This is actually a very interesting post.
I can’t say I’ve seen a lot of clever viral marketing campaigns launched by authors. There were the authors wearing swan hats and manga costumes at RWA. Those created a bit…
To entertain myself while reading this book--because God knows this book was not entertaining, or at least, not intentionally so--I found myself imagining what it’d be like if the various elements of Red Hawk’s Woman were represented by interpetive dancers. I saw it going something like this:
Dramatis Personae:
THE BOOK, represented by a person clad in a dollar-store Indian costume
THE PLOT, represented by a half-baked cake the size of a wading pool
GRAMMAR, represented by a man in a suit
DIALOGUE, represented by a giant ball of twine
MALAPROPISMS, represented by a woman wearing a bright pink spandex leotard covered in sequins and gold puffy paint
Scene:
A darkened stage, with a badly-painted backdrop of mountains and scrub. To the right of the stage is a big tub full of THE PLOT; off to the side is DIALOGUE, an end dangling seductively loose.
THE BOOK leaps out onto the darkened stage, spotlight trained solidly on it. It lets out a loud cry of anguish as it lands badly and breaks its ankle. This, however, does not prevent it from hobbling back on its feet; soon, it is twirling madly, if erratically. Its thrashings inevitably bring it up against GRAMMAR, whom THE BOOK proceeds to grope and molest in the most unseemly manner. MALAPROPISM sees this, and not one to be left out, comes up behind GRAMMAR, bashes him on the head, does the Hustle on his unconscious body and ties him up using some of the twine of DIALOGUE. She then grabs THE BOOK and makes out thoroughly with him. The two of them, lips still firmly locked, proceed to dance again, slowly at first, then going faster and faster, entangling themselves in DIALOGUE in the process, until they trip and fall over the body of GRAMMAR and straight into THE PLOT, where THE BOOK and MALAPROPISMS proceed to swim about, occasionally spuming like whales.
...what, you want an actual summary? And maybe some analysis? What the fuck? You think this is some kind of review site or something?
Bah. Fine. You win. Here’s the review proper:
Maybe Edwards deserves an F- and this book deserves an F.
Perhaps you took this book too seriously and it was really supposed to be a spoof.
I have a lot of issues with “Native” Romances.
1. Most of the time the information is either incorrect or stereotypical.
2. The names kill me. Red Hawk? How many times has that been used? Seriously.
but I’m pretty sure that if you try to go beyond the bounds and write a historical romance between, say, two Native American characters or (SHOCK! HORROR!) a black person and a Native American, the Indian Romance Mob will send Tony out to break your kneecaps (or possibly to throw you into the trunk of his Caddy) and remind you of your place.
I guess Tony will just have to try. I’ve only written a few books with Native hero and in all of them the heroine’s been black. Or black and native. *shrugs* I write what I know.
Candy, will you marry me? We’d have to move to Massachusetts, but there’s really good Italian food in the North End of Boston. *g*
I got my laugh for the day and learned a new word! Woohoo! It’s been productive.
Any of the Bitches willing to review a certain Ellora’s Cave author by the initials of CL who is luvvvved by Mrs. G? Just want to see how her books rate against Cassie Edwards’s masterpieces.
Oh, God, I think I died laughing during the interpretive dance.
I don’t know why I didn’t classify you as a genius before, Candy. My oversight entirely.
Amazing review. The entire interpretive dance scene? Words fail me.
Candy, you are a Goddess. Your unfailing courage in reviewing this book and Cassie Edwards so thoroughly may in fact save me from having to read them myself. I had been steeling myself to do so, because every serious researcher should be familiar with all aspects of the genre if they’re going to comment on them. I just haven’t been able to bring myself to do so yet.
See, you are far braver than me. And definitely much, much funnier.
Perhaps on reading it a second time you would find it more enjoyable, Candy.
I will soon be walking to the bakery so hope to have a tete-a-tete with the road.
A Cassie Edwards Scale of Crap… must say it has potential.
Oh my,
talk about taking one for the team Candy!
I question the assumption here on how really bad Cassie Edwards is.
Has there been a through review of which book she was truly at her worst in?
I say we request Candy to review more Cassie Edwards. Just to pinpoint the absolute.
Candy is brave, brave like Wolverine.
TeddyPig, you’re a braver man than I am to even suggest such a thing.
So it blew the White Wind, huh?
I think you’ve earned your very own Native American name by now - maybe Cassie Edwards can suggest one for you
AAR gave this one a D and contained some of the same observations as Candy made (without the interpretive dance, of course):
http://www.likesbooks.com/cgi-bin/bookReview.pl?BookReviewId=6248
If anyone is interested in a much more authentic novel about the Blackfeet, I highly recommend James Welch’s Fools Crow. Not a Romance, but a stunning achievement of historical fiction, nonetheless (Welch is himself Blackfeet and Gros Ventre). Welch is just an incredible wordsmith, IMO, and one of my all-time favorite writers.
That first sentence should read, “AAR gave this a D, and the review contained . . . “
I like it when you all teach me new words like “asymptote,” which, when I looked it in Webster, I still didn’t understand…
Aw, Candy, I confess I love the F grade books because then you write these beautiful reviews with interpretive dance scenes and words such as asymptote, and we all learn together. Only we didn’t have to suffer. So yes, it was good for me. Nearly piddled in my pants because I laughed so hard good.
*dies laughing*
*is dead*
*returns briefly from the grave to say thank you for taking the hit so we don’t have to read this book, and then for writing interpretive dance about it*
“Job21”. Presumably as in the Biblical sufferer.
Great review Candy! I laughed so hard one of my dogs came to check on me. The interpretive dance is an incredible mental picture. And OMG - that immortal phrase “Bury the Meat Hatchet”...I can’t wait for your and Sarah’s book. (Oops, is that correct grammar? Sorry, I really are a colleg gradit - biznes majer.)
o holy crap. reading your review, i laughed so much, i feel like i’ve been reading a Thorne Smith novel (funniest author EVER.)
i’m sure it’s not what you intended, but i want to read it myself now, just to know what true pain is. ‘cause i’m a masochist, donchaknow. but not a dumb one… i’ll borrow, not buy it.
There’s another wonderful thing about this: a female archaeologist in 19th century Montana? An archaeologist AT ALL in 19th century Montana??????
Is she shitting me? The first real archaeological studies, at least dealing with aboriginal history, north of Mexico were in the mid 1920s in New Mexico.
The dramatis personae? Best. Review. Ever.
For some reason this review makes me want to dig up my old pair of leotards....
06.21.07 at 03:19 PM |