TooMuchSexisBad,mmmkay?

by Candy Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 11:26 AM

Step 1: Instead of ass say buns, like “kiss my buns” or “you’re a buns hole”

Step 2: Instead of shit say poo, as in “bull poo”, “poo head” and this “poo is cold”

Step 3: With bitch drop the t because bich is latin for generosity

Step 4: Dont say fuck any more because fuck is the worst word that you can say

So just use the word mmmkay!

Big flappedy-flap-flap going on about those naughty words certain romance authors like to use and those naughty acts these same authors like to write about.

A quote from a letter to the editor published in the RWR:

“There’s a big difference between sensual romance and erotica, and I think we made a big mistake in lowering our standards to accept such a publisher.”

Ahhhh. Right. Must not lower those professional standards. Nope.

Let’s play a game. Guess which type of passage I MUCH prefer reading (and which sounds more professionally-written, period):

A. She had even pretended to be a man while on the opium-carrying ship! Even though dressed again like a man this night, she at least admitted to being a woman, which she most surely was!

B. Trembling now, Eric tried to breathe as steadily as his friend. His own erection felt like a club, hot behind the cloth B.G.’s feather-light caresses tugged. His employer was always gentle, always careful not to hurt. It was the only complaint Eric ever had.

Passage A contains no mention of sex at all, but frankly, I find it much more offensive that a book containing sentences like that (and trust me, the book this was excerpted from was FULL of gems like those) was published.

Now sit down and brace yourself, because this may come as a BIG FUCKING SHOCK (whoops, sorry, BIG MMM-KAYING SHOCK), but I generally don’t judge the merits of a book solely on sex scenes or whether naughty language is used. If the characters engage me, if the craft is solid, if the plot is entertaining, I’ll enjoy the book whether it had 20 sex scenes or none at all. What a revolutionary concept!

And actually, if the romance novel (especially a contemporary) contains explicit sex scenes like, ohhhh, say, humping of the ta-tas, and the characters don’t dare to so much as say “cock” or even “penis” and instead use ridiculous euphemisms like “arousal” or “manhood,” I WILL laugh at inappropriate moments, read the passage out loud to my husband so HE can laugh too, then proceed to make fun of it in excruciating detail in on a website I run with an equally snarky partner. There’s a time and place when no-nonsense descriptions and those naughty Anglo-Saxon words come in handy, people.

I understand that reading about throbbing staffs and moist orifices being violated in a variety of graphic ways does not float everyone’s boat. That’s cool--there are PLENTY of books out there with non-graphic sex scenes. But why these prudes gotta ruin my shit and try to make it harder (huh huh, I said hard) for these books to be published? Leave me to my happy, pervy, foul-mouthed fun, goddammit. I’m certainly not lobbying to have romances that use too many exclamation points or ellipses be banned, no matter how much it offends my tender sensibilities.

Anyway, I’m not going to say any more, because Sylvia, Shannon, Monica and HelenKay have done a more than adequate job of stating how I feel, and repetition is tiresome.

Picture of {name}
23 comments1 trackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Ranty McRant

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Book-Hopping,CourtesyofMaili!

by Candy Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 06:30 AM

OK, I’m really, really late on this. I suck. But it’s such a cool little game; better late than never, no?

Anyway, the ever wondrously smart (and almost never bitchy) Maili instructs us to:

1. Take first five novels from your bookshelf.
2. Book 1—first sentence
3. Book 2—last sentence on page 50
4. Book 3—second sentence on page 100
5. Book 4—next to the last sentence on page 150
6. Book 5—final sentence of the book
7. Make the five sentences into a paragraph.
8. Feel free to “cheat” to make it a better paragraph.
9. Name your sources
10.Post to your blog.

