

by SB Sarah • Friday, April 08, 2005 at 08:52 AM
I can’t believe I forgot to mention this when Candy and I were writing about it earlier, but I have a definite theory about why paranormals are so very hot and the market is almost oversaturated, as white raven said, especially in the vampire romance department.
I think this stems from the hyper awareness we carry now of terrorism, and how, unlike in prior wars where we knew who the enemy was (Germans! Russians! Japanese! Canadians! No, wait, not Canada - sorry), we don’t know who the enemy is, and we can’t place them in one convenient location. Terrorists don’t walk up to you and say, ‘Hi! I’m a terrorist and I hate your capitalist agenda. Pull this string on my jacket, would you?” Terrorists are among us and we have no idea who or where they are, and it’s really freaking scary.
Now I could be feeling this more acutely because I live near and work in Manhattan, and it’s generally something I’m aware of, but I think it’s somewhat a national trend- and the reason paranormals are popular right now, along with monster stories and creepy crawly mysteries in general, is that it’s comforting to visit a world where the enemy is very, very easy to spot, and at the end of the story, the obvious evil is vanquished or neutralized. I think paranormals and monsters specifically are attractive as fantasy-relief for readers because supernatural evil is a sort of uber-evil - about the only thing MORE scary than wondering if any of the people on the train with you today are terrorists, and dude, it’s 70 degrees, what’s up with the heavy down jacket? Seeing fangs or claws or watching them molt into a hairy thing at the full moon is a big clue: yo. Dude is baaad news.
Being able to identify and vanquish an evil that is so powerful it’s not even human, or, better yet, to tame and accept that supremely powerful and scary creature with the Healing Power of Luuuuv (tm) is enticing, and helps assuage the fears that a good number of people might carry around. Psychologically, we know we can’t return to a time where terrorism was something that happened somewhere else, but if we look at alternate universes, somehow the uber-scary isn’t so scary anymore when compared with present day life.
8 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.







by Candy • Friday, April 08, 2005 at 07:23 AM
As with the previous two contests: Guess the character’s name, the title of the novel and the author in the comments, and the first person to get everything right will be bestowed with a unique, hand-crafted, guaranteed sweatshop-free title. Smart Bitches, Inc. is a Fair Trade-certified organization. (OK, that last bit is a lie. But we would be, if we actually sold anything. Or were actually, y’know, incorporated.)
FORGET TINA TURNER: WE DO NEED ANOTHER A HERO
Shy princess of small European principality seeks noble, courageous, well-decorated military hero for assistance in progressive nation-building exercise. Must be ready to weather adversity, up to and including imprisonment, shipwreck and rebellion. Fondness for zaftig white girls a plus. PTSD OK.
5 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Guess That Lonely Heart!
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.









by Candy • Friday, April 08, 2005 at 05:51 AM
What is your favorite type of paranormal romance - vampires? Immortal folks? Werewolves? Shapeshifters? Ghosts? Does time travel count?
Sarah: I have to say I’m particularly fond of werewolves, vampires and immortals, but don’t have much time (huh) for time-travel, because they are often so predictable and poorly handled. I did read one crazy wack thing where the heroine switched bodies with a mermaid and went back in time (Goddess of the Sea, by PC Cast - I just looked it up) and there were goddessess and merpeople and all manner of stuff and after awhile I had a hard time with the tone, as it seemed to be more of a fairy tale than anything else. With a rather pointed moral. I don’t want moralizing from my romance! I want nookie!
I think the thing I like best about paranormals is when they take place in a reality that is close to the present, or at least close enough that I can recognize it, and focus on how a person who is clearly, even predatorily different, and tries to fit in, and run a “human"-like life, when really, their abilities and physiology are so beyond humans they run the risk of living among them and feeling contempt and envy all the time. I dig stories like that, the ones that focus on alienation and fitting in under extraordinary circumstances.
Candy: I classify “paranormals” as “anything involving magic and alternate realities.” Which I guess would include time-travel, “futuristics,” shape-shifters, wee folk like fairies, mermaids, ghosts, vampires and right-wing columnists and talk show hosts (no, wait, scratch that last one--I DO NOT want Ann Coulter or Sean Hannity invading my nookie time).
