felt like hunting down pictures of pretty people.
So anyway, a little while ago, I found a meme that told you to list ten famous people you’d shag, but now I forget WHERE I saw it. Regardless, here’s my top ten list. Alex Kapranos and Jared Padalecki didn’t quite make it; James Mercer and Johnny Depp bumped ‘em off. The eye candy factor in this particular list may or may not suit you, since I generally like ‘em small, skinny and goofy, but if you think Spike Jonze is infinitely bone-able, you’ll probably dig this.
I have SUCH a crush on Matthew Caws. In fact, have another picture of Matt:
I get to see him live in just under two weeks! EEEEE!
Beck was the first goofy, skinny celebrity I had a crush on. He was the gateway goofy, skinny musician crush, if you will.
Yeah, I even think his Richard Koufey alter-ego is kind of hot, in a really weird way.
God bless whoever found this picture of Jakey-boy and posted it in the comments. RAWR.
CSI: Miami is rendered unwatchable to me because of David “Glasses On, Glasses Off” Caruso’s terrible acting, but I still tune in every now and again just to lust and drool over Jonathan Togo’s character. I’ll do chores or read by the TV until I hear Ryan Wolfe’s voice, then I’ll stop what I’m doing and sigh. Hey, here’s a thought: There needs to be a “good parts” DVD for CSI: Miami, kind of like those porn videos with only the money shots, only instead of spewing penises I get to see Ryan Wolfe looking adorably worried. DUDE. I’M A GENIUS.
Smart, super-skinny, angsty and rocks out with great sexiness and verve in stiletto heels: I apparently like my women the way I like my men. I’d so totally go gay for Polly Jean.
It’s the deadpan sarcasm that gets to me. Really. It is. Oh, fine, the rippling muscles don’t hurt, either.
You regulars probably know about my huge crush on Andy Lau. I’ve wanted him to be my boyfriend ever since I saw him in a kung fu soap opera when I was five or six years old. Him, and Ricky Schroeder in Silver Spoons. Andy’s appeal has lasted quite a bit longer than Ricky’s, however.
He is such a freak, and baby Siddharta knows he looks greasy enough to fry an egg on in a lot of his movies and pictures, but he’s a damn fine actor, and, well, LOOK AT THOSE CHEEKBONES. And that mouth. Christ.
I want to cuddle James Mercer ruthlessly and tell him everything’s going to be OK. Then do unspeakably dirty things to him. And then cuddle him again.
I think I’m supposed to tag people at the end of the meme, so how about this: I tag all of you who read this and feel remotely inclined to participate. If you do, just drop a note in the comments. I’m always down for some eye candy.





84 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.





by Candy • Friday, February 10, 2006 at 07:48 PM
Mandy Roth is the romance novel maven who successfully guessed the correct answer to today’s personal ad contest, and for that, she shall be soundly rewarded with one of our Smart Bitch titles! Kneel and prepare to be tapped with a sword. (No, not THAT kind of sword. OK, maybe on alternate Wednesdays, it’s that kind of sword.)
Rise, Mandy, for we dub thee:
2 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.






by Candy • Friday, February 10, 2006 at 12:04 PM
Hang on to your panties, because it’s Friday, which means ANOTHER personal ad challenge.
Author + Title + Heroine’s name = AWESOME SMART BITCH TITLE GOODNESS
Faux Ho Seeks Groping, Manhandling
Quiet teacher with felonious OMGHOT showgirl twin seeks big, burly law-enforcment type to manhandle and grope her. Long roadtrips a plus; long roadtrips with bitter arguments, big secrets, big misunderstandings and even bigger cocks a bonus.
8 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.







by SB Sarah • Friday, February 10, 2006 at 11:50 AM
Our Grade:
Title: Getting Rid of Bradley
Author: Jennifer Crusie
Publication Info: Mira 2001, ISBN: 1551668653
Genre: Contemporary Romance

