





by SB Sarah • Wednesday, June 01, 2005 at 09:25 AM
I am in the middle of an advanced reader copy of a novel to be published later this fall, and while I am enjoying the reading, I have to say, editors, copy editors, and those whose job it is to catch the pickiest of the nitpicky, and pull all the coherent threads back together, I am in awe. Awe, I tell you.
It’s not that this book is not well-written or that this ARC is full of errors that distract me - it’s only a few “and” where “an” should be, and at one point the sister is a she-shit, and at another the heroine mentions her as if she hadn’t been mentioned at all prior, and while it’s my job to evaluate the plot and the storyline, I am thinking more as I read this how much I take for granted the people whose job it is to catch all those and/an and bring the loose strands back into the braid. If it were my job, I would go in circles and have no idea how to see the big picture and the little parts. The larger story and the smaller parts that create it would blur and merge from big to little and back again, like looking too long at an MC Escher picture.
So to the editors, wordsmiths, typesetters, grammar sticklers, and authors out there: this Bud’s for you.
From a humble reader: I say, Thank you.
19 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.





by Candy • Tuesday, May 31, 2005 at 10:53 AM
Sarah and Candy are incommunicado for three days because of Sarah’s lack of internet, and THIS is what they start talking about first thing Monday morning.
Candy: Hey, how’d the moving go?
Sarah: Moving went well. LOVE the new house. We not only hired movers to move us, but we hired movers to PACK which was a WEIRD experience. They packed EVERYTHING. And I mean, every thing. My mother in law helped us unpack because I am limited in energy and it is far too easy for me to hurt myself, and she opened a lovingly wrapped paper bundle of… takeout Chinese duck sauce packets.
Sidebar: Can evidence of arousal in Chinese romance/erotica heroines be likened unto duck sauce? Discuss!
Candy: I love that the movers packed your duck sauce packets! BWAH! And I’m glad you asked about comparisons to duck sauce, because seriously, you could’ve said fish sauce. Or sweet-and-sour. Or oyster.
Sarah: See, I’m a big fan of duck sauce, though not from women, and while I don’t think I’ve ever had fish sauce, or oyster, I have had sweet-n-sour and lobster, and I don’t think they match the true erotica heroine consistency I’m looking for.
Of course, then we have to discuss the hero: egg roll? Kung pao chicken roll? Chicken skewer?
Candy: I’m pretty sure you’ve had oyster sauce. If you’ve had stir-fry or fried rice, you’ve had oyster. Few people realize that the distinctive taste of Chinese stir-fry is almost entirely due to oyster sauce. The sauce itself is thick and gloopy and brown, and it’s not a dipping sauce at all--it’s used strictly for cooking, near as I can tell. I have a giant bottle in my refrigerator at all times for the making of the stir-fry.
It would be too funny if in the Chinese version of the Catherine Coulter novel you told me about, the hero had used oyster sauce to lubricate the heroine’s cunny instead of cream.
As for what the hero should be: pork ribs? Or if he’s especially large--beef shank in herbal broth?
Sarah: Stirfry is oyster sauce? No kidding! No wonder stir fry makes me ill. Just about all the valve-type shellfish, like clams, oysters, mussels, etc, make me iller than ill. I be illin’.
Oh my GOD yes. Midsummer Magic, with oyster sauce! UGH!
Pork ribs would be GREAT. Perhaps we can work this into the character generator script? He’s as big as an egg roll, or some chicken satay on a skewer, or a shishkabob - the whole thing. Useful if one is a sheik, no?
Candy: Hey, if the hero’s a sheikh, then we need to include leg of lamb. Or mutton. He’s baa-aaa-aaa-d to the bone.
And the heroine’s sauce would be some kind of yogurt-tahini combination. HAAAAA.
Sarah: Totally, if the hero is a sheik, there needs to be mutton or some kind of shank (har har shank). Or, if he were seriously teeny, a pine nut. And tahini would work. Or, on a bad day, hummus.
Candy: YES to the hummus. CHUNKY hummus.
Or chunky kefir.
Wow, that just made me throw up a little in my mouth.
Sarah: Hummus with Roasted Garlic and Pine Nuts!
Candy: Screw the pine nuts! This heroine wants cucumber! An UNCUT cucumber!
Sarah: Don’t forget the yogurt sauce.
Ok. Now I’m nauseated, too.
25 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.