I have yet to read a shape-shifting romance that I like, but it’s not so much a problem with the type of romance as it is a problem finding an author whose writing style I like. If the author’s good, I’ll read just about anything she releases. I tried shape-shifter stories by Donna Boyd, Susan Krinard and Tracy Fobes, but all the books left me kinda “eh.”
I’m not sure I have a favorite kind of paranormal. I like ‘em all. Time travel romances do require a LOT of suspension of disbelief, especially with regards to the culture shock and the language barriers (especially when somebody travels to or from medieval England). The keepers on my shelf that have paranormal elements include The Last Mermaid by Shane Abe, Forever His by Shelly Thacker (time-travel), the Dara Joy Matrix of Destiny trilogy and The Vampire Viscount and The Devil’s Bargain by Karen Harbaugh.
Oh wait, the Matrix of Destiny novels feature shapeshifters, durrrr, so I have read shapeshifting romances that I liked.
And speaking of Karen Harbaugh: I was so excited to learn she was writing again, but I thought Dark Enchantment, her new paranormal novel, was really disappointing and kind of meh, unlike the Signet Regencies she wrote, which were generally excellent.
I think the appeal with paranormal romances (for me, anyway) lies in two major factors:
1. The whole “fish out of water” element. I enjoy reading about people trying to cope with something really, really weird, whether it’s discovering they’re now blood-sucking freaks, or struggling with a corset when in their previous life they couldn’t even stand wearing pantyhose, or trying to figure out what those tiny talking people are in the illuminated box. A lot of the fun also allows us to marvel at the weirdness of human culture, kind of like that creative writing exercise in high school/college in which you pretend you’re an alien who just came to earth and you have to describe a football game to your fellow aliens on your home planet while pretending you don’t know ANY of the rules or the purpose of the event.
2. Paranormal nookie. With aliens, mermaids, shapeshifters and the like, we’re going into some seriously taboo territory--I mean, what the protagonist is fucking is not even strictly human. Sexy inter-species humping extravaganza, woot. And then there’s the whole “vampires/Familiars/whatever can make the sex sooo much better than normal via vaguely-explained mystical means,” and yeah, I get a prurient kick out of that too.
Sarah: I have such a hard time with time travel novels. For one thing, anyone going back in time is going to end up with some serious problems, especially if that person is going back to a time when burning the witches was at all a good idea. I mean, modern language vs. middle/old English? Clothing? Synthetic fibers? I mean, I’d think five minutes after the person landed in the past someone would be all, “OK, you’re just a little too different, so come over here next to the fire, mmkay?” So time travels require a good long suspension of belief for me.
I once read a present-into-future, future-into-present series by La Nora, part of her Silhouette series which she is no longer writing (so now you have to “Look for the seal that guarantees an authentic new work by Nora Roberts!” *snort*) and it left me rather indifferent. I thought it was completely unrealistic, and I usually like Nora Roberts’ books for the realistic characterizations - particularly the heroes. Nora writes her some good men, in my never-humble opinion. But this duo of books - it might have been a trilogy I never finished - never really dealt with some of the culture shock issues: what does it mean psychologically to the characters when they jump ahead or behind and must face a world where their loving parent or sibling is either not due to be born for decades, or is long dead? How do you grieve for someone that might be still alive, if one accepts the theory of time periods existing concurrently in parallel, and thus allowing people to travel between them.
I am, however, a big sucker, as I said, for the theme of alienation - trying to fit in when one is so extraordinary that it’s nearly impossible. It’s like the “fish out of water” element you speak of, amplified by the personal feelings and the psychology of knowing you are so very, very different.
And I’m embarrassed to say this, but I never thought about the paranormal nookie, but you are right that it is often SO hot. And so original, and leaves so much room for exploration of superhuman sexual adventures - and I am not talking about the idea that the hero can get it up five minutes after he had an orgasm. That’s superhuman, but I don’t even think a vampire or a werewolf could swing that (no pun intended).