I read Getting Rid of Bradley upon the recommendation of the Bitchery, who said I should dive in immediately after reading Who’s the Daddy. Indeed, like a fine sorbet, it did cleanse the palette.
The early works of Crusie are fun to read because you see her starting out with some sizeable writing muscles, and you know already that she eventually turns into something of a powerhouse. Not that I’m sucking up or anything. Really. Swear.
Getting Rid of Bradley details the creation of a love story out of the unravelling of a marriage, along with some embezzlement, larceny, and attempted murder, and some crazy-ass and adorable animals.
Lucy Savage Porter has just been stood up by her ex-husband, Bradley, who asked her to meet him at the courthouse so he could explain everything. Lucy’s well-meaning but overbearing sister is in her usual position of taking care of Lucy, who is beginning to realize she’d prefer not to be so taken-care-of all the freaking time. Perhaps it would be good for her to fall down and bruise her ass every once in awhile instead of having her sister tell her what she needs to do.
Seeing a heroine decide to break out of her routine because she’s tired of it is one of my favorite methods of character development, because it means she has to evaluate where she is presently and why it sucks booty, make changes, and charm the reader into accepting her as she is, and as she will be by the end of the story. In the hands of a skilled writer, this method works brilliantly on me. I’m a sucker for a heroine’s self-reinvention.
After being stood up in divorce court, the newly-divorced Lucy persuades her sister to take her to lunch in a dingy restaurant, again because Bradley said he’d speak to her there.
Coincidentally, due to being tipped off by anonymous caller, Detective Zach Warren and his partner Julian are also in the restaurant, waiting for Bradley. Is it the same Bradley, or a “more different” Bradley?
Zach operates mainly on instincts, and he’s sure that something is up with Lucy, and that she has information he needs. So he follows her out of the restaurant, only to end up saving her when someone takes a shot at them. But she doesn’t take kindly to being tackled, and assaults him with a mammoth physics textbook to free herself, and runs home.
He is convinced that she’s key to his investigation of the embezzling Bradley, despite her assurances that there is no way her ex-husband Bradley is the droid they are looking for. Zach decides she needs round-the-clock protection, an idea she mocks until her car blows up right in front of her.
Here’s where I began to quirk a brow: in order to keep an eye on Lucy, and wait for Bradley to show up, he decides to move in, thus forcing them into close and constant contact. I’ve seen worse methods of shoving the hero and heroine into close quarters, but it was a bit contrived.
But once Zach and Lucy are in her house, and once he persuades her that (a) her life is in danger, and (b) she should use her mammoth amount of sick days to take time off of work and hide out in the house with him, the attraction builds, forcing Lucy to consider who she wants to be and whether she wants that version of herself to be with Zach, and forcing Zach to consider that perhaps his days of ardent bachelorhood are over - just as soon as they figure out which Bradley is the one they want, and why Lucy’s Bradly and Zach’s Bradley seem to be the same dude.
As with most of Crusie’s stories, the book is charming because of the characters, both human and canine. Lucy, seeking to reinvent herself, starts with superficial goofy changes, and ends up with hair dyed a dead, depthless black. But as she learns to stand up for herself, she stops bending at the direction of other people’s preferences for her, and learns to choose her own mistakes, even if they mean that she ends up with green hair. And once she understands that the changes she’s hoping for are internal, she’s able to pick a hair color that matches the person she thinks she can be.
Lucy is a great heroine: she’s not thin or physically perfect, and is prone to doing dumb things to her appearance when what she really wants is to change her life - I’ve done that. Watching her change and watching the hero fall for all sides of her - where she starts and where she ends up - quite delicious.
Zach is nicely yummy as well, though not as attractive a character as Lucy. He’s definitely worthy of her, given that he’s gone to great lengths to protect her, even as he becomes aware of some rather large and scary feelings for her. Instead of running away and distancing himself from those big scary emotions, as some romance heroes might do, Zach moves in and sits on the sofa owned by the subject of those big scary emotions, and faces his fears while protecting her from a Bradley or two.
But Zach also illustrates what aspects of this book didn’t work for me. After only a few days of being locked in together, Zach is done - that’s it, he’s getting married. Literally, days after he’s met Lucy. I know some dudes prefer not to dwell on decisions, but that was a little quick on the surrender of his bachelorhood. Even Lucy, who has decided to be more spontaneous and to go after what she wants, is taken aback, considering she just got divorced a few days prior.
Without giving away too much, the mystery of which Bradley is which, and who is after whom, came together slowly, but was prolonged by Lucy and Zach ignoring details and clues that two detail-attentive people should have caught. It’s like watching someone do something really doltish in a movie - I wanted to scream at the book, “No, NO Don’t IGNORE THAT it’s IMPORTANT.” And I couldn’t believe that Zach would breeze by two very large clues that indicated the safety of Lucy’s house had been compromised. The inattention didn’t seem in-character and made the mystery less sold, more flimsy.
But the aspects of what didn’t work were far outweighed by what did, particularly how Crusie handled the bad guy. Bradley is a clever creation in that he is not an all-out villain, just a bit creepy. He’s like a watered down version of that uber-creep Bill in Crazy for You. By the end of the story, you understand his motivations, though you might question as I did why Lucy put up with some of his behaviors. But he is certainly not evil personified, and even Zach realized that he and bad-guy Bradley have things in common. Much like we discussed on SBTB earlier, understanding the motivations and humanity of the villain, particularly when they are written as a person who has made some evil decisions rather than just being evil through and through, makes for a scary and effective antagonist.
Reading early Crusie so soon after reading the babydaddy book did indeed restore my happy quest for good romance, but it also shuffled my To-be-read pile, as I now want to read Don’t Look Down sooner rather than later to see how current Crusie compares to the early publications. But as usual, if one is looking for quality, particularly after deliberately delving into some sticky romance territory, Crusie is as dependable as ever.





6 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-C •
Reviews by Grade: B
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.