





by Candy • Tuesday, April 11, 2006 at 01:35 PM
This is wildly OT and applies to more than romance novels, but it’s something that’s been stuck in my head a while, so here goes:
It kind of bugs me that a lot of authors, especially authors of genre fiction, get the diminutive forms of foreign names wrong or completely ass-fucking-backwards.
This train of thought got kick-started when some co-workers and I engaged in a conversation about my Chinese name.
Yes, I have a Chinese name. My parents, for some reason, inflicted two different names on both the girls in the family. They gave us English names (Honey and Candy) but then put down Chinese names on our birth certificates and promptly proceeded to pretend the Chinese names didn’t exist. This created quite a bit of confusion on the first day of kindergarten, since the teacher naturally went by what was on the birth certificate. I ended up getting into an argument with the teacher over what constituted my “real” name.
My sister’s story is even funnier. She didn’t know about HER Chinese name until she took a math test in first grade. Her teacher had no idea who this “Honey Tan” was, but she definitely wasn’t registered in the class.
Anyway, most Chinese names have at least two parts to them, not including the family name. Some have three, and some have only one, but the vast majority of the Chinese names will consist of a family name, followed by two other names: Zhang Zi Yi, Chow Yuen Fat, Leung Chiu Wai, Mao Tze Tung, Deng Xiao Ping, etc.
This is because one part of the name is usually a name used for a whole generation of kids. Basically, every boy and girl born to a group of brothers will have a name in common. All my brothers’ sons have names starting with Cheng, for example, while all their daughters’ names start with Kim. The second part of their names is what distinguishes the child within the generation: there can be a Cheng Kin, Cheng Leong, Cheng San, etc.
Note that it’s not always the first part of the name that’s the generational name; I’ve seen people switch it around, too, though from what I’ve observed, using the first name as the generational name is more prevalent.
People familiar with Chinese culture know that these two-part names are usually treated as a unit. If you’re very familiar with the person and want to create a diminutive, you drop the generational name, which makes sense; if you did it the other way around, you’d be calling upwards of a dozen people the same name. So, for example, somebody named Xiao Ming who had Xiao as the generational name may be referred to as Ming, Ming-Ming, or Ah Ming.
People here in Portland find my two-part Chinese name horribly confusing. I hyphenate it to indicate that it should be pronounced as one unit, but people still inevitably try to pronounce only the first part. I try to politely correct people who do this, but some people really, really resent this, occasionally stooping to hostile or snippy comments. I don’t see why it’s treated as such an imposition, because there are similar compound names in English, like Mary-Ann.
I also had a hard time pinpointing why I was so bothered by this. A rose by any other name, etc., right? Then it hit me: it’d be like me calling somebody named Stephen, “Phen,” or somebody named Brian, “Ian"--without their permission, and without knowing them very well.
OK, so I’m taking a long time to make my point, and my point is this: different cultures have different methods of creating diminutive forms of names. And when a name from a certain culture or time period isn’t given the proper diminutive, it can really jar on the ears.
Take, for example, my French friend, Edouard. Some of his American friends call him Ed, sometimes even Eddie baby, which makes me laugh, mostly because it sounds so WRONG. On the other hand, a very French diminutive (albeit one that would probably only be used on a little kid), Dou-Dou, makes me laugh even harder. But this is a pretty good illustration of how diminutives sometimes focus on the stressed syllable.
And once you get into the sort of diminutive where letters are added or completely changed in a name instead of merely trimming away syllables, things get a whole lot more complicated. How Daisy became a diminutive for Margaret and Dick for Richard is still something I have yet to puzzle out, but some, like Nicky or Colette from Nicole, are less difficult to figure out.
And as anyone who’s read Dostoyevsky or Tolstoy can tell you, Russians have their own system of diminutives, and they’re not afraid of inflicting four of five different ones on the same person, some of them not resembling the original name at all, therefore making you feel like a right a dumbass when you realize a few dozen pages down the line that this character you totally thought was somebody else was one of the major characters.
I think this is all a very long-winded way to say: if you want to write about a foreign culture or a different time period, try to get the diminutives right.
Yeah, I realize this is nitpicky shit. Most people probably don’t care, but when used correctly, it really adds an authentic flavor to the prose, and when used wrongly, my OCD self tends to pick on it and pick on it and not let it alone, le sigh. And y’all know how much wiser it is to keep me happy.