I’d have to say my favorite paranormal to date is Bitten by Kelley Armstrong. Oh, heavens I love that book. I also loved the first of the Sookie Stackhouse series, and the very very beginning of Laurell K. Hamilton’s Anita Blake series before, as my friend JenFu says, she started adding superpowers like charms on a charm bracelet. But finding paranormals that are well written and not dripping with angst and fear has proven difficult for me.
And I don’t know if Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity qualify as “paranormal” or just “not normal.”
And now, Gentle Reader, The Smart Bitches Present to You: The Paranormal Drinking Game!
Vampires:
Male vampire seeks human woman: 5 sips
Female vampire seeks male companion: 1 sip
Hero was responsible for turning heroine into vampire: 2 sips
Heroine was responsible for turning hero into vampire: 5 sips
Character is in deep, deep denial about being a vampire, to the point they’re steadfastly denying any vampirishness despite growing pointy fangs and experiencing an unholy thirst for human blood: 2 sips
Vampire character is redeemed as better than average bloodsucker by not killing his victims: 2 sips
Vampire is Carpathian: put the book down.
Vampire character is part of a race or culture of people who must have blood to survive, and aren’t evil: 2 sips
Vampire is evil and is the hero anyway: chug!
Likes being a vampire: 2 sips
Holds humans in lowly contempt: 2 sips
Hates being a vampire and wants to return to human life but cannot, a source of much angst: 2 sips
Paranormals Involving Human/Non-Human Pairings:
Hero needs the heroine in order to propagate his species: 2 sips
But doing so is extremely perilous: 3 sips
To BOTH of them: 4 sips
But he doesn’t mention it: 5 sips
Until he almost kills her with his magnificent rod or lightning sperm, or whatever: 10 sips
Even though we have a niggling suspicion that the lightning sperm probably wouldn’t work anyway because the way genetics work indicates that fertile offspring can usually only be produced by two members of the same species: 1 mug
Time Travel:
He goes forward in time, and stays there: 1 sip
She goes forward and stays there: 1 sip
He travels back in time and stays there: 1 sip
She travels backwards and stays there: 1 sip
One person travels, then returns, and their souls find each other: 5 sips
Woman who travels back in time is thought to be a witch: 2 sips
Woman who travels back in time gets any manner of pox: 5 sips
Person who travels back in time is very conveniently in costume at a ren faire/movie set: 2 sips
Person who travels forward is mistaken for an eccentric movie extra or ren faire participant, resulting in hilarious antics and misunderstandings: 3 sips
And somehow speaks modern English perfectly, though they may ‘tis and ‘twas a little bit here and there: 10 sips
Man who travels forward is immediately comfortable with science and gadgets of the future, particularly the remote controls: 5 sips
Or conversely, tries to find the “little people” trapped inside the heroine’s TV set, resulting in hilarious antics and misunderstandings: 2 sips
Or tries to “protect” the heroine from something innocuous to us but seemingly dangerous to his medieval sensibilities, like a bicycle, resulting in hilarious antics and misunderstandings: 2 sips
Woman who travels back in time makes copious observations about the inconvenience of the wardrobe: 2 sips
Woman who travels back in time loses weight due to effort of day to day life and the weight of all of those clothes, and “develops interesting hollows in her cheeks” thus glamorizing weight loss even hundreds of years ago: 5 sips
One person travels forward or back and does not suffer even one moment of debilitating psychological mind warp by realizing that loved ones have either never been born, or are long long since dead: 1 sip
One person travels and goes immediately insane upon realizing where he/she is: 5 sips
Person who travels back and is horrified at the filthy conditions in the past: 2 sips
Person who travels back isn’t horrified at the filthy conditions in the past, in fact isn’t even slightly fazed at the sight of people chucking champerpot contents out of windows and into the streets below: 10 sips
Traveller is a Viking: 2 sips
Traveller is a Viking wearing an actual horned helmet: 6 sips
Traveller is a very virile Viking: lend book to Sarah, because it makes her laugh to say the title out loud!





6 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.


by SB Sarah • Thursday, April 07, 2005 at 05:39 PM
While finding the graphic for “Uncommon Vows” by Mary Jo Putney, I glanced at the review on Amazon - and it was not favorable. I grabbed it because I thought it was supposed to be one of her best - but amnesia? Big Misunderstandings? And a Jewish money lender character? I think that third one just about sent me over the edge.
