GuessthatLonelyHeart

by SB Sarah Friday, May 13, 2005 at 09:00 AM

It’s personals time, since this here is a Friday. So - I’m posting this at 1:00 PM EDT so you west coasters can have a go.

So, let’s get ready to guess that lonely heart:

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
8 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Takingtheweekendoff!

by Candy Friday, May 13, 2005 at 07:05 AM

OK, darlings, I’m off to Seattle to see The Shins. [insert prolonged squee] Then I’m off to southern Oregon to attend the Not-Particularly-Tall Father-in-Law’s retirement party. [insert prolonged ZZZZZZZZZZ] However, thanks to the magic of ExpressionEngine’s post-dating abilities, I have provided scintillating, timely content that’s set to post over the next three days.

See y’all Monday, and don’t do anything I wouldn’t do. (In other words: don’t molest the livestock or the kids; everything else is fair game.)

Picture of {name}
4 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: News

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

VisualRomance

by SB Sarah Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 06:31 PM

So pretend for a moment you have no romance novels to read - Candy, given the multiple universes need to house your TBR pile, I know this is a bit of a stretch. But pretend you have no romances to read, and you’ve re-read everything in your keeper shelf a million times. The order you placed isn’t here, and you are a-hankerin’ for some romance, stat.

Where do you go? Well, fire up the telly: What tv shows and movies satisfy your romance-love jones?

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
42 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

InMyDreamsbyMonicaJackson

by Candy Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 04:40 PM
Our Grade:
C-
Title: In My Dreams
Author: Monica Jackson
Publication Info: Dafina Books 2004, ISBN: 0758208685
Genre: Paranormal

Monica has warned me that she has her author calming visualization aid at the ready should I decide to rip In My Dreams to pieces. Well, I’m only to going to partially shred it in this review, because although it didn’t really engage me on a lot of levels, it really wasn’t all that bad. So what happens then? Does the author visualization aid change for the reviewer too? Do I get downsized to, say, Kirstie Alley instead of Gilbert Grape’s mama?

image vs. image

Though now that I think about it, I’m not sure which is crueller—Chartreuse satin, or 600 lbs. of backfat?

Anyway, on with the review. Bless has always been the “homely and weird” one of the three Sanderson girls. She sees auras, spirits and demons, she has precognitive dreams and she can perform minor healing acts. It’s a family trait; her aunt Praise has supernatural abilities too. All three sisters are radically different. Bless has the Gift, Maris is autistic, and Ginger is the beautiful one, the restless one, the one who ran for the bright lights of Atlanta as soon as she could.

One recurring dream in particular fills Bless with almost unbearable longing; in it, a handsome dark stranger seduces and loves her. She knows the man is real and that she’ll meet him one day, because she always meets the people she dreams about. She’s just not sure when.

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
13 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-KReviews by Grade: C

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Eroticavs.Romance,ascoveredbythemainstreampress

by Candy Tuesday, May 10, 2005 at 03:54 PM

I never really expected to find something like this on this particular blog, but the Huffington Post (the super-blog hosted by Arianna Huffington) provided this link to an article by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch: “Romance Novels Get Kinky.”

Pretty amusing read, though this bit here peeved me just a little:

After the session, Bright explained the difference between steamy, bodice-ripping romances and erotica.

“When people read a romance, they don’t want a surprise, they want to be put through the paces,” she said, explaining that those paces include a hero, a heroine, a conflict, a resolution and, most important, a happy ending.

“In an erotic novel, you don’t know what’s going to happen. It might not have a happy ending at all,” she said.

She compared it to watching “Law & Order” or “CSI” where the plot line could go in several directions, rather than a Western, which is more predictable because you have a cowboy, an Indian and a showdown.

Of course, the steamy parts are different, too. In romance novels, the mere touch of a man will often launch the heroine into waves of ecstasy. Not so in erotica, where those portrayals are more realistic. (Sorry, guys.)

Do you wish that people who talk about romance novels in the mass media have read books that were published in the last 10, 15 years instead of being stuck in Woodiwisslandia, circa 1975? Yeah, me too.

And in terms of erotica being more “surprising” than mainstream romance: I call bullshit. I don’t know what’s gonna happen? Fuck that, I’ll tell you what’s gonna happen: loads and loads of steamy sex, often with multiple partners. The HEA may not be guaranteed, but so what? A romance novel can be completely sex-free and still be considered a romance novel; you can’t say the same about erotica. Trying to tout one genre as more unpredictable because of its different constraints is pretty damn silly. Their example of CSI vs. Westerns kind of proves the point: I think crime shows operate under just as many constraints as Westerns (though what kind of Westerns ARE they talking about? I haven’t seen a whole lot, but I’ve seen plenty of Clint Eastwood Westerns and none of them feature Indian sidekicks that I can remember, though the showdown was de rigueur). Instead of a cowboy, an Indian and a showdown, you have a crazy-ass killer, some forensic pathologists flexing their studly bods (or in David Caruso’s case, taking his sunglasses on and off) while babbling about hydrogen peroxide concentrations in the plasma or what-have-you, and the bad guy is caught at the end. Or have the 10 or so episodes of CSI that I’ve watched been completely atypical of the series?

The comments on the Huffington Post about this article are also pretty amusing, by the way.

Picture of {name}
26 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSS
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 463 of 498 pages « FirstP  <  461 462 463 464 465 >  Last »