by SB Sarah • Tuesday, May 31, 2005 at 08:46 AM
Candy and I have been kicking ideas back and forth regarding advertising on this site. On one hand, I solemnly swear on all four of my cats, and on Candy’s cats, that we will never subject you to epileptic seizure advertisements, popup windows, or those bastard sliding ads that get in your way and won’t let you see the actual content. So fear not- annoying ads are not in our plans.
Neither, for the time being, are Google ads, which are content-specific, and, as Candy pointed out, the number of times we mention backdoor lovin’ might bring some seriously questionable advertisement blocks.
So - I came up with an idea, and I want to ask you, our noble - and somewhat titled - readership what you think. We’d like to offer dedicated advertisement space on a weekly basis for authors, publishing houses, editors, and writers. We’d link to reviews or point-of-sale sites for your book, and feature a graphic, and a small blurb about your book or product. Candy and I are still discussing rates - and your suggestions in that department are certainly welcome - but since we are both happy with the number of writerly-sorts that frequent this here bitcherty, we thought we’d make the discussion about advertisement as much of an opportunity for you as it is for us.
So: *puts on Linda Richman voice*: Advertisements for authors and books. To host or not to host: discuss!
29 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.




by SB Sarah • Tuesday, May 31, 2005 at 07:25 AM
All of my books, save exactly three pregnancy books and a novel, are packed in boxes that, given the priority system Hubby and I worked out, will probably stay in wrapped confinement for a week or so.
So yesterday in the Super Stop n’Shop, after doing the Mother of All Target Runs, I passed by the paperback aisles and took my usually gander at what was new, hot, and popular enough to stock at the grocery store. I didn’t go to the book section of Target because that’s just asking for some heavy impatient sighing from Hubby. But the SSnS book aisle had the romance conveniently wrapped around the end so you passed it on your way to the checkout lines.
I glance over, and hello Suzanne Enoch? Writing contemporary? Well color me surprised. I think Enoch and I think “London/rake/scoundrel/cravat/valet/pelisse.” I surely do not think of contemporary cartoon covers about cat burglars and business tycoons.
So, in my first ever ‘I am going to have to review this for SBTB. Wonder if I can claim it on my taxes?’ purchase, I have procured said contemporary, written by a known-historical author, and I shall let you know how it goes.
However, this phrase from the Amazon synopsis does give me pause: Though some readers may be disappointed by the lack of a traditional happily-ever-after, others will cheerfully await Sam and Richard’s next adventure. First, a not HEA? Dang. That’s why I read romance, people. Come on now, don’t take my guaranteed HEA away from me. Second, continued adventures? What, is everyone JD Robb now? Writing series with heavy romantic elements? Dang, again.
4 comments •
Trackback •
Categories: Random Musings
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.



by Candy • Monday, May 30, 2005 at 11:58 AM
Darlene Marshall (writer of that swishbuckling classic, Pirate’s Price) has notified me that Bookaza, an e-book retailer, is selling at least one of her titles without authorization. Her publisher, LTDBooks is trying get them to cease and desist, but so far they’ve apparently been unsuccessful. Darlene and her publisher get zip when you buy something of hers from this store. This is so far the first and only confirmed case. (See update below.) Other e-book authors: do you have any experiences with this retailer?
Anyway: Bad e-book retailer! Stealing is naughty!
Update: Darlene just notified me of another way Bookaza is engaging in thievery: According to J.K. Rowling herself, there are NO authorized e-book versions of any Harry Potter books, yet Bookaza offers them anyway.
39 comments •
2 trackbacks •
Categories: News
Tags: This entry has not been tagged yet.