Ho-kay! Here are my results:

Della Mitchell clutched the steering wheel of her silver SUV and closed her eyes. Instead, after wrangling with accelerated motion such as the spinning bucket, Newton saw no option but to invoke some invisible background stuff with respect to which motion could be unambiguously defined. “I’m saying we choose what’s familiar, for good or ill.” If they had a normal marriage, he would kiss the delicate curve of her throat and find a way not to crumple her gown while he made them late for dinner. “All we know is the ghost is most likely to show himself when the moon is full and the B & B is hosting handsome young tourists.”

Yowch! Do I win some kind of prize for Most Schizophrenic Paragraph? I didn’t actually bother to go to my bookshelves (I mean, which bookcase should I have chosen? The HC bookcase? The one holding the paperbacks? What about the ones holding nothing but TBR books?) so I just grabbed five of the eight books currently littering my computer desk.

These here are the books I used:

The Sistahood of Shopaholics by Leslie Esdaile, Monica Jackson, Reon Laudat and Niqui Stanhope
The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene
The Royal Treatment by MaryJanice Davidson
The Bartered Bride by Mary Jo Putney
Pirate’s Price by Darlene Marshall

Picture of {name}
3 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

TellMeLiesbyJenniferCrusie

by SB Sarah Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 01:53 AM
Our Grade:
D
Title: Tell Me Lies
Author: Jennifer Crusie
Publication Info: St. Martin's Paperbacks 1998, ISBN: 0-312-96680-6
Genre: Contemporary Romance


Everyone I encounter online, or at least, everyone who left their comments and reviews online for me to find, LOVED this book. I mean, love love loved it, to the point where they put it in the time capsule and let future generations find it so that they, too, can love it. Maybe my future children will love this book. But I sure didn’t.

Seriously. I know. I’m insane. I’m defective in some way. But holy hell if Crusie didn’t write the first contemporary heroine that was actually Too Stupid To Live (TSTL). Not that she put herself in mortal danger at every turn but woo damn. By page six I wanted to reach into the book and smack her silly.

Instead, I wrote her a letter:

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
27 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Reviews by Author, A-CReviews by Grade: D

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

ALittleBitofLink-Whoring,andaFunnyPictureofaSugarGlider

by Candy Tuesday, April 26, 2005 at 11:50 AM

I meant to link to this yesterday, but what with thinking intently about schwanstuckers and hoohahs and euphemisms therewith, I plumb forgot.

Anyway, Christina Dodd, Connie Brockway, Elizabeth Bevarly, Teresa Medeiros, Eloisa James and (allegedly, though she has yet to post) Lisa Kleypas have banded together to create a blog called Squawk Radio. They’re smart and funny, and they have the most hilarious hen backgrounds. Sarah can’t stand Eloisa James, tee hee hee.

And now I present to you.....

image

By the Power of Greyskull.... I HAVE NOTHING TO SAYYYYY!

Random thought: Anyone else think He-Man shooting that “lightning” from his “sword” at poor Cringer who then turns into a raging beast looks somewhat homoerotic and bestial, well, just flat-out WRONG?

Picture of {name}
14 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: The Link-O-Lator

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

You-phum-isms

by SB Sarah Monday, April 25, 2005 at 10:45 AM

I love how this page has rapidly tackled the more sultry and scintillating issues at work in romance novels - be specific, we’re talkin’ nookie! Serious nookie! I’m still giggling over the phrase “chocolate starfish.”

But - my IT department? They will be looking at the log files of accessed pages and thinking I am one depraved little woman.

So I had an idea: not that Candy or you all or even I can refrain from saying “big honking cock” or even that we should - but let us come (huh) up (huh) with a master (huh) list of euphamisms for our various actions, lest someone be unable to access our site due to our propensity for naughty talk. I figure between our collective readership of romance novels past, present and future, we can come up with plenty o’ phrases to refer to any and all sex acts.

Except that one, you know, with the goat. 

More,more,more!>
Picture of {name}
4 commentsTrackback Bookmark to del.icio.us Add to Technorati favorites Digg this post on digg.com RSSadd to sk*rt
Categories: Random Musings

Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.

Page 403 of 432 pages « FirstP  <  401 402 403 404 405 >  Last »