51 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Ranty McRant
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.



by Candy • Monday, April 10, 2006 at 11:01 AM
This week’s cover snark was brought to you by this year’s RITA nominees. Quality romance != quality covers, as many authors can probably attest to (poor Loretta Chase--will she ever catch a break, or does God really hate her so much that she’s forever doomed to hideous covers featuring dudes with greasy perms and/or jaundice?). So, congratulations to the nominees, and also best of luck--especially with the art department.
Candy: The Secret Wife hands the (no doubt) Even More Secret Baby to Gunther the bodyguard so he can exterminate the last of the evidence of her drunken Cabo weekend.
Sarah:
Dude. Isn’t that the bald guy from Night Court? You never know WHO is going to turn up as a cover model next!
And why is there a car driving into his crotch?
Candy: HAY GUYS! THIS BOOK IS LIKE OMGHOT LIKE REALLY FOR REALZ HOT! EVEN THOUGH THE GUY LOOKS LIKE A BLIND DATE REJECT BUT U NO HES HOT COZ LOOK AT ALL THOSE HOT CHICS STANDING AROUND HIM.
Sarah: Here at SBTB we present the following ironclad rule: “If you have to use an exclamation point to assert the hotness of your hero, there is no way said hero will be remotely hot on the cover of your novel. Instead, your hero will look like a meth-addled Joey Lawrence.”
Whoa.
Candy: OK, I know the guy is supposed to be putting his hands up in surrender, but from this angle, it looks like he’s excited. “Ooooh, ooooh, Sharon Stone is shooting me with a red laser! How veddy, veddy exciting! I can’t wait to tell Mumsy about this, she will just die!”
Sarah: Either he’s running to Mumsy, or he’s gyrating his hips like those guys in the Nextel commercial and she’s so pissed about his poor dancing skills that she’s going to shoot off his schmeckie and see how well he dances now, huh, punk?!












by Candy • Sunday, April 09, 2006 at 03:59 PM
I’ve pimped John Vanderslice to assorted people with varying success, but I saw him last night at the Doug Fir here in Portland, and HOLY SHIT, he’s good. It was the first show of his that I’d gone to, and it certainly won’t be the last; the music was gorgeous, there was some very witty repartee and much hilarity was had with a recorded horn riff sample.
I also realized I’ve become the kind of fan who sings along to every song--and does it noticeably enough that somebody comes up to me after the show and remarks on it. *headdesk*
Anyway. Please give John Vanderslice a chance. The instrumentation on his music is gorgeous, the songs beautifully and cleverly crafted, and I’m pretty sure they’ll cure cancer while giving you really, really good head. Or something. If you’re curious about what genre he falls under, I guess indie-folk-electro-rock might come close, but he’s that rarest of beasts: he really doesn’t sound like anyone or anything else out there. He has loads of nifty MP3s you can download from his website, so try before you buy, etc. All his albums are good, but my three favorites are Time Travel is Lonely, Life and Death of an American Four-Tracker and Cellar Door.
One of his opening bands, Crystal Skulls, is also amaza-crazy good. So good that the friend I went to the show with bellied up to the merch counter after the concert and bought their latest release. Their music is pretty and jangly and clever, with just the right touch of retro pop, the lead singer kinda looks like a younger, hotter and not-so-much-with-the-Parkinson’s version of Michael J. Fox, and the drummer and bassist make the most hilarious faces at each other while they play (they goofed around so much, the drummer almost fell off his seat; he bounced around quite adorably while trying to maintain his balance, all without missing a beat). What’s not to love? They’re playing two more shows this year in Portland, and I’m pretty freakin’ excited.
And speaking of opening bands, I saw Rogue Wave open for Nada Surf a few months ago, and I was very impressed. I finally got around to getting their debut, Out of the Shadow, last week, and I really, really like it. If The Flaming Lips made sweet, sweet love to the ghost of Elliot Smith while wearing Simon and Garfunkel drag, the bastard child of that beautiful union might make music that comes close to what Rogue Wave sound like. I can’t wait to get my mitts on their next album, Descended Like Vultures.
In summary: please give these bands a chance and throw some money their way, either by getting their CDs or checking out their live shows should you be lucky enough to be graced with their presence. I won’t say you won’t regret it, because for all I know you might have appalling taste, but if you like indie-ish rock/pop, there’s a better-than-average chance you’ll like these guys.
2 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: News
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by Candy • Friday, April 07, 2006 at 02:11 PM
Sara proved her mettle by correctly guessing the answer to this week’s personal ad contest, and as a consequence, has been found worthy of bearing one of our 100% organic and Free Trade Certified Smart Bitch aristocratic titles.
Kneel, Sara, for we now dub thee:
6 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by SB Sarah • Friday, April 07, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Title, author, and
heroine’s name? Oh, goody!
a Smart Bitch title™!
It’s not quite a romance, but it’s close.
Single psychic barmaid seeks pale, thin, thirsty and enigmatic hero to come in, order what we don’t have in stock yet, and involve me in some crazy crap with your friends. I’d be most pleased if you kept your thoughts to yourself, or just didn’t have any that were audible to me. Special consideration paid to men whose essence can give me some seriously super strength and a wicked good hair day.
15 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.