But, I’ll ask the lovely readers. Shall I continue? Is it worth it? Or shall I move on to Gaelen Foley and the books Candy lovingly wrapped up in titanium to send to me via UPS? What’s your call?
12 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.





by SB Sarah • Thursday, April 07, 2005 at 08:43 AM
Our Grade:
Title: Night Pleasures
Author: Sherrilyn Kenyon
Publication Info: St. Martin's 2002, ISBN: 0-312-97998-3
Genre: Paranormal

For the seventh day in a row, I am sick. I have more phlegm than I care to think about, and I am over being tired. Moreover, I am cranky because being sick is the suck and I can’t figure out the right combination of pharmaceuticals to at least hide my symptoms. So I sit and cough and sneeze and make disgusting wet noises with my throat and wish I could go home and snork and wheeze in the privacy of my own home with my own dog who doesn’t care if I make nasty old people noises so long as I rub his belly while I do it.
So I’m in a pretty foul mood, and I probably shouldn’t write a review in this magical state, but to hell with it. I’m going to bust out the cranky and let you all in on some things I hate when I read romance of any genre.
1. I hate stupid heroes and stupid heroines.
2. I hate Big Misunderstandings.
3. I hate plotlines that are so over-mined for originality that they are predictable. I am close to calling the strip mine of vampire romance closed because there are no more gems to be found in this post-Buffy world.
That last one is what gets me with the book I just finished, “Night Pleasures” by Sherrilyn Kenyon, part of the Dark-Hunter series. I have the feeling that yet again I have stumbled into the middle of the much-loved and long-adored series – and once I give a big hearty, “WTF?!” folks will come out of the woodwork to tell me how very, very wrong I am. Like when I tried to read “Outlander” and couldn’t get through the melodrama.
Normally, if I weren’t congested and cranky, I would be more diplomatic: “Perhaps it is because I entered in what is obviously the middle of a series.” “Perhaps I am missing some of the key plot elements because it is a series and I didn’t start with the beginning.” “Perhaps I am not in the mood right now for paranormal romping.”
Oh, horse-fuck-pucky. I understand that trilogies are beginning-middle-end of a larger story arc and I understand that to best appreciate them, I should start at the beginning. But novels that are part of a series, or involve recurring themes and sets of the same characters or family members, yet are expected to also stand alone as individual fiction should damn well stand on their own and not lean on the books alongside it. It’s one thing if you’re reading Sweet Valley High and have to go through the introduction of who the eternally perfect Wakefield twins are. It’s another when you are still thinking, “Huh?” thirty pages into the book and are annoyed that you’re being treated by the author as a gate crasher at the exclusive club of her fiction.
So imagine my surprise when I realize I am reading the first in the series, and I still feel like an outsider. There’s a prequel of sorts, but this is indeed the first of the Dark-Hunter series. There’s plenty of exposition but not nearly enough to explain the motivations, and I still got the feeling that I didn’t Get All of It.
Pah.
Secondly, vampire romance, it is getting old. Perhaps I OD’d on Buffy and those crazy Carpathians, along with Anita Blake, and several series about immortals, but I’m beginning to suspect that everyone is churning out vampire paranormals that are far short of memorable. Paranormal vampire romance: has it jumped the shark?
Night Pleasures is the story of Kyrian of Thrace, a Dark-Hunter (and why the hyphen? Is this like the Waldorf=Astoria differentiating itself with an equal sign?) who surrendered his soul to fight Daimons, who prey on humans. Daimons have wonderfully potent assorted powers but a lifespan of only 27 years (paging Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, and Jimi Hendrix, please report to Sherrilyn Kenyon’s house for use as inspiration for Daimon characters, STAT) and so they start consuming human souls to extend their lives.
Due to their predilection for soul consumption, and their general evilness, Daimons are the targets of the Dark-Hunters and have been for thousands of years, dating back to the times of the Greek gods and goddesses. Kenyon bases her paranormal world on a great deal of Greek mythology, and gods such as Artemis and Apollo make appearances in the history of the fictional world the characters inhabit. The world itself is fascinating, and presents an epic good vs. evil struggle of which all humans remain blissfully unaware, but the hero and heroine of this particular story do not really live up to the noble and epic backdrop on which they meet.
Amanda Deveraux is the plain-Jane twin sister of a vampire huntress named Tabitha. Amanda is an accountant and is constantly embarrassed by her psychically gifted and beyond-paranormal family, as they are each weird in their own way. One is a sorceress, Tabitha’s a huntress, and their mother sees auras. And one of them is a midwife- nice way to subtly imply the midwife/witch historical rumor, there. They are all magically delicious, and Amanda can’t stand it. She’s looking for as plain a vanilla life as she can get.
Kyrian of Thrace is chasing an uber-Daimon who has unheard-of powers and has bested several Dark-Hunters. Betrayed by his wife back when he was a royal Greek mortal two thousand years prior, Kyrian was given the chance for vengeance and immortality by becoming a Dark-Hunter. Thus, Kyrian is strong, handsome, immortal, noble, brave, loyal, and utterly, fabulously wealthy, and therefore, annoyingly perfect. His only flaw, and it’s not even much of one, is that he doesn’t trust women and is tormented by his memories of his mortal life, in which he was a bit of a bastard to his family. A little sex ought to take care of that, don’t you think?
Amanda is equally perfect, and though she cannot stand anything paranormal, the minute she and Kyrian meet, it is hot lusty looks and endlessly expressed wishes for physical intimacy. It’s always great when the hero and heroine are humpingly hot for one another, but when that’s the only thing drawing them together, it’s not satisfying, it’s not romantic, and it’s certainly not memorable.
The duration of their epic battle against evil is fraught with much peril, and the endless cycle of “his and hers” drama: Will we be able to Be Together? Can I Trust Her? Does he Want Me? The author constantly reassures the reader of their undying lust and they are constantly gazing at each other with the hunger one might see in my eyes at sundown on Yom Kippur after a 24 hour fast. I look at a bagel with plenty of lust, let me tell you.
But there is little development of their emotional attachment, so their relationship seems simple, flat, and transparent. They have lust, therefore they are drawn together. He is perfect and noble. She is brave and feisty, and appropriately gifted with clever skills and powers at the perfect moment. Perfection in all regards: except there is very little emotional development on either side once that lust is acknowledged and acted upon. The personal issues they overcome to be worthy of one another, which are usually a key element in an epic struggle and romance, are pithy at best and seem too easily remedied, usually by some hot bumpy humpin’.
For example after Kyrian and Amanda get it on, he loses his power. Seriously. He came and it went. He enjoys the afterglow and realizes he’s a helpless weakling with a bad, bad headache. His squire and another Dark-Hunter correctly assume that this is only temporary, and indeed it is, though it comes at a time when Kyrian can ill afford to be vulnerable. A few pages later, he’s got his mojo back, but there’s little revealed about how his recovery came about. Was it a gradual recharge or did he wake up a day later able to kick ass and take names again? And of course, let me just continue to spread the giggles: for the rest of their sexual encounters, he refrains from orgasm because he cannot be powerless, so he implores her to “come for both of them.” Yeah. I know. I’m right there with you. AS IF.
And thus my major beef with this book: throughout the entirety, I couldn’t figure out if I liked it. I like paranormals. I like vampire fiction. I dig romance. I like hot sex in a romance. I like cool weapons, battles with supernatural powers, and characters that rise up to the occasion and kick some serious patoot. Night Pleasures has all of these and still manages to be plain. It’s served up like food from a restaurant that is reported to be fabulous but then makes you yearn for Hamburger Helper and the tv remote. Unmemorable in this respect means terribly disappointing, particularly when one considers that it could have been so very much better. I keep reading back over this review and am surprised at how scathing I am, but one of my major peeves with romance is the amount of dreck that comes out that sounds like it’s going to be a gangbusters novel and is so routine and mass-produced that it pisses me off. This book falls square in the low grade territory because my reaction was “Don’t Waste My Money and Don’t Waste My Time.” And also, “Grrrr!” peppered with “As if!”
The resolution of the battle is just as perfect as the main characters. Having once again been tricked by the evil uber-Daimon, who comes across as a whiny, petulant two-year-old with nuclear strength toys and no friends rather than as a scary evil dude, Kyrian and Amanda must face him down to defeat his evil. In a twist on the drunk-father-made-me-evil bit, uber-Daimon’s father is revealed to have been Bacchus, who gave his son the royal shaft by refusing to intervene when uber-D’s lifespan is almost up. Now he pursues Amanda, because he senses her incredible untapped power and he wants his for his very, very own.
Allow me to ruminate for a moment, here. The balance of power is one of the key elements of a paranormal for me, and how each author handles a pair where only one contains the superpowers is always interesting. One expects the hero to be rich, and some authors of historicals play with the idea of the heroine having the money. One expects one or both to be attractive; again, some play with average looks but eventually fall onto another attribute that makes the plain character unique. Other authors charge the hero with emotional growth such that he gets over his expectation that his girl be a supermodel and learns to appreciate a real-sized, sharp-witted average woman as a sign of his worthiness. So what to do when one person can lift cars and move objects with a thought, and the other can’t?
It’s akin to the idea of an aristocrat marrying a commoner. Some authors arrange for the discovery of an unknown title, thus bringing both characters to the same social level. Others allow the social imbalance to be one of the issues the couple must work through, and refuse to “save” the commoner with the long-lost earldom.
In the case of paranormals and power imbalance, if one character is superhuman and the other is merely human, any number of things can happen, just as in a historical novel. Sometimes the human is revealed to be a secret superhuman, or has the ability to become superhuman. Other times the superhuman must return to human status, a convention I often find disappointing. Either way, a conversion takes place, and now restored to quasi-equal status, they can live happily ever after. This is almost expected when one character is immortal, as the reader cannot believe in happily ever after if the reader knows one character will age and die while the other remains permanently youthful.
But what to do when one character will undoubtedly have powers that the other lacks? In the case of this novel, the power balance shifts dramatically back and forth in the final pages, and the resolution is so unsatisfying I sneered over the ending. In the course of kidnapping and controlling the heroine, the bad guy easily “unlocks” the long denied and despised Whitman’s sampler of powers in the heroine. After years of denying and locking up her considerable paranormal resources, one bad guy with the ability to get inside her head can allow her to flex her considerable psychic muscle. Suddenly she can make shit fly across the room, though of course she allows her now-human but still powerful man to fight the final battle and destroy the evil bad guy while she clutches a Barbie doll with a weapon hidden in her feet. No I’m not making that up. Talk about symbolism!
Once they walk into the sunshine and into their happily ever after, an epilogue informs us of the new balance of powers. She is indeed a sorceress, but is he a mere mortal beside her? Of course not. His powers remain, or some of them, after his mortal soul is restored, even though prior explanations of how a Dark-Hunter gets his soul back imply that once he regained mortality, he would be a normal mortal human. But he can’t be weaker than his now-sorceress girl, now can he? That wouldn’t wash. So his superpowers, in diluted and never-fully-explained form, remain. He is off the hook as far as Dark-Hunting is concerned, but he has enough mojo leftover to “protect them.” Meanwhile, she can likely glance at a building and move it three feet to the left, so what protection does she need, really? At least the reassurance is there, so we won’t remember him walking off into the sunset, emasculated beside his Powerpuff Girl of a wife.
All About Romance’s review of this book fell between one reviewer who gave it a marginally higher grade, and another who loathed it. The reviewer who enjoyed it said, “Sometimes you just have to go with it, you know?” Usually I have that attitude, but the mediocrity and processed perfection of the book made it rote and boring, so I couldn’t go with it. I felt like reading this book was akin to watching a rerun, or worse, an entirely and frustratingly predictable new episode of a show I usually like. In fact, an Amazon reviewer likened it to “a poorly scripted, poorly acted made-for-TV movie on the Sci-Fi channel.” Amen to that. I’ve read plenty of books that sounded good but ended up average. It’s somewhat more rare for a book to have limitless potential and fall so far short of memorable that it pissed me off.





18 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Reviews by Author, H-K •
Reviews by Grade: